Revision as of 21:50, 24 October 2024 editColinFine (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,302 edits →When and where were drawers invented?: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:09, 18 January 2025 edit undoScsbot (talk | contribs)Bots240,427 edits edited by robot: archiving January 3 | ||
(900 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
= |
= January 4 = | ||
== |
== Goal number one == | ||
How do you forgive and forget? <small>(not sure if that's off-topic for the reference desk. if it is, sorry in advance.)</small> ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> 05:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Was the Kathy Andrade who was a friend of the victim ] the same woman as ], the Salvadoran-American union activist? I can't find any reliable sources. ] (]) 20:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:By deciding to. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 06:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Andrade was on Forensic Files in 2000, described as a union activist and a friend of Marroquin. ] (]) 01:16, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::One can decide to forget, but will it work? --] 09:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
: is the Forensic Files episode with Kathy Andrade in it. She appears about 15 minutes into it. ] (]) 16:48, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
: is an essay on the topic, by a practitioner of ], that you may (or may not) find helpful. More advice: , and (written from a Christian perspective) . --] 09:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Thank you, it looks like the same woman, does the programme describe her as a union activist? ] (]) 17:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:(], in that I have no published sources for this, though I was taught it by others): Forgiving does not necessarily mean forgetting - it also doesn't necessarily mean condoning. It means not carrying ill will. In my experience, once I see the cost (to me) of bearing the resentment, and how illusory are the apparent benefits of doing so, it is easy to choose to let it go. ] (]) 14:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::I notice that "The uploader has not made this video available in country ": are you in the same position? {The poster formerly known nas 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 19:59, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::There is also a copy on Dailymotion. ] (]) 20:32, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::The Forensic Files episode "A Voice from Beyond" only identifies Kathy Andrade as a friend of Marroquín, but all details fit. The episode reveals that Marroquin took lessons at the High School of Fashion Industries and attended Andrade's English class. Andrade is shown, talking about her frjend Angélica Marroquín, saying, "her dream was to become an American citizen". Our article on ] states that she was Education Director for Local 23-25 of the ] and organized various educational programs for union members, supporting their paths to citizenship. Also, we see a page of Marroquín's address book with Andrade's address, "311 W 24 ST", which is in the ] housing development where our article on Andrade states that she lived. While this is very strong but circumstantial evidence, the person seen speaking in this episode is clearly the same as shown in a photograph in Andrade's obit in ''The New York Yimes'', captioned, "Kathy Andrade at a rally in Manhattan in 2006 on behalf of immigrants' rights".<sup></sup> Kathy Andrade's biography at ] – not a "]" – also makes the identification: "Was a leading union activist for garment workers in New York City for over 50 years. Assisting many Latin American workers, she became friends with a fellow Salvadoran worker by the name of Reyna Marroquin."<sup></sup> --] 07:45, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::{{ping|Lambiam}} thank you for the detailed reply. I found "Kathy Andrade" on a list of orphaned articles and added a wikilink to the existing mention at "Murder of Reyna Marroquín" after a brief investigation. I had checked the IMDB, but know that is user generated. I think your answer is sufficient to convince me that the link was correct. It would be nice to have an online news source which joins the dots but not vital. I calculated that the 30 days after I added the link got 27 times as many views as the 30 days before, which shows how popular murder is on the internet. ] (]) 16:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Shall we forgive the OP for forgetting that we don't offer advice?] (]) 17:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
= October 13 = | |||
:{{small|I'd suggest searching the web. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 17:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)}} | |||
:The injunction does not apply to all advice, but is aimed specifically at giving <u>medical</u> or <u>legal</u> advice. --] 23:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Slowing down time == | |||
::<poem> NonStopGo | |||
What are some ways I can slow down time (or relax) without using drugs or marijuana (since I hope to God I don't try any)? ]<sup><small>TM</small></sup> <small>(])</small> 02:45, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Unfortunately I don't have a copy near me right now to check the details, but memory tells me that a character in ] by ] chose to deliberately watch and involve himself in boring activities so that it would feel like he was living longer in a time and place where dying was highly likely. I welcome clarification from those with better memories or an actual copy of the book. ] (]) 03:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
One of the reasons I hurt myself quite so much last May was to make sure | |||
:If Tom Lehrer's inference is to be believed, you could try listening to '']'' on repeat. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 03:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
that I stopped for long enough to arrive at this particular point. For only | |||
through understanding can we see how to forgive both ourselves and other | |||
people. In forgiveness there is love ; and although we can accept forgiveness | |||
from others, true forgiveness comes solely from within. And only if we | |||
love ourselves can we hope to achieve that shining state of grace which | |||
is our true birthright and to find, finally, the gate which leads out of this | |||
vale of tears : and opens for ever into the realms of eternal light. | |||
7th July 2005 | |||
:].<sup></sup> Some recommend ],<sup></sup> which can be seen as a specific meditation technique.<sup></sup> --] 08:14, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
</poem> | |||
] (]) 05:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:For various reasons, I have lately been sleeping in two bouts of about 4 hours in 24, rather than one of about 8. A side effect I have noticed is that time seems to pass more slowly, perhaps because almost every time I wake up it's still the same day. This does of course require one not to need to interact with others on a more normal schedule very much. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 09:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I tend to find that waiting at a ] achieves this very well. ]|] 18:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Westminster Coroner's Court == | |||
:Depending on your ] predipositions you may take a few moments following the second hand of the stopwatch. Alternatively or not, do it while listening to some recorded works after ]. Without a stopwatch it will require enough free space for pacing back and forth for a few steps. --] (]) 19:00, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
I'm trying to research a sudden death that occurred in the London Borough of Merton. Please help me find information about ], also known as "Inner West London Coroner's Court". They appear to have no website, and publish no court listings. They claim that coroners records are closed to public access for 75 years. | |||
:There's always the proverbial "watching grass grow" or "watching paint dry". Or, you could get one of your namesakes to keep as a pet in a terrarium, and watch it all day, because they just sit there doing nothing most of the time. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 22:52, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::{{small|Occasionally wildly dancing a ] when nobody's watching. ] (]) 00:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
:::{{small|In the 1950s, Clint Eastwood thwarted that frenetic dance in Napalm Springs. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 13:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)}} | |||
But other coroners courts in the UK, for example "London Inner South Coroner’s Court", and say that inquests are public and anyone can attend. | |||
= October 14 = | |||
Why is there are difference? Why is "London Inner South Coroner’s Court" open to the public, but "Inner West London Coroner's Court" is not? Surely all coroners courts operate under the same laws? | |||
== Questions on environmental sustainability and whitewashing definition == | |||
Thanks for your help ] (]) 12:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:As you can see from coroners' courts are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. I can assure you, however, that inquests held by the Westminster coroner are as public as inquests held by any other coroner. ] (]) 14:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
In this article what do they mean by "A plastic manual replaceable head toothbrush was probably the best, according to the study." | |||
== Where can I find unmarried men list in Science/Maths? == | |||
] | |||
Like ], ], ], ]. | |||
And in this article what do they mean by "whitewashing" in this context? ] (]) 05:23, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:That term does not appear in the cited sources, but might have to do with white Barbie-doll types being the fashion standard. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 07:44, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:As to the first question, they meant a toothbrush that was fashioned from plastic (and not from bamboo), with the brushing action effected manually, by the user by moving their hand (and not with an electric motor), and with a head that was not fixed, but could be replaced on the toothbrush's handle when it was worn out, instead of the user discarding the whole assembly, not only the head but also the handle. --] 09:54, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I found the following in source 354 (https://www.teenvogue.com/story/the-y2k-style-trend-isnt-fatphobic-our-attitudes-about-it-are): Ads and runways showcasing the trends also sent another message. In an article called The Fatphobic & Racist Origins of Y2K Fashion Trends, Aishwarya Jagani cites Sabrina Strings in Fearing the Black Body: The Racial Origins of Fat Phobia, in which she explains how “Y2K fashion’s emphasis on thinness…erased the creative contributions of the Black community, attributing styles popularized by people of color to the white celebrities of the time.” The popular image of the day was of thin, white women, further limiting what society saw as beautiful. | |||
:I believe this is what is being referred to as "whitewashing". --] (]) (]) 11:16, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I don't see the "thorough" criticism (or any criticism) of McBling, though. --] 16:08, 14 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
I want to ] ] due to his ], ] as he have ] and ] who has ] out of wedlock. ] (]) 14:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
= October 16 = | |||
:Do you have any reason to suppose that such a list exists, @]? ] (]) 14:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Container islands in New York East River == | |||
::Just to encourage ] ] (]) 14:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::So, you've come here to ask people how to remove from a list that doesn't exist, some names that would probably belong only the list if it existed, because you have some private meaning of "unmarried"? ] (]) 12:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::If some men don't (appear to) have sexual relationships with women, they're not necessarily demonstrating celibacy - they might be otherwise inclined. ] (]) 11:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::: <small>Possibly worth noting here that the more traditional meaning of "celibacy" doesn't necessarily exclude sex, just marriage. That could have been the meaning HarryOrange was using. --] (]) 07:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC) </small> | |||
: Why did you pipe the correctly-spelled "Isaac" Newton to the incorrectly-spelled "Issac" Newton? -- ] </sup></span>]] 18:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::And do the same strange thing to Nikola Tesla? ] (]) 23:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::I forget to include ] , ] ] (]) 06:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Champagne explosion == | |||
I don't know what words to use to get a good search for this topic. If you look at satellite images of the East River in New York, you will see multiple rectangular "islands" that look like shipping containers stacked up. The images are very low quality, so it is possible the appearance is just artifacts of image compression. Are there actually stacks of shipping containers or something of similar appearance in the East River? If so, what are they? I originally dismissed it as the satellite picking up container ships moving along the river, but many of them are in the exact same place across more than one satellite image. So, they must be stationary. An example of one is off shore from the Rose M Singer Center on Riker's Island. On Google, it looks like a stack of containers. On Bing, it lookse like a rectangular building. Neither one labels it. Another one is halfway between Soundview pier and Ferry Point Park pier. ] (]) 14:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
I had an unopened bottle of cheap champagne (Barefoot Rosé if that matters) left over from NYE, and about 10 minutes ago the thing spontaneously exploded. It had been just sitting there at room temperature. No serious damage but there is champange and broken glass all over the place now, and I'm in the process of cleaning it up. Are these explosions a usual occasional occurrence? I'm used to champagne bottles being thicker than regular wine bottles for obvious reasons, but this one seems on the thin side in retrospect, maybe as an economy measure. Could that be? I'm surprised it doesn't happen on store shelves if it happens at home. Thanks. ] (]) 18:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:A mystery! To me on the satellite photos they look like they could be barges either filled with loose material or covered in a light coloured tarp. To get a different angle, I looked for some near Google Street View coverage. There are a couple of mystery objects just east of the Bronx end of the Whitestone Bridge, and Street View coverage looking out over the East River at the south end of Robinson Avenue in Throg's Neck. Looking south on Street View, you can see what look very much like barges around the same location as the objects in the satellite photos. | |||
:As for what they're doing... Is the East River dredged regularly? That might explain them being there frequently/with long linger times, but also moving around - as a barge is filled up it moves off to deposit the fill elsewhere. ] (]) 14:54, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I does happen.<sup></sup> Sometimes a cause can be identified. When a bottle of champagne is stored in a freezer, or a fridge whose temperature setting is too low, the contents may freeze, causing it to expand. This can lead to minute cracks in the glass, weakening its strength. Thawed in a relatively warm environment, the pressure of the gas can then result in fracture. Another potential cause is premature bottling, when fermentation has not run its fill course ands the wine still contains yeast and sugar. (Almost all wine sold as "champagne" in the US, also when labelled "Brut", contains residual sugar to accommodate the local taste.) When warmed up, fermentation resumes and pressure increases. Finally, a small fraction of bottles is damaged in handling or comes with production defects, not detectable through visual inspection. --] 22:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Lokking on Bing Maps, the object off Rikers Island looks like a ] with six or seven piles of material (maybe sand or gravel) onboard. There is a much smaller circular object close by, probably a bouy. ] (]) 16:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks. No idea about refrigeration before I bought it, but I got it off the shelf at a big supermarket, carried it home, and it sat in the exact same place in the room for several days before going kablooie. All I can think of is that carrying it home might have bumped it around or something. Oh well, no big deal in the scheme of things. ] (]) 01:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::Maybe those are anchor spots for barges when not in use. That would explain why they are in the same location, but appearing rather different, from two obviously different satellite passes. I didn't try a street view of the first one because I assumed there is no street view on Riker's Island. It turns out there is a "street view" from a sailboat, but the sail blocks view of the object. However, following that sailboat's path, I did see that the object between the piers is clearly a flat, red-sided barge full of containers. It is too flat to be a container ship (assuming that refers to those massive ships with hundreds of containers). Assuming these examples (and the many others I found) are anchor spots, I can start googling for official anchor spots along the East River. ] (]) 18:51, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::The traditional method of making ] requires freezing it in the bottle, so I suppose most bottles are designed to handle that – although freezing from the bottom up is safer than top-down, as it creates no plug of ice between the liquid and the gas. If not using the traditional method, or if the wine doesn't come from the Champagne region, many countries (including all of the EU) forbid selling it under the name Champagne. The US however hasn't got that restriction. | |||
:::A guide once pointed me at such buoys during a school excursion to the ], floating in the ]. You can view them there too. They're meant to tie vessels to, to moor away from the dockside. This can be to store empty barges, to use barges as floating storage or to transship directly from one ship to another, using floating or on-board loading facilities. Traditionally, cereals are transshipped that way. A giant floating vacuum cleaner comes alongside the ocean going ship, sucks up the cereals and dumps them in a river barge for transport deeper inland. If you scroll a bit in time on Google, you can find some ships transshipping bulk goods in the Waalhaven. | |||
::Wines freeze around -5°C, so accidental freezing in a fridge set too cold seems unlikely. ] (]) 11:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::There's a lot of sand extraction along the ] and ] rivers, where I used to live. It's collected by dredging and sometimes dumped directly into a ship. It looks quite different from the piles you see in the barges near New York. The dredged material is pumped into the cargo hold as a very wet ]. The sand sinks to the bottom of the hold; the water flows out. There're no visible piles. The material in the pictures was dry when loaded and must have been loaded by chute or conveyor belt. | |||
:::In this case the bottle had not been opened, but the cold liquid carbonated contents of a closed bottle may freeze upon opening due to cooling by ] of the CO<sub>2</sub>. --] 13:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::If the material in the hold isn't sensitive to weather, the cover of river barges is often left off. This saves time. The cover consists of segments of sheet metal, optionally painted, that can be moved using a small ]. Sometimes the segments have wheels running on tracks, so that one segment of the cover can be rolled over another. ] (]) 18:54, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::With all the information here, I've found plenty of documentation for anchorage regulations throughout the rivers around New York and the locations where there seem to be barges are in fact official anchorages. They are not digital encoding artifacts in the satellite images. ] (]) 18:59, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Once upon a time ] used to come in ] glass bottles, and I read somewhere that this would happen from time to time with the larger sizes. And indeed, sometime around 1980 a large bottle of Coca-Cola, probably 1.5 liters, exploded while sitting in my cupboard. --] (]) 02:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:New York (as well as other cities) used to accumulate its garbage on barges, prior to its being disposed of in landfill sites or elsewhere/otherwise; finding places to do so became problematical – see for example ]. Such procedures may still be in operation to some extent, and such barges can remain moored in place for long periods: I have seen similar barges remain for weeks at a time in ], beside which I used to work (there is a large ] on the Western shore of the harbour). Storing refuse thusly is relatively cheap, and keeps it from causing onshore problems with vermin, smells, fires, etc. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 23:25, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Organizations == | ||
Are there any international organizations headquartered in Australia, similar to UN and World Bank are headquartered in the US? --] (]) 22:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:We have a ]. --] 23:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:It depends entirely on the area. Hong Kong has a lot of English signs due to the history of English rule and many English speakers still residing there. Beijing is an international city, as with any capital city. It has not only English, but other languages depending on the area of the city and who will likely be using the signs. Shainghai is a big business city with a lot of foreign residents and tourists. They adopted English and Pinyin as the alternative language for most signs. There is always an argument to remove English and Pinyin from the signs, but it doesn't progress much. If you travel away from locations with a lot of foreign residents and tourists, the chance of finding a sign in English or Pinyin drops. If you get near country borders, you will find signs with the other country's language along with Chinese for the same reason that English is found on signs where many people are expected to know English to some degree but not Chinese. ] (]) 21:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Isn't this more or less ]? ]|] 09:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::An international organization is a completely different thing from a multinational company. --] 11:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::yes but both questions are easily answered with even the most cursory research and 40bus here seems to have a habit of asking research questions. ] (]) 17:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
= January 6 = | |||
:In the top 20-50 cities destination signs are in characters and pinyin. ] (]) 23:44, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Replacement for my My Yahoo page== | |||
:While falling asleep, I thought that this is closely related to another topic. Many languages use similar words, so it is not necessary to translate. For example, police in English is police in French, Polizia in Italian, policía in Spanish, politi in Norweegian, poliţie in Romanian, pûlis in Kurdish... etc... Because the word is so similar across languages, there is no need to translate it. When it is different, as in Russian, you will often see it translated from полиция to politsiya. But, in Chinese, there is no way that a person who does not read Chinese to mentally shuffle the phonetics of 警察 to jǐngchá to Police. There is a need to translate words to a language that most visitors will recognize enough to understand. As English has borrowed so heavily from everyone else, it is a good choice for a catch-all/sounds-alike language. My personal experience is that most countries do not translate much. Instead, they use signage that doesn't require translation. I was easily able to get by in Spain, Italy, Turkey, India, Brazil, and Panama without having any knowledge of the local language. In Norway, I was amazed that their written language is so much like English that I thought they were translating. They simply pronounce the words different. ] (]) 14:54, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Not sure this is the correct venue, but here goes. | |||
Yahoo have shut down all personal My Yahoo pages. For those who don't use Yahoo, your My Yahoo page was sort of your own personal webpage, where you could have various modules that interested you displayed (e.g. cartoons, horoscopes, travel, finance etc). Yahoo have closed My Yahoo down. A big feature of my personal My Yahoo page was that it had loads of links to my favourite websites. This loss is the one that is hurting most. | |||
= October 17 = | |||
==Some vehicle-related questions== | |||
In recent months, I have become interested in personal watercraft and other recreational vehicles. I’ve been doing a lot of reading about these things and I’ve found one or two areas which confuse me. I am aiming to get these matters clarified in order to ensure I have the right information necessary to make an informed decision about acquiring for myself something of this sort. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at look at these things for me. | |||
Any suggestions as to a replacement? ] (]) 10:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
The first point of confusion for me would appear to be pricing. My understanding of this is rather poor, and I’m making a lot of assumptions based on the prices of cars and motorcycles. What I am confused by is how high the price tags are for things such as 2-seater aeroplanes and rigid inflatable boats. The planes seem on the surface to be not that much heavier or more powerful than an average motor car, yet they have six digit prices. The boats seem to be as expensive as a family car despite being considerably lighter and less mechanically complex. Why are the prices so high, and why isn’t anyone offering these types of vehicle at a lower price? What is it about the planes that stops them from being made as cheap as a 1.5 tonne automobile? And, what is it about the RIBs that makes them have 5 digit prices despite being made of rubber and not metal? | |||
:MSN.com does that pretty well. --] 10:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Could you explain in more detail how one can go about to create a personalized web space using ]? --] 12:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::: would be a start. That link is for UK users, presumably you can customize it to your own country. --] 13:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Perhaps one of the content curation tools listed , some of which are free, will serve your purposes. I have no knowledge of any of these tools beyond what you find there. --] 12:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:No modules, but there is ]. Actually, I may misunderstand: perhaps you seek a kind of home page which is online but available to you only, mainly for collecting bookmarks. ] ] 13:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::For those answering, while it appears to be a question asking how to make a basic list of links, it is not. Yahoo's links page was created by selecting modules through a GUI and then customizing the settings. For example, I could select the comics GUI and then select which comics I want to show up in my links. I don't need to know any of the URLs. I just place a check next to the comics I like. For finance, I add the module with a click and then type in the ticket symbols for the stocks I care about. It automatically creates a daily stock thumbnail with links to news articles about those stocks. So, it is true that there are many available options to create a list of links, there are not as many options to create a custom content page for multiple areas of personal interest. ] (]) 15:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::The IP is correct, but as I said above, I can live without horoscopes, comics etc. The ability of easily store links to favourite websites is the biggest loss. {{re|Card_Zero}} - it doesn't have to be for me only. I think that using a subpage of my user space will fall foul of ] #5, even though many (but not all) of the websites are used in Misplaced Pages research. ] (]) 15:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::Does it have to be a website in that case? Why not browser bookmarks? In fact, I believe these days some browsers will let you select bookmarks for a "start page" or "start screen" that is displayed when you open a new window/tab. And if they don't, you can probably find a browser extension that will do that. -- ] (]) 17:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Major traffic fatality incident, Denmark, 2019 == | |||
The other thing that I’m not quite sure about is the fact that battery electric technology still hasn’t completely taken over yet as far as recreational vehicles are concerned. In particular, even in light of climate change and respiratory concerns, gasoline powered go-karts and boats are still quite common. While I understand that price and battery size are important issues at the moment, I still would have thought that the technology would be a no-brainer for such small vehicles. Why would anyone risk damaging their lungs by using a petrol go-kart on an indoor tracks? Wouldn’t that be as bad as smoking? And, why haven’t batteries completely replaced fossil fuels for vehicles, such as small boats, jet skis, motorcycles, quad bikes, and snowmobiles? Why do people still support climate-destroying engines when battery-electric alternatives are possible with today’s technology? This is especially strange, when it would be easy to do battery swaps to deal with charging times. | |||
In 2019, Denmark had a minor spike in traffic fatalities. I feel that the spike is most likely the result of a single accident with multiple fatalities. However, I cannot find any news about multiple-fatality accidents in Denmark in 2019. Everything that I find is related to train accidents, which I do not think Denmark includes in "traffic fatality" counts. Can anyone find a list of accidents or news about a single large-scale accident that might skew the yearly count for 2019? ] (]) 15:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
I hope I can have some light shed on these mysteries. Then, I can make a more informed choice and be less confused. Thank you. ] (]) 21:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:First of all, where are you seeing this spike and is it a reliable source? ]|] 09:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::And is it even statistically significant? With unrelated events happening by chance, there will always be fluctuations in number of events by time period. Spikes will occur every now and then, entirely by chance. --] 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::I found (pdf) which seems to go into this matter in great detail. I don't read Danish, but I ran it though Google Translate. The table on page 28 shows that there were 199 traffic-related fatalities in Denmark in 2019, which is more than the two previous years but less than some earlier years. So I agree with the above posters that there is not enough here to constitute a spike. The document doesn't list individual accidents, btw. --] 14:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::The mean number of fatalities of the 10-year sample given in this Danish report is 194.9, while its ] is 27.3. This means that the 2019 value deviates from the mean by 0.15 ], which is more remarkable by how little the deviation is. --] 23:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:I saw this before and perhaps you are trying to recreate it. In 2019, traffic fatalities in Denmark increased 20%. But, they were so low that it was a small bump to make that 20% jump. The reason it matters is because the increase was used as the basis to use government funding for more bicycle lanes and improving intersections. But, the increase was not statistically significant and didn't mean anything, so it should not have been used as justification for any changes. Now, from memory, it was a multi-car, weather-related accident in January that added more than 10 fatalities to the yearly count. That was overshadowed by a train accident due to the same snowstorm which killed 8 (I remember it was 8 because most new articles listed 6, but some stated that a few days later, two more bodies were found). So, my gut feeling is that you are intending to show that this "20% spike" in traffic fatalities is really a data artifact created by a single large-scale accident and not representative of general driver behavior in Denmark. Unfortunately, I do not know how to search Danish news. But, if my memory is correct, you can use the date of the well documented train accident in Denmark in 2019 to get the date of the multi-car accident and then, hopefully, find that as well. I doubt you will find it in any English-based news repository. You will have to search Danish repositories. ] (]) 16:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Yes. That is what I am doing. I found multiple overblown newspaper headlines like "Biggest increase in traffic fatalities in five years! Your mind will be blown when you see the numbers!" and I am using that to demonstrate that while it is technically true that there was a 20% increase in fatalities, the proper context around that increase is that it is negligible and the result of a single event that could have happened on any other year. Basically, it is a presentation on applying context to data and how it is often done improperly. Now that I know there was a multi-vehicle traffic accident at the same time as the train accident I keep finding, I decided to read those articles and many of them comment on the car accident as well as the train accident, but I didn't read through the articles to notice previously. ] (]) 13:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::According to the document linked by @], there were 199 deaths in 2019, compared to 171 the year before. That's a 16% increase, not 20%. On the other hand, it's an extra 28 people - so more than the result of a single incident. It just looks like random variation in a decade (the 2010's) that saw about 200 people killed every year on Denmark's roads. This decade it's been more like 150 a year, so if they spent a lot of money in 2019 it was worth it. You can further eamine annual figures and . ] (]) 13:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::::What's 'this decade'? There tends to be some controversy especially with 2020 and 2021 figures since reduced traffic due to COVID-19 whether from lockdowns or just changes in behaviour e.g. with more working from home are often cited as reasons for reduced fatalities the. ] (]) 10:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Neurodiverse dating site == | |||
:'''Price:''' There are several major factors in the cost of producing a factory-made vehicle (or any other manufactured item). | |||
:One is the cost of designing it, including the (often considerable) costs of demonstrating to the relevant regulating bodies that it will be (and continues to be) safe. This is a fixed cost, the same if you then go on to make one hundred or one million of the vehicle. | |||
:A second is the cost of making the factory that will make the vehicle. This is also largely fixed. | |||
:A third is the labour costs of paying the people who make the vehicle, manage the factory, etc. This generally increases with time (because wages usually increase), and obviously has a lower bound. | |||
:A fourth is the cost of the materials and components. This is variable, because the more you make the bigger discount you will be able to negotiate on bulk purchase, but it has a lower bound. | |||
:(There are other costs, such as marketing, after-sales service and spares manufacture, etc., but let's ignore those for the moment.) | |||
:The first two costs have to be recovered by spreading them over the price of all the vehicles sold, over and above the third and fourth which are inherent in producing each vehicle. This means that the more vehicles that are sold, the less that each individual vehicle's price will have to cover those upfront costs (which may have been paid for by investment or borrowing, which generate dividend or interest costs that also have to be covered). | |||
:'Average motor cars' are typically made (often in already-established factories that can easily switch to new designs) and sold in hundreds of thousands per model, so the first two costs are spread very thinly. | |||
:Vehicles such as recreational aeroplanes and boats are sold in much smaller numbers, so the upfront costs to be recovered are much higher per individual vehicle. | |||
:This is a ''very'' crude and non-comprehensive outline, based on my experience of working in both retail and manufacturing environments. No doubt an expert can give a far better one. I have some thoughts on battery power, but I'll leave that for others. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 03:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Today's popular consumer cars are manufactured in assembly lines in a continuous process using highly automated processes. At the rate in which they are produced, the automation results in considerable savings on the production costs. The rate of production of 2-seater aeroplanes or rigid inflatable boats of any brand is far lower, not justifying a comparable investment in automation. --] 05:27, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Another factor is that aircraft manufacture and component parts are subject to a far stricter regime of quality control. ] (]) 09:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::Does anyone know why 60 year old Cessna aeroplanes are still super expensive. Surely oldness = cheapness, right? ] (]) 11:36, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::Also, can anyone explain why a rubber boat comes in at a five figure price? Why can’t such things be cheaper than metal vehicles? ] (]) 11:39, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::I note that a ] is not inflatable except for the sides. I too am somewhat puzzled by the steep price. Leaving material costs out of it, there are some mysterious market forces at work. Old leisure boats, typically small cabin cruisers, are frequently ''abandoned'' and left to rot, yet those offered for resale are typically in relatively good condition and still offered at relatively high prices. I suppose the main cause of the high price is that people looking to buy boats have money, and want good quality. On the positive side, this means there is no RIB ]. ] ] 14:27, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::Any/one know anything about the aforementioned 60-year-old planes or RIBs? ] (]) 19:51, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Size of production run has already been covered. | |||
:The engine size may appear to be similar for cars compared to boats or aeroplanes, but there's one difference. Car engines only run at maximum power for a few seconds a time when accelerating or a few minutes when climbing a steep hill at high speed – but most steep roads are to sinuous for high speeds. So car engines are only designed to run at peak power for a short time. Engines of boats and aeroplanes run close to peak power almost all the time. Worse, they have to be more reliable. If a car engine breaks down, you simply coast to a stop; if the same happens in an aeroplane, you have to find a suitable landing spot very nearby or you crash. The engines of racing cars do run at full power all the time; maybe you've noticed how often one breaks down during a race. | |||
:As for making them battery-electric, some are. Slow recreational boats have been electric for decades. The sporty ones however need such a high power-to-mass ratio that battery power would only last a very short time, maybe half an hour. For an aeroplane, half an hour is about the limit now and it won't be sporty at all. Go-karts can certainly be made battery-electric or on overhead power (think ]s), but some users seem to like the noise and smell. Battery swapping could work, but battery designs must then be standardised and demand high enough, or charged batteries will be waiting for ages before a user comes to pick them up. ] (]) 09:48, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::And yet an electric car can last for over 200 miles. Explain that? ] (]) 11:43, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::Bearing in mind that said cars are much heavier, maybe 2 tonnes, than any boat or go-kart, therefore they take a lot more energy to move and still too 200 miles on a full charge. Explain that? ] (]) 11:47, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::First, an electric car may carry several hundred kilogrammes of batteries. It's a significant fraction of the loaded vehicle weight and you can't increase that fraction much on other vehicles. And for vehicles lighter compared to the person using it, you'll get less battery compared to loaded weight, therefore less battery compared to energy use (weight is often a decent proxy for energy use), therefore less range. Electric cars only get their decent range at that speed by being heavy compared to their payload (which in turn makes them inefficient). | |||
::::Second, a car on a motorway only uses about 10 kW of power, something like 50 watts per kilogramme of battery you can put in. The engine is more powerful, but you rarely use it at full power. Our article on ]s mentions that the 2017 model has a 120 kW engine and weighs 250 kg; maybe you could put a 50 kg battery in one of those. As it actually runs close to full power most of the time, that's 2400 watts per kilogramme of battery. The battery will be drained in five minutes. ] (]) 18:07, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Is there website that shows with neurodiverse person goes well with which other neurodiverse, e.g. ADHD with Autism, Autism with HPI, HPI with dylexsia etc? --Donmust90-- ] (]) 15:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::: Much of that weight is the battery itself, and a car does not have to either float, or remain airborne. As yet, battery technology has not yet been developed to ''routinely'' combine very large energy storage ''and'' low weight, ''safely'': storing a large amount of energy in a small space is always a ''potential'' bomb or conflagration. Cutting-edge experimentation (for example in the form of ] racing cars and ] bikes) is ongoing, and has shown rapid progress year by year. As for why various recreational vehicles in electric form have not caught on – it boils down to lack of public demand; manufacturers ''would'' offer such vehicles if there was sufficient demand to make them profitable. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 18:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::I still don’t understand why a 250kg vehicle needs a more “powerful” engine than a 2 tonne vehicle. It just doesn’t make sense to me. Could someone explain the physics behind this? Surely there is no doubt to the fact that 2 tonnes takes 8 times as much energy to move as only 250 kg? So why the discrepancy? I mean, if we have the technology to power a 2 tonne vehicle for 200 miles, then why can’t we do the same with a vehicle one eighth of the weight? I struggle to understand the physics of this and it’s messing with my head. | |||
:::::Also, why are people not faking climate change more seriously? Shouldn’t they prioritise cutting gasoline out of their lives as soon as possible? ] (]) 19:41, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::Heh. ''Faking seriously?'' That's an unfortunate typo. But anyway a jet ski, or a RIB for that matter, is for zooming around, bouncing giddily over the waves. It not only has to go fast, it has to go fast in water, overcoming friction by ]. "To plane, especially to initiate planing, the power-to-weight ratio must be high". This kind of hedonism is not ''typically'' associated with environmentalism, although I see an image of an electric jet ski, or "electric personal watercraft", positioned opposite ]. It has an external link and looks suspiciously like an advert, you may want to check that out before I get round to removing it as promotional. ] ] 20:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::I still don’t understand the physics here. You still can’t deny the fact that a 2 tonne vehicle requires eight times as much energy to move as a 250kg vehicle. So, why the big difference in engine power? Surely it is impossible to deny what you can physically see with these numbers. If we can get a 2 tonne vehicle to travel 200 miles on battery power, then what is stopping us from doing the same with a 250kg vehicle? It should only require one eighth of the energy. ] (]) 00:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::If there's no ], then any tiny force F will move them both the same distance. If we want them to cover the same distance in the same time, ] = F/m, so yes, it takes 8 times more. But you should pay attention to the missing f (friction), of which there are many kinds. The watercraft needs more power because it pushes through water. ] says that a 15hp motor (about equivalent to four 50cc scooters) can only move a small dinghy at less than 10 mph. ] ] 03:14, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::There's quite a big difference between land vehicles and water vehicles. At low speed, a land vehicle mostly suffers from ] and ] in the drivetrain. This is more or less proportional to weight and independent of speed. A boat mostly suffers from ] and ], increasing more or less linearly with speed. As the resistance of the boat has no constant term, it's at low speed much less than that of a land vehicle. That's why freight ships are so efficient. | |||
::::::::At high speed this changes. For land vehicles, ] becomes dominant, roughly increasing with the square of velocity. The speed where this becomes dominant depends on the vehicle, maybe 20 km/h for a bicycle and 70 km/h for some cars. For a boat, the critical point is the ], which depends on the size of the boat. For a kayak it's around 8 km/h, for a big container ship 80 km/h. Once you reach the hull speed, drag increases enormously. For a ] it's not as bad as for a ], but it's still bad. That's why fast boats are such an inefficient way of moving things around. Jet Skis and rigid inflatable boats are designed to work well above their (rather low, because they're small) hull speed, so their drag is huge. | |||
::::::::For aeroplanes, drag is proportional to weight and practically independent of speed. If you want to go faster, you go higher, keeping lift and drag constant. The lower density of the air compensates for the higher speed in the drag equation. ] (]) 11:06, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::Ok, that seems reasonable. Now I want to know more about my first question. For instance, why is a 60 year old plane still expensive? Also, how do price drops work in the first place? | |||
:::::::::Also, why are petrol go-karts still a thing? Can’t we get rid of them and use batteries instead? ] (]) 17:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::Especially in the US, many people believe that climate change is either a hoax or a natural phenomenon unrelated to human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. Apart from that, the price is an issue. I think gasoline-powered go-karts are substantially cheaper than electric ones. The go-karts rented in competitive racing events organized by commercial go-kart track operators need all to be the same type, so switching to an all-electric fleet is a very costly proposition. Also, gas-powered karts produce a more satisfying vroom-vroom noise (satisfying to the driver). --] 06:37, 20 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:For any combination of forms of neurodiversity, some persons will go well with each other, while others will not. This depends mainly on other factors, in particular the ] and personal ] of each. --] 12:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
On aircraft pricing, this source lists pre-owned aircraft for less than $100,000. However, I would hate to be flying in one and need repairs ... ] (]) 20:43, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Still I would expect a weak correlation, which may or may not be better than none. ] (]) 21:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
= January 8 = | |||
:That still sounds like a lot. Why are 60 year old planes still that expensive? I’ve seen brand new cars that cost less than that? ] (]) 21:26, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Because (a) they're rare, and (b) old things have appeal beyond their utility – see for example ]. | |||
::With reference to your earlier queries, see ]. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} ] (]) 05:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Anthropology Misplaced Pages page == | |||
:It's basic economics: supply and demand, whatever the market will bear. If you offer an object for 1,000 dollars and nobody buys it, you can either keep it or reduce the price until it sells. ←] <sup>'']''</sup> ]→ 10:42, 20 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Does anyone know why the Misplaced Pages page for "Anthropology" jumped to 6 million views on Dec. 25, 2024?https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2024-12-18&end=2025-01-07&pages=Anthropology | |||
::To return to the electric aircraft question, Misplaced Pages has (of course) an article called ]. Most commercially available examples are ]s, such as the ] and ], although a few are proper light aircraft, the ] for example. A number of passenger aircraft are in the pipeline, the 10-seat ] being perhaps the nearest to actual service. ] (]) 13:43, 21 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 23:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Probably just a glitch. Such things happen all the time. ]|] 09:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
= October 20 = | |||
::Previously, a spike for views of a particular page was due to some device or other (a digital assistant?) suggesting searching for the topic as part of its default demo or a tour of its features. Obviously I can't remember any specifics but it was along those lines. So a reasonable theory is that a lot of people got a device for Christmas that did something similar, although "try asking about anthropology" seems an unlikely way to show off a new phone's AI gimmicks, but maybe. Perhaps the spike was a side-effect of whatever the gadget really said. ] ] 11:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:<small>Clearly, this is a result of extraterrestrial aliens abusing this article as a source for humanoid porn. ] and relatives are depicted in full frontal nudity which may excite the libidinous erectiles in our solar system, the Milky Way or the Andromeda Nebula.</small> --] (]) 18:42, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Average time for inauguration == | |||
::<small> Who are you to call us humanoid porn addicts, Earthling? Besides, we were only doing research. Yeah, that's it. ] (]) 21:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)</small> | |||
:::<small>Pssst I've got polaroid snaps of nude bare-naked skeletons. What do you have to swap? ] (]) 17:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)</small> | |||
= January 11 = | |||
I stopped editing about topics surrounding the President-elect of Indonesia ] for a bit. What is exactly the time for the inauguration ceremony? ] (]) 04:04, 20 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I did not readily find the time schedule for the ceremony. But, curiously, this article, , was posted "Oct 19, 2024 / 11:04 PM CDT". Since ] is ], it was posted the very same minute you posted the question. --] 05:49, 20 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Young adult novel series called Blitzkrieg == | |||
Does anybody remember who was the author of a novel series, aimed at middle and high school students called Blitzkrieg? It was about a high school football team and I think it was or were published in the 1970s or 1980s. --Donmust90-- ] (]) 00:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
= October 24 = | |||
:The series was actually called ''Blitz'' and was written by Paul Nichols (about whom we don't seem to have an article). There are some examples . --] 07:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::"Paul Nichols" is the pen name of Robert Hawks (b. 1961).<sup></sup> More about him . He has also published under his own name,<sup></sup> as well as young-adult horror under the pen name "M. T. Coffin" :).<sup></sup> In any case, neither the author nor the books appear to meet Misplaced Pages's notability criteria. --] 09:42, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Founding members of ], 27 November 1945 == | |||
= January 18 = | |||
Which 22 organisations including ] founded ] in 1945? | |||
Kind regards ] (]) 16:02, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== When and where were drawers invented? == | |||
Looking at old furniture today, I wondered when drawers were first made. I looked at our article ], and disappointingly it has absolutely nothing about their history. ] has a "History" section, but the word "drawer" does not occur in that section. | |||
When I went looking outside Misplaced Pages, it only wanted to tell me about "chests of drawers", and , for example, tells me that " it was not until the late 17th century that the use of drawers in chests emerged": it is not clear whether it is saying that drawers were a new invention, or already existed in some other kind of furniture. | |||
It occurred to me to look at desks, and I found ], which says that these were first produced in the 15th century (but does not explicitly say that these first ones contained drawers, though typical ones certainly do). | |||
] led me to ], several types of which from the Edo period are described with drawers - but that is hardly "ancient". | |||
I'm sure somebody can find better sources that will help pin it down. ] (]) 21:50, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 02:09, 18 January 2025
Wikimedia Project Page Welcome to the miscellaneous sectionof the Misplaced Pages reference desk. skip to bottom Select a section: Shortcut Want a faster answer?
Main page: Help searching Misplaced Pages
How can I get my question answered?
- Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
- Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
- Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
- Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
- Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
- Note:
- We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
- We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
- We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
- We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.
How do I answer a question?
Main page: Misplaced Pages:Reference desk/Guidelines
- The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.
January 4
Goal number one
How do you forgive and forget? (not sure if that's off-topic for the reference desk. if it is, sorry in advance.) TWOrantula (enter the web) 05:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- By deciding to. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 06:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- One can decide to forget, but will it work? --Lambiam 09:22, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Here is an essay on the topic, by a practitioner of mindfulness, that you may (or may not) find helpful. More advice: , and (written from a Christian perspective) . --Lambiam 09:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- (OR, in that I have no published sources for this, though I was taught it by others): Forgiving does not necessarily mean forgetting - it also doesn't necessarily mean condoning. It means not carrying ill will. In my experience, once I see the cost (to me) of bearing the resentment, and how illusory are the apparent benefits of doing so, it is easy to choose to let it go. ColinFine (talk) 14:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Shall we forgive the OP for forgetting that we don't offer advice?DOR (ex-HK) (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'd suggest searching the web. ←Baseball Bugs carrots→ 17:47, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- The injunction does not apply to all advice, but is aimed specifically at giving medical or legal advice. --Lambiam 23:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
NonStopGo
One of the reasons I hurt myself quite so much last May was to make sure
that I stopped for long enough to arrive at this particular point. For only
through understanding can we see how to forgive both ourselves and other
people. In forgiveness there is love ; and although we can accept forgiveness
from others, true forgiveness comes solely from within. And only if we
love ourselves can we hope to achieve that shining state of grace which
is our true birthright and to find, finally, the gate which leads out of this
vale of tears : and opens for ever into the realms of eternal light.
7th July 2005
MinorProphet (talk) 05:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Westminster Coroner's Court
I'm trying to research a sudden death that occurred in the London Borough of Merton. Please help me find information about Westminster Coroner's Court, also known as "Inner West London Coroner's Court". They appear to have no website, and publish no court listings. They claim that coroners records are closed to public access for 75 years.
But other coroners courts in the UK, for example "London Inner South Coroner’s Court", publish their court listings and say that inquests are public and anyone can attend.
Why is there are difference? Why is "London Inner South Coroner’s Court" open to the public, but "Inner West London Coroner's Court" is not? Surely all coroners courts operate under the same laws?
Thanks for your help Cylopi (talk) 12:41, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- As you can see from coroners' courts are not subject to the Freedom of Information Act. I can assure you, however, that inquests held by the Westminster coroner are as public as inquests held by any other coroner. 2A00:23D0:54D:2001:7843:31E3:192B:798 (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Where can I find unmarried men list in Science/Maths?
Like Brahmagupta, Isaac Newton, Nikola Tesla, Arthur Eddington.
I want to exclude Archimedes due to his unknown marital status, Leonardo da Vinci as he have romantic relations and Galileo Galilei who has 3 children out of wedlock. HarryOrange (talk) 14:08, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Do you have any reason to suppose that such a list exists, @HarryOrange? ColinFine (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Just to encourage celibacy HarryOrange (talk) 14:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- So, you've come here to ask people how to remove from a list that doesn't exist, some names that would probably belong only the list if it existed, because you have some private meaning of "unmarried"? ColinFine (talk) 12:56, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- If some men don't (appear to) have sexual relationships with women, they're not necessarily demonstrating celibacy - they might be otherwise inclined. Chuntuk (talk) 11:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Possibly worth noting here that the more traditional meaning of "celibacy" doesn't necessarily exclude sex, just marriage. That could have been the meaning HarryOrange was using. --Trovatore (talk) 07:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Just to encourage celibacy HarryOrange (talk) 14:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Why did you pipe the correctly-spelled "Isaac" Newton to the incorrectly-spelled "Issac" Newton? -- Jack of Oz 18:37, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- And do the same strange thing to Nikola Tesla? Cullen328 (talk) 23:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- I forget to include Paul Erdos , Charles Proteus Steinmetz HarryOrange (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- And do the same strange thing to Nikola Tesla? Cullen328 (talk) 23:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Champagne explosion
I had an unopened bottle of cheap champagne (Barefoot Rosé if that matters) left over from NYE, and about 10 minutes ago the thing spontaneously exploded. It had been just sitting there at room temperature. No serious damage but there is champange and broken glass all over the place now, and I'm in the process of cleaning it up. Are these explosions a usual occasional occurrence? I'm used to champagne bottles being thicker than regular wine bottles for obvious reasons, but this one seems on the thin side in retrospect, maybe as an economy measure. Could that be? I'm surprised it doesn't happen on store shelves if it happens at home. Thanks. 2601:644:8581:75B0:0:0:0:DA2D (talk) 18:39, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- I does happen. Sometimes a cause can be identified. When a bottle of champagne is stored in a freezer, or a fridge whose temperature setting is too low, the contents may freeze, causing it to expand. This can lead to minute cracks in the glass, weakening its strength. Thawed in a relatively warm environment, the pressure of the gas can then result in fracture. Another potential cause is premature bottling, when fermentation has not run its fill course ands the wine still contains yeast and sugar. (Almost all wine sold as "champagne" in the US, also when labelled "Brut", contains residual sugar to accommodate the local taste.) When warmed up, fermentation resumes and pressure increases. Finally, a small fraction of bottles is damaged in handling or comes with production defects, not detectable through visual inspection. --Lambiam 22:42, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. No idea about refrigeration before I bought it, but I got it off the shelf at a big supermarket, carried it home, and it sat in the exact same place in the room for several days before going kablooie. All I can think of is that carrying it home might have bumped it around or something. Oh well, no big deal in the scheme of things. 2601:644:8581:75B0:0:0:0:DA2D (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- The traditional method of making Champagne requires freezing it in the bottle, so I suppose most bottles are designed to handle that – although freezing from the bottom up is safer than top-down, as it creates no plug of ice between the liquid and the gas. If not using the traditional method, or if the wine doesn't come from the Champagne region, many countries (including all of the EU) forbid selling it under the name Champagne. The US however hasn't got that restriction.
- Wines freeze around -5°C, so accidental freezing in a fridge set too cold seems unlikely. PiusImpavidus (talk) 11:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- In this case the bottle had not been opened, but the cold liquid carbonated contents of a closed bottle may freeze upon opening due to cooling by adiabatic expansion of the CO2. --Lambiam 13:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Once upon a time soda pop used to come in reusable glass bottles, and I read somewhere that this would happen from time to time with the larger sizes. And indeed, sometime around 1980 a large bottle of Coca-Cola, probably 1.5 liters, exploded while sitting in my cupboard. --142.112.149.206 (talk) 02:51, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Organizations
Are there any international organizations headquartered in Australia, similar to UN and World Bank are headquartered in the US? --40bus (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- We have a Category:International organisations based in Australia. --Lambiam 23:05, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
- Isn't this more or less the same question that you asked a month ago? Shantavira| 09:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- An international organization is a completely different thing from a multinational company. --Viennese Waltz 11:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- yes but both questions are easily answered with even the most cursory research and 40bus here seems to have a habit of asking research questions. 208.121.35.65 (talk) 17:37, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- An international organization is a completely different thing from a multinational company. --Viennese Waltz 11:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
January 6
Replacement for my My Yahoo page
Not sure this is the correct venue, but here goes.
Yahoo have shut down all personal My Yahoo pages. For those who don't use Yahoo, your My Yahoo page was sort of your own personal webpage, where you could have various modules that interested you displayed (e.g. cartoons, horoscopes, travel, finance etc). Yahoo have closed My Yahoo down. A big feature of my personal My Yahoo page was that it had loads of links to my favourite websites. This loss is the one that is hurting most.
Any suggestions as to a replacement? Mjroots (talk) 10:15, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- MSN.com does that pretty well. --Viennese Waltz 10:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Could you explain in more detail how one can go about to create a personalized web space using MSN.com? --Lambiam 12:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- would be a start. That link is for UK users, presumably you can customize it to your own country. --Viennese Waltz 13:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Could you explain in more detail how one can go about to create a personalized web space using MSN.com? --Lambiam 12:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Perhaps one of the content curation tools listed here, some of which are free, will serve your purposes. I have no knowledge of any of these tools beyond what you find there. --Lambiam 12:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- No modules, but there is Neocities. Actually, I may misunderstand: perhaps you seek a kind of home page which is online but available to you only, mainly for collecting bookmarks. Card Zero (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- For those answering, while it appears to be a question asking how to make a basic list of links, it is not. Yahoo's links page was created by selecting modules through a GUI and then customizing the settings. For example, I could select the comics GUI and then select which comics I want to show up in my links. I don't need to know any of the URLs. I just place a check next to the comics I like. For finance, I add the module with a click and then type in the ticket symbols for the stocks I care about. It automatically creates a daily stock thumbnail with links to news articles about those stocks. So, it is true that there are many available options to create a list of links, there are not as many options to create a custom content page for multiple areas of personal interest. 68.187.174.155 (talk) 15:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- The IP is correct, but as I said above, I can live without horoscopes, comics etc. The ability of easily store links to favourite websites is the biggest loss. @Card Zero: - it doesn't have to be for me only. I think that using a subpage of my user space will fall foul of WP:NOTWEBHOST #5, even though many (but not all) of the websites are used in Misplaced Pages research. Mjroots (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Does it have to be a website in that case? Why not browser bookmarks? In fact, I believe these days some browsers will let you select bookmarks for a "start page" or "start screen" that is displayed when you open a new window/tab. And if they don't, you can probably find a browser extension that will do that. -- Avocado (talk) 17:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- The IP is correct, but as I said above, I can live without horoscopes, comics etc. The ability of easily store links to favourite websites is the biggest loss. @Card Zero: - it doesn't have to be for me only. I think that using a subpage of my user space will fall foul of WP:NOTWEBHOST #5, even though many (but not all) of the websites are used in Misplaced Pages research. Mjroots (talk) 15:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- For those answering, while it appears to be a question asking how to make a basic list of links, it is not. Yahoo's links page was created by selecting modules through a GUI and then customizing the settings. For example, I could select the comics GUI and then select which comics I want to show up in my links. I don't need to know any of the URLs. I just place a check next to the comics I like. For finance, I add the module with a click and then type in the ticket symbols for the stocks I care about. It automatically creates a daily stock thumbnail with links to news articles about those stocks. So, it is true that there are many available options to create a list of links, there are not as many options to create a custom content page for multiple areas of personal interest. 68.187.174.155 (talk) 15:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Major traffic fatality incident, Denmark, 2019
In 2019, Denmark had a minor spike in traffic fatalities. I feel that the spike is most likely the result of a single accident with multiple fatalities. However, I cannot find any news about multiple-fatality accidents in Denmark in 2019. Everything that I find is related to train accidents, which I do not think Denmark includes in "traffic fatality" counts. Can anyone find a list of accidents or news about a single large-scale accident that might skew the yearly count for 2019? 68.187.174.155 (talk) 15:25, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- First of all, where are you seeing this spike and is it a reliable source? Shantavira| 09:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- And is it even statistically significant? With unrelated events happening by chance, there will always be fluctuations in number of events by time period. Spikes will occur every now and then, entirely by chance. --Lambiam 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I found this document (pdf) which seems to go into this matter in great detail. I don't read Danish, but I ran it though Google Translate. The table on page 28 shows that there were 199 traffic-related fatalities in Denmark in 2019, which is more than the two previous years but less than some earlier years. So I agree with the above posters that there is not enough here to constitute a spike. The document doesn't list individual accidents, btw. --Viennese Waltz 14:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- The mean number of fatalities of the 10-year sample given in this Danish report is 194.9, while its estimated standard deviation is 27.3. This means that the 2019 value deviates from the mean by 0.15 sigma, which is more remarkable by how little the deviation is. --Lambiam 23:54, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I found this document (pdf) which seems to go into this matter in great detail. I don't read Danish, but I ran it though Google Translate. The table on page 28 shows that there were 199 traffic-related fatalities in Denmark in 2019, which is more than the two previous years but less than some earlier years. So I agree with the above posters that there is not enough here to constitute a spike. The document doesn't list individual accidents, btw. --Viennese Waltz 14:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- And is it even statistically significant? With unrelated events happening by chance, there will always be fluctuations in number of events by time period. Spikes will occur every now and then, entirely by chance. --Lambiam 13:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- I saw this before and perhaps you are trying to recreate it. In 2019, traffic fatalities in Denmark increased 20%. But, they were so low that it was a small bump to make that 20% jump. The reason it matters is because the increase was used as the basis to use government funding for more bicycle lanes and improving intersections. But, the increase was not statistically significant and didn't mean anything, so it should not have been used as justification for any changes. Now, from memory, it was a multi-car, weather-related accident in January that added more than 10 fatalities to the yearly count. That was overshadowed by a train accident due to the same snowstorm which killed 8 (I remember it was 8 because most new articles listed 6, but some stated that a few days later, two more bodies were found). So, my gut feeling is that you are intending to show that this "20% spike" in traffic fatalities is really a data artifact created by a single large-scale accident and not representative of general driver behavior in Denmark. Unfortunately, I do not know how to search Danish news. But, if my memory is correct, you can use the date of the well documented train accident in Denmark in 2019 to get the date of the multi-car accident and then, hopefully, find that as well. I doubt you will find it in any English-based news repository. You will have to search Danish repositories. 12.116.29.106 (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. That is what I am doing. I found multiple overblown newspaper headlines like "Biggest increase in traffic fatalities in five years! Your mind will be blown when you see the numbers!" and I am using that to demonstrate that while it is technically true that there was a 20% increase in fatalities, the proper context around that increase is that it is negligible and the result of a single event that could have happened on any other year. Basically, it is a presentation on applying context to data and how it is often done improperly. Now that I know there was a multi-vehicle traffic accident at the same time as the train accident I keep finding, I decided to read those articles and many of them comment on the car accident as well as the train accident, but I didn't read through the articles to notice previously. 68.187.174.155 (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- According to the document linked by @Viennese Waltz, there were 199 deaths in 2019, compared to 171 the year before. That's a 16% increase, not 20%. On the other hand, it's an extra 28 people - so more than the result of a single incident. It just looks like random variation in a decade (the 2010's) that saw about 200 people killed every year on Denmark's roads. This decade it's been more like 150 a year, so if they spent a lot of money in 2019 it was worth it. You can further eamine annual figures here and here. Chuntuk (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- What's 'this decade'? There tends to be some controversy especially with 2020 and 2021 figures since reduced traffic due to COVID-19 whether from lockdowns or just changes in behaviour e.g. with more working from home are often cited as reasons for reduced fatalities the. Nil Einne (talk) 10:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- According to the document linked by @Viennese Waltz, there were 199 deaths in 2019, compared to 171 the year before. That's a 16% increase, not 20%. On the other hand, it's an extra 28 people - so more than the result of a single incident. It just looks like random variation in a decade (the 2010's) that saw about 200 people killed every year on Denmark's roads. This decade it's been more like 150 a year, so if they spent a lot of money in 2019 it was worth it. You can further eamine annual figures here and here. Chuntuk (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. That is what I am doing. I found multiple overblown newspaper headlines like "Biggest increase in traffic fatalities in five years! Your mind will be blown when you see the numbers!" and I am using that to demonstrate that while it is technically true that there was a 20% increase in fatalities, the proper context around that increase is that it is negligible and the result of a single event that could have happened on any other year. Basically, it is a presentation on applying context to data and how it is often done improperly. Now that I know there was a multi-vehicle traffic accident at the same time as the train accident I keep finding, I decided to read those articles and many of them comment on the car accident as well as the train accident, but I didn't read through the articles to notice previously. 68.187.174.155 (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Neurodiverse dating site
Is there website that shows with neurodiverse person goes well with which other neurodiverse, e.g. ADHD with Autism, Autism with HPI, HPI with dylexsia etc? --Donmust90-- Donmust90 (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- For any combination of forms of neurodiversity, some persons will go well with each other, while others will not. This depends mainly on other factors, in particular the personality and personal value system of each. --Lambiam 12:57, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
- Still I would expect a weak correlation, which may or may not be better than none. —Tamfang (talk) 21:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
January 8
Anthropology Misplaced Pages page
Does anyone know why the Misplaced Pages page for "Anthropology" jumped to 6 million views on Dec. 25, 2024?https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&start=2024-12-18&end=2025-01-07&pages=Anthropology 136.26.125.34 (talk) 23:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Probably just a glitch. Such things happen all the time. Shantavira| 09:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Previously, a spike for views of a particular page was due to some device or other (a digital assistant?) suggesting searching for the topic as part of its default demo or a tour of its features. Obviously I can't remember any specifics but it was along those lines. So a reasonable theory is that a lot of people got a device for Christmas that did something similar, although "try asking about anthropology" seems an unlikely way to show off a new phone's AI gimmicks, but maybe. Perhaps the spike was a side-effect of whatever the gadget really said. Card Zero (talk) 11:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Clearly, this is a result of extraterrestrial aliens abusing this article as a source for humanoid porn. Homo erectus and relatives are depicted in full frontal nudity which may excite the libidinous erectiles in our solar system, the Milky Way or the Andromeda Nebula. --Cookatoo.ergo.ZooM (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Who are you to call us humanoid porn addicts, Earthling? Besides, we were only doing research. Yeah, that's it. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pssst I've got polaroid snaps of nude bare-naked skeletons. What do you have to swap? Philvoids (talk) 17:17, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Who are you to call us humanoid porn addicts, Earthling? Besides, we were only doing research. Yeah, that's it. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
January 11
Young adult novel series called Blitzkrieg
Does anybody remember who was the author of a novel series, aimed at middle and high school students called Blitzkrieg? It was about a high school football team and I think it was or were published in the 1970s or 1980s. --Donmust90-- Donmust90 (talk) 00:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- The series was actually called Blitz and was written by Paul Nichols (about whom we don't seem to have an article). There are some examples here. --Viennese Waltz 07:46, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- "Paul Nichols" is the pen name of Robert Hawks (b. 1961). More about him here. He has also published under his own name, as well as young-adult horror under the pen name "M. T. Coffin" :). In any case, neither the author nor the books appear to meet Misplaced Pages's notability criteria. --Lambiam 09:42, 11 January 2025 (UTC)