| Revision as of 17:13, 8 January 2025 editDclemens1971 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers16,636 edits cmt← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:43, 16 January 2025 edit undoCryptic (talk | contribs)Administrators41,737 edits Listed at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2025 January 16 | ||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude>{{delrevxfd|date=2025 January 16|page=EV Group}}</noinclude> | |||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: var(--background-color-progressive-subtle, #F3F9FF); color: var(--color-base, inherit); margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid var(--border-color-subtle, #AAAAAA);"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:var(--color-error, red);">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''delete'''__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ] ] 17:09, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} | |||
| <div class="other-afds" style="width:33%; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: var(--background-color-interactive-subtle, #f8f9fa); color: var(--color-base, inherit); margin: 0.5em 0 0.5em 1em; padding: 0.2em; float: right; clear: right; font-size: 88%; min-width:20em; max-width: 100%">AfDs for this article: | <div class="other-afds" style="width:33%; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: var(--background-color-interactive-subtle, #f8f9fa); color: var(--color-base, inherit); margin: 0.5em 0 0.5em 1em; padding: 0.2em; float: right; clear: right; font-size: 88%; min-width:20em; max-width: 100%">AfDs for this article: | ||
| {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EV Group}} | {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EV Group}} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 20: | ||
| *'''Comment:''' To the closing admin, I have restructured the article entirely; check it before you go ahead and keep or delete it. Given the current structure, I believe the subjects meet the notability guidelines. Note: I'm no the initial editor, I just volunteered to improve it. If the resolution was to keep, kindly place an 'Improvement' tag on the article; otherwise, delete it. ] (]) <small><i><span style="color:#666;">I came from a remote place</span></i></small> 17:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | *'''Comment:''' To the closing admin, I have restructured the article entirely; check it before you go ahead and keep or delete it. Given the current structure, I believe the subjects meet the notability guidelines. Note: I'm no the initial editor, I just volunteered to improve it. If the resolution was to keep, kindly place an 'Improvement' tag on the article; otherwise, delete it. ] (]) <small><i><span style="color:#666;">I came from a remote place</span></i></small> 17:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' from nominator offering a brief analysis of the newly added sources: more ] coverage based on press releases (, , , , ) and one actual press release (). Still no ] in ] and thus no NCORP pass. ] (]) 17:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' from nominator offering a brief analysis of the newly added sources: more ] coverage based on press releases (, , , , ) and one actual press release (). Still no ] in ] and thus no NCORP pass. ] (]) 17:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' While I appreciate the above editor's efforts to improve the article, I think notability is still missing here. ] 09:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''': Per nom. Though there has been some effort to improve it, this still doesn't appear notable. ] (]) 20:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Keep''' I think after the efforts made by @], the article merits future. Also as @] too mentions, smaller things too possibly deserve a start on wikipedia. For my bit, I found this link https://news.3m.com/2008-12-22-3M-and-EV-Group-Settle-Patent-Infringement-Suit which seems to suggest this as a fair product company - whom 3M had to settle with back in 2008. Rest final decision is upto the other well-meaning reviewers too. ] (]) 10:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::That source is a press release, see ]. ] (]) 14:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::Correct it is a company's PR - but it is a competitor company - no less than a 3M - admitting publicly that they have resolved patent infringement issues with the company in question!!! How more true can it be than a competitor admitting their folly - that too in 2008 which establishes the history/pedigree of the company in question - as far as i am concerned. ] (]) 14:49, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::3M is a ] on a dispute between 3M and EV Group. To be counted toward notability it would need to be a secondary, independent, ''and'' reliable source, say a major newspaper or business newsmagazine. ] (]) 17:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::I haven't changed my mind. It still relies too heavily on primary sources. ] (]) 17:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 10:43, 16 January 2025
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2025 January 16. For an explanation of the process, see Misplaced Pages:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Owen× ☎ 17:09, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
EV Group
AfDs for this article:New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- EV Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company; fails WP:NCORP. All sourcing is WP:ORGTRIV coverage of new facility openings, etc. (); WP:USERGENERATED content (); WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS (, , , ); the company's own website and/or press releases, and other non-independent sources (, , ); WP:PRSOURCE-driven coverage in WP:TRADES publications (, , ); and a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE document (). One source does not mention the company at all (). Nothing else qualifying came up in a WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Austria. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: To the closing admin, I have restructured the article entirely; check it before you go ahead and keep or delete it. Given the current structure, I believe the subjects meet the notability guidelines. Note: I'm no the initial editor, I just volunteered to improve it. If the resolution was to keep, kindly place an 'Improvement' tag on the article; otherwise, delete it. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 17:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment from nominator offering a brief analysis of the newly added sources: more WP:TRADES coverage based on press releases (, , , , ) and one actual press release (). Still no WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS and thus no NCORP pass. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete While I appreciate the above editor's efforts to improve the article, I think notability is still missing here. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 09:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. Though there has been some effort to improve it, this still doesn't appear notable. TheBritinator (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Keep I think after the efforts made by @Cameremote, the article merits future. Also as @TheBritinator too mentions, smaller things too possibly deserve a start on wikipedia. For my bit, I found this link https://news.3m.com/2008-12-22-3M-and-EV-Group-Settle-Patent-Infringement-Suit which seems to suggest this as a fair product company - whom 3M had to settle with back in 2008. Rest final decision is upto the other well-meaning reviewers too. Jn.mdel (talk) 10:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- That source is a press release, see WP:PRSOURCE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Correct it is a company's PR - but it is a competitor company - no less than a 3M - admitting publicly that they have resolved patent infringement issues with the company in question!!! How more true can it be than a competitor admitting their folly - that too in 2008 which establishes the history/pedigree of the company in question - as far as i am concerned. Jn.mdel (talk) 14:49, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- 3M is a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE on a dispute between 3M and EV Group. To be counted toward notability it would need to be a secondary, independent, and reliable source, say a major newspaper or business newsmagazine. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Correct it is a company's PR - but it is a competitor company - no less than a 3M - admitting publicly that they have resolved patent infringement issues with the company in question!!! How more true can it be than a competitor admitting their folly - that too in 2008 which establishes the history/pedigree of the company in question - as far as i am concerned. Jn.mdel (talk) 14:49, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- I haven't changed my mind. It still relies too heavily on primary sources. TheBritinator (talk) 17:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- That source is a press release, see WP:PRSOURCE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.