Misplaced Pages

Star of Bethlehem: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:39, 25 June 2007 editCmdrObot (talk | contribs)339,230 editsm sp: till→until← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:52, 9 January 2025 edit undoJoppa Chong (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,096 edits External links: removed supercat (already included via eponymous cat) 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Biblical star revealing Christ's birth}}
] (1267-1337). The '''Star of Bethlehem''' is shown as a ] above the child. Giotto witnessed an appearance of ] in 1301.]]
{{Other uses}}
:''see also ] and ]''
] (1267–1337). The Star of Bethlehem is shown as a ] above the child. Giotto witnessed an appearance of ] in 1301.]]


The '''] of ]''', also called the '''] Star''' or the '''] Star''', was an object in the sky which revealed the birth of Jesus to the ] and later led them to a house<ref></ref> where they found the child Jesus and his mother, according to the ] narratives in the ].<ref name="Nativity"> and .</ref> The ] were men "from the east" who were inspired by the appearance of the star to travel to ] in search of a "]".<ref></ref> There they met King ] of ], who advised them that the child they sought was in Bethlehem, a nearby village. The magi then went to Bethlehem, found Jesus, paid him homage, gave gifts, and returned to their "own country."<ref></ref> The '''Star of Bethlehem''', or '''Christmas Star''',<ref>{{cite web |url=https://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast16May_1.htm |title = A Christmas Star for SOHO |access-date = 2008-07-04 |publisher = ] |url-status=dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20041224171230/https://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast16May_1.htm |archive-date = December 24, 2004}}.</ref> appears in the ] of the ] ] where "wise men from the East" (]) are inspired by the star to travel to ]. There, they meet King ] of ], and ask him:
{{blockquote|Where is ]? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:1–2|NKJV}}</ref>}}


Herod calls together his scribes and priests who, quoting ] from the ], interpret it as a prophecy that the ] would be born in ] to the south of ]. Secretly intending to find and kill the Messiah in order to preserve his own kingship, Herod invites the wise men to return to him on their way home.
] regarded the star as a miraculous sign given by God to mark the birth of the Christ (or ]). Ancient ] claimed that the star fulfilled several prophecies, including the ]. In modern times, ] have proposed various explanations for the star, including a ], a ], a ], an ], and a ] (massing of planets). The subject is a favorite at ] shows during the Christmas season,<ref name="Mosley1">Mosley, John, , ''Planetarian'', Third Quarter 1981.</ref> although the ] account suggests that the visit of the magi took place at least several months after Jesus was born.<ref>. When the magi enter the house, Jesus is a "child" and is with his mother. Thus the forty day confinement period prescribed by Jewish law has already passed.</ref> The visit was traditionally celebrated on ].<ref>, Rev. John Ratti, The Episcopal Church</ref>


The star leads them to ]' Bethlehem birthplace, where they worship him and give him gifts. The wise men are then given a divine warning not to return to Herod, so they return home by a different route.<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:11–12|NKJV}}</ref>
==Biblical narrative==
The ] states that "wise men" (] ''magoi'') arrived at the court of Herod in Jerusalem and told the king of the star:


Many ] believe the star was a ] sign. Some ] claimed that the star fulfilled a prophecy, known as the ].<ref name="Freed 2001 93">{{cite book |last=Freed |first=Edwin D. |title=The Stories of Jesus' Birth: A Critical Introduction |publisher=Continuum International |date=2001 |page=93 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sF-ZKEssEGwC|isbn=0-567-08046-3}}</ref> ]s have made several attempts to link the star to unusual celestial events, such as a ] of ] or ] and ],<ref>{{cite web |author=Telegraph |author-link=Telegraph |title=Jesus was born in June |url= https://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/christmas/3687843/Jesus-was-born-in-June-astronomers-claim.html |access-date=2011-12-14 |location=London |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=2008-12-09}}.</ref> a ], or a ].<ref>"Star of Bethlehem." Cross, F. L., ed. The ''Oxford dictionary of the Christian Church''. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005.</ref> Some modern scholars do not consider the story to be describing a historical event, but rather a ] added later to the main gospel account.<ref>For example, Paul L. Maier, "Herod and the Infants of Bethlehem", in ''Chronos, Kairos, Christos II'', ] (1998), 171; ], ''The Nativity: History and Legend'', London: Penguin, 2006, p. 22; ], ''The Historical Figure of Jesus'', 1993, p. 85; Aaron Michael Adair, "Science, Scholarship and Bethlehem's Starry Night", ''Sky and Telescope'', Dec. 2007, pp. 26–29 (reviewing astronomical theories).</ref>
{{cquote|In the time of King Herod, after Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, asking, ''Where is the child who has been born king of the ]? For we observed his star at its rising,''<ref>The ] (1611) reads "star in the East".</ref>'' and have come to pay him homage.'' When King Herod heard this, he was frightened, and all Jerusalem with him; and calling together all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Messiah was to be born.<ref> ] (1989).</ref>}}


The subject is a favorite at ] shows during the ] season.<ref name="Mosley1">{{cite web |last=John |first=Mosley |title=Common Errors in 'Star of Bethlehem' Planetarium Shows |url=http://www.ips-planetarium.org/planetarian/articles/common_errors_xmas.html |access-date=2008-06-05 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080516043233/http://www.ips-planetarium.org/planetarian/articles/common_errors_xmas.html |archive-date=2008-05-16 }}.</ref> However, most ancient sources and Church tradition generally indicate that the wise men visited Bethlehem sometime after Jesus' birth.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.christianity.com/jesus/birth-of-jesus/star-and-magi/when-did-the-magi-visit.html|last=Andrews|first=Samuel James|title=When did the Magi visit?|website=Salem Web Network|date=2020|access-date=3 February 2020}}</ref> The visit is traditionally celebrated on ] (January 6) in ].<ref>{{cite web |last=Ratti |first=John |title=First Sunday after the Epiphany |url=http://www.episcopalchurch.org/sermons_that_work_6772_ENG_HTM.htm |access-date=2008-06-05 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080613012449/http://www.episcopalchurch.org/sermons_that_work_6772_ENG_HTM.htm |archive-date=2008-06-13 }}.</ref>
The statement that Herod was "frightened" by what the magi said has led some readers to conclude that Herod did not know of the star before the magi arrived. However, a close reading suggests that Herod was frightened by their statement that the "king of the Jews" had been born rather than by the star itself. He understood this phrase to refer to the Messiah, a leader of the Jewish people whose coming was foretold in Old Testament prophecy. So he asked his advisors where the Messiah could be born.<ref>.</ref> They answered Bethlehem, birthplace of King ], and quoted the ] ].<ref>. The Old Testament version of this prophecy can be found at .</ref> The king passed this information along to the magi.<ref>.</ref>


The account in the Gospel of Matthew describes Jesus with the broader ] word {{langx|grc|παιδίον|paidíon|label=none}}, which can mean either "infant" or "child" rather than the more specific word for infant, {{langx|grc|βρέφος|bréphos|label=none}}. This possibly implies that some time has passed since the birth. However, the word {{langx|grc|παιδίον|paidíon|label=none}} is also used in the ] specifically concerning Jesus' birth and his later presentation at the temple.<ref name="Luke 2 bh">{{bibleverse|Luke|2:17, 27}}</ref> Herod I has all male Hebrew babies in the area up to age two killed in the ].
], by Jehan de Beauce, France, 16th century.]]{{cquote|Then Herod secretly called for the wise men and learned from them the exact time when the star had appeared. Then he sent them to Bethlehem, saying, ''Go and search diligently for the child; and when you have found him, bring me word so that I may also go and pay him homage.'' When they had heard the king, they set out; and there, ahead of them, went the star that they had seen at its rising, until it stopped over the place where the child was. When they saw that the star had stopped, they were overwhelmed with joy.<ref>.</ref>}}


==Matthew's narrative==
Matthew's account suggests that the magi knew from the star that the "king of the Jews" had already been born even before they arrived in Jerusalem. According to the ], Jesus was born in a stable.<ref>.</ref> By the time the magi arrived, Jesus was a child (''paidion''), not an infant (''brephos'') and he was living in a house with his mother.<ref name="Matt211"></ref> The magi presented Jesus with gifts of ], ], and ].<ref>.</ref>
], by ], France, 16th century.]]
The ] tells how the ] (often translated as "wise men", but more accurately astrologers){{sfn|Brown|1988|p=11}} arrive at the court of Herod in Jerusalem and tell the king of a star which signifies the birth of the King of the Jews:


{{blockquote|Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, {{sup|2}}"Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we have seen his star in the East, and have come to worship him." {{sup|3}}When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him; {{sup|4}}and assembling all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. {{sup|5}}They told him, "In Bethlehem of Judea; for so it is written by the prophet:
In a dream, the magi were warned not to return to Jerusalem, so they "left for their own country by another road."<ref>.</ref> When Herod realized that he had been tricked, he ordered the execution of all male children in Bethlehem age 2 and under, based on the information the magi had given him concerning the time the star first appeared.<ref>.</ref>
<poem>
{{sup|6}}'And you, O Bethlehem, in the land of Judah,
are by no means least among the rulers of Judah;
for from you shall come a ruler
who will govern my people Israel.'"</poem>


{{sup|7}}Then Herod summoned the wise men secretly and ascertained from them what time the star appeared; {{sup|8}}and he sent them to Bethlehem, saying, "Go and search diligently for the child, and when you have found him bring me word, that I too may come and worship him." {{sup|9}}When they had heard the king they went their way; and lo, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came to rest over the place where the child was. {{sup|10}}When they saw the star, they rejoiced exceedingly with great joy; {{sup|11}}and going into the house they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh.|Matthew 2:1–11, ]<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:1–11|RSV}}</ref>}}
==Interpretations and explanations==
===A fulfillment of prophecy===
Matthew is written in a traditional Jewish style called '']'', which emphasized the fulfillment of prophecy. The ancients believed that astronomical phenomena were connected to terrestrial events. Miracles were routinely associated with the birth of important people, including the ] ], as well as ] and ] heroes.<ref name="Vermes">Vermes, Geza, , Dec. 2006, '''56''' (12), pp. 23-9.</ref> The Star Prophecy<ref name="StarProphecy">.</ref> in the ] was well-known at the time that Matthew was written. It was cited by ] in reference to Emperor ].<ref>Josephus, Flavius, '']'', .</ref> ], one of the most influential early Christian theologians, discussed the connection between this prophecy and the Star of Bethlehem:


Herod is "troubled", not because of the appearance of the star, but because the Magi have told him that a "king of the Jews" had been born,<ref>{{cite book |last=Long |first=Thomas |title=Matthew |location=Westminster |publisher=John Knox Press |date=1997 |page=18}}</ref> which he understands to refer to the Messiah, a leader of the Jewish people whose coming was believed to be foretold in scripture. He asks his advisors where the Messiah would be born.<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:4|NKJV}}</ref> They answer Bethlehem, birthplace of King ], and quote the ] ].<ref group=nb>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:5–6|NKJV}}. Matthew's version is a conflation of {{bibleverse|Micah|5:2|NKJV}} and {{bibleverse|2|Samuel|5:2|NKJV}}.</ref> The king passes this information along to the Magi.<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:8|NKJV}}</ref>
{{cquote|If, then, at the commencement of new dynasties, or on the occasion of other important events, there arises a comet so called, or any similar celestial body, why should it be matter of wonder that at the birth of Him who was to introduce a new doctrine to the human race, and to make known His teaching not only to Jews, but also to Greeks, and to many of the barbarous nations besides, a star should have arisen? Now I would say, that with respect to comets there is no prophecy in circulation to the effect that such and such a comet was to arise in connection with a particular kingdom or a particular time; but with respect to the appearance of a star at the birth of Jesus there is a prophecy of ] recorded by ] to this effect: ''There shall arise a star out of ], and a man shall rise up out of ].''<ref name="StarProphecy";"Origen2">.&nbsp;Origen, '']'' , Chapter LIX.</ref>}}


In a dream, they are warned not to return to Jerusalem, so they leave for their own country by another route.<ref name="Matt212">{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:12|NKJV}}</ref> When Herod realizes he has been tricked, he ] "two years old and younger," based on the age the child could be in regard to the information the magi had given him concerning the time the star first appeared.<ref group=nb>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:16|NKJV}} This is presented as a fulfillment of a prophecy and echoes the killing of firstborn by pharaoh in {{bibleverse|Exodus|11:1–12:36|NKJV}}.</ref>
Matthew's use of the word magi connects the visitors to the magi of ] who selected ] their chief in the ].<ref>.</ref> The word is usually translated as "wise men" and refers to a person with the gift of interpreting dreams and other portents. Daniel was revered by Jews for a prophecy he made concerning the Messiah.<ref>Daniel was considered "one of the greatest prophets" because "he did not only prophecy future events, like the other prophets but specified the time of their accomplishment". (Josephus, Flavius, '']'' ). For Daniel's messianic prophecy, see .</ref> If the magi knew of Jewish prophecy, from Daniel or elsewhere, they could have "conjectured that the man whose appearance had been foretold along with that of the star, had actually come into the world," according to Origen.<ref name="Origen2">Origen, , Chapter LX.</ref>


Joseph, warned in a dream, takes his family to Egypt for their safety.<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:13–14|NKJV}}</ref> The gospel links the escape to a verse from scripture, which it interprets as a prophecy: "Out of Egypt I called my son."<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:15|NKJV}} The original is from {{bibleverse|Hosea|11:1|NKJV}}.</ref> This was a reference to the departure of the Hebrews from Egypt under ], so the quote suggests that Matthew saw the life of Jesus as recapitulating the story of the Jewish people, with Judea representing Egypt and Herod standing in for pharaoh.<ref>"An Exodus motif prevails in the entire chapter." ({{cite book |last=Kennedy |first=Joel |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=byeQn2T93LAC&q=Matthew+recapitulates+story+of+Jewish&pg=PA156 |title=Recapitulation of Israel |page=132 |access-date=2009-07-04 |publisher=Mohr Siebeck |isbn=978-3-16-149825-1 |date=2008}})</ref>
While Origen argued for a naturalistic explanation, ] viewed the star as purely miraculous: "How then, tell me, did the star point out a spot so confined, just the space of a manger and shed, unless it left that height and came down, and stood over the very head of the young child? And at this the evangelist was hinting when he said, ''Lo, the star went before them, until it came and stood over where the young Child was.''"<ref>St John Chrysostom, </ref>


After Herod dies, Joseph and his family return from Egypt,<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:10–21|NKJV}}</ref> and settle in ] in ].<ref name="Matt223">{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:23|NKJV}}</ref> This is also said to be a fulfillment of a prophecy ("He will be called a Nazorean," (NRSV) which could be attributed to Judges 13:5<ref>{{bibleverse|Judges|13:5|NKJV}}</ref> regarding the birth of ] and the ] vow. The word ''Nazareth'' is related to the word {{transliteration|he|netzer}} which means "sprout",<ref name="Hebrew meaning netzer"> Retrieved December 29, 2015.</ref> and which some Bible commentators<ref name="Matthew 2:23 commentaries"> Retrieved on December 29, 2005.</ref> think refers to Isaiah 11:1:<ref>{{bibleverse|Isaiah|11:1|NKJV}}</ref> "There shall come forth a Rod from the stem of Jesse, And a Branch shall grow out of his roots."<ref name="Isaiah 11:1 bh"> Retrieved on December 29, 2015.</ref><ref group=nb>{{bibleverse|Judges|13:5–7|NKJV}} is sometimes identified as the source for {{bibleverse|Matthew|2:23|NKJV}} because the ]'s {{lang|grc|ναζιραιον}} (Nazirite) resembles Matthew's {{lang|grc|Ναζωραῖος}} (Nazorean). However, few scholars accept the view that Jesus was a Nazirite.</ref>
The magi's choice of gifts and their trip to Jerusalem also fulfill Old Testament prophecy. ] prophesied a visit to "]" (Jerusalem) by ].<ref>.</ref> Gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh<ref name="Matt211"/> are specifically mentioned in the ] (Greek translation).<ref>.</ref>


==Explanations==
]


===An astronomical object=== ===Pious fiction===
Scholars who see the gospel nativity stories as later apologetic accounts created to establish the messianic status of Jesus regard the Star of Bethlehem as a ].<ref>{{citation |last= Brown |first=Raymond E. |title=The Birth of the Messiah |publisher=Anchor Bible Reference Library |date=1993 |page=188}}.</ref><ref>Markus Bockmuehl, This Jesus (Continuum International, 2004), p. 28; {{Citation | last=Vermes | first=Géza | author-link=Géza Vermes | title=The Nativity: History and Legend | date=2006-11-02 | publisher=Penguin Books Ltd | isbn=0-14-102446-1 | page=22}}; {{Citation | last=Sanders | first=Ed Parish | author-link=E. P. Sanders | title=The Historical Figure of Jesus | date=1993 | publisher=Allen Lane | location=London | isbn=0-7139-9059-7 | page=85}}; : A lecture in the annual October series on Radical Christian Faith at Carrs Lane URC Church, Birmingham, October 5, 2006.</ref> Aspects of Matthew's account which have raised questions of the historical event include: Matthew is the only one of the four gospels which mentions either the Star of Bethlehem or the Magi. Some scholars suggest that Jesus was born in ], and that the Bethlehem nativity narratives were later additions to the gospels intended to present his birth as the fulfillment of prophecy.<ref>Nikkos Kokkinos, "The Relative Chronology of the Nativity in Tertullian", in Ray Summers, Jerry Vardaman and others, eds., ''Chronos, Kairos, Christos II'', Mercer University Press (1998), pp. 125–26.<br />Funk, Robert W. and the Jesus Seminar, ''The Acts of Jesus: The Search for the Authentic Deeds of Jesus'', HarperSanFrancisco, 1999, {{ISBN|0-06-062979-7}}. pp. 499, 521, 533.<br />Paul L. Maier, "Herod and the Infants of Bethlehem", in ''Chronos, Kairos, Christos II'', Mercer University Press (1998), 171.<br />For Micah's prophecy, see {{bibleverse|Micah|5:2|NKJV}}.</ref>
Because the magi told Herod that they saw the star "at its rising,"<ref></ref> many readers have concluded that it was an astronomical object. Although there is no basis for the often repeated claim that the Greek text specifies a pre-dawn, or ], rising<ref name="Mosley1"/> it would be odd if professional ] felt the need to mention an ordinary nightly rising.


According to ], the Matthew account conflicts with that given in the Gospel of Luke, in which the family of Jesus already lives in Nazareth, travel to Bethlehem for the census, and return home almost immediately.<ref>], '']'', Oxford University Press 1999, p. 38.</ref>
According to Origen, the star was in "the nature of those celestial bodies which appear at times, such as comets, or those meteors which resemble beams of wood, or beards, or wine jars."<ref name="Origen3">Origen, , Chapter LVIII.</ref>


] (15th century). The Star of Bethlehem can be seen in the top right. The soldiers and castle in the background may represent the ] (1453).]]
In 1614, ] astronomer ] determined that a series of three conjunctions of the planets ] and ] occurred in 7 BC and linked this event to the Star of Bethlehem.<ref name="Mosley2">Mosley, John, , ''Planetarian'', Third Quarter 1981.</ref> Although conjunctions were important in ], Kepler was not thinking in astrological terms. He argued that a planetary conjunction could create a nova, which he linked to the Star of Bethlehem.<ref name="Mosley2"/> Modern calculations show that there was always a large gap between the two planets, so these conjunctions were not visually impressive. An ancient almanac has been found in ] which covers the events of this period, but it makes no specific reference to the conjunctions.<ref name="Kidger1">Kidger, Mark, , . For the contrary view, i.e. that the almanac does show the conjunction was considered significant, see Ashgrove, .</ref>


===Fulfillment of prophecy===
Chinese and Korean stargazers observed an object thought to be a nova or a comet around 5 BC.<ref name="Kidger2">Kidger, Mark, , .</ref> This object was observed for over seventy days with no movement recorded.<ref name="Kidger2"/> Ancient writers described comets as "hanging over" specific cities, just as the Star of Bethlehem was said to have "stood over" the "place" where Jesus was (presumably the town of Bethlehem).<ref name="Jenkins">Jenkins, R.M., , ''Journal of the British Astronomy Association'', June 2004, '''114''', pp. 336-43.</ref> This phrase was not used to describe other astronomical objects, so perhaps the tail of a comet was thought to point to a specific terrestrial location.
The ancients believed that ]. Miracles were routinely associated with the birth of important people, including the ] ], as well as ] and ] heroes.<ref name="Vermes">{{cite news |last=Vermes |first=Geza |author-link=Geza Vermes |title=The First Christmas |newspaper=History Today |volume=56 |issue=12 |pages=23–29 |date=December 2006 |url=http://www.historytoday.com/MainArticle.aspx?m=31928&amid=30235606 |access-date=2009-07-04 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071214213149/http://www.historytoday.com/MainArticle.aspx?m=31928&amid=30235606 |archive-date=2007-12-14 }}</ref>


The Star of Bethlehem is traditionally linked to the ] in the ]:
Another Star of Bethlehem candidate is ], which was visible at various times. However, it probably moved too slowly to be recognized as a planet.<ref>Curiosa, Deneb, , 2000. See also Kidger, Mark, .</ref> ] from a 6th century mosaic at a synagogue in Beit Alpha, Israel]]
{{poemquote|
I see him, but not now;
I behold him, but not near;
A Star shall come out of Jacob;
A Scepter shall rise out of Israel,
And batter the brow of Moab,
And destroy all the sons of tumult.|Numbers 24:17, NKJV<ref>{{bibleverse|Numbers|24:17|NKJV}}</ref>}}


Although possibly intended to refer to a time that was long past, since the kingdom of ] had long ceased to exist by the time the Gospels were being written, this passage had become widely seen as a reference to the coming of a Messiah.<ref name="Freed 2001 93"/> It was, for example, cited by ], who believed it referred to Emperor ].<ref>{{cite book |last=Josephus |first=Flavius |author-link=Josephus |title=The Wars of the Jews |url=https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/2850 |access-date=2008-06-07}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Lendering |first=Jona |author-link=Jona Lendering |title=Messianic claimants |url=https://www.livius.org/men-mh/messiah/messianic_claimants13.html |access-date=2008-06-05 |archive-date=2016-06-02 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160602013609/http://www.livius.org/men-mh/messiah/messianic_claimants13.html |url-status=dead }}</ref> ], one of the most influential early Christian theologians, connected this prophecy with the Star of Bethlehem:
Another recent hypothesis states that the star of Bethlehem was a supernova or hypernova occurring in the nearby Andromeda Galaxy. The author notes that a Type Ia or Ic supernova/hypernova occurring in the Andromeda Galaxy would have been visible directly overhead in the town of Bethlehem at the same time of the birth of Jesus. Although supernovae have been detected in Andromeda, it is extremely difficult to detect a supernova remnant in another galaxy, stand alone obtain an accurate date of when it occurred. <ref> The Star of Bethlehem: a Type Ia/Ic Supernova in the Andromeda Galaxy. F.J. Tipler: Dept. of Mathematics and Dept. of Physics, Tulane University; New Orleans, LA 70118. 20 March 2005., </ref>
{{blockquote|If, then, at the commencement of new dynasties, or on the occasion of other important events, there arises a comet so called, or any similar celestial body, why should it be matter of wonder that at the birth of Him who was to introduce a new doctrine to the human race, and to make known His teaching not only to Jews, but also to Greeks, and to many of the barbarous nations besides, a star should have arisen? Now I would say, that with respect to comets there is no prophecy in circulation to the effect that such and such a comet was to arise in connection with a particular kingdom or a particular time; but with respect to the appearance of a star at the birth of Jesus there is a prophecy of Balaam recorded by Moses to this effect: ''There shall arise a star out of Jacob, and a man shall rise up out of Israel.''<ref name="Origen2">{{cite web | last = Adamantius | first = Origen | title = Contra Celsum |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf04.vi.ix.i.lx.html | access-date = 2008-06-05 }}, Book I, Chapter LIX.</ref>}}


] suggested that the Magi may have decided to travel to Jerusalem when they "conjectured that the man whose appearance had been foretold along with that of the star, had actually come into the world".<ref name="Orign3">{{cite web | last = Adamantius | first = Origen | title = Contra Celsum | url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/anf04.vi.ix.i.lxi.html}}. Book I, Chapter LX.</ref>
===An astrological event===
The use of the phrase "king of the Jews" by the magi has led many writers to link the Star of Bethlehem to astrology. In ] astrology, ] was the king planet and ] was the king star.<ref name="Newman1">Newman, Robert C., , Interdisciplinary Biblical Research Institute, 2001.</ref> As they traveled from Jerusalem to Bethlehem, the star "went before" the magi and then "stood over" the place where Jesus was. In astrological interpretations, these phrases are said to refer to ] and to stationing, i.e. Jupiter appeared to reverse course for a time, then stopped, and finally resumed its normal progression<ref>Molnar, Micheal R., .</ref> (This assumes that the magi had an instrument equivalent to an ] that allowed them to detect to the motion of a planet between one night and the next.)


The Magi are sometimes called "kings" because of the belief that they fulfill prophecies in ] and ] concerning a journey to Jerusalem by gentile kings.<ref name="Isaiah">France, R.T., ''The Gospel according to Matthew: an introduction and commentary'', p. 84. See {{bibleverse|Isaiah|60:1–7|NKJV}} and {{bibleverse|Psalms|72:10|NKJV}}.</ref> Isaiah mentions gifts of gold and incense.<ref name="Isaiah606">{{bibleverse|Isaiah|60:6|NKJV}}</ref> In the ], the Greek translation of the Old Testament probably used by Matthew, these gifts are given as gold and frankincense,<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180929135716/http://ecmarsh.com/lxx-kjv/isaiah/isa_060.htm |date=2018-09-29 }} (Septuagint).</ref> similar to Matthew's "gold, frankincense, and myrrh."<ref name="Matt211">{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:11|NKJV}}</ref> The gift of myrrh symbolizes mortality, according to Origen.<ref name="Orign3" />
In 3-2 BC, there was a series of seven conjunctions, including three between ] and ] and a strikingly close conjunction between Jupiter and ] on June 17, 2 BC.<ref name="Newman2">Newman, Robert C., , Interdisciplinary Biblical Research Institute, 2001. A visual presentation is given .</ref> "The fusion of two planets would have been a rare and awe-inspiring event," according to an influential paper by Roger Sinnott.<ref>Sinnott, Roger, "Thoughts on the Star of Bethlehem," ''Sky and Telescope'', December 1968, pp. 384–386.</ref>


While Origen argued for a naturalistic explanation, ] viewed the star as purely miraculous: "How then, tell me, did the star point out a spot so confined, just the space of a manger and shed, unless it left that height and came down, and stood over the very head of the young child? And at this the evangelist was hinting when he said, "Lo, the star went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was."<ref>{{cite book |last=Schaff |first=Philip |author-link=Philip Schaff |title=St. Chrysostom: Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew |publisher=Christian Literature Publishing Co. |date=1886 |location=New York |page=36 |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf110.VI_1.html |access-date=2009-07-04 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090207183010/http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf110.VI_1.html |archive-date=2009-02-07 }}.</ref>
Astronomer Michael Molnar has proposed a link between a double occultation of Jupiter by the moon in 6 BC in ] and the Star of Bethlehem.<ref name="Molnar">Molnar, Michael R., , Rutgers University Press: 1999. ISBN 0-8135-2701-5.</ref> This event was quite close to the sun and would have been difficult to observe, even with a small ].<ref name="Kidger3">Kidger, Mark, , Cambridge Conference Correspondence, Dec. 5, 2001.</ref> Occultations of planets by the moon are quite common, but ], an astrologer to Roman Emperor ], wrote that an occultation of Jupiter in Aries was a sign of the birth of a divine king.<ref name="Molnar";"Stenger">Molnar, Michael R., , Rutgers University Press: 1999. ISBN 0-8135-2701-5.&nbsp;Stenger, Richard, , Dec. 27, 2001</ref> "When the royal star of Zeus, the planet Jupiter, was in the east this was the most powerful time to confer kingships. Furthermore, the Sun was in Aries where it is exalted. And the Moon was in very close conjunction with Jupiter in Aries," Molnar wrote.<ref name="Molnar"/> This set of conditions reoccurs every sixty years.<ref name="Molnar"/>


===Astronomical object===
A modern and exclusively astrological interpretation of Matthew's account of the star, based on the magi's role as astrologers, "decodes" the Star of Bethlehem as a rare celestial configuration that was visible only to the magi. The "star" was revealed in an astrological chart dated March 2, 5 BC. <ref>Webb, John Charles, Jr, '''' (2006).</ref>
<!-- SOCK WARNING: Hutchison's books are not reliable sources. If you add them back you will be reported to WP:SPI. -->
Although the word ''magi'' (] {{lang|grc|μαγοι}}) is usually translated as "wise men," in this context it probably means 'astronomer'/'astrologer'.{{sfn|Brown|1988|p=11}} The involvement of astrologers in the story of the birth of Jesus was problematic for the early Church, because they condemned ] as demonic{{citation needed|date= July 2021|reason=Was astrology really condemned by Christians? Did not Christian used, practiced and encouraged astrology until at least Renaissance? More sources than Tester will be needed}}; a widely cited explanation was that of ], who suggested that astrology was allowed 'only until the time of the Gospel'.<ref>{{cite book |last=Tester |first=S. J. |title=A History of Western Astrology |publisher=Boydell & Brewer |date=1987 |pages=111–112}}</ref>


====Planetary conjunction====
===A historical fiction===
In 1614, German astronomer ] determined that a series of three conjunctions of the planets ] and ] occurred in the year 7 BC.<ref name="Mosley1"/> He argued (incorrectly) that a ] could create a ], which he linked to the Star of Bethlehem.<ref name="Mosley1"/> Modern calculations show that there was a gap of nearly a degree (approximately twice a diameter of the moon) between the planets, so these conjunctions were not visually impressive.<ref name="MarkKidger">{{cite web | last = Mark | first = Kidger | title = Chinese and Babylonian Observations | url=http://www.astrosurf.com/comets/Star_of_Bethlehem/English/Chinese.htm | access-date = 2008-06-05 }}</ref> An ancient almanac has been found in ] which covers the events of this period, but does not indicate that the conjunctions were of any special interest.<ref name="MarkKidger"/> In the 20th century, Professor ], an astronomer, argued that this was an astronomical event where Jupiter and Saturn were in a triple conjunction in the constellation ].<ref>Minnesota Astronomy Review Volume 18 – Fall 2003/2004 {{cite web|url=http://www.astro.umn.edu/news/vol18.pdf |title= The Star of Bethlehem by Karlis Kaufmanis|date= 30 October 2023}}</ref><ref>Audio Version of Star of Bethlehem by Karlis Kaufmanis {{cite web |url=http://sites.google.com/site/astrologicalstarofbethlehem/ |title=The Star of Bethlehem by Karlis Kaufmanis |access-date=2011-01-03 |archive-date=2018-08-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180801055112/https://sites.google.com/site/astrologicalstarofbethlehem/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> Archaeologist and ] ] has also suggested this explanation.<ref name="Parpola">Simo Parpola, "The Magi and the Star," ''Bible Review,'' December 2001, pp. 16–23, 52, 54.</ref>
Matthew is the only one of the four ] which mentions either the Star of Bethlehem or the magi. The ] and the ] material in Luke and Matthew, considered to be the oldest and most historical material in the gospels under the doctrine of ],<ref>Head, Peter M., , Cambridge, 1997, ISBN 0-521-58488-4. For a case against Markan priority, see Peabody, David B., Lamar Cope, and Allan J. McNicol, , Trinity Press International, 2002, ISBN 1-56338-352-7. The traditional view, presented by ] and others, was that Matthew was written first and that Mark was redacted from Matthew.</ref> do not include a nativity narrative or any hint that Jesus was born in Bethlehem.<ref>The Gospels often described Jesus as "of Nazareth," but never as "of Bethlehem." Several passages suggest that neither Mark nor ] were aware of the Bethlehem nativity story or of anything outstanding about the birth of Jesus. See , , , and .</ref> The highly publicized ], sponsored by the Westar Institute, concluded that both of the nativity narratives<ref name="Nativity"/> are almost entirely unhistorical and that Jesus was probably born in ] rather than in Bethlehem.<ref>Funk, Robert W. and the Jesus Seminar, ''The Acts of Jesus: The Search for the Authentic Deeds of Jesus'', HarperSanFrancisco, 1999, ISBN 0-06-062979-7. pp. 499, 521, 533.</ref> (Other scholars have suggested ].)<ref>Kennard, J. Spencer, , Jun. 1946, '''65''' (2), pp. 131-141. states that the home of Jesus was in Capernaum. The Gospels often refer to Jesus as a ''Nazarēnos'' (]) or a ''Nazōraios'' (Nazorean), titles usually translated as "of Nazareth." Kennard argued that these forms were nonstandard in Greek and may have referred to something other than a town. Albright countered by showing how both words could have been derived from vernacular ]. (Albright, W.F., , , Dec. 1946, '''65''' (4), pp. 399-400.) In , "Nazorean" is a play on the ] word ''nazer'', literally "branch," figuratively "descendant ]]." (Miller, Fred P., )</ref>


In 3–2 BC, there was a series of seven conjunctions, including three between Jupiter and ] and a strikingly close conjunction between Jupiter and ] near Regulus on June 17, 2 BC. "The fusion of two planets would have been a rare and awe-inspiring event", according to Roger Sinnott.<ref>{{cite magazine | last = Sinnott | first = Roger | title = Thoughts on the Star of Bethlehem | magazine = Sky and Telescope | date = December 1968 | pages = 384–86 }}</ref> Another Venus–Jupiter conjunction occurred earlier in August, 3 BC.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.al.com/living/index.ssf/2015/06/is_this_what_the_star_of_bethl.html| title=Is this what the Star of Bethlehem looked like? Venus, Jupiter put on a show | first =Greg | last = Garrison | date=7 March 2019 | access-date=3 February 2020 | publisher=Alabama Media Group}}</ref> While these events occurred after the generally accepted date of 4 BC for the ], they did occur during the reign of ] (who ] the ]), and early Christian historians ] and ] calculated the birth of Jesus to 3-2 BC.<ref>{{cite book | author = Eusebius | title = ] | chapter = Book I, Chapter 5. The Time of his Appearance among Men | chapter-url = https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/250101.htm | quote = 2. It was in the forty-second year of the reign of Augustus and the twenty-eighth after the subjugation of Egypt and the death of Antony and Cleopatra, with whom the dynasty of the Ptolemies in Egypt came to an end, that our Saviour and Lord Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem of Judea }}</ref><ref>{{cite book | author = ] | title = ] | chapter = Book 1, Chapter XXI: The Jewish Institutions and Laws of Far Higher Antiquity Than the Philosophy of the Greeks | chapter-url = http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/clement-stromata-book1.html | quote = And our Lord was born in the twenty-eighth year ]], when first the census was ordered to be taken in the reign of Augustus. }}</ref> Since the conjunction would have been seen in the west at sunset it could not have led the magi south from Jerusalem to Bethlehem.<ref>{{cite book |last=Kidger |first=Mark |title=Astronomical Enigmas: Life on Mars, the Star of Bethlehem, and Other Milky Way Mysteries |publisher=] |location =Baltimore |date=2005 |page=63 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DKYJaBd-znAC |isbn=0-8018-8026-2}}</ref>
As there are no records of failed magi searches, the magi in Matthew seem to have witnessed an event that allowed them to determine with certainty that a king had been born.<ref name="Jenkins">Jenkins, R.M., , ''Journal of the British Astronomy Association'', June 2004, '''114''', pp. 336-43.</ref> But a nova, a comet, or a conjunction would not qualify as a unique event. Moreover, several of the astronomical explanations that have been put forward are equally plausible as birth signifiers.<ref name="Jenkins"/> The magi traveled a great distance, but when they arrive in Bethlehem they merely gave some gifts. They served the storyteller's purpose of glorifying Jesus, but their motives remain obscure.


====Double occultation on Saturday (Sabbath) April 17, 6 BC ====
Instead of focusing on the events around the time of the birth of Jesus, the historical fiction approach considers what sources were available to Matthew when he composed his gospel (AD 85-90) and what events might have influenced his thinking. His description of the miracles and portents attending the birth of Jesus echoed stories concerning the birth of ] (63 BC), the first Roman emperor.<ref>The god ] was said to have conceived with Augustus' mother and there was a "public portent" indicating that a king of Rome would soon be born. (], C. Tranquillus, ''The Lives of the Twelve Caesars'', , Chapter 94.)</ref> Linking a birth to the first appearance of a star was consistent with the popular belief each person's life was linked to a particular star.<ref>], ], 28</ref> Magi and astronomical events were linked in the public mind by the visit to ] of a delegation of magi at the time of a spectacular appearance of ] in AD 66.<ref name="Jenkins"/> This delegation was led by King Tiridates of ], who came seeking confirmation of his title from Emperor ]. Ancient historian ] wrote that, "The King did not return by the route he had following in coming,"<ref name="Jenkins"/> a line echoed in Matthew's account.<ref></ref>
Astronomer Michael R. Molnar argues that the "star in the east" refers to an astronomical event with astrological significance in the context of ].<ref name=Weintraub></ref> He suggests a link between the Star of Bethlehem and a double occultation of Jupiter by the Moon on March 20 and April 17 of 6 BC in ], particularly the second occultation on April 17.<ref name="Molnar">{{citation |last=Molnar |first=Michael R. |url=http://www.eclipse.net/~molnar/index.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/19991012062556/http://eclipse.net/%7Emolnar/index.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=1999-10-12 |title=The Star of Bethlehem: The Legacy of the Magi |publisher=Rutgers University Press |date=1999 |isbn=0-8135-2701-5 |access-date=2009-07-04 |pages=86, 89, 106–07 }}.</ref><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Eiland |first=Murray |date=2019 |others=Interview with Michael R. Molnar |title=The Star of Bethlehem, Jupiter, and imperial astrology |url=https://www.academia.edu/80960677 |journal=Antiqvvs |issue=Christmas Supplement |pages=3–6}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pattern |first1=Michael |title=Identifying the Star of Bethlehem |journal=The Journal of the Faculty of Religious Studies, McGill |date=2005 |volume=33 |page=290}}</ref><ref>For a similar interpretation, see Minnesota Astronomy Review Volume 18 – Fall 2003/2004 {{cite web|url=http://www.astro.umn.edu/news/vol18.pdf |title= The Star of Bethlehem by Karlis Kaufmanis|date= 30 October 2023}}</ref> ]s of planets by the Moon are quite common, but ], an astrologer to Roman Emperor ], wrote that an occultation of Jupiter in Aries was a sign of the birth of a divine king.<ref name="Molnar"/><ref name="Stenger">{{cite web |last=Stenger |first=Richard |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2001/TECH/space/12/27/star.coverup/index.html |title=Was Christmas star a double eclipse of Jupiter? |date=December 27, 2001 |access-date=2009-07-04 |work=CNN}}</ref> He argues that Aries rather than Pisces was the zodiac symbol for Judea, a fact that would affect previous interpretations of astrological material. Molnar's theory was debated by scientists, theologians, and historians during a colloquium on the Star of Bethlehem at the Netherlands' ] in October 2014. Harvard astronomer ] supports Molnar's explanation but noted technical questions.<ref name=Govier></ref> "The gospel story is one in which King Herod was taken by surprise," said Gingerich. "So it wasn't that there was suddenly a brilliant new star sitting there that anybody could have seen something more subtle."<ref name=Govier/> Astronomer David A. Weintraub says, "If Matthew's wise men actually undertook a journey to search for a newborn king, the bright star didn't guide them; it only told them when to set out."<ref name=Weintraub/>


There is an explanation given that the events were quite close to the Sun and would not have been visible to the naked eye.<ref name="Kidger3">{{citation |last=Kidger |first=Mark |url=http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/ccc/cc120501.html |title=The Star of Bethlehem |work=Cambridge Conference Correspondence |date=December 5, 2001 |access-date=2007-07-04 |archive-date=2016-04-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160403212241/http://abob.libs.uga.edu/bobk/ccc/cc120501.html |url-status=dead }}.</ref>
==Determining the year Jesus was born==
] (1453).]]


====Regulus, Jupiter, and Venus====
Which event is most plausible as an explanation of the Star of Bethlehem depends on which year is accepted as the year Jesus was born. Both Luke and Matthew wrote that Jesus was born when Herod was king. According to Josephus, Herod died shortly after a lunar ]. This is usually identified as the eclipse of March 13, 4 BC. Jesus was born sometime between the first appearance of the Star of Bethlehem and the time the magi arrived in Herod's court. As Herod ordered the execution of boys age 2 and under, the star must have made its first appearance within the previous two years. This line of reasoning yields a date of 6-4 BC for the nativity.
{{synthesis|section|date=December 2023}}{{original research section|date=December 2023}}
Attorney ] examined the biblical account in the Gospel of Matthew, chapter 2<ref name="Matt 2 all bg amp"> Retrieved on December 22, 2015.</ref>{{synthesis inline|date=December 2023}} and found the following nine qualities of Bethlehem's Star:<ref name="USA Today Lawton08"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref><ref name="abc13 Herzog07"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref> It signified birth, it signified kingship, it was related to the Jewish nation, and it rose "in the East";<ref name="Matt 2:2 bh"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref>{{synthesis inline|date=December 2023}} King Herod had not been aware of it;<ref name="Matt2:3 bh"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref>{{synthesis inline|date=December 2023}} it appeared at an exact time;<ref name="Matt2:7 bh"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref>{{synthesis inline|date=December 2023}} it endured over time;<ref name="Matt 2:1-10allbhswc"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref>{{synthesis inline|date=December 2023}} and, according to Matthew,<ref name= "Matt2:9"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref>{{synthesis inline|date=December 2023}} it was in front of the Magi when they traveled south from Jerusalem to Bethlehem, and then stopped over Bethlehem.<ref name="Ch Hd Ireland"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref>


Using the ], and an article<ref name="Imprimis Chester 1993"/> written by ] Craig Chester<ref name="EthicsD Cliff 2009"> Retrieved on January 2, 2016.</ref> based on the work of archeologist and historian ],<ref name="Chicago Tribune Chester"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref><ref name="Martin book"> Retrieved on February 12, 2016. {{ISBN|9780945657880}}</ref> Larson thinks all nine characteristics of the Star of Bethlehem are found in events that took place in the skies of 3–2 BC.<ref name="abc13 Herzog07"/><ref name="R&E Lawton 2007"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref> Highlights<ref name="NBC Rao 2011"> Includes a brief interactive at the bottom, "What's the story behind the Star?" showing retrograde motion and the 3–2 BC planetary conjunctions. Retrieved on January 2, 2016.</ref> include a ] of ], called the king planet, with the fixed star ], called the king star, starting in September 3 BC.<ref name="SP St dance coronation"> Retrieved December 22, 2015.</ref><ref name="BP2007"> Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref> Larson believes that may be the time of Jesus' conception.<ref name="R&E Lawton 2007"/>
One problem with the 6-4 BC date is that there was no ] at that time, a key element in Luke's nativity narrative. Some modern authors identify Luke's worldwide census with a mass oath taking that occurred in 3-2 BC when Augustus was given the title "father of the nation."<ref name="Mosley1"/> Luke wrote that Jesus was "about thirty" when he began his ministry in AD 29,<ref>, .</ref> which yields a birth year of 3-2 BC.<ref name="Maranatha">Maranatha Church, Inc, , 1998.</ref> There were also two lunar eclipses in 1 BC, so it is possible that Herod died at that time.<ref name="Pratt1">Pratt, John, , ''Planetarian'', Dec. 1990, '''19''' (4), pp. 8-14.</ref> However, coins issued by Herod's successors show that they dated their reigns as beginning in 4 BC.<ref name="Pratt2">Pratt, John, , ''Planetarian'', Dec. 1990, '''19''' (4), pp. 8-14. Pratt suggested that a regent was appointed in 4 BC and that Herod's successors dated their reigns from this event.</ref>

By June of 2 BC, nine months later, the human gestation period, Jupiter had continued moving in its ] around the Sun and appeared in close ] with ]<ref name="BP2007"/> in June of 2 BC.<ref name="SP Westward leading"> Retrieved December 22, 2015.</ref> In ] Jupiter is called {{transliteration|he|Sedeq}}, meaning "righteousness", a term also used for the ], and suggested that because the ] Venus represents love and fertility, so Chester had suggested astrologers would have viewed the close conjunction of Jupiter and Venus as indicating a coming new king of Israel, and Herod would have taken them seriously.<ref name="Chicago Tribune Chester"/> Astronomer Dave Reneke independently found the June 2 BC planetary conjunction, and noted it would have appeared as a "bright beacon of light".<ref name="Telegraph Reneke 08"> Retrieved on December 22, 2015.</ref> According to Chester, the disks of Jupiter and Venus would have appeared to touch<ref name="Imprimis Chester 1993"/> and there has not been as close a Venus-Jupiter conjunction since then.<ref name="Chicago Tribune Chester"/>

Jupiter next continued to move and then stopped in its ] on December 25 of 2 BC over the town of Bethlehem.<ref name="BP2007"/>{{clarify|reason=If it stopped, it stopped from the point of view of everyone on the planet|date=December 2023}}{{unreliable source?|reason=A religious website is not a reliable source for dating astronomical events|date=December 2023}} Since planets in their ]s have a "stationary point",<ref name="Imprimis Chester 1993"> Originally presented at Hillsdale College during fall 1992. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.</ref><ref name="Chicago Tribune Chester"/> a planet moves eastward through the stars but, "As it approaches the opposite point in the sky from the sun, it appears to slow, come to a full stop, and move backward (westward) through the sky for some weeks. Again it slows, stops, and resumes its eastward course," said Chester.<ref name="Imprimis Chester 1993"/> The date of December 25 that Jupiter appeared to stop while in ] took place in the season of ],<ref name="Imprimis Chester 1993"/> and is the date later chosen to celebrate ].<ref name="BP2007"/><ref name="Hist Christmas 12-25"> Retrieved on December 22, 2015.</ref>

====Heliacal rising====
] from a 6th-century mosaic at a synagogue in ], Israel]]
The Magi told Herod that they saw the star "in the East,"<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:2|NKJV}}</ref> or according to some translations, "at its rising",<ref name="rising">. ].</ref> which may imply the routine appearance of a constellation, or an ]. One theory interprets the phrase in Matthew 2:2, "in the east," as an astrological term concerning a "]." This translation was proposed by Edersheim<ref>Edersheim, Alfred. The Life and times of Jesus the Messiah. Peabody, (MA: Hendrickson, 1993), several references, chapter 8.</ref> and Heinrich Voigt, among others.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Adair |first=Aaron |date=2013 |title=The Star of Bethlehem: A Skeptical View (Kindle Edition – location 1304) |publisher=Onus Books |isbn=978-0956694867}}</ref> The view was rejected by the philologist ] (1867–1924). Two modern translators of ancient astrological texts insist that the text does not use the technical terms for either a heliacal or an acronycal rising of a star. However, one concedes that Matthew may have used layman's terms for a rising.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Roberts |first=Courtney |date=2007 |title=The Star of the Magi |publisher=Career Press |pages=120–21 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=9z_0nQEACAAJ&q=editions:-hQLa5bJEgsC |isbn=978-1564149626}}</ref>

====Comet====
Other writers highly suggest that the star was a ].<ref name="MarkKidger"/> ] was visible in 12 BC and another object, possibly a comet or ], was seen by Chinese and Korean stargazers in about 5 BC.<ref name="MarkKidger"/><ref>Colin Humphreys, , in ''Science and Christian Belief'' 5 (1995), 83–101.</ref> This object was observed for over seventy days, possibly with no movement recorded.<ref name="MarkKidger"/> Ancient writers described comets as "hanging over" specific cities, just as the Star of Bethlehem was said to have "stood over" the "place" where Jesus was (the town of Bethlehem).<ref name="Jenkins">{{cite news |last=Jenkins |first=R.M. |url=http://www.bristolastrosoc.org.uk/www/media/Publications_BAS_Documents/the_star_of_bethlehem.pdf |title=The Star of Bethlehem and the Comet of AD 66 |work=Journal of the British Astronomy Association |date=June 2004 |number=114 |pages=336–43 |access-date=2016-12-23 |archive-date=2018-10-05 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181005222753/http://www.bristolastrosoc.org.uk/www/media/Publications_BAS_Documents/the_star_of_bethlehem.pdf |url-status=dead }}</ref> However, this is generally thought unlikely as in ancient times comets were generally seen as bad omens.<ref>Mark Kidger, ''Astronomical Enigmas: Life on Mars, the Star of Bethlehem, and Other Milky Way Mysteries'', (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), page 61.</ref> The comet explanation has been recently promoted by Colin Nicholl. His theory involves a hypothetical comet which could have appeared in 6 BC.<ref>Colin R. Nicholl. 2015. ''The Great Christ Comet: Revealing the True Star of Bethlehem.'' Crossway.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2015/december/what-kind-of-astronomical-marvel-was-star-of-bethlehem.html|title=What Kind of Astronomical Marvel was the Star of ... – Christianity Today|author=Interview Greg Cootsona|work=ChristianityToday.com|date=23 November 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/book-reviews-great-christ-comet-revealing-the-true-star-of-bethlehem|title=The Great Christ Comet: Revealing the True Star of Bethlehem|author=Guillermo Gonzalez|work=TGC – The Gospel Coalition|date=16 June 2017 }}</ref>

====Supernova====
Physicist ] has proposed that the star of Bethlehem was a ] or ] occurring in the nearby ].<ref name=tipler>{{cite journal | author=] |date=2005 | title=The Star of Bethlehem: A Type Ia/Ic Supernova in the Andromeda Galaxy? | url=http://math.tulane.edu/~tipler/starofbethlehem.pdf | journal=] | volume=125 |pages=168–74 | bibcode=2005Obs...125..168T}}</ref> Although it is difficult to detect a supernova remnant in another galaxy, or obtain an accurate date of when it occurred, supernova remnants have been detected in Andromeda.<ref>{{cite journal | title=ROSAT HRI Observations of M31 Supernova Remnants |author1=Eugene A. Magnier |author2=Francis A. Primini |author3=Saskia Prins |author4=Jan van Paradijs |author5=Walter H. G. Lewin | date=1997 | journal=The Astrophysical Journal | volume= 490 | issue=2 | pages=649–52 | doi=10.1086/304917|bibcode=1997ApJ...490..649M |s2cid=54162850 |url=https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/1202169/2567_25290y.pdf }}</ref>

Another theory is the more likely supernova of February 23 4 BC, which is now known as ] or the Hulse-Taylor Pulsar. It is said to have appeared in the constellation of ], near the intersection of the winter ] and the equator of date. The nova was "recorded in China, Korea, and Palestine" (probably meaning the Biblical account).<ref>{{Cite journal|url=http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1978JRASC..72...65M/0000066.000.html|bibcode = 1978JRASC..72...65M|title = The Christmas Star as a Supernova in Aquila|last1 = Morehouse|first1 = A. J.|journal = Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada|year = 1978|volume = 72|page = 65}}</ref>

A nova or comet was recorded in China in 4 BC. "In the reign of Ai-ti, in the third year of the Chien-p'ing period. In the third month, day {{transliteration|zh|chi-yu}}, there was a rising {{transliteration|zh|po}} at Hoku" (Han Shu, The History of the Former Han Dynasty). The date is equivalent to April 24, 4 BC. This identifies the date when it was first observed in China. It was also recorded in Korea: "In the fifty-fourth year of Hyokkose Wang, in the spring, second month, day {{transliteration|ko|chi-yu}}, a {{transliteration|ko|po-hsing}} appeared at Hoku" (Samguk Sagi, The Historical Record of the Three Kingdoms). The Korean text may have been corrupted because Ho (1962) points out that "the {{transliteration|ko|chi-yu}} day did not fall in the second month that year but on the first month" (February 23) and on the third month (April 24). The original must have read "day {{transliteration|ko|chi-yu}}, first month" (February 23) or "day {{transliteration|ko|chi-yu}}, third month" (April 24). The latter would coincide with the date in the Chinese records although professor Ho suggests the date was "probably February 23, 4 BC."<ref>{{Cite journal|url=http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=2005JRASC..99...87M&db_key=AST&page_ind=1&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_VIEW&classic=YES|bibcode = 2005JRASC..99...87M|title = The Star on Roman Coins|last1 = McIvor|first1 = Robert S.|journal = Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada|year = 2005|volume = 99|issue = 3|page = 87}}</ref>

==Relating the star historically to Jesus' birth==
{{See also|Chronology of Jesus}}
If the story of the Star of Bethlehem described an actual event, it might identify the year Jesus was born. The Gospel of Matthew describes the birth of Jesus as taking place when Herod was king.<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:1|NKJV}}</ref><ref>{{bibleverse|Luke|2:2|NKJV}}</ref> According to Josephus, Herod died after a lunar ]<ref>Josephus, ''Antiquities'' XVII:7:4.</ref> and before a ].<ref name = "Josephus 17.9.3"> Retrieved on March 16, 2016.</ref><ref name = "Josephus WAR 2.1.3"> Retrieved on March 16, 2016.</ref> Some scholars suggested dates in 5 BC, because it allows seven months for the events Josephus documented between the lunar eclipse and the Passover rather than the 29 days allowed by lunar eclipse in 4 BC.<ref name="Herod4BC">Timothy David Barnes, "The Date of Herod’s Death," ''Journal of Theological Studies'' ns 19 (1968), 204–19.

P. M. Bernegger, "Affirmation of Herod’s Death in 4 B.C.," ''Journal of Theological Studies'' ns 34 (1983), 526–31.</ref><ref name = "Finegan Handbook 300 1998">Finegan, Jack. ''Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible''. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998. p. 300. {{ISBN|1565631439}}</ref> Others suggest it was an eclipse in 1 BC.<ref name = "Steinmann Abraham 219-256">Andrew Steinmann, ''From Abraham to Paul: A Biblical Chronology''. (St. Louis, MO: Concordia Pub. House, 2011), Print. pp. 219–56.</ref><ref name = "Filmer Chronology 283-298">W.E. Filmer, "The Chronology of the Reign of Herod the Great". ''The Journal of Theological Studies'', 1966. 17(2): pp. 283–98.</ref><ref name = "Finegan Handbook 238-278">Finegan, Jack. ''Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible''. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998, 2015. pp. 238–79.</ref> The narrative implies that Jesus was born sometime between the first appearance of the star and the appearance of the Magi at Herod's court. That the king is said to have ordered the execution of boys two years of age and younger implies that the Star of Bethlehem appeared within the preceding two years. Some scholars date the birth of Jesus as 6–4 BC,<ref name="BritJesus">{{cite book | title=Jesus Christ | publisher=Encyclopædia Britannica | location=Chicago | url=http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/303091/Jesus-Christ | date=2010}}</ref> while others suggest Jesus' birth was in 3–2 BC.<ref name="Steinmann Abraham 219-256"/><ref name="Filmer Chronology 283-298"/>
The Gospel of Luke says the census from Caesar Augustus took place when ] was governor of Syria.<ref name="Luke 2:2 parallel Bible Hub"> Retrieved on March 3, 2016.</ref> Tipler suggests this took place in AD 6, nine years after the death of Herod, and that the family of Jesus left Bethlehem shortly after the birth.<ref name=tipler/> Some scholars explain the apparent disparity as an error on the part of the author of the Gospel of Luke,<ref>Ralph Martin Novak, ''Christianity and the Roman Empire: background texts'' (Continuum International, 2001), p. 293.</ref><ref>Raymond E. Brown, ''Christ in the Gospels of the Liturgical Year'', (Liturgical Press, 2008), p. 114. See, for example, James Douglas Grant Dunn, Jesus Remembered, (Eerdmans, 2003) p. 344. Similarly, Erich S. Gruen, 'The expansion of the empire under Augustus', in ''The Cambridge ancient history'' Volume 10, p. 157, Geza Vermes, ''The Nativity'', Penguin 2006, p. 96, ] and E. P. Sanders, 'Jesus from the Jewish point of view', in ''The Cambridge History of Judaism'' ed William Horbury, vol 3: the Early Roman Period, 1984, Anthony Harvey, ''A Companion to the New Testament'' (Cambridge University Press 2004), p. 221, Meier, John P., '']''. Doubleday, 1991, v. 1, p. 213, ] ''The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke''. London: G. Chapman, 1977, p. 554, ], pp. 166–67, {{cite conference | first = Fergus | last = Millar | author-link = Fergus Millar | title = Reflections on the trials of Jesus | book-title = A Tribute to Geza Vermes: Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History (JSOT Suppl. 100) | pages = 355–81 | publisher = JSOT Press | year = 1990 | location = Sheffield}} repr. in {{cite journal | last = Millar | first = Fergus | author-link = Fergus Millar | title = The Greek World, the Jews, and the East | journal = Rome, the Greek World and the East | volume = 3 | pages = 139–63 | publisher = University of North Carolina Press | year = 2006}}</ref> concluding that he was more concerned with creating a symbolic narrative than a historical account,<ref>Marcus J. Borg, ''Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time: The Historical Jesus and the Heart of Contemporary Faith'', (HarperCollins, 1993), p. 24.</ref> and was either unaware of, or indifferent to, the chronological difficulty.<ref>Elias Joseph Bickerman, Studies in Jewish and Christian History, p. 104.</ref>

However, there is some debate among Bible translators about the correct reading of ] ({{lang|grc|"Αὕτη ἀπογραφὴ πρώτη ἐγένετο ἡγεμονεύοντος τῆς Συρίας Κυρηνίου"}}).<ref name="Luke 2:2 Bible Hub commentaries"> Retrieved on March 3, 2016.</ref> Instead of translating the registration as taking place "when" Quirinius was governor of Syria, some versions translate it as "before"<ref name = "Wright Bible Luke 2:2">Wright, N. T. 2011. ''The Kingdom New Testament: A Contemporary Translation.'' Luke 2:2. New York, HarperOne. {{ISBN|978-0062064912}}</ref><ref name = "Luke 2:2 Biblegateway OJB"> Retrieved on March 3, 2016.</ref> or use "before" as an alternative,<ref name="Luke 2:2 Biblegateway NIV"> Retrieved on March 3, 2016.</ref><ref name = "Luke 2:2 Biblegateway ESV"> Retrieved on March 3, 2016.</ref><ref name="Luke 2:2 Biblegateway HSCB"> Retrieved on March 3, 2016.</ref> which ], ], ] and others have suggested may be the correct translation.<ref>Brindle, Wayne. "The Census And Quirinius: Luke 2:2." JETS 27/1 (March 1984) 43–52. Other scholars cited in Brindle's article include A. Higgins, N. Turner, P. Barnett, I. H. Marshall and C. Evan.</ref> While not in agreement, ] also acknowledged that such a translation can be justified grammatically.<ref>Emil Schürer, Géza Vermès, and Fergus Millar, ''The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ'' (175 B.C.–A.D. 135), (Edinburgh: Clark, 1973 and 1987), 421.</ref> According to ], the tax census conducted by the Roman senator Quirinius particularly irritated the Jews, and was one of the causes of the ] movement of armed resistance to Rome.<ref name = "Josephus 18.1.1"> Retrieved on March 3, 2016.</ref> From this perspective, Luke may have been trying to differentiate the census at the time of Jesus' birth from the tax census mentioned in ] 5:37<ref name = "Acts 5:37 on Bible Hub"> Retrieved on March 16, 2016.</ref> that took place under Quirinius at a later time.<ref name = "Vincent's Luke 2"> Retrieved on March 16, 2016.</ref> One ancient writer identified the census at Jesus' birth, not with taxes, but with a universal pledge of allegiance to the emperor.<ref>Paulus Orosius, ''Historiae Adversus Paganos'', and .</ref>

Jack Finegan noted some early writers' reckoning of the regnal years of Augustus are the equivalent to 3/2 BC, or 2 BC or later for the birth of Jesus, including ] (3/2 BC), ] (3/2 BC), ] (3/2 BC), ] (3/2 BC), ] (3/2 BC), ] (3/2 BC), ] (3/2 BC), ] (3/2 BC), ] (3/2 BC), ] (3 BC), ] (2 BC), ] (1 BC), and ] (AD 1).<ref name = "Finegan Handbook 279-292">Finegan, Jack. ''Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible''. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998. pp. 279–92.</ref> Finegan places the death of Herod in 1 BC, and says if Jesus was born two years or less before Herod the Great died, the birth of Jesus would have been in 3 or 2 BC.<ref name = "Finegan Handbook page 301">Finegan, Jack. ''Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible''. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998. p. 301.</ref> Finegan also notes the ] reckoned Jesus's birth with the equivalent of 4 BC or AD 9.<ref name = "Finegan Handbook 289-290">Finegan, Jack. ''Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible''. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998. pp. 289–90.</ref>

==Religious interpretations==

===Catholicism===
The ] has no say on the Star of Bethlehem, except that it led the Magi to Jesus.<ref></ref> Various theologians have speculated on the star's nature: star, angel, light, person, bird, illusion, hallucination, natural phenomenon, etc.<ref></ref>

===Eastern Orthodoxy===
] of the Nativity. The Star of Bethlehem is depicted at the center top as a dark semicircle, with a single ray coming down.]]
In the ], the Star of Bethlehem is interpreted as a miraculous event of symbolic and pedagogical significance, regardless of whether it coincides with a natural phenomenon; a sign sent by God to lead the ] to the ].{{citation needed|date=March 2016}} This is illustrated in the ] of the Nativity:

{{poemquote|
Your birth, O Christ our God,
dawned the light of knowledge upon the earth.
For by Your birth ]
were taught by a star
to worship You, the Sun of Justice,
and to know You, Orient from on High.
O Lord, glory to You.<ref>{{cite web | title = Hymns of the Feast| url = http://www.goarch.org/special/listen_learn_share/nativity | work = Feast of the Nativity of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ | publisher = ] | date = 2009}}</ref>}}

In Orthodox ], the Star of Bethlehem is often depicted not as golden, but as a dark ], a semicircle at the top of the icon, indicating the ] of ], with a ray pointing to "the place where the young child lay" (Matthew 2:9).<ref>{{bibleverse|Matthew|2:9|KJV}}</ref> Sometimes the faint image of an angel is drawn inside the aureola.

] founded the monastery of ] on ] after seeing a star he identified with the Star of Bethlehem.<ref> at oca.org, accessed 31 October 2017.</ref>

===The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints===
] members believe that the Star of Bethlehem was an actual astronomical event visible the world over.<ref>{{cite journal |title= Birth of the Messiah |journal= ] |date=December 1997 |first= Paul Thomas |last= Smith |url= https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/1997/12/birth-of-the-messiah?lang=eng }}</ref> In the 1830 ], which they believe contains writings of ancient prophets, ] prophesies that a new star will appear as a sign that Jesus has been born, and ] later writes about the fulfillment of this prophecy.<ref>{{lds|Helaman|hel|14|5}}; {{lds|3 Nephi|3-ne|1|21}}</ref>

===Jehovah's Witnesses===
Members of ] believe that the "star" was a vision or sign created by ], rather than a sign from God. This is because it led the pagan astrologers first to Jerusalem where King Herod consequently found out about the birth of the "king of the Jews", with the result that he attempted to have Jesus killed.<ref></ref>

===Seventh-day Adventist===
In her 1898 book, '']'', ] states "That star was a distant company of shining angels, but of this the wise men were ignorant."<ref>The Desire of Ages, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201126050741/https://text.egwwritings.org/publication.php?pubtype=Book&bookCode=DA&lang=en&collection=2&section=4&pagenumber=60%2F |date=2020-11-26 }}.</ref>

==Depiction in art==
], 1860]]
Paintings and other pictures of the ] may include a depiction of the star in some form. In the fresco by ], it is depicted as a comet. In the ] designed by ] (and in ]), the star is held by an angel.

The colourful star lantern known as a {{lang|fil|]}} is a cherished and ubiquitous symbol of Christmas for ], its design and light recalling the star. In its basic form, the {{lang|fil|paról}} has five points and two "tails" that evoke rays of light pointing the way to the baby Jesus, and candles inside the lanterns have been superseded by electric illumination.

In the ] in Bethlehem, a silver star with 14 undulating rays marks the location traditionally claimed to be that of Jesus' birth.
]
In European textiles a common eight-pointed star design is known as the Holy Star of Bethlehem. The design has been used in stone, metal, wood-work and embroidery in the Middle East since antiquity and is one of the oldest patterns in patterns in Palestinian ].<ref>{{Cite book |last=Munayyer |first=Hanan Karaman |title=Traditional Palestinian Costume - Origins and Evolution |publisher=Interlink Publishing Group Incorporated |year=2020 |isbn=9781623719241 |language=English}}</ref> In 2019 US congresswoman ] was sworn in wearing a ] that featured the design.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Zraick |first=Karen |date=January 3, 2019 |title=As Rashida Tlaib Is Sworn In, Palestinian-Americans Respond With #TweetYourThobe |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/03/us/politics/rashida-tlaib-palestinian-thobe.html |website=New York Times}}</ref> On Vogue Arabia's November 2023 cover the star took a central position in the celebration of Palestinian embroidery.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Editorial |first=Vogue Arabia |date=October 30, 2023 |title=The Meaning Behind the Palestinian Fabric on Vogue Arabia's November 2023 Cover |url=https://en.vogue.me/culture/palestinian-fabric-tatreez-meaning-november-2023-cover/ |website=Vogue Arabia}}</ref> The design also features on ].


==See also== ==See also==
{{Portal|Christianity}}
*]
*] * ]
* ] – the Jewish symbol of ], which the Star of Bethlehem is often associated with having been a miraculous appearance of.
*]
*] * ]
* ] — where the Star of Bethlehem is a symbol of the Christian identity of the ]

==Notes==
{{Reflist|group=nb}}


==References== ==References==
{{Reflist|25em}}
<!--See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the<ref> and </ref> tags and the tag below -->

<div class="references-2column">
==Bibliography==
<references />
* {{cite book
</div>
| last1 = Brown
| first1 = Raymond E.
| title = The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus
| publisher = Paulist Press
| year = 1973
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=a0Ik5DuD01cC&q=%22family+tradition%22&pg=PA61
| isbn = 978-0809117680
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Brown
| first1 = Raymond E.
| title = The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke
| publisher = Yale University Press
| year = 1999
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=1_1ZAAAAYAAJ
| isbn = 978-0300140088
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Brown
| first1 = Raymond E.
| title = An Adult Christ at Christmas: Essays on the Three Biblical Christmas Stories
| publisher = Liturgical Press
| year = 1988
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=G4qpnvoautgC
| isbn = 0-8028-3931-2
}}


==External links== ==External links==
{{Commons|Star of Bethlehem}}
<div class="references-small">
* Case, Shirley Jackson (2006). ''Jesus: A New Biography'', Gorgias Press LLC: New Ed. {{ISBN|1-59333-475-3}}.
*Jenkins, R.M., , ''Journal of the British Astronomy Association'', June 2004, '''114''', pp. 336-43. This article argues that the Star of Bethlehem is a historical fiction influenced by the appearance of Halley Comet in AD 66.
*Coates, Richard (2008)
*Martin, Dr. Ernest L., , (1996). Martin favors the theory that the star was a conjunction of Venus and Jupiter in 3 BC (elaborating on Roger Sinnott's 1968 thesis) and that Jesus was born in the early evening of September 11. More than 600 planetariums have revised their Christmas star show to match this work.
* Consolmagno S.J., Guy (2010)
*Molnar, Michael R., . Proposes that the "star" was an occultation of Jupiter by the moon in 6 BC.
* Gill, Victoria: by Helen Jacobus with link to, Jacobus, Helen, , ''BBC''
*Newman, Robert C., , Interdisciplinary Biblical Research Institute, 2001. A variation on the Sinnott thesis. Includes a table of conjunctions and star charts.
* Jenkins, R.M., " {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181005222753/http://www.bristolastrosoc.org.uk/www/media/Publications_BAS_Documents/the_star_of_bethlehem.pdf |date=2018-10-05 }}", ''Journal of the British Astronomy Association'', June 2004, '''114''', pp.&nbsp;336–43. This article argues that the Star of Bethlehem is a historical fiction influenced by the appearance of ] in AD 66.
*Griffith Observatory, presented on MSNBC's ''Mysteries of the Universe.''
* Larson, Frederick A.
* Biblical text on the magi and the star.
* Nicholl, Colin R., {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161019193309/http://greatchristcomet.com/thegreatchristcomet-endorsements.html |date=2016-10-19 }}. Crossway, 2015. {{ISBN|978-1-4335-4213-8}}
*. Provides an extensive bibliography with Web links to online sources.
*. Gives possible scientific explanations of the Star of Bethlehem. * . Provides an extensive bibliography with Web links to online sources.

* by Professor Konradin Ferrari d'Occhieppo<!--since 1965 in many books, last 2003-->
{| border="1" style="border-collapse:collapse; margin:1em auto; text-align:center;"
*Michele Crudele, , Interdisciplinary Encyclopedia of Religion and Science, 2002
|- bgcolor="FFD700"
*
|colspan=3|'''Star of Bethlehem<br>]: ]'''
</div>
|- bgcolor="white"
|{{resize|Preceded by<br>''']'''}}
|{{space|3}}''']{{space|3}}<br>Events'''
|{{resize|Followed by<br>'''] ]'''}}
|}


{{Christmas}} {{Christmas}}
{{Nativity of Jesus}}
]
{{Gospel of Matthew}}
]
{{Authority control}}
]
{{Good article}}
]
]
]


{{DEFAULTSORT:Star Of Bethlehem}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 21:52, 9 January 2025

Biblical star revealing Christ's birth For other uses, see Star of Bethlehem (disambiguation).
Adoration of the Magi by Florentine painter Giotto di Bondone (1267–1337). The Star of Bethlehem is shown as a comet above the child. Giotto witnessed an appearance of Halley's Comet in 1301.

The Star of Bethlehem, or Christmas Star, appears in the nativity story of the Gospel of Matthew chapter 2 where "wise men from the East" (Magi) are inspired by the star to travel to Jerusalem. There, they meet King Herod of Judea, and ask him:

Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the East and have come to worship Him.

Herod calls together his scribes and priests who, quoting a verse from the Book of Micah, interpret it as a prophecy that the Jewish Messiah would be born in Bethlehem to the south of Jerusalem. Secretly intending to find and kill the Messiah in order to preserve his own kingship, Herod invites the wise men to return to him on their way home.

The star leads them to Jesus' Bethlehem birthplace, where they worship him and give him gifts. The wise men are then given a divine warning not to return to Herod, so they return home by a different route.

Many Christians believe the star was a miraculous sign. Some theologians claimed that the star fulfilled a prophecy, known as the Star Prophecy. Astronomers have made several attempts to link the star to unusual celestial events, such as a conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn or Jupiter and Venus, a comet, or a supernova. Some modern scholars do not consider the story to be describing a historical event, but rather a pious fiction added later to the main gospel account.

The subject is a favorite at planetarium shows during the Christmas season. However, most ancient sources and Church tradition generally indicate that the wise men visited Bethlehem sometime after Jesus' birth. The visit is traditionally celebrated on Epiphany (January 6) in Western Christianity.

The account in the Gospel of Matthew describes Jesus with the broader Greek word παιδίον, paidíon, which can mean either "infant" or "child" rather than the more specific word for infant, βρέφος, bréphos. This possibly implies that some time has passed since the birth. However, the word παιδίον, paidíon is also used in the Gospel of Luke specifically concerning Jesus' birth and his later presentation at the temple. Herod I has all male Hebrew babies in the area up to age two killed in the Massacre of the Innocents.

Matthew's narrative

Adoration of the Magi, Chartres Cathedral, by Jehan de Beauce, France, 16th century.

The Gospel of Matthew tells how the Magi (often translated as "wise men", but more accurately astrologers) arrive at the court of Herod in Jerusalem and tell the king of a star which signifies the birth of the King of the Jews:

Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of Herod the king, behold, wise men from the East came to Jerusalem, saying, "Where is he who has been born king of the Jews? For we have seen his star in the East, and have come to worship him." When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him; and assembling all the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ was to be born. They told him, "In Bethlehem of Judea; for so it is written by the prophet:

'And you, O Bethlehem, in the land of Judah,
are by no means least among the rulers of Judah;
for from you shall come a ruler
who will govern my people Israel.'"

Then Herod summoned the wise men secretly and ascertained from them what time the star appeared; and he sent them to Bethlehem, saying, "Go and search diligently for the child, and when you have found him bring me word, that I too may come and worship him." When they had heard the king they went their way; and lo, the star which they had seen in the East went before them, till it came to rest over the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they rejoiced exceedingly with great joy; and going into the house they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh.

— Matthew 2:1–11, Revised Standard Version

Herod is "troubled", not because of the appearance of the star, but because the Magi have told him that a "king of the Jews" had been born, which he understands to refer to the Messiah, a leader of the Jewish people whose coming was believed to be foretold in scripture. He asks his advisors where the Messiah would be born. They answer Bethlehem, birthplace of King David, and quote the prophet Micah. The king passes this information along to the Magi.

In a dream, they are warned not to return to Jerusalem, so they leave for their own country by another route. When Herod realizes he has been tricked, he orders the execution of all male children in Bethlehem "two years old and younger," based on the age the child could be in regard to the information the magi had given him concerning the time the star first appeared.

Joseph, warned in a dream, takes his family to Egypt for their safety. The gospel links the escape to a verse from scripture, which it interprets as a prophecy: "Out of Egypt I called my son." This was a reference to the departure of the Hebrews from Egypt under Moses, so the quote suggests that Matthew saw the life of Jesus as recapitulating the story of the Jewish people, with Judea representing Egypt and Herod standing in for pharaoh.

After Herod dies, Joseph and his family return from Egypt, and settle in Nazareth in Galilee. This is also said to be a fulfillment of a prophecy ("He will be called a Nazorean," (NRSV) which could be attributed to Judges 13:5 regarding the birth of Samson and the Nazirite vow. The word Nazareth is related to the word netzer which means "sprout", and which some Bible commentators think refers to Isaiah 11:1: "There shall come forth a Rod from the stem of Jesse, And a Branch shall grow out of his roots."

Explanations

Pious fiction

Scholars who see the gospel nativity stories as later apologetic accounts created to establish the messianic status of Jesus regard the Star of Bethlehem as a pious fiction. Aspects of Matthew's account which have raised questions of the historical event include: Matthew is the only one of the four gospels which mentions either the Star of Bethlehem or the Magi. Some scholars suggest that Jesus was born in Nazareth, and that the Bethlehem nativity narratives were later additions to the gospels intended to present his birth as the fulfillment of prophecy.

According to Bart D. Ehrman, the Matthew account conflicts with that given in the Gospel of Luke, in which the family of Jesus already lives in Nazareth, travel to Bethlehem for the census, and return home almost immediately.

Adoration of the Magi, by Jean Fouquet (15th century). The Star of Bethlehem can be seen in the top right. The soldiers and castle in the background may represent the Battle of Castillon (1453).

Fulfillment of prophecy

The ancients believed that astronomical phenomena were connected to terrestrial events. Miracles were routinely associated with the birth of important people, including the Hebrew patriarchs, as well as Greek and Roman heroes.

The Star of Bethlehem is traditionally linked to the Star Prophecy in the Book of Numbers:

I see him, but not now;
I behold him, but not near;
A Star shall come out of Jacob;
A Scepter shall rise out of Israel,
And batter the brow of Moab,
And destroy all the sons of tumult.

— Numbers 24:17, NKJV

Although possibly intended to refer to a time that was long past, since the kingdom of Moab had long ceased to exist by the time the Gospels were being written, this passage had become widely seen as a reference to the coming of a Messiah. It was, for example, cited by Josephus, who believed it referred to Emperor Vespasian. Origen, one of the most influential early Christian theologians, connected this prophecy with the Star of Bethlehem:

If, then, at the commencement of new dynasties, or on the occasion of other important events, there arises a comet so called, or any similar celestial body, why should it be matter of wonder that at the birth of Him who was to introduce a new doctrine to the human race, and to make known His teaching not only to Jews, but also to Greeks, and to many of the barbarous nations besides, a star should have arisen? Now I would say, that with respect to comets there is no prophecy in circulation to the effect that such and such a comet was to arise in connection with a particular kingdom or a particular time; but with respect to the appearance of a star at the birth of Jesus there is a prophecy of Balaam recorded by Moses to this effect: There shall arise a star out of Jacob, and a man shall rise up out of Israel.

Origen suggested that the Magi may have decided to travel to Jerusalem when they "conjectured that the man whose appearance had been foretold along with that of the star, had actually come into the world".

The Magi are sometimes called "kings" because of the belief that they fulfill prophecies in Isaiah and Psalms concerning a journey to Jerusalem by gentile kings. Isaiah mentions gifts of gold and incense. In the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament probably used by Matthew, these gifts are given as gold and frankincense, similar to Matthew's "gold, frankincense, and myrrh." The gift of myrrh symbolizes mortality, according to Origen.

While Origen argued for a naturalistic explanation, John Chrysostom viewed the star as purely miraculous: "How then, tell me, did the star point out a spot so confined, just the space of a manger and shed, unless it left that height and came down, and stood over the very head of the young child? And at this the evangelist was hinting when he said, "Lo, the star went before them, till it came and stood over where the young Child was."

Astronomical object

Although the word magi (Greek μαγοι) is usually translated as "wise men," in this context it probably means 'astronomer'/'astrologer'. The involvement of astrologers in the story of the birth of Jesus was problematic for the early Church, because they condemned astrology as demonic; a widely cited explanation was that of Tertullian, who suggested that astrology was allowed 'only until the time of the Gospel'.

Planetary conjunction

In 1614, German astronomer Johannes Kepler determined that a series of three conjunctions of the planets Jupiter and Saturn occurred in the year 7 BC. He argued (incorrectly) that a planetary conjunction could create a nova, which he linked to the Star of Bethlehem. Modern calculations show that there was a gap of nearly a degree (approximately twice a diameter of the moon) between the planets, so these conjunctions were not visually impressive. An ancient almanac has been found in Babylon which covers the events of this period, but does not indicate that the conjunctions were of any special interest. In the 20th century, Professor Karlis Kaufmanis, an astronomer, argued that this was an astronomical event where Jupiter and Saturn were in a triple conjunction in the constellation Pisces. Archaeologist and Assyriologist Simo Parpola has also suggested this explanation.

In 3–2 BC, there was a series of seven conjunctions, including three between Jupiter and Regulus and a strikingly close conjunction between Jupiter and Venus near Regulus on June 17, 2 BC. "The fusion of two planets would have been a rare and awe-inspiring event", according to Roger Sinnott. Another Venus–Jupiter conjunction occurred earlier in August, 3 BC. While these events occurred after the generally accepted date of 4 BC for the death of Herod, they did occur during the reign of Caesar Augustus (who is referenced in the Gospel of Luke), and early Christian historians Eusebius and Clement of Alexandria calculated the birth of Jesus to 3-2 BC. Since the conjunction would have been seen in the west at sunset it could not have led the magi south from Jerusalem to Bethlehem.

Double occultation on Saturday (Sabbath) April 17, 6 BC

Astronomer Michael R. Molnar argues that the "star in the east" refers to an astronomical event with astrological significance in the context of ancient Greek astrology. He suggests a link between the Star of Bethlehem and a double occultation of Jupiter by the Moon on March 20 and April 17 of 6 BC in Aries, particularly the second occultation on April 17. Occultations of planets by the Moon are quite common, but Firmicus Maternus, an astrologer to Roman Emperor Constantine, wrote that an occultation of Jupiter in Aries was a sign of the birth of a divine king. He argues that Aries rather than Pisces was the zodiac symbol for Judea, a fact that would affect previous interpretations of astrological material. Molnar's theory was debated by scientists, theologians, and historians during a colloquium on the Star of Bethlehem at the Netherlands' University of Groningen in October 2014. Harvard astronomer Owen Gingerich supports Molnar's explanation but noted technical questions. "The gospel story is one in which King Herod was taken by surprise," said Gingerich. "So it wasn't that there was suddenly a brilliant new star sitting there that anybody could have seen something more subtle." Astronomer David A. Weintraub says, "If Matthew's wise men actually undertook a journey to search for a newborn king, the bright star didn't guide them; it only told them when to set out."

There is an explanation given that the events were quite close to the Sun and would not have been visible to the naked eye.

Regulus, Jupiter, and Venus

This section possibly contains synthesis of material that does not verifiably mention or relate to the main topic. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. (December 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (December 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Attorney Frederick Larson examined the biblical account in the Gospel of Matthew, chapter 2 and found the following nine qualities of Bethlehem's Star: It signified birth, it signified kingship, it was related to the Jewish nation, and it rose "in the East"; King Herod had not been aware of it; it appeared at an exact time; it endured over time; and, according to Matthew, it was in front of the Magi when they traveled south from Jerusalem to Bethlehem, and then stopped over Bethlehem.

Using the Starry Night astronomy software, and an article written by astronomer Craig Chester based on the work of archeologist and historian Ernest L. Martin, Larson thinks all nine characteristics of the Star of Bethlehem are found in events that took place in the skies of 3–2 BC. Highlights include a triple conjunction of Jupiter, called the king planet, with the fixed star Regulus, called the king star, starting in September 3 BC. Larson believes that may be the time of Jesus' conception.

By June of 2 BC, nine months later, the human gestation period, Jupiter had continued moving in its orbit around the Sun and appeared in close conjunction with Venus in June of 2 BC. In Hebrew Jupiter is called Sedeq, meaning "righteousness", a term also used for the Messiah, and suggested that because the planet Venus represents love and fertility, so Chester had suggested astrologers would have viewed the close conjunction of Jupiter and Venus as indicating a coming new king of Israel, and Herod would have taken them seriously. Astronomer Dave Reneke independently found the June 2 BC planetary conjunction, and noted it would have appeared as a "bright beacon of light". According to Chester, the disks of Jupiter and Venus would have appeared to touch and there has not been as close a Venus-Jupiter conjunction since then.

Jupiter next continued to move and then stopped in its apparent retrograde motion on December 25 of 2 BC over the town of Bethlehem. Since planets in their orbits have a "stationary point", a planet moves eastward through the stars but, "As it approaches the opposite point in the sky from the sun, it appears to slow, come to a full stop, and move backward (westward) through the sky for some weeks. Again it slows, stops, and resumes its eastward course," said Chester. The date of December 25 that Jupiter appeared to stop while in retrograde took place in the season of Hanukkah, and is the date later chosen to celebrate Christmas.

Heliacal rising

A zodiac from a 6th-century mosaic at a synagogue in Beit Alpha, Israel

The Magi told Herod that they saw the star "in the East," or according to some translations, "at its rising", which may imply the routine appearance of a constellation, or an asterism. One theory interprets the phrase in Matthew 2:2, "in the east," as an astrological term concerning a "heliacal rising." This translation was proposed by Edersheim and Heinrich Voigt, among others. The view was rejected by the philologist Franz Boll (1867–1924). Two modern translators of ancient astrological texts insist that the text does not use the technical terms for either a heliacal or an acronycal rising of a star. However, one concedes that Matthew may have used layman's terms for a rising.

Comet

Other writers highly suggest that the star was a comet. Halley's Comet was visible in 12 BC and another object, possibly a comet or nova, was seen by Chinese and Korean stargazers in about 5 BC. This object was observed for over seventy days, possibly with no movement recorded. Ancient writers described comets as "hanging over" specific cities, just as the Star of Bethlehem was said to have "stood over" the "place" where Jesus was (the town of Bethlehem). However, this is generally thought unlikely as in ancient times comets were generally seen as bad omens. The comet explanation has been recently promoted by Colin Nicholl. His theory involves a hypothetical comet which could have appeared in 6 BC.

Supernova

Physicist Frank Tipler has proposed that the star of Bethlehem was a supernova or hypernova occurring in the nearby Andromeda Galaxy. Although it is difficult to detect a supernova remnant in another galaxy, or obtain an accurate date of when it occurred, supernova remnants have been detected in Andromeda.

Another theory is the more likely supernova of February 23 4 BC, which is now known as PSR 1913+16 or the Hulse-Taylor Pulsar. It is said to have appeared in the constellation of Aquila, near the intersection of the winter colure and the equator of date. The nova was "recorded in China, Korea, and Palestine" (probably meaning the Biblical account).

A nova or comet was recorded in China in 4 BC. "In the reign of Ai-ti, in the third year of the Chien-p'ing period. In the third month, day chi-yu, there was a rising po at Hoku" (Han Shu, The History of the Former Han Dynasty). The date is equivalent to April 24, 4 BC. This identifies the date when it was first observed in China. It was also recorded in Korea: "In the fifty-fourth year of Hyokkose Wang, in the spring, second month, day chi-yu, a po-hsing appeared at Hoku" (Samguk Sagi, The Historical Record of the Three Kingdoms). The Korean text may have been corrupted because Ho (1962) points out that "the chi-yu day did not fall in the second month that year but on the first month" (February 23) and on the third month (April 24). The original must have read "day chi-yu, first month" (February 23) or "day chi-yu, third month" (April 24). The latter would coincide with the date in the Chinese records although professor Ho suggests the date was "probably February 23, 4 BC."

Relating the star historically to Jesus' birth

See also: Chronology of Jesus

If the story of the Star of Bethlehem described an actual event, it might identify the year Jesus was born. The Gospel of Matthew describes the birth of Jesus as taking place when Herod was king. According to Josephus, Herod died after a lunar eclipse and before a Passover Feast. Some scholars suggested dates in 5 BC, because it allows seven months for the events Josephus documented between the lunar eclipse and the Passover rather than the 29 days allowed by lunar eclipse in 4 BC. Others suggest it was an eclipse in 1 BC. The narrative implies that Jesus was born sometime between the first appearance of the star and the appearance of the Magi at Herod's court. That the king is said to have ordered the execution of boys two years of age and younger implies that the Star of Bethlehem appeared within the preceding two years. Some scholars date the birth of Jesus as 6–4 BC, while others suggest Jesus' birth was in 3–2 BC.

The Gospel of Luke says the census from Caesar Augustus took place when Quirinius was governor of Syria. Tipler suggests this took place in AD 6, nine years after the death of Herod, and that the family of Jesus left Bethlehem shortly after the birth. Some scholars explain the apparent disparity as an error on the part of the author of the Gospel of Luke, concluding that he was more concerned with creating a symbolic narrative than a historical account, and was either unaware of, or indifferent to, the chronological difficulty.

However, there is some debate among Bible translators about the correct reading of Luke 2:2 ("Αὕτη ἀπογραφὴ πρώτη ἐγένετο ἡγεμονεύοντος τῆς Συρίας Κυρηνίου"). Instead of translating the registration as taking place "when" Quirinius was governor of Syria, some versions translate it as "before" or use "before" as an alternative, which Harold Hoehner, F.F. Bruce, Ben Witherington and others have suggested may be the correct translation. While not in agreement, Emil Schürer also acknowledged that such a translation can be justified grammatically. According to Josephus, the tax census conducted by the Roman senator Quirinius particularly irritated the Jews, and was one of the causes of the Zealot movement of armed resistance to Rome. From this perspective, Luke may have been trying to differentiate the census at the time of Jesus' birth from the tax census mentioned in Acts 5:37 that took place under Quirinius at a later time. One ancient writer identified the census at Jesus' birth, not with taxes, but with a universal pledge of allegiance to the emperor.

Jack Finegan noted some early writers' reckoning of the regnal years of Augustus are the equivalent to 3/2 BC, or 2 BC or later for the birth of Jesus, including Irenaeus (3/2 BC), Clement of Alexandria (3/2 BC), Tertullian (3/2 BC), Julius Africanus (3/2 BC), Hippolytus of Rome (3/2 BC), Hippolytus of Thebes (3/2 BC), Origen (3/2 BC), Eusebius of Caesarea (3/2 BC), Epiphanius of Salamis (3/2 BC), Cassiodorus Senator (3 BC), Paulus Orosius (2 BC), Dionysus Exiguus (1 BC), and Chronographer of the Year 354 (AD 1). Finegan places the death of Herod in 1 BC, and says if Jesus was born two years or less before Herod the Great died, the birth of Jesus would have been in 3 or 2 BC. Finegan also notes the Alogi reckoned Jesus's birth with the equivalent of 4 BC or AD 9.

Religious interpretations

Catholicism

The Catholic Church has no say on the Star of Bethlehem, except that it led the Magi to Jesus. Various theologians have speculated on the star's nature: star, angel, light, person, bird, illusion, hallucination, natural phenomenon, etc.

Eastern Orthodoxy

Russian icon of the Nativity. The Star of Bethlehem is depicted at the center top as a dark semicircle, with a single ray coming down.

In the Eastern Orthodox Church, the Star of Bethlehem is interpreted as a miraculous event of symbolic and pedagogical significance, regardless of whether it coincides with a natural phenomenon; a sign sent by God to lead the Magi to the Christ Child. This is illustrated in the Troparion of the Nativity:

Your birth, O Christ our God,
dawned the light of knowledge upon the earth.
For by Your birth those who adored stars
were taught by a star
to worship You, the Sun of Justice,
and to know You, Orient from on High.
O Lord, glory to You.

In Orthodox Christian iconography, the Star of Bethlehem is often depicted not as golden, but as a dark aureola, a semicircle at the top of the icon, indicating the Uncreated Light of Divine grace, with a ray pointing to "the place where the young child lay" (Matthew 2:9). Sometimes the faint image of an angel is drawn inside the aureola.

Simon the Athonite founded the monastery of Simonopetra on Mount Athos after seeing a star he identified with the Star of Bethlehem.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

LDS members believe that the Star of Bethlehem was an actual astronomical event visible the world over. In the 1830 Book of Mormon, which they believe contains writings of ancient prophets, Samuel the Lamanite prophesies that a new star will appear as a sign that Jesus has been born, and Nephi later writes about the fulfillment of this prophecy.

Jehovah's Witnesses

Members of Jehovah's Witnesses believe that the "star" was a vision or sign created by Satan, rather than a sign from God. This is because it led the pagan astrologers first to Jerusalem where King Herod consequently found out about the birth of the "king of the Jews", with the result that he attempted to have Jesus killed.

Seventh-day Adventist

In her 1898 book, The Desire of Ages, Ellen White states "That star was a distant company of shining angels, but of this the wise men were ignorant."

Depiction in art

Woodcut by Julius Schnorr von Karolsfeld, 1860

Paintings and other pictures of the Adoration of the Magi may include a depiction of the star in some form. In the fresco by Giotto di Bondone, it is depicted as a comet. In the tapestry of the subject designed by Edward Burne-Jones (and in the related watercolour), the star is held by an angel.

The colourful star lantern known as a paról is a cherished and ubiquitous symbol of Christmas for Filipinos, its design and light recalling the star. In its basic form, the paról has five points and two "tails" that evoke rays of light pointing the way to the baby Jesus, and candles inside the lanterns have been superseded by electric illumination.

In the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem, a silver star with 14 undulating rays marks the location traditionally claimed to be that of Jesus' birth.

Christmas sweater featuring multiple black 8-pointed Star of Bethlehem designs

In European textiles a common eight-pointed star design is known as the Holy Star of Bethlehem. The design has been used in stone, metal, wood-work and embroidery in the Middle East since antiquity and is one of the oldest patterns in patterns in Palestinian tatreez. In 2019 US congresswoman Rashida Tlaib was sworn in wearing a thobe that featured the design. On Vogue Arabia's November 2023 cover the star took a central position in the celebration of Palestinian embroidery. The design also features on Christmas sweaters.

See also

Notes

  1. Matthew 2:5–6. Matthew's version is a conflation of Micah 5:2 and 2 Samuel 5:2.
  2. Matthew 2:16 This is presented as a fulfillment of a prophecy and echoes the killing of firstborn by pharaoh in Exodus 11:1–12:36.
  3. Judges 13:5–7 is sometimes identified as the source for Matthew 2:23 because the Septuagint's ναζιραιον (Nazirite) resembles Matthew's Ναζωραῖος (Nazorean). However, few scholars accept the view that Jesus was a Nazirite.

References

  1. "A Christmas Star for SOHO". NASA. Archived from the original on December 24, 2004. Retrieved 2008-07-04..
  2. Matthew 2:1–2
  3. Matthew 2:11–12
  4. ^ Freed, Edwin D. (2001). The Stories of Jesus' Birth: A Critical Introduction. Continuum International. p. 93. ISBN 0-567-08046-3.
  5. Telegraph (2008-12-09). "Jesus was born in June". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 2011-12-14..
  6. "Star of Bethlehem." Cross, F. L., ed. The Oxford dictionary of the Christian Church. New York: Oxford University Press. 2005.
  7. For example, Paul L. Maier, "Herod and the Infants of Bethlehem", in Chronos, Kairos, Christos II, Mercer University Press (1998), 171; Geza Vermes, The Nativity: History and Legend, London: Penguin, 2006, p. 22; E. P. Sanders, The Historical Figure of Jesus, 1993, p. 85; Aaron Michael Adair, "Science, Scholarship and Bethlehem's Starry Night", Sky and Telescope, Dec. 2007, pp. 26–29 (reviewing astronomical theories).
  8. ^ John, Mosley. "Common Errors in 'Star of Bethlehem' Planetarium Shows". Archived from the original on 2008-05-16. Retrieved 2008-06-05..
  9. Andrews, Samuel James (2020). "When did the Magi visit?". Salem Web Network. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
  10. Ratti, John. "First Sunday after the Epiphany". Archived from the original on 2008-06-13. Retrieved 2008-06-05..
  11. Luke 2:17, 27
  12. ^ Brown 1988, p. 11.
  13. Matthew 2:1–11
  14. Long, Thomas (1997). Matthew. Westminster: John Knox Press. p. 18.
  15. Matthew 2:4
  16. Matthew 2:8
  17. Matthew 2:12
  18. Matthew 2:13–14
  19. Matthew 2:15 The original is from Hosea 11:1.
  20. "An Exodus motif prevails in the entire chapter." (Kennedy, Joel (2008). Recapitulation of Israel. Mohr Siebeck. p. 132. ISBN 978-3-16-149825-1. Retrieved 2009-07-04.)
  21. Matthew 2:10–21
  22. Matthew 2:23
  23. Judges 13:5
  24. Concordances on the meaning of the word "netzer" on Bible Hub. Retrieved December 29, 2015.
  25. Commentaries for Matthew 2:23 on Bible Hub. Retrieved on December 29, 2005.
  26. Isaiah 11:1
  27. Isaiah chapter 11, verse 1 on Bible Hub with commentaries. Retrieved on December 29, 2015.
  28. Brown, Raymond E. (1993), The Birth of the Messiah, Anchor Bible Reference Library, p. 188.
  29. Markus Bockmuehl, This Jesus (Continuum International, 2004), p. 28; Vermes, Géza (2006-11-02), The Nativity: History and Legend, Penguin Books Ltd, p. 22, ISBN 0-14-102446-1; Sanders, Ed Parish (1993), The Historical Figure of Jesus, London: Allen Lane, p. 85, ISBN 0-7139-9059-7; Believable Christianity: A lecture in the annual October series on Radical Christian Faith at Carrs Lane URC Church, Birmingham, October 5, 2006.
  30. Nikkos Kokkinos, "The Relative Chronology of the Nativity in Tertullian", in Ray Summers, Jerry Vardaman and others, eds., Chronos, Kairos, Christos II, Mercer University Press (1998), pp. 125–26.
    Funk, Robert W. and the Jesus Seminar, The Acts of Jesus: The Search for the Authentic Deeds of Jesus, HarperSanFrancisco, 1999, ISBN 0-06-062979-7. pp. 499, 521, 533.
    Paul L. Maier, "Herod and the Infants of Bethlehem", in Chronos, Kairos, Christos II, Mercer University Press (1998), 171.
    For Micah's prophecy, see Micah 5:2.
  31. Bart D. Ehrman, Jesus: apocalyptic prophet of the new millennium, Oxford University Press 1999, p. 38.
  32. Vermes, Geza (December 2006). "The First Christmas". History Today. Vol. 56, no. 12. pp. 23–29. Archived from the original on 2007-12-14. Retrieved 2009-07-04.
  33. Numbers 24:17
  34. Josephus, Flavius. The Wars of the Jews. Retrieved 2008-06-07.
  35. Lendering, Jona. "Messianic claimants". Archived from the original on 2016-06-02. Retrieved 2008-06-05.
  36. Adamantius, Origen. "Contra Celsum". Retrieved 2008-06-05., Book I, Chapter LIX.
  37. ^ Adamantius, Origen. "Contra Celsum".. Book I, Chapter LX.
  38. France, R.T., The Gospel according to Matthew: an introduction and commentary, p. 84. See Isaiah 60:1–7 and Psalms 72:10.
  39. Isaiah 60:6
  40. Isaiah 60:6 Archived 2018-09-29 at the Wayback Machine (Septuagint).
  41. Matthew 2:11
  42. Schaff, Philip (1886). St. Chrysostom: Homilies on the Gospel of Saint Matthew. New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co. p. 36. Archived from the original on 2009-02-07. Retrieved 2009-07-04..
  43. Tester, S. J. (1987). A History of Western Astrology. Boydell & Brewer. pp. 111–112.
  44. ^ Mark, Kidger. "Chinese and Babylonian Observations". Retrieved 2008-06-05.
  45. Minnesota Astronomy Review Volume 18 – Fall 2003/2004 "The Star of Bethlehem by Karlis Kaufmanis" (PDF). 30 October 2023.
  46. Audio Version of Star of Bethlehem by Karlis Kaufmanis "The Star of Bethlehem by Karlis Kaufmanis". Archived from the original on 2018-08-01. Retrieved 2011-01-03.
  47. Simo Parpola, "The Magi and the Star," Bible Review, December 2001, pp. 16–23, 52, 54.
  48. Sinnott, Roger (December 1968). "Thoughts on the Star of Bethlehem". Sky and Telescope. pp. 384–86.
  49. Garrison, Greg (7 March 2019). "Is this what the Star of Bethlehem looked like? Venus, Jupiter put on a show". Alabama Media Group. Retrieved 3 February 2020.
  50. Eusebius. "Book I, Chapter 5. The Time of his Appearance among Men". Church History (Eusebius). 2. It was in the forty-second year of the reign of Augustus and the twenty-eighth after the subjugation of Egypt and the death of Antony and Cleopatra, with whom the dynasty of the Ptolemies in Egypt came to an end, that our Saviour and Lord Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem of Judea
  51. Clement of Alexandria. "Book 1, Chapter XXI: The Jewish Institutions and Laws of Far Higher Antiquity Than the Philosophy of the Greeks". Stromata. And our Lord was born in the twenty-eighth year , when first the census was ordered to be taken in the reign of Augustus.
  52. Kidger, Mark (2005). Astronomical Enigmas: Life on Mars, the Star of Bethlehem, and Other Milky Way Mysteries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 63. ISBN 0-8018-8026-2.
  53. ^ Weintraub, David A., "Amazingly, astronomy can explain the biblical Star of Bethlehem", Washington Post, December 26, 2014
  54. ^ Molnar, Michael R. (1999), The Star of Bethlehem: The Legacy of the Magi, Rutgers University Press, pp. 86, 89, 106–07, ISBN 0-8135-2701-5, archived from the original on 1999-10-12, retrieved 2009-07-04.
  55. Eiland, Murray (2019). "The Star of Bethlehem, Jupiter, and imperial astrology". Antiqvvs (Christmas Supplement). Interview with Michael R. Molnar: 3–6.
  56. Pattern, Michael (2005). "Identifying the Star of Bethlehem". The Journal of the Faculty of Religious Studies, McGill. 33: 290.
  57. For a similar interpretation, see Minnesota Astronomy Review Volume 18 – Fall 2003/2004 "The Star of Bethlehem by Karlis Kaufmanis" (PDF). 30 October 2023.
  58. Stenger, Richard (December 27, 2001). "Was Christmas star a double eclipse of Jupiter?". CNN. Retrieved 2009-07-04.
  59. ^ Govier, Gordon. "O Subtle Star of Bethlehem", Christianity Today, Vol. 58, No. 10, p. 19, December 22, 2014
  60. Kidger, Mark (December 5, 2001), "The Star of Bethlehem", Cambridge Conference Correspondence, archived from the original on 2016-04-03, retrieved 2007-07-04.
  61. Matthew chapter 2 on Bible Gateway, Amplified Version with footnotes. Retrieved on December 22, 2015.
  62. Lawton, Kim. "Christmas star debate gets its due on Epiphany". USA Today. January 5, 2008. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  63. ^ Herzog, Travis. "Did the Star of Bethlehem exist?" abc13 Eyewitness News. December 20, 2007. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  64. Matthew chapter 2, verse 2. Bible Hub with commentaries. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  65. Matthew chapter 2, verse 3. Bible Hub with commentaries. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  66. Matthew chapter 2 verse 7. Bible Hub with commentaries. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  67. Matthew chapter 2, verses 2–10. Bible Hub with whole chapter and commentaries. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  68. Gospel of Matthew chapter 2 verse 9. Bible Hub with commentaries. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  69. Ireland, Michael. "Evidence emerges for Star of Bethlehem's reality". Assist News Service. Christian Headlines. October 18, 2007. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  70. ^ Chester, Craig. "The Star of Bethlehem". Imprimis. December 1993, 22(12). Originally presented at Hillsdale College during fall 1992. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  71. Vaughn, Cliff. "The Star of Bethlehem". Ethics Daily. November 26, 2009. Retrieved on January 2, 2016.
  72. ^ Scripps Howard News Service. "Astronomer Analyzes The Star Of Bethlehem". The Chicago Tribune. December 24, 1993. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  73. Martin, Ernest. 1991 The Star that Astonished the World. ASK Publications. Can be read for free online, for personal study only. Other uses prohibited. Retrieved on February 12, 2016. ISBN 9780945657880
  74. ^ Lawton, Kim. "Star of Bethlehem". Interview with Rick Larson. PBS, Religion & Ethics Newsweekly. December 21, 2007. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  75. Rao, Joe. "Was the Star of Bethlehem a star, comet … or miracle?" NBC News. Updated December 12, 2011. Includes a brief interactive at the bottom, "What's the story behind the Star?" showing retrograde motion and the 3–2 BC planetary conjunctions. Retrieved on January 2, 2016.
  76. Larson, Frederick. "A coronation" Description of Jupiter as king planet. Retrieved December 22, 2015.
  77. ^ Foust, Michael. Baptist Press. December 14, 2007. Retrieved on December 19, 2015.
  78. Larson, Frederick. "Westward leading" Description of when Jupiter and Venus aligned. Retrieved December 22, 2015.
  79. Telegraph. "'Jesus was born in June", astronomers claim". The Telegraph. December 9, 2008. Retrieved on December 22, 2015.
  80. "History of Christmas". History. Retrieved on December 22, 2015.
  81. Matthew 2:2
  82. Matthew 2:2. New Revised Standard Version.
  83. Edersheim, Alfred. The Life and times of Jesus the Messiah. Peabody, (MA: Hendrickson, 1993), several references, chapter 8.
  84. Adair, Aaron (2013). The Star of Bethlehem: A Skeptical View (Kindle Edition – location 1304). Onus Books. ISBN 978-0956694867.
  85. Roberts, Courtney (2007). The Star of the Magi. Career Press. pp. 120–21. ISBN 978-1564149626.
  86. Colin Humphreys, 'The Star of Bethlehem', in Science and Christian Belief 5 (1995), 83–101.
  87. Jenkins, R.M. (June 2004). "The Star of Bethlehem and the Comet of AD 66" (PDF). Journal of the British Astronomy Association. No. 114. pp. 336–43. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-10-05. Retrieved 2016-12-23.
  88. Mark Kidger, Astronomical Enigmas: Life on Mars, the Star of Bethlehem, and Other Milky Way Mysteries, (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005), page 61.
  89. Colin R. Nicholl. 2015. The Great Christ Comet: Revealing the True Star of Bethlehem. Crossway.
  90. Interview Greg Cootsona (23 November 2015). "What Kind of Astronomical Marvel was the Star of ... – Christianity Today". ChristianityToday.com.
  91. Guillermo Gonzalez (16 June 2017). "The Great Christ Comet: Revealing the True Star of Bethlehem". TGC – The Gospel Coalition.
  92. ^ Frank J. Tipler (2005). "The Star of Bethlehem: A Type Ia/Ic Supernova in the Andromeda Galaxy?" (PDF). The Observatory. 125: 168–74. Bibcode:2005Obs...125..168T.
  93. Eugene A. Magnier; Francis A. Primini; Saskia Prins; Jan van Paradijs; Walter H. G. Lewin (1997). "ROSAT HRI Observations of M31 Supernova Remnants" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal. 490 (2): 649–52. Bibcode:1997ApJ...490..649M. doi:10.1086/304917. S2CID 54162850.
  94. Morehouse, A. J. (1978). "The Christmas Star as a Supernova in Aquila". Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada. 72: 65. Bibcode:1978JRASC..72...65M.
  95. McIvor, Robert S. (2005). "The Star on Roman Coins". Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada. 99 (3): 87. Bibcode:2005JRASC..99...87M.
  96. Matthew 2:1
  97. Luke 2:2
  98. Josephus, Antiquities XVII:7:4.
  99. Josephus, Flavius. ~AD 93. Antiquities of the Jews. Book 17, chapter 9, paragraph 3 (17.9.3) Bible Study Tools website. First sentence of paragraph 3 reads: "Now, upon the approach of that feast ..." Retrieved on March 16, 2016.
  100. Josephus, Flavius. ~93 AD. The War of the Jews. Book 2, chapter 1, paragraph 3 (2.1.3) Bible Study Tools website. About one-third through paragraph three it reads: "And indeed, at the feast ...". Retrieved on March 16, 2016.
  101. Timothy David Barnes, "The Date of Herod’s Death," Journal of Theological Studies ns 19 (1968), 204–19. P. M. Bernegger, "Affirmation of Herod’s Death in 4 B.C.," Journal of Theological Studies ns 34 (1983), 526–31.
  102. Finegan, Jack. Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998. p. 300. ISBN 1565631439
  103. ^ Andrew Steinmann, From Abraham to Paul: A Biblical Chronology. (St. Louis, MO: Concordia Pub. House, 2011), Print. pp. 219–56.
  104. ^ W.E. Filmer, "The Chronology of the Reign of Herod the Great". The Journal of Theological Studies, 1966. 17(2): pp. 283–98.
  105. Finegan, Jack. Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998, 2015. pp. 238–79.
  106. Jesus Christ. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica. 2010.
  107. Luke 2:2 Luke chapter 2 verse in parallel translations on Bible Hub. Retrieved on March 3, 2016.
  108. Ralph Martin Novak, Christianity and the Roman Empire: background texts (Continuum International, 2001), p. 293.
  109. Raymond E. Brown, Christ in the Gospels of the Liturgical Year, (Liturgical Press, 2008), p. 114. See, for example, James Douglas Grant Dunn, Jesus Remembered, (Eerdmans, 2003) p. 344. Similarly, Erich S. Gruen, 'The expansion of the empire under Augustus', in The Cambridge ancient history Volume 10, p. 157, Geza Vermes, The Nativity, Penguin 2006, p. 96, W. D. Davies and E. P. Sanders, 'Jesus from the Jewish point of view', in The Cambridge History of Judaism ed William Horbury, vol 3: the Early Roman Period, 1984, Anthony Harvey, A Companion to the New Testament (Cambridge University Press 2004), p. 221, Meier, John P., A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. Doubleday, 1991, v. 1, p. 213, Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in Matthew and Luke. London: G. Chapman, 1977, p. 554, A. N. Sherwin-White, pp. 166–67, Millar, Fergus (1990). "Reflections on the trials of Jesus". A Tribute to Geza Vermes: Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History (JSOT Suppl. 100) . Sheffield: JSOT Press. pp. 355–81. repr. in Millar, Fergus (2006). "The Greek World, the Jews, and the East". Rome, the Greek World and the East. 3. University of North Carolina Press: 139–63.
  110. Marcus J. Borg, Meeting Jesus Again for the First Time: The Historical Jesus and the Heart of Contemporary Faith, (HarperCollins, 1993), p. 24.
  111. Elias Joseph Bickerman, Studies in Jewish and Christian History, p. 104.
  112. Luke 2:2 commentaries on Bible Hub. Retrieved on March 3, 2016.
  113. Wright, N. T. 2011. The Kingdom New Testament: A Contemporary Translation. Luke 2:2. New York, HarperOne. ISBN 978-0062064912
  114. Luke 2:2 in the Orthodox Jewish Bible (OJB) on BibleGateway. Retrieved on March 3, 2016.
  115. Luke 2:2 in the New International Version NIV) Bible on BibleGateway. Retrieved on March 3, 2016.
  116. Luke 2:2 in the English Standard Version (ESV) Bible on BibleGateway. Retrieved on March 3, 2016.
  117. Luke 2:2 in Holman Christian Standard Bible (HSCB) on BibleGateway. Retrieved on March 3, 2016.
  118. Brindle, Wayne. "The Census And Quirinius: Luke 2:2." JETS 27/1 (March 1984) 43–52. Other scholars cited in Brindle's article include A. Higgins, N. Turner, P. Barnett, I. H. Marshall and C. Evan.
  119. Emil Schürer, Géza Vermès, and Fergus Millar, The History of the Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ (175 B.C.–A.D. 135), (Edinburgh: Clark, 1973 and 1987), 421.
  120. Josephus, Flavius. ~93 AD. Antiquities of the Jews. Book 18, chapter 1, paragraph 1 (hereafter noted as 18.1.1) Entire book free to read online. Bible Study Tools website. Scroll down from 18.1.1 to find Jewish revolt also mentioned in 18.1.6. Retrieved on March 3, 2016.
  121. Acts of the Apostles, chapter 5, verse 2 with commentaries. Bible Hub. Retrieved on March 16, 2016.
  122. Vincent, Marvin R. Vincent's Word Studies. Luke chapter 2, verse 2. Bible Hub. Retrieved on March 16, 2016.
  123. Paulus Orosius, Historiae Adversus Paganos, VI.22.7 and VII.2.16.
  124. Finegan, Jack. Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998. pp. 279–92.
  125. Finegan, Jack. Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998. p. 301.
  126. Finegan, Jack. Handbook of Biblical Chronology: Principles of Time Reckoning in the Ancient World and Problems of Chronology in the Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1998. pp. 289–90.
  127. Catechism of the Catholic Church 528
  128. Catholic Answers, What Was The Star Of Bethlehem?
  129. "Hymns of the Feast". Feast of the Nativity of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. 2009.
  130. Matthew 2:9
  131. Venerable Simon the Myrrh-gusher of Mt Athos at oca.org, accessed 31 October 2017.
  132. Smith, Paul Thomas (December 1997). "Birth of the Messiah". Ensign.
  133. Helaman 14:5; 3 Nephi 1:21
  134. Jesus – The Way, the Truth, the Life, ch. 7: Astrologers Visit Jesus
  135. The Desire of Ages, p. 60 Archived 2020-11-26 at the Wayback Machine.
  136. Munayyer, Hanan Karaman (2020). Traditional Palestinian Costume - Origins and Evolution. Interlink Publishing Group Incorporated. ISBN 9781623719241.
  137. Zraick, Karen (January 3, 2019). "As Rashida Tlaib Is Sworn In, Palestinian-Americans Respond With #TweetYourThobe". New York Times.
  138. Editorial, Vogue Arabia (October 30, 2023). "The Meaning Behind the Palestinian Fabric on Vogue Arabia's November 2023 Cover". Vogue Arabia.

Bibliography

External links

Star of Bethlehem
Life of Jesus: The Nativity
Preceded by
Infant Jesus at the Temple
   New Testament   
Events
Followed by
Adoration of the Wise Men
Christmas
In
Christianity
In folklore
Gift-bringers
Companions of
Saint Nicholas
Traditions
By country
Music
Other media
In
modern
society
Food and
drink
Dinner
Sweets
Soup
Sauces
Beverages
Dumplings
Meat and fish
Nativity of Jesus
People
Holy Family
Magi
Others
Place
Gifts of the Magi
Narratives
Gospel of Matthew
Gospel of Luke
Related
In culture
Remembrances
Gospel of Matthew
Bible
(New Testament)
Chapters
Verses
Events
and phrases
People
Groups
Angels
Pharisees
Sadducees
Sanhedrin
Places
Related
In culture
Manuscripts
Sources

Categories:
Star of Bethlehem: Difference between revisions Add topic