| Revision as of 09:05, 23 February 2005 editSamboy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,613 edits →Probem editor []: Gene Poole is a problem editor← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:17, 23 May 2023 edit undoChidgk1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions60,418 edits Notification: proposed deletion of A5147 road.Tag: Twinkle | ||
| (280 intermediate revisions by 51 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Policy== | |||
| Nice input on Liverpool. You don't appear to be that confused :) ] 16:18, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Any comments by my accuser will be removed as vandalism.--] 16:05, 2005 Apr 10 (UTC) | |||
| Current list of know vandals. ], ] | |||
| ==Clitwars== | |||
| The way you and 198 keep reverting so fast, it could give the impression that it's only you against him. If you would wait an hour or two before reverting, I'm sure you'd find others only two willing to do so (me for a start!) It's just that you're so damn fast. | |||
| --] 00:52, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| That what my last SO said.--] 00:53, 2004 Nov 10 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ==UK Wikipedians== | |||
| I don't know if you are aware of the ], but I thought I'd draw your attention to them. ] has just put up a notice that ] will be coming to London in late Vovember, and is suggesting a possible meet. ] Thought you might be interested. -- ] 11:36, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Has been vandlising by MetaWiki talk page.--] 11:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :: Looks like ] has been suggested. Keep your eye on it and comment ] --] 15:27, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Irate. Please do not modify other users' user pages. It is not allowed. The line that you removed was perfectly within policy. While I was more than happy to welcome you back, your return has been distinctly lacking in auspicity thus far. Cheers, ]</nowiki>]] 12:22, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Your comment: "Remove bipolar symptom" == | |||
| Do you mind? I think this was most likely trolling, not the result of mental illness. Particularly when you look at the link inserted, which is http://www.natcenscied.org/, that of a ''pro''-evolution website. Let's not pander to stereotypes. -- ] 22:37, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :If it's against the rules then stop ] altering min on WikiMedia. Until then it is fair game. I don't realy care about you opinion.--] 12:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Yup ok noted.--] 02:11, 2004 Nov 15 (UTC) | |||
| ==Redirects for Deletion== | |||
| First let me say I love your user name ''and'' your user page. LOL! :-) I removed the speedy delete tag from ] as it doesn't qualify as a ]. If you think the redirect is inappropriate and should simply be deleted, you can list it at ]. Happy editing, and thanks for making me smile. ] | ] 08:52, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| :Ta. I've converted it to a {{disambig}}, which seems the most sensible.--] 14:14, 2004 Nov 19 (UTC) | |||
| What a suprise I put in aRfC against Terrsa Knot and what happens she deletes it and blocks me. Typical admin action. This woman should be banned.--] 15:06, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Please justify the use of the pub-stub == | |||
| ] and ] already qualify any articles you have placed in the public houses stub. As you have only listed 5, I do not see any further use of the template or the category. As a result, I have listed them up for deletion. See: ] and ] --] ]]] 10:59, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Now going around bosting about it. ''Irate is currently on an 24 hour block for edit warring over where his comments should go on this page ] ] 15:14, 24 July 2005 (UTC)'' You not she still continues the fiction that I undid here contxt destroying edit. I did not. I was putting in an RFC against Knott. See ] | |||
| :Hi, if your around could you justify this? I want to see whether to remove it or not. - ] 12:34, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've added a justification. How anyone could doubt the importance of the public house is beyond me.--] 14:13, 2004 Nov 19 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'd agree. But I'm biased because I come from Australia. - ] 03:55, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| --] 15:18, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==Vandalism?== | |||
| Anthony is right, you have broken the 3RR. The guidelines say that ''both'' sides in a dispute should be blocked if both break this rule. Please note that a content dispute is not "simple vandalism". Regards -- ] ] 14:30, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :It is in my book when it takes the form it has.--] 14:36, 2004 Dec 2 (UTC) | |||
| Just confirming what I said in my latest email. As soon as you calm down and agree to stop with the bad faiths rfcs etc I will unblock you. ] ] 16:05, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| : |
:They are not bad faith. I beleive you hand others have broken the rules. Now stop hassling me, restore my RFC and reenable me.--] 16:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ::You still have not restored my editing and so continue to break the rules inorder to stop an RfC being started against you. Any vote by you against me is simply you abusing you position. You have attacked me by blocking me. You prevent me from starting an RFC against you. You should resign you admin ship immediatly it is not supposed to be used be people for there own ends. Anyone who places a link on a page inorder to check up on me is engaged in personal abuse. The problem is you don't like beingkept with in your rules.--] 18:33, 24 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Stop the revert war already! == | |||
| ::: Oh, look, stop being so ridiculous. The 3 RfCs and the RfAr you started today were all utterly frivolous, as you well know. Let's be frank: you are about to be put in a position where admins can block you summarily for anything they judge to be a personal attack. You're not stupid, so I'm sure you appreciate that this means you face a simple choice. Either you A) continue to antagonise others as you have been doing today, and get blocked; or B) stop the personal attacks and stop firing off spurious RfC / RfArs, and be allowed to edit here. The choice is yours to make, but I'm sure we would all much rather ''not'' spend our time chasing around after you, and would infinitely prefer it if we could just get back to the simple joys of quietly editing encyclopedia articles. How about you make that possible, eh? ] 00:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Well I'd appreciate it if you'd with draw you provoctive lists. It is people who choose to chase after me, example being your watchlist.--] 00:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Well, it's locked now. Happy? '''Stop it'''! - ] 03:53, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| : |
::::: I've deleted ]. ] 00:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :: |
::::::I will attempt to more subtle in future.--] 01:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==People who need to be watched== | |||
| ==Clitoris== | |||
| :Thing2 Still up to your old tricks hey Gerard. Protecting your mates. You personal attacks against me will be removed as soon as I am back online. as will ve VileTriga and the others. | |||
| Please stop reverting this, or I will block you per the ] and the principle of ]. In spite of your comments, this is not simple ] (see "What vandalism is not—Bullying or stubbornness"). ] ] 17:27, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :DavidGerard go away, you gibbering fuckwit. ] ]. | |||
| :Thing2 I a gibbering fuckwqit hey. COmpared with you I am a genius. | |||
| :Thing2 Though of course being as lacking in integrity as you. I imagine you clam to be one. | |||
| :Thing2 So do you refuse to remove your attacks? | |||
| :Thing2 This is of course going in my RFC apparently I have to have tried to resolve the problem, but obviosly you don't want to be solved. | |||
| :Thing2 Misplaced Pages also isn't a bigger dick. | |||
| :Thing2 You realy are unplasant aren't you. That little lot will be going in the log as well. | |||
| :You are being reported for abousing sysop powers.--] 18:30, 2004 Dec 6 (UTC) | |||
| ::I've removed you rfc against cool hand luke. Please note that our dispute resolution process demands that you try to sort out problems ''before'' trying the more exteme steps such as rfc.You are of course free to add it back in, I will not revert you if you do so, but bear in mind that such as request is unlikely to be certified. I suggest that you talk to CHL instead. Something along the lines of "Hey I had no intention of breaking the 3RR so your warning is completely unnecessary" should do the trick. Remeber that CHL is trying to prevent an edit warnot trying to upset you. ] ] 20:02, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ::I don't want to talk to him.--] 20:18, 2004 Dec 6 (UTC) | |||
| :DavidGerard argh. how does one set a mask to /ignore an IP range? | |||
| ::Very sorry. I miscounted Anthony's reverts when I blocked him. He was also blocked (and is) for violating his standing order. Do be advised that this is not simple vandalism, and breaking the rule should get you blocked. ] ] 02:27, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :Denelson83_IPA I don't think that's possible | |||
| :DavidGerard irate is hopping around on dhcp being a PITA | |||
| :Project2501a Dave2: it's not possible. | |||
| :ambi2 DavidGerard: have them k-lined? | |||
| :=-= Mode #wikipedia +b *!*Thing2@*.range217-44.btcentralplus.com by DavidGerard | |||
| :=-= YOU (Thing2) have been booted from #wikipedia by DavidGerard (DavidGerard) | |||
| :Thing2 I'm soory but Misplaced Pages requires me to try and solve disputes. But when it invloves talkingto people like you it';s not worth it. | |||
| --] 13:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :He aint finished yet. | |||
| :::Yeah ok just in Vbad mood.--] 03:01, 2004 Dec 7 (UTC) | |||
| ::::No problem. I think when many different people revert the page it looks better anyway. Like Theresa said to Anthony last time, "Four different editors have reverted you. This is a war you can't win." There's no need to do it yourself every time—a lot of people agree. ] ] 19:10, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :YOU (Thing2) have been booted from #wikipedia by DavidGerard (DavidGerard) | |||
| == Article Licensing == | |||
| : You are banned from this channel. | |||
| --] 13:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I've ] to get users to ] all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the ] Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 ]s or into the ] if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Misplaced Pages's license, the ], but it allows '''other projects''', such as ], to use our articles. Since you are among the ] Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: | |||
| *] - Lots of questions answered | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| ==Threats by Thersa Knott== | |||
| To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" template into their user page, but there are other options at ]. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page: | |||
| I've manually unblocked the autoblocker block, as it's clear you were experimenting rather than trying to evade a block. The 24 hour block I put in place expires at 16.04 today. If you try to edit between now and then you'll trip the autoblocker again and reset the block for another 24 hours. | |||
| If you make any personal attacks when you return or start any malicious rfcs or rfars you will be blocked again. ] ] 14:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Option 1''' | |||
| ::You'll note that this is one of the people I want to put an RFC in against. For there block in the first place, now using there admin powers to protect themselves and threatening me. This is a clear case of abusing admin powers and will be reported ASAP.--] 14:34, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :<nowiki>I agree to ] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:</nowiki> | |||
| ::Further more your should unblock me and resign your adminship, you are not fit to be incharge of anything.--] 14:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki> | |||
| '''OR''' | |||
| :'''Option 2''' | |||
| :<nowiki>I agree to ] all my contributions to any ], county, or city article as described below:</nowiki> | |||
| :<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki> | |||
| :::For reference, this was the statement that triggered the one week personal attack ban. ] 15:34, July 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" with "'''<nowiki>{{MultiLicensePD}}</nowiki>'''". If you only prefer using the ], I would like to know that too. ''Please let me know'' what you think at my ''']'''. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- ] (| ] | |||
| ==Page protection== | |||
| == Assorted Liverpool docks == | |||
| Your page has been protected for the remainder of your week ban, so as to make avoiding personal attacks that much easier. ] 14:50, July 25, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Since your name's on one of them, so I'll tell you - the various Mersey dock stubs (Canning/Wapping/Canning Half Tide) appear to be borked - contents not matching titles. I've no idea if this interests you more than it does me, but since you created at least one of 'em, I'm guessing it does. ] 20:38, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| :Yep sorry about the block copy errors. My head was spinning by that time.--] 20:50, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| ==clitoris talk page== | |||
| :<b>Article contains only a name and dates of birth & death. It is unreferenced. Article not further developed since its creation in early 2005.</b> | |||
| "The level of my lanaguge is I feel appropriate" The level of your language is not appropriate and you need to tone it down. The purpose of talk pages is for discussion. The purpose of discussion is to try and persuade people. You will not persuade anyone by insulting them. ] ] 08:07, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| :The people you are talking with are not amenable to persuasion.--] 13:24, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC) | |||
| ::CHL seems perfectly reasonable. ] ] 23:05, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| :::He may do to you.--] 12:24, 2004 Dec 25 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> ] (]) 12:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==Wikiquette== | |||
| Please consider ]. You get more done by being friendly to people than by insulting them. Even if you feel they're not going to be swayed even if you are friendly to them, you gain nothing by being rude. --]] 13:33, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC) | |||
| :I gain a sense of having done everything possible rather than just a subset of what is possible.--] 13:37, 2004 Dec 24 (UTC) | |||
| ::Being rude plays into the hands of your opponents. People have already commented on how abusive the hardliners are. They are lumping the likes of me in with the likes of you. You are hindering my ability to argue and gain a solution. Plus being rude is against Misplaced Pages policy. Stop it. ] ] 23:04, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| :::Who are these people and where did they make these comments. As I have said several times I regard them as rude, in the extreme, and dishonest. I will act inline with my views not yours.--] 12:23, 2004 Dec 25 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>The article ''']''' is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| as a completely uninvolved party, allow me to comment that by being rude, you will almost certainly acheive ''less'' than would in fact have been possible. ] <small>] 14:32, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ==Talk page== | |||
| Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. --] | ] 22:24, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ]]] 00:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| No problem.--] 22:31, 2004 Dec 27 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| =='m'== | |||
| ] | |||
| why do you mark ''all'' of your edits as 'minor', when they are, in fact, not minor at all? You should give a short summary of what you did. E.g., I have reverted your redirect on ] to the full disambiguation article. ] <small>] 14:29, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| With the QE page it had already been screwed 02:07, 2005 Jan 6 I didn't realise and though it was just a messed up redirect, and fixed it as such. As for the minor, most of them are and I set the default to minor rather than major.--Jirate 14:35, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC) | |||
| :'''WP is not a dictionary.''' | |||
| While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| == Cookiecaper RFC == | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| I've removed your RFC on Cookiecaper from ], as it lacks any of the proper information. See the "example user" template in ] to understand what you need. --]] 17:43, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry Id forgotten about it. I was over reacting anyway.--] 18:15, 2005 Jan 8 (UTC) | |||
| ==Category:Unarmed people shot by police== | |||
| ::'Tis cool. I'm thinking we should put advice on the RfC page, similar to Lewis Carroll's suggestions for letter writers: if you're angry, go to sleep and write the letter in the morning, if you still want to. --]] 18:35, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 18:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Vandalism == | |||
| == Your account will be renamed == | |||
| Stop calling me a vandal, dude. You are part of a majority that is throwing its weight around. That doesn't actually make you right.] 00:17, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="plainlinks mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr"> | |||
| :No other things make me right. --] 00:49, 2005 Jan 13 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See ] for more information. | |||
| For once, I have to agree with Dr. Zen - disagreeing with someone does not make them a vandal. You have a history of calling people you disagree with vandals. ] 19:01, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Irate. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Irate~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can ]. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit ] to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed. | |||
| :He is a vandal end of story.--] 15:09, 2005 Jan 22 (UTC) | |||
| Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in. | |||
| Sorry for the inconvenience. | |||
| Yours,<br />]<br />Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation | |||
| == ] == | |||
| </div> 00:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- SUL finalisation notification --> | |||
| == Renamed == | |||
| I've taken it upon myself to expand ]. If you have a few minutes, I'd appreciate it if you could look over it and give me some input. I noticed that there was conflicting information on some of the sites, and I tried to sort that out, but I may have missed some, thereby causing some chronology errors. Thank you! -]|] 15:57, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Seems good to me, I'll have a look for some dates around here. The only thing I would say is that the article doesn't spell out that Roberts work underpins all optical astronomy until the development of Active optics. Long integrations plus trackling. So it may be worth mentionining the ] and the faint ]. --] 17:46, 2005 Feb 2 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="plainlinks mw-content-ltr" lang="en" dir="ltr”> | |||
| ==Irish stubs== | |||
| This account has been renamed as part of ]. If you own this account you can ] for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: ]. -- ] (]) | |||
| Hi Irate - just a short note to say that stub articles about places in Northern Ireland can use Ireland-geo-stub or UK-geo-stub, rather than just lumping them in with the unsorted geo-stubs. Thanks for improving the articles and putting the stub messages on, but using the more specific stub messages would help even more! Cheers, ]|<sup>]</sup> ] 05:49, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| </div> 14:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- SUL post-rename notification --> | |||
| == Proposed deletion of Johnsons Cleaners UK == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ]  because of the following concern: | |||
| ==Caps== | |||
| :'''No indication of notability, no ].''' | |||
| Thanks for your input on the Pump RE caps. Between your links, and other things I've seen, it seems that this might be a case where un-specified usage (eg 'first cap') is usually referring to a 'national' cap, while narrower usages are usually self-identified, ie 'first county cap', 'first school cap', etc.? ] 18:55, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ]. | |||
| :Seems right to me, the unqualified is usually the international. It seems to date to 1880 for football and be of cricket origin. Also .--] 00:02, 2005 Feb 18 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ==Probem editor ] == | |||
| Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] ] 01:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there. Just thought I'd get in touch regarding the above problem editor, who I notice seems to have recently targeted you for harrassment . I was made a target of harrassment, stalking and abuse by this editor late last year, and the matter even escalated to arbitration before being resolved in my favour. During an absence from Misplaced Pages of several months I have been contacted privately by several editors who claim to have been abused by ] under similar circumstances to myself, so I'm currently exploring whether it may be worth iniating a formal disciplinary process to address ]'s history of inappropriate behaviour. Would you be willing to support such a process? --] 05:22, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| ::] is a known problem editor whose actions were escalated to arbitration. The main reason the arbitrators did not perform any actions against this editor was because he took an extended Wiki vacation during the arbitration proceedings. If you wish to see this editor's previous behavior, please review ] and ]. ] 09:05, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ''']''' (]) 08:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ==] has been nominated for discussion== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ''']''' (]) 08:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>External links given list variously: a quoted statement from the subject regarding a festival, a brief directory entry, a link making no mention of the subject. Can find only passing mentions otherwise. No indication of satisfying ].</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 09:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
| <!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 04:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''not notable'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 18:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:17, 23 May 2023
Policy
Any comments by my accuser will be removed as vandalism.--Jirate 16:05, 2005 Apr 10 (UTC)
Current list of know vandals. User:Smoddy, User:Matt Crypto
User:Zanimum
Has been vandlising by MetaWiki talk page.--Jirate 11:20, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
User:Violetriga
Hi Irate. Please do not modify other users' user pages. It is not allowed. The line that you removed was perfectly within policy. While I was more than happy to welcome you back, your return has been distinctly lacking in auspicity thus far. Cheers, ] 12:22, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- If it's against the rules then stop User:Zanimum altering min on WikiMedia. Until then it is fair game. I don't realy care about you opinion.--Jirate 12:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
User:Theresa Knott
What a suprise I put in aRfC against Terrsa Knot and what happens she deletes it and blocks me. Typical admin action. This woman should be banned.--Jirate 15:06, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Now going around bosting about it. Irate is currently on an 24 hour block for edit warring over where his comments should go on this page Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 15:14, 24 July 2005 (UTC) You not she still continues the fiction that I undid here contxt destroying edit. I did not. I was putting in an RFC against Knott. See ]
--Jirate 15:18, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Just confirming what I said in my latest email. As soon as you calm down and agree to stop with the bad faiths rfcs etc I will unblock you. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 16:05, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- They are not bad faith. I beleive you hand others have broken the rules. Now stop hassling me, restore my RFC and reenable me.--Jirate 16:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- You still have not restored my editing and so continue to break the rules inorder to stop an RfC being started against you. Any vote by you against me is simply you abusing you position. You have attacked me by blocking me. You prevent me from starting an RFC against you. You should resign you admin ship immediatly it is not supposed to be used be people for there own ends. Anyone who places a link on a page inorder to check up on me is engaged in personal abuse. The problem is you don't like beingkept with in your rules.--Jirate 18:33, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, look, stop being so ridiculous. The 3 RfCs and the RfAr you started today were all utterly frivolous, as you well know. Let's be frank: you are about to be put in a position where admins can block you summarily for anything they judge to be a personal attack. You're not stupid, so I'm sure you appreciate that this means you face a simple choice. Either you A) continue to antagonise others as you have been doing today, and get blocked; or B) stop the personal attacks and stop firing off spurious RfC / RfArs, and be allowed to edit here. The choice is yours to make, but I'm sure we would all much rather not spend our time chasing around after you, and would infinitely prefer it if we could just get back to the simple joys of quietly editing encyclopedia articles. How about you make that possible, eh? — Matt Crypto 00:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- You still have not restored my editing and so continue to break the rules inorder to stop an RfC being started against you. Any vote by you against me is simply you abusing you position. You have attacked me by blocking me. You prevent me from starting an RFC against you. You should resign you admin ship immediatly it is not supposed to be used be people for there own ends. Anyone who places a link on a page inorder to check up on me is engaged in personal abuse. The problem is you don't like beingkept with in your rules.--Jirate 18:33, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Well I'd appreciate it if you'd with draw you provoctive lists. It is people who choose to chase after me, example being your watchlist.--Jirate 00:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- I've deleted User:Matt Crypto/list. — Matt Crypto 00:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Well I'd appreciate it if you'd with draw you provoctive lists. It is people who choose to chase after me, example being your watchlist.--Jirate 00:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- I will attempt to more subtle in future.--Jirate 01:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
People who need to be watched
- Thing2 Still up to your old tricks hey Gerard. Protecting your mates. You personal attacks against me will be removed as soon as I am back online. as will ve VileTriga and the others.
- DavidGerard go away, you gibbering fuckwit. Misplaced Pages is not chlorpromazine.
- Thing2 I a gibbering fuckwqit hey. COmpared with you I am a genius.
- Thing2 Though of course being as lacking in integrity as you. I imagine you clam to be one.
- Thing2 So do you refuse to remove your attacks?
- Thing2 This is of course going in my RFC apparently I have to have tried to resolve the problem, but obviosly you don't want to be solved.
- Thing2 Misplaced Pages also isn't a bigger dick.
- Thing2 You realy are unplasant aren't you. That little lot will be going in the log as well.
- DavidGerard argh. how does one set a mask to /ignore an IP range?
- Denelson83_IPA I don't think that's possible
- DavidGerard irate is hopping around on dhcp being a PITA
- Project2501a Dave2: it's not possible.
- ambi2 DavidGerard: have them k-lined?
- =-= Mode #wikipedia +b *!*Thing2@*.range217-44.btcentralplus.com by DavidGerard
- =-= YOU (Thing2) have been booted from #wikipedia by DavidGerard (DavidGerard)
- Thing2 I'm soory but Misplaced Pages requires me to try and solve disputes. But when it invloves talkingto people like you it';s not worth it.
--Jirate 13:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- He aint finished yet.
- YOU (Thing2) have been booted from #wikipedia by DavidGerard (DavidGerard)
- You are banned from this channel.
--Jirate 13:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
Threats by Thersa Knott
I've manually unblocked the autoblocker block, as it's clear you were experimenting rather than trying to evade a block. The 24 hour block I put in place expires at 16.04 today. If you try to edit between now and then you'll trip the autoblocker again and reset the block for another 24 hours.
If you make any personal attacks when you return or start any malicious rfcs or rfars you will be blocked again. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 14:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- You'll note that this is one of the people I want to put an RFC in against. For there block in the first place, now using there admin powers to protect themselves and threatening me. This is a clear case of abusing admin powers and will be reported ASAP.--Jirate 14:34, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Further more your should unblock me and resign your adminship, you are not fit to be incharge of anything.--Jirate 14:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- For reference, this was the statement that triggered the one week personal attack ban. Snowspinner 15:34, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
Page protection
Your page has been protected for the remainder of your week ban, so as to make avoiding personal attacks that much easier. Snowspinner 14:50, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Charles Molyneux, 1st Earl of Sefton
The article Charles Molyneux, 1st Earl of Sefton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article contains only a name and dates of birth & death. It is unreferenced. Article not further developed since its creation in early 2005.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 12:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Clodhopper (shoe) for deletion
The article Clodhopper (shoe) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Clodhopper (shoe) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 00:34, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Commissary
The article Commissary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP is not a dictionary.
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:10, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
Category:Unarmed people shot by police
Category:Unarmed people shot by police, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 18:19, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
Your account will be renamed
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Irate. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Irate~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
00:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Renamed
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)
14:06, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Johnsons Cleaners UK
The article Johnsons Cleaners UK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability, no reliable, independent sources.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 01:40, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Category:Knowsley has been nominated for discussion
Category:Knowsley, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Category:Sefton has been nominated for discussion
Category:Sefton, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Kenny Murray
The article Kenny Murray has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
External links given list variously: a quoted statement from the subject regarding a festival, a brief directory entry, a link making no mention of the subject. Can find only passing mentions otherwise. No indication of satisfying WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mutt Lunker (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of North Corporation Primary School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North Corporation Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/North Corporation Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Imcdc (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of A5147 road
The article A5147 road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
not notable
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 18:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)