| Revision as of 20:01, 19 October 2024 editNovem Linguae (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Interface administrators, Administrators51,111 edits →RFC close clarification request: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:26, 13 January 2025 edit undoProcrastinatingReader (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors28,767 edits →ProcBot: Main Page snapshots failure: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| (21 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Superpes15@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Bot_policy/New_global_bot_discussion&oldid=25384075 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Superpes15@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Bot_policy/New_global_bot_discussion&oldid=25384075 --> | ||
| == Question at TFD about the COVID-19 edit notices == | |||
| == RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins == | |||
| Hi {{u|ProcrastinatingReader}}, please see for a question – you haven't edited for 4 days, so I was afraid you might not notice the ping. Thanks! ] (]) 21:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there! Phase I of the ] has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus: | |||
| :Hey. I think you found the answer to your particular question? I don't really want to get involved in the broader question of whether COVID articles still need CT editnotices 😅 ] (]) 22:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Proposals 2 and 9b''' (''']'''): ] and ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 3b''' (in trial): ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 13''' (in trial): ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 14''' (implemented): ] | |||
| * '''Proposals 16 and 16c''' (''']'''): ] and ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 17''' (''']'''): ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 24''' (''']'''): ] | |||
| * '''Proposal 25''' (implemented): ] | |||
| See the ] for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. ] (]), via ] (]) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | <!-- Message sent by User: |
||
| == |
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | ||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| ⚫ | ]'s task "Main Page snapshots" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) |
||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| :I've manually created snapshots for yesterday and today. <span class="nowrap"> — ] (]</span> 15:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Telegraph close ? == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| It's been a while since our paths crossed and it seems you've largely been away from Misplaced Pages for a while. Welcome back. Is there a reason you wrote about plural closers for the Telegraph RfC when it was closed by a single person (S Marshall)? Best, ] (]) 03:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hey Barkeep. Thanks! Things have been busy recently but I try to pop my head in when I can. No, that particular instance was a poorly placed apostrophe. ] (]) 03:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Normally I wouldn't ask but given the previous close for that discussion I was just curious if you were lumping Compassionate in with S Marshall. Glad that wasn't the case. Best, ] (]) 04:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| Hello ProcrastinatingReader, thank you for your close of the close review. It must have taken significant effort. Appreciate it! ''']] (])''' 10:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :same as the rest, thanks for closing such a contentious discussion, which had already eaten two other closers alive, in a way that seems to me completely unobjectionable!--] (]) 11:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1258243641 --> | ||
| :{{+1}} -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 16:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == User:ProcBot purge task == | |||
| Hey, can you reactive the purge task? I've added a category to the one off list at ]. ] (]) 11:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{re|Gonnym}} Forgot to reply here, but this should be done. (Let me know if you think it didn't work properly?) In future, it should automatically respond to one-time category purge requests on that page. ] (]) 13:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks, it finished. ] (]) 06:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hey @], can the bot can purge modules and can it purge deleted modules? ] (]) 14:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Deleted ones I don't think would work. | |||
| :::For non-deleted, let's see... I used to have old code which purged transclusions of templates. It's disabled (and I'd have written the code for it differently today), but I can re-enable it, and it might work mostly as-is for modules. ] (]) 20:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I think it's not immediately going to work, so I've disabled template transclusion purges for now. I'll need to look into it a bit more, but not sure when I'll have time in the immediate future. ] (]) 14:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::OK, thanks for letting me know. ] (]) 14:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ProcBot: Move editnotices following underlying page move failure == | == ProcBot: Move editnotices following underlying page move failure == | ||
| ]'s task "Move editnotices following underlying page move" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 "move" actions in the last 14 days, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) |
]'s task "Move editnotices following underlying page move" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 "move" actions in the last 14 days, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) 00:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == ProcBot: Main Page snapshots failure == | |||
| == RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review == | |||
| Hi there! The trial of the <strong>RfA discussion-only period</strong> passed at ] has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at ''']'''. Cheers, and happy editing! ] (]) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Theleekycauldron@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/2024_review/Mailing_list&oldid=1223231383 --> | |||
| == Global bot approval request for Leaderbot == | |||
| {{int:hello}}! | |||
| I apologize for sending this message in English. {{int:please-translate}}. | |||
| In accordance to ], this message is to notify you that there is a new approval request for a global bot. | |||
| The discussion is available at ] on Meta. | |||
| ⚫ | ]'s task "Main Page snapshots" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) 12:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| Thank you for your time. | |||
| :Investigating; {{phab|T383560}}. ] (]) 19:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Best regards, | |||
| ] (]) 09:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:EPIC@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Bot_policy/New_global_bot_discussion&oldid=26399716 --> | |||
| == ProcBot II: Update edit filter failure == | |||
| == RFC close clarification request == | |||
| ]'s task "Update edit filter" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 "abusefilter/modify" actions in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) 06:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hello friend. I hope you're well. In your recent RFC close at ], you wrote {{tq|any voter guides will not be linked to from this page}}. I'm wondering if you'd be willing to amend it to be clearer about what {{tq|this page}} applies to? Does it apply to subpages? (I assume yes.) Does it apply to AELECT talk pages? (Completely unsure on this one, "this page" is technically the talk page.) Does it apply to any non AELECT pages? (I assume no.) Thanks for your consideration. –] <small>(])</small> 20:01, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:26, 13 January 2025
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Archives:
Request for global bot flag for CommonsDelinker
Hello!
This is a notification to let you know that a new request for the global bot flag for CommonsDelinker has been started.
Please note that the request will remain open for 14 days starting today. You can leave a comment or opinion on the relevant page!
Best regards --Superpes15 (talk)
Question at TFD about the COVID-19 edit notices
Hi ProcrastinatingReader, please see for a question – you haven't edited for 4 days, so I was afraid you might not notice the ping. Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hey. I think you found the answer to your particular question? I don't really want to get involved in the broader question of whether COVID articles still need CT editnotices 😅 ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:20, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
ProcBot: Move editnotices following underlying page move failure
ProcBot's task "Move editnotices following underlying page move" failed to run per the configuration specified at Misplaced Pages:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 "move" actions in the last 14 days, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
ProcBot: Main Page snapshots failure
ProcBot's task "Main Page snapshots" failed to run per the configuration specified at Misplaced Pages:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 12:20, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Investigating; T383560. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
ProcBot II: Update edit filter failure
ProcBot II's task "Update edit filter" failed to run per the configuration specified at Misplaced Pages:Bot activity monitor/Configurations. Detected only 0 "abusefilter/modify" actions in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the task configuration instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the |notify= parameter from the {{/task}} template. Thanks! – SDZeroBot (talk) 06:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)