| Revision as of 05:03, 2 December 2008 editMasem (talk | contribs)Administrators187,714 edits →Quick q on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Carmelita Fox: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:04, 17 August 2024 edit undoB-bot (talk | contribs)Bots533,802 edits Notification that File:SuperfundLogo us.gif is orphaned and will be deleted in seven days per WP:CSD#F5 | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Not around|is not currently active on Misplaced Pages|3=13 February 2024}} | |||
| {{Editor review|MBisanz 2|his}} | |||
| Hi, This is just my talk page, feel free to leave any advice on my edits or ask for help on anything. If you feel I've abused my administrative or BAG powers, please see ] for further instructions to request their removal. | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 250K | |maxarchivesize = 250K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 23 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(5d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:MBisanz/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:MBisanz/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{AutoArchivingNotice|small=yes|age=10|target=./Archive 1|dounreplied=yes|index=./Archive index|bot=MiszaBot III}} | |||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:MBisanz/Archive index|mask=User talk:MBisanz/Archive <#>|indexhere=nein|template=User:MBisanz/indextemplate}} | |||
| {{archives|small=yes}} | |||
| Hi, This is just my talk page, feel free to leave any advice on my edits or ask for help on anything. If you feel I've abused my administrative or BAG powers, please see ] for further instructions to request their removal. | |||
| {{User:MiszaBot/Trackers/CAT:DFUI|align=left}}{{-}} | |||
| {{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn|target=User talk:MBisanz/Archive index|mask=User talk:MBisanz/Archive <#>|indexhere=no|leading_zeros=0}} | |||
| {{archives|small=yes|search=yes|age=5|bot=MiszaBot III}}{{INDEX}} | |||
| == |
==Merry Christmas!== | ||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| {{talkback|Robertgreer}} | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| ]<sup>]</sup> is wishing you a ] ]! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! <br /> | |||
| ] | |||
| <small><center><font color=#f7458c>] | ] | Design by ]</font></small></center></br> | |||
| {| style="border: 2px solid #f40850; background-color: #f4c2c2;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Mizu onna sango15 Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you to all who participated in my RFA- regardless of whether you supported or opposed,<br> | |||
| all feedback is important to me. I look forward to proving in the coming months that the trust placed in me by the community is not misplaced. <br> | |||
| —]<sup>'']''</sup> | |||
| |}</br> | |||
| ''Spread the cheer by adding {{tls|Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.'' | |||
| == Request for neutral judgment == | |||
| </div> | |||
| ==Request for Undeletion - Kingsley's Chicken== | |||
| Hi MBisanz. Back in 2016 you closed off an RfD ] about this local take-away chain. Since then, there have been numerous news articles involving the chain, including in a multinational publication, an explosion in one of their stores, and inclusions in lists of "Australia's Best hot chips" by nationally syndicated broadcasters. | |||
| I'd like to request undeletion so I can add new information and references to demonstrate notability. If you feel it's more appropriate given the contentious deletion history, perhaps it could be userfied and I will make the changes and run it through an AfC process. Thanks! ] (]) 23:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Hi Matt. I wonder of you could take a look at Natural Stress Relief or suggest an editor who could, to see if the article is notable enough for Misplaced Pages. Because I have been involved in removing a link and information NSR added to the TM page as a spam link, and inappropriate material for the TM article, I don't feel I can be seen as a neutral editor. I'm not attached in any way, do need an outside opinion, and will be satisfied with whatever the judgement is. Many thanks.(] (]) 05:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC)) | |||
| :I'll try to remember to get to it later tonight. Thanks. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:14, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, it is very poorly written to begin with, more of a "how-to" style than an encyclopedia. I think it can be folded as a redirect into the main TM article for now, since the only sourcable content I can see is "NSR is a cheaper form of TM that involves repeating a silent mantra to release stress". Hope that helps. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 14:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Happy First Edit Day!== | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| ::Thanks. My thought would be to leave it for now. If we includeed every form of meditation that was somehow like or not like TM , the article would be enormous. There has been discussion on TM as well to have more science since there have been at least 450 peer reviewed studies on the technique and that would extend the article. There has been a general agreement over time to remove or limit the article to just TM not other forms of meditation .... NSR is a single mantra form very different from TM in that regard, even other "advanced techniques" taught by the TM organization have been moved into thoir own artilces, so that it is clear what the article is about. At any rate its good to have your input.(] (]) 15:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)_ | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| | name = First Edit Day | |||
| == ] == | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| Hi. You closed ] as delete. I think we all overlooked ] which was originally a redirect to ] but has been revamped as a re-creation of the deleted article. I tagged it for speedy deletion several hours ago but no-one has got round to it yet. ] (]) 16:29, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid CornflowerBlue; background: linear-gradient(to left, Gold, #FFF600); | |||
| :Someone else fixed it. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| == ] == | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy First Edit Day!'''</big><br />Hi MBisanz! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made and became a Wikipedian! ] (]) 06:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Can you run your grep again but this time only search for policies ? Please reply at village pump ] (]) 17:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == RfA thanks == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #E6F2FF;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The RfA Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | {{BASEPAGENAME}}, I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent ], which '''passed''' with 112 supports, 4 opposes and 5 neutrals. A special mention goes out to ] and ] for nominating me, thanks a lot for having trust in me! In response to the neutrals, I will try to double check articles that have been tagged for speedy deletion before I CSD them and will start off slowly with the drama boards of ] and ] to ensure that I get used to them. In response to the oppose !votes on my RfA, I will check that any images I use meet the ] and will attempt to handle any disputes or queries as well as I can. If you need my help at all, feel free to simply at my ] and I'll see if I can help. Once again, thank you for your participation, and have a great day! :) ]]] 22:08, 25 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| <p align="center"><small><font face="Trebuchet MS">design by ] | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste <nowiki>{{subst:User:Neurolysis/THOBS}}</nowiki> and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies</font></small></p> | |||
| == ACE template == | |||
| Yeah, I guess you can add my thing to the ACE template. I probably haven't thought through everything I've written that well, so the feedback would probably be good. How'd you find my page, by the way? I deliberately gave it a useless name. --] (]) 01:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| : LOL, people were like "Psst, there's a secret ArbCom guide. It's nuts." And you were like "Ooh, I have to find this!" As if it's a speakeasy or something :) --] (]) 02:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Basically :P ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 02:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Visopsys == | |||
| If you undelete ] I'll improve it; I know a lot about these "hobby" OSes. As you can see I just fixed up the ] article and can do more so tomorrow (or today), because it's way past midnight. I've left ] a little message too. Thanks. ] (]) 03:31, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Please see ], the consensus was quite clear. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 15:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Access to deleted material == | |||
| Hi! Can you send me the text of my deleted version of the image description page, so that I can use that on Commons? Thanks, --] 15:45, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 15:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::]<span style="display:none">Y</span> '''Where?''' --] 16:33, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Emailed via EmailUser. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 16:36, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::::]<span style="display:none">Y</span> '''Thanks!''' --] 16:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy Thanksgiving! == | |||
| ] | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to ], supportive enough to ], etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, ]<sup>'']''</sup> 02:35, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Oops - looks like I was commenting, just as you were closing. As per my comment - he seems to easily meet ], with several articles such as . ] (]) 04:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Hmm, even with your comment, it seems that consensus points at him being non-notable. I'm willing to relist it if you think that would make a great different, but I'm not sure it would change much. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 05:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| * Can you please relist. Also in ] all the keep discussion was based on the person meeting ] however your closing statement only addresses the person failing ] which no one contested. ] (]) 18:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *:My close takes into account all of the comments relating to notability made. That one is a clear close to delete. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Arbstats done == | |||
| I think ] is mostly done now, although I still need to ask Franamax if all Privatemusings numbers were talled from various accounts. ] (]) 19:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *{{done}} ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 02:04, 28 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == DYKsuggestion == | |||
| Crap. I need to remember to do edits at the dev template from now on...I still haven't quite gotten used to the fact that the regular template is actually being used by people. Anyway, I reverted back to the old version and it looks like things are fixed now (I was only able to give T:TDYK a cursory glance, though). Thank you very much for notifying me. —] <small><sup>''']'''</sup></small>/<small><sub>''']'''</sub></small> 07:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == assistence on Coolhunting page == | |||
| Hi MBisanz, | |||
| I'm looking over the Coolhunting page, that just recently has been discussed. I'm afraid I was too late to enter the discussion. I was looking for ways to add my view on this: that is that coolhunting is a special form of trend watching (which doesn't seem to have a page also), although some articles seem rewritten from a trendwatching.com company kind of direction. The kind of coolhunting I do in my professional work is about finding consumer mentalities. Mentalities are also somehow differently discribed. None of these three concepts seem to be linked in trend, sociologically and in the end marketing, kind of way. How could I propose the linking (the framework) of these three concepts? | |||
| Apreciate your thoughts on this one. | |||
| --] (]) 23:19, 28 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Everyme == | |||
| Erm, FYI, it's a dyn IP from a large pool and blocking such IPs for prolonged periods is rarely useful. Look. I know I am evading my block, but it's not like I'm doing or trying to do any damage, quite to the contrary. I've done some minor formatting as well, and I see no reason not to boldly ignore all rules and still do some very minor uncontroversial stuff with proper edit summaries. I'm still a reader, you know, and I correct errors as I happen upon them just like in the old days before I ever registered an account. ''And'' I contact acquaintances whom I know in advance will more than gladly tolerate me. Blocking my IP just for that appears, well, a tad ''vengeful'', don't you think? ] (]) 00:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Jclemens RfA == | |||
| {{ #ifeq: Jclemens' RfA Thankspam | end | </div></div> | | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="width:100%"><div class="NavHead" | |||
| style="color: #ffc000; background-color: #1010d0;">Jclemens' RfA Thankspam</div><div class="NavContent" | |||
| style="display:{{#ifeq:yes|yes|show|none}}; text-align:left;"> | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| ==Happy 'cratship Anniversary!== | |||
| <!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #ffd000;" | |||
| {{ombox | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| | name = Happy Bureaucratship | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color: #1010d0;" | '''JClemens' RfA Thanks''' | |||
| | imageright = ] | |||
| |- | |||
| | style = border: 2px solid SlateBlue; background: linear-gradient(300deg, AliceBlue, LavenderBlush 30%, LavenderBlush 70%, AliceBlue); | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | '''Thank you for participating in ], which passed with 77 supporting and 2 opposing. Regardless of your position, I thank you for the time you took to examine my record and formulate your response. ] (]) 02:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC)''' | |||
| | textstyle = padding: 0.75em; text-align:center; | |||
| |} | |||
| | plainlinks = yes | |||
| | text = <big>'''Happy bureaucratship anniversary!'''</big><br />Hi MBisanz! On behalf of the ], I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your . Enjoy this special day! ] (]) 08:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{ #ifeq: end | end | </div></div> | | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="width:100%"><div class="NavHead" | |||
| style="background:00 FF FF;">end</div><div class="NavContent" | |||
| style="display:{{#ifeq:{{{show}}}|yes|show|none}}; text-align:left;"> | |||
| }} | }} | ||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:SuperfundLogo us.gif== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == List of fictional swords == | |||
| Hi, MBisanz. Given the weight of arguments on both sides of ], and the complete inappropriateness of the nomination comments, I'm surprised you closed it without a word of explanation. I'm curious how you arrived at your conclusion that there was consensus for removal. ] <sup><small><small>]</small></small></sup> 14:56, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :It was actually a rather easier close than the page size would indicate. Most of the Keep comments centered around the nominator and his incivility. Most of the Delete comments cited things like indiscriminate list and reliable sources, etc. At the end of the day, the discussion was on the article, not the nominator, and the arguments on the article indicated deletion. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:05, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I too was rather startled by your close, and I think it did not take account of the improvements to the article during the discussion. I suggest you look again at the deleted article. I'm sure you recognize that a list of things mostly having their own article cannot be called ''indiscriminate''. I'd suggest reversing to a non-consensus. ''']''' (]) 19:26, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :::Of the last 4 comments to the AFD, made on or after Nov 26th, three supported deletion. They were all made after any revision work had been completed. I'm just not seeing any other close, even with revisions. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 20:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| *IMO a Delete or No Consensus would both have been perfectly acceptable closes of this AfD. MBisanz came down on the side of delete which is well within reasonable admin discretion given the opinions expressed in the AfD. The article wasn't much improved since nomination, at best any improvement was very moderate. The article wasn't indiscriminate, very few list articles truly are, but it was far too broad a subject matter to exercise reasonable discriminate control over. ] (]) 21:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| **For what it is worth, I actually didn't comment in this one, because I thought the nomination was so over the top I just didn't want to dignify it. Had I commented, I would have made the following argument... '''Strong speedy keep''' as it is a discriminate list that serves a purpose. Nomination is insulting and many deletes are unsubstantiated “votes” with ] and ] style of non-arguments. In this particular case, given the incivility of the nomination, deletes “per nom” all the more disturbing. Whether you think the article should be deleted or not, we have to take a stand against blatant incivility. I would never want to be party to a deletion in which the nomination attacks fellow editors and readers and I would hope no one else would either. This discussion should be speedily closed for that reason alone. Moreover, this page is for a discussion and not a vote. Three of the deletes above only have “delete” followed by a signature. Three more only have “delete” followed by “per nom,“ and the nomination has already been discredited. Other cite mere essays about “cruft”, which are not policies or guidelines. Which only leaves us with repetitive calls that it is indiscriminate, and yet we know that is not true because it has a clear discriminate criteria for inclusion. Only swords. And only fictional swords at that. And per our other policies and guidelines, as is understood, only fictional swords verified in reliable sources. As far as saying it is unsalvageable, practically everything that is not just made up nonsense is improvable, including this article. Finally, an article such as this one serves as a table of contents to other articles. Best, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 15:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Blah == | |||
| Sorry for two in a row, but that's what you get when you close AfDs I guess. =) In ], I don't understand how you found no consensus. The arguments for keep were largely unsupported: "it's more than a dicdef" without further explanation. Did you find those arguments equally compelling as the deletion arguments? ] <sup><small><small>]</small></small></sup> 15:03, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :It basically came down to both sides disagreeing over the definition of ]. Both sides cited reasons, like it being a dicdef or it fitting into our category structure, and in light of the prior AFDs, it appears to be one of those articles that has a good number of people on both sides, but no clear consensus about it. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 19:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::I thought this was a good close. Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 14:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK for University of Arkansas Community College at Hope == | |||
| {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} ''''']'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:|, and ''''']'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> ] (]) 13:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK for Rich Mountain Community College == | |||
| {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} ''''']'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:|, and ''''']'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> ] (]) 13:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| For what it is worth, even though I created the article and argued to keep, I thought your close accurately read consensus. Well done! Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 14:59, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Great work == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I've noticed your RFDs of innappropriate redirects, all of them were great noms, great work ]] 15:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi, would you be good enough to take a second look at the close, please? Now that the page has been made a DMB I think that the consensus became keep (as a DMB not the original article). Also, you redirected ] but left ] which still carries the AfD tag. ] (]) 16:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 20:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you. ] (]) 02:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Locking the scorebaord == | |||
| What's the rationale for this? ''']''' ('']'') 03:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I move protected it since I don't want Grawp page moving it and breaking the bot and having to wait hours for Gurch to come home and reset it. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 03:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Sorry, didn't notice it was move only. ''']''' ('']'') 03:31, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == {{tl|smallcaps}} TfD == | |||
| Hi, | |||
| Sorry about that; the problem is that Twinkle doesn't note an error when it can't add a TfD tag to a fully-protected template. I've started a discussion on the talk page; any particular suggestion on how long to leave this before a re-nom? and fancy downgrading the template to semiprotection so that auto-tagging works next time? ] - ] 16:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :I have no idea what that template does and would be scared to edit it. Try asking ], he knows more about complex formatting and could probably add the TFD if needed. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 16:10, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :: D'oh! Wrong admin! Sorry for the confusion! ] - ] 16:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Dont need it anymore == | |||
| It's ok i don't need it anymore. The Flag is only useful if i was still using the ACC Tool. But now since im revoked from using it there is no need for it anymore. Regards <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:navy;">'''] ] ]''']'''</span> 21:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :No but im sorry about my resent threats but i ain't the happiest wiki here. <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:navy;">'''] ] ]''']'''</span> 21:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you for participating in my RfA == | |||
| I just wanted to take a moment to say "thank you" for taking the time and effort to participate in my recent RfA. As you may know, the discussion closed 66/0/1 and I'm now a holder of the mop. I will keep working to improve the encyclopedia and appreciate the trust which you have placed in me. - ] (]) 00:07, 2 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == DYK for National Park Community College == | |||
| {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:|yes|small|standard}}-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |On ], ], ''']''' was updated with {{#if:|facts|a fact}} from the article{{#if:|s|}} ''''']'''''{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:|{{#if:|, |, and}} ''''']''''' | |||
| }}{{#if:|, and ''''']'''''}}, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |||
| |} <!-- ], ] --> ] (]) 01:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Quick q on ] == | |||
| I don't disagree on the deletion, it was obviously the right thing to do - but this is a likely search term and should at least be a redirect to the list of characters. Is there any problem for me creating that? --] 05:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:04, 17 August 2024
 | This user is not currently active on Misplaced Pages. MBisanz has not edited Misplaced Pages since 13 February 2024. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Hi, This is just my talk page, feel free to leave any advice on my edits or ask for help on anything. If you feel I've abused my administrative or BAG powers, please see User:MBisanz/Recall for further instructions to request their removal.
 Archives |
| Index |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Merry Christmas!
CAPTAIN RAJU is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Request for Undeletion - Kingsley's Chicken
Hi MBisanz. Back in 2016 you closed off an RfD here about this local take-away chain. Since then, there have been numerous news articles involving the chain, including one in a multinational publication, an explosion in one of their stores, and inclusions in lists of "Australia's Best hot chips" by nationally syndicated broadcasters. I'd like to request undeletion so I can add new information and references to demonstrate notability. If you feel it's more appropriate given the contentious deletion history, perhaps it could be userfied and I will make the changes and run it through an AfC process. Thanks! Dfadden (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Wilber F. Breslin Center for Real Estate Studies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wilber F. Breslin Center for Real Estate Studies is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Wilber F. Breslin Center for Real Estate Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Variety312 (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
 | Happy First Edit Day! Hi MBisanz! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC) |  |
Happy 'cratship Anniversary!
 | Happy bureaucratship anniversary! Hi MBisanz! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for bureaucratship. Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 08:27, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |
Orphaned non-free image File:SuperfundLogo us.gif
Thanks for uploading File:SuperfundLogo us.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories: