Misplaced Pages

Talk:Boriswave: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:46, 16 December 2024 editJohn Smith's (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers13,813 edits Seriously?: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:42, 23 December 2024 edit undoSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,571 edits Old AFD: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Boriswave closed as redirect (XFDcloser
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi |date=16 December 2024 |result='''redirect''' |page=Boriswave}}
{{Press
|author = Jack Peat
|title = ‘Boriswave’ Misplaced Pages page set up in reference to immigration surge under ex-PM
|date = December 17, 2024
|org = ]
|url =
|lang =
|quote = A “disputed” Misplaced Pages page has been set up in reference to the surge of immigration under former prime minister Boris Johnson.
|archiveurl = <!-- URL of an archived copy of the page, if the original URL becomes unavailable. -->
|archivedate = <!-- do not wikilink -->
|accessdate = December 17, 2024
}}

== Seriously? == == Seriously? ==


Line 10: Line 24:
:I think it's entering the lexicon. Maybe the renaming of the 'Brexit and COVID' section of https://en.wikipedia.org/Modern_immigration_to_the_United_Kingdom to 'Boriswave' would be better? ] (]) 13:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC) :I think it's entering the lexicon. Maybe the renaming of the 'Brexit and COVID' section of https://en.wikipedia.org/Modern_immigration_to_the_United_Kingdom to 'Boriswave' would be better? ] (]) 13:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
::Yes, and I'm sure the intent is to help drive it into the lexicon via things like this page. ] (]) 13:46, 16 December 2024 (UTC) ::Yes, and I'm sure the intent is to help drive it into the lexicon via things like this page. ] (]) 13:46, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
::These are basically the only three reputable sources that include the word. With all due respect to Max Tempers, you can't just invent a phrase from whole cloth, make a Misplaced Pages article for it, and then say "omg this is spreading". Maybe give it a few months, see if it catches on. None of the info in this article seems to be overtly wrong, it's just that the phrase isn't relevant. ] (]) 14:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 14:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
:::If the article isn't deleted then it can be renamed. After all, the "wave" didn't end after Boris Johnson left office. ] (]) 14:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Whilst I don’t think this phrase '''yet''' merits a Misplaced Pages article (I expect it will in the future), I can’t help but sense from your use of quotation marks there that you have biases in your commenting here, @]. ] (]) 18:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

== Article nominated for deletion ==

Per notice on the front page. . ] (]) 13:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:42, 23 December 2024

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 16 December 2024. The result of the discussion was redirect.
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:
  • Jack Peat (December 17, 2024). "'Boriswave' Misplaced Pages page set up in reference to immigration surge under ex-PM". The London Economic. A "disputed" Misplaced Pages page has been set up in reference to the surge of immigration under former prime minister Boris Johnson. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)

Seriously?

I don't think a single article in The Telegraph and some kunley_drukpa-adjacent Twitter chatter makes this term a thing. Immigration to the United Kingdom is a totally decent article that does everything this page does, except sans the snazzy Twitter terminology...and if you're unhappy with it, then just edit that article. Theodore Christopher (talk) 13:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Quite agree. The article should be deleted. John Smith's (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Reputable sites I found using the terminology:
https://www.adamsmith.org/blog/britains-ilr-emergency
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/10/19/britain-must-kick-its-addiction-to-migration-led-growth/
https://conservativehome.com/2024/12/12/sam-bidwell-the-immigration-slow-motion-car-crash-that-is-coming-and-how-to-stop-it/
I think it's entering the lexicon. Maybe the renaming of the 'Brexit and COVID' section of https://en.wikipedia.org/Modern_immigration_to_the_United_Kingdom to 'Boriswave' would be better? 2A02:C7C:7CCC:7A00:C862:50D2:90F7:AD5E (talk) 13:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Yes, and I'm sure the intent is to help drive it into the lexicon via things like this page. John Smith's (talk) 13:46, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
These are basically the only three reputable sources that include the word. With all due respect to Max Tempers, you can't just invent a phrase from whole cloth, make a Misplaced Pages article for it, and then say "omg this is spreading". Maybe give it a few months, see if it catches on. None of the info in this article seems to be overtly wrong, it's just that the phrase isn't relevant. Theodore Christopher (talk) 14:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC) Theodore Christopher (talk) 14:09, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
If the article isn't deleted then it can be renamed. After all, the "wave" didn't end after Boris Johnson left office. John Smith's (talk) 14:11, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
Whilst I don’t think this phrase yet merits a Misplaced Pages article (I expect it will in the future), I can’t help but sense from your use of quotation marks there that you have biases in your commenting here, @John Smith's. EPEAviator (talk) 18:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Article nominated for deletion

Per notice on the front page. . John Smith's (talk) 13:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Category:
Talk:Boriswave: Difference between revisions Add topic