| Revision as of 21:59, 22 April 2008 editAve Caesar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers2,545 edits →AIV: true← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:45, 21 March 2023 edit undoLegobot (talk | contribs)Bots1,671,052 editsm Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <center> (1x)Tag: Fixed lint errors | ||
| (200 intermediate revisions by 70 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=October 7, 2013}} | |||
| <center>'''Please add any new sections to the bottom of the page, sign them at the end by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, and insert an appropriate header; see examples below for how to do that. If you don't do so, then your comment runs the risk of being ignored. I will reply to them here.'''</center> | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| {{archive box|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}} | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 50K | |||
| |counter = 10 | |||
| |header = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} | |||
| |algo = old(72h) | |||
| |archive = User talk:Veinor/Archive %(counter)d | |||
| }} | |||
| <div class="center">'''Please add any new sections to the bottom of the page, sign them at the end by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, and insert an appropriate header; see examples below for how to do that. If you don't do so, then your comment runs the risk of being ignored. I will reply to them here.'''</div> | |||
| {{archive box|]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]<br>]}} | |||
| ==The Stinger Report Issues== | |||
| == PSA Artwork == | |||
| Thank you for your comments, I have gone through the page and removed the interview and toned down the descriptions. The only thing that I have problems with is that you say 'reliable sources' - I think 1up.com and SPONG.com are respected consumer industry sites (as well as three trade associations)- also the amusement industry is small so there are only a limited number of references to be had, as many as possible have been used to show fairness. What else could be done to this page? ] (]) 16:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I think you could say that 1up.com and SPONG.com are ], the point I'm making is that if you find something that goes on length about Stinger, but is on John Q. Public's random blog, then it wouldn't work for a source. As for what else could be done, it's really just an issue of finding good sources that talk specifically about the Stinger Report. Not that reprint information gleaned from it, not that talk about the founder, just about Stinger itself. ] ] 17:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| April 2007 I added "trivia" that is factually true about the origin of PSA's logo airplane, which I created. I would like to suggest that the addition be reinserted, and that any info you feel is self-promoting can be left out. I am no longer an illustrator, and you have mistakenly presumed I am trying to promote my work. Not at all so. Just trying to relate the true history of the logo, and the connection to the film "Pursuit of happyness." <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> | |||
| Thank you for your valuable observations. The Page has been paired down of reference about the founder, the interviews, and uses references only talking about the Stinger Report and not written by the Stinger. Also details on the service operation and areas of coverage have been extended - with a re-write of the start and description as suggest. Please can you confirm this is more in keeping with Wiki requirements? (I will also be pairing down more the external links to three) ] (]) 17:55, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| == Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == | |||
| ] | |||
| I added my name to my article on 'Kalirai', i do not understand why i cannot take credit for this page by adding my name as all the information is provided by myself after careful research. The article relates to myself as i am a 'Kalirai' and the village which i have written about is the village that my roots are from. I made the page seeing no-one had written anything or created anything and now that I have people want to take it over. i do not understand, i want a way to be credited on the main page as this is very personal to me. ] (]) 16:57, 20 April 2008 (UTC)! Veinor | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 01:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy 7th Misplaced Pages Anniversary to you :) == | |||
| Sumeet Kalirai | |||
| :The point of Misplaced Pages, and indeed of the whole ] concept is community collaboration; if you didn't want people to 'take over' your article then you probably shouldn't have made it. But as it stands, when you created the page, you agreed to license it under the ], which gives other people the right to create derivatives of your work. If we allowed people to maintain exclusive control over articles that they had created, then it would devolve into anarchy as people with competing biases worked to publicize their particular version of a controversial event more than the other guy's, so to speak. So we don't let people ] precisely because it causes divisiveness. ] ] 17:04, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Veinor :) Greetings on your 7th Misplaced Pages Anniversary since your joining of Misplaced Pages on 11 September, 2005! Best Wishes. Regards and Happy Editing! ] (]) 18:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| If there is any way at all i can be known as the initiator then please do let me know. ] (]) 17:29, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| :Your username is permanently marked in the ; it will not be removed unless the page is deleted, and even then it will still exist in the deleted pages archive, though it will only be visible to admins. And you could create your userpage by ] and add your name, and whatever else you want people to know about you. Although your userpage is still technically part of the Wiki and thus open to community editing, you will have much more exclusive control over it; see ] for more information. ] ] 17:33, 20 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ] | |||
| I am unsure specifically what it is about my article that is not allowed. The fact that I did gain national newspaper coverage on two occasions surely would be ok? Once for the selling of the carrier bag on eBay (people still talk about it today) and it was in the Daily Mail as I have uploaded the picture to prove it, and the other as I did appear int he Guardian newpapaper, and their website. I did also appear in the Whizzer & Chips comic in 1985, so there are three seperate publications that I have had something printed - two with pictures as well. Can you tell me what I can and cannot keep? I am happy to compromise. Jamiecg74. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:04, 21 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :The Whizzer and Chips thing is basically what is considered a 'trivial mention' under the ]; it's something so small that it doesn't really count. I was in a car accident when I was young and my name was briefly mentioned on the news, but that doesn't really qualify me for an article. The same goes for the "spot the ball" one; somebody winning a local newspaper competition again doesn't really count for much. | |||
| :As for the Daily Mail, I believe that the picture you uploaded is indeed real. However, I don't believe that getting one article written up about you in a national newspaper is really all that notable; though again, I could be wrong. This is why I've nominated it for deletion, instead of just going and deleting it myself, so that the community can give its input. ] ] 21:09, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| How will the community decide and how long will it take before I am notified of a decision? I have uploaded two photographs to validate the information so it least I am not making all this up. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:13, 21 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ] | |||
| :The decision is made via the ] process; it takes five days. At the end, an administrator (who has not previously stated their opinion) will look at the arguments for and against keeping the article and decide to keep or delete it, as they deem appropriate. The debate is held at ]. ] ] 21:51, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] 09:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| I understand your concern that the Draper edit is a bit long, but it is an accurate and complete biography with slew of citations. This wikipedia page is part of University of Florida class project where we have to put our biographies on the webpage. If it could be left up for just a week, that would be great. Thanks ] (]) 22:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :'Your' biographies? I assume you mean biographies that you wrote... unless you are indeed a resurrected Mr. Draper. | |||
| :In any case, the thing of it is that we usually don't allow people to keep their pages up for school projects or whatever. However, you can copy-paste it into someplace in your userspace, so to speak, which would be a page that starts with ], such as ]. You could tweak it then, convert the citations (which I do agree there are a good number of) into a standard wiki format, which uses ], and pare down the text to something more manageable. ] ] 22:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Are you an editor of the site or something or just a user? And yes, I am part of a class of about 20 people who wrote biographies of scientists and will probably be doing the same thing I just did here in the next week.] (]) 23:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm an ]; it's one level above registered user. There's a couple higher levels, though, so it's not like I have any sort of final authority over anything. In any case, I wish you and your class well, and would appreciate it if you pass on my advice: that the articles don't have to be quite as big as that one, though the effort is definitely appreciated. Also make sure to look into that link I posted above about ]; it makes it easier both for people to check them. ] ] 23:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello. I'm about to close your Afd nomination as '''delete'''. Thanks for partcipating. BTW, that was going to be my first non-admin closure. Cheers. Please delete it if it seems it neccessary.--] (''''']''''') 03:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Speadily deleted Melville Rovers Football Club Page == | |||
| <br /> | |||
| Hi, i created the page Melville Rovers Football club as am currently doing so for all the teams in the district league for the university. I am trying to link together all the clubs one by one so that people can access player info and look at club formation. I started with the team i am in as i had all the releveant info- kit colour eg so that teams know what to wear against us. This is not a personal entry as many more will be done. we would also aim to do this for the university hockey and cricket clubs so as to create a more comprehensive picture of recreational sport at our university. i would think that this would be noteable for people coming to the university and theose already at it, cheers | |||
| ] (]) 15:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :The problem is that ]; it requires the existence of multiple independent ] about the specific group. You haven't shown any coverage by, say, a newspaper or anything about the Melville Rovers Football Club, so I deleted it. I would also caution against creation of more pages along similar lines, as they will likely be deleted for similar reasons. ] ] 15:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == BDD page external link == | |||
| <br/> | |||
| Hi, I'm not sure how you can feel that a link to the website of the world's leading authority on the disorder isn't relevant to the topic? It has nothing to do with advertising. It has nothing to do with search engine results. The link was added to simply convey to people another place they can visit to get a lot more detailed information on the disorder, including links to many free scholarly journal publications that have been authored by Dr. Phillips. It's as relevant as the link to BDD Central, if not more relevant because it's information being provided DIRECTLY by the MD considered by nearly everyone in the field to be the foremost authority on BDD. Just because you didn't see the relationship of the link to the topic, doesn't mean there isn't one - and your comment about "removed because it isn't useful to people who don't live near the clinic" was really unfounded and if you took 5 minutes to investigate the site before you wrote that, you would have seen just how much information is there and just how useful it is to those suffering from BDD and those looking to Misplaced Pages to get more info on the disorder. ] (]) 15:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == stockbroker fraud == | |||
| many people to not even know that they have these rights. | |||
| I tried to make this informative rather than an advertisement. Where do I send my permission to? | |||
| Thank you for your help. | |||
| ] (]) 16:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Nicholas J. Guiliano, Esquire | |||
| The Guiliano Law Firm, P.C. | |||
| 230 South Broad Street, Suite 601 | |||
| Philadelphia, PA 19102 | |||
| (215) 413-8223 (Telephone) | |||
| (215) 413-8225 (Telecopier) | |||
| njgesq@aol.com | |||
| www.stockbrokerfraud.com | |||
| :You send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org ] ] 16:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Evil and testing?!? == | |||
| Why did you move ]? -- ] ]</sup> 21:02, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I'm about to tell stewards to desysop you, please respond. ] 21:04, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Because MBisanz on IRC told me AN was move-protected against admins. Apparently it was a ] test. ] ] 21:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Which I didnt think he'd actually try and test... ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 21:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Oy vey. ] 21:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::: {{ec}} Well, that was kinda silly. BTW - checkuser shows the account hasn't been compromised. Might as well post it anyways ... - ] <sup>]</sup> 21:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{Trout}} <font color="forestgreen">]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">]</font> 21:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Next stop ], perhaps? <sub>]</sub><sup>]/]</sup> 21:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | You have been sentenced to the ''']''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For being gullible | |||
| ] (]) 21:12, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Maybe you should have read ]. Same exact situation. An IRC user says this, an admin tries it out, and then: | |||
| {|style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Destroyer of the Wiki Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Oh my gosh what did you do now it seems there are monkeys and fish everywhere someone help they a... <!-- text goes here; credit to Alison for the award --> | |||
| |} — <span style="font-family:Script MT Bold; font-size:12pt">] <span style="font-size: 10pt">(]|])</span></span> 21:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Darn, I came here with my finger on the blocking trigger looking for some action. --] (]) 21:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Seconded. There shall be a fish dinner tonight! --] (]) 21:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Anybody want to try out the new ;)) Double dare? ] (]) 21:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::That's more like it! <!--dream on pal :D--> <font color="forestgreen">]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">]</font> 21:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I wish I didn't have to do this, but I think I probably do: That's a joke, don't do it! There is no such thing as crat protection (although there could be, the software allows for it). --] (]) 21:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Aw, you have to go spoil the fun don't you <tt>:D</tt> ? Hehehe. I think the software only allows for two levels of protection, although you can set the barriers wherever you want. So in order to get crat-only protection we'd have to sacrifice semi <tt>:S</tt> . I could be wrong though. <font color="forestgreen">]</font>‑<font color="darkorange">]</font> 21:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::I'm a spoil sport like that, sorry! As far as I know, there's no limit - there is an array in LocalSetting.php ($wgRestrictionLevels if memory serves) that controls it, and you can just list as many usergroups as you like. --] (]) 21:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Rule of thumb: If you get as far as being able to click the button, it's going to work. MediaWiki tells you that you can't do something before you get to that stage. --] (]) 21:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I was ''so'' about to block you when I saw that on my watchlist. Let this be a lesson: Don't believe what you see on IRC. ]]] 21:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == AIV == | |||
| I responded to your comment on the AIV noticeboard. It's not a content dispute since it's a talk page and the comment clearly violates ] particularly where it states, "Do not be critical in headings." It also violates ]. Further, the blog article attacks Misplaced Pages specifically named editors. --] (]) 21:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Okay, fine, he was critical in his heading. I also don't think he's using it as a forum; he want to discuss it. Granted, he may not have the viewpoint you agree with, but I at least don't think he's using it as a forum. I won't block, at the very least. ] ] 21:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::How is it not using the talk page as a forum? ] clearly states, " are not mere general discussion pages about the subject of the article, nor are they a helpdesk for obtaining instructions or technical assistance. If you wish to ask a specific question on a topic, Misplaced Pages has a Reference Desk, and questions should be asked there rather than on talk pages." In this case, he is bringing up an absolutely off-topic point - a non-governmental organization's attempts to influence content on Misplaced Pages which has nothing to do with "Allegations of Israeli Apartheid." In addition to this, he has continuously readded the material. --] (]) 21:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Eh, I guess you have a point. Looks like it's been taken care of, though, as the report is no longer on AIV. ] ] 21:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yeah, either way I think it's more of a problem concerning communication. The user brought it up on the incident noticeboard rather than adding it to the talk page again. Hopefully that is a better area in which to clarify policy concerning the matter. --] (]) 21:59, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 21 March 2023
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Veinor has not edited Misplaced Pages since October 7, 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Please add any new sections to the bottom of the page, sign them at the end by typing ~~~~, and insert an appropriate header; see examples below for how to do that. If you don't do so, then your comment runs the risk of being ignored. I will reply to them here.
PSA Artwork
April 2007 I added "trivia" that is factually true about the origin of PSA's logo airplane, which I created. I would like to suggest that the addition be reinserted, and that any info you feel is self-promoting can be left out. I am no longer an illustrator, and you have mistakenly presumed I am trying to promote my work. Not at all so. Just trying to relate the true history of the logo, and the connection to the film "Pursuit of happyness." ~~~~
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Happy 7th Misplaced Pages Anniversary to you :)
Hi Veinor :) Greetings on your 7th Misplaced Pages Anniversary since your joining of Misplaced Pages on 11 September, 2005! Best Wishes. Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 18:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Acalamari 09:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC)