Misplaced Pages

User talk:Smashville: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:40, 24 January 2009 editSmashville (talk | contribs)10,619 edits Sixteenth note: thanks!← Previous edit Latest revision as of 09:09, 3 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB 
(556 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 2 |counter = 3
|algo = old(7d) |algo = old(3d)
|archive = User talk:Smashville/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Smashville/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
Line 8: Line 8:
{{User talk}} {{User talk}}
{{Archive box| {{Archive box|
*] - Aug 2007 to Dec 2007<br> *] - Aug 2007 to Dec 2007<br>
*] - Dec 2007 to Present *] - Dec 2007 to August 2009<br>
*] - August 2009 to Present
}} }}
__TOC__ __TOC__


== Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
== ] ==


]
I suggest protecting it for a short time due to abuse of unblock template. ] (]) 17:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return&nbsp;if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 00:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
:I was gonna give him one more shot...which he apparently used up...--]] 17:43, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


== Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
== Sorry! ==


]
I apologise for accidentally recreating ]. I was tagging it for speedy deletion, but you managed to delete it before I could do such a thing. Sorry! Please accept this barnstar for your trouble.
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return&nbsp;if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> ] (]) 00:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)


==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity==
]
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->–]] 04:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Editor's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | ] (]) 20:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
|}


== Notification of automated file description generation ==
== Rihanna ==
Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.


This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
that source is not right?] 18:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
:You can't use ] in an article. --]] 20:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


== ] ==
== RE: ==


{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm very sorry, I don't know how to find out if Colts1 and Sinofdreams are the same guy another way. ]]]] 20:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692057745 -->
:You could request a checkuser or file a suspected sockpuppet report. However, the fact that he isn't caught in Colts1's autoblock should tell you something. --]] 20:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


== Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago ==
He i'm not colts1 but I can tell you that he does have other accounts on wikipedia that got blocked because of sock pupetry. '''<span style="border: 2px black solid;background:yellow;font-family:futana;">&nbsp;] ]&nbsp;</span>''' 21:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox

| title = Awesome
== Hello ==
| image = Cscr-featured.svg

| image_upright = 0.35
I Noticed That There Is A Colts1 That Was Blocked
| bold = ]
IM NOT HIM
}}

--] (]) 17:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
I Tried To Make My Account Colts1 But It Said It Was Already In Use
Please Nominate Me To Be An Admin

Thanks
] (]) 03:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

EDIT: I Live In Indiana And I Noticed That You Created The Indiana Down Article...Im Not From Shelbysville But Isnt It A Part Of The Casino Indiana Live <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Conspicuous Behavior ==

Hey, I'm Hazardous Matt. You might remember me from such hair-pulling episodes as "Kalajan", and "Kalajan II: The Blockening".

''ahem'' Anyway, I was trying to stay out of that whole thing. Unwatched all the related pages, trying to let the block be a block, etc. Taking a step back and all that. Anyway, today I got a message from a brand new user ]. Very few contributions, saw my signature on ] and wanted me to make one. No big deal. Anyway, I asked them what they wanted in their signature (noting a very short list of contributions). They wanted . Normally, okay, except this is the very same signature that.

Okay, conincidence, right? I look at the userpage for ]. It's got similar links, the same friends list, all of that. Then I look at the contributions and notice that and he promptly took down the unblock request. Incidentally, .

I was prepared to just ignore this. I figured it was nothing but happenstance. Then, he ].

Please tell me if I'm going all Oliver Stone here. '''<span style="border: 2px black solid;background:yellow;font-family:futana;">&nbsp;] ]&nbsp;</span>''' 16:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
:While I hate to see like I'm hounding the issue: His first userpage edit was almost an exact replica of ]. That's it. I've said what I needed to. '''<span style="border: 2px black solid;background:yellow;font-family:futana;">&nbsp;] ]&nbsp;</span>''' 17:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
::I've blocked him as an obvious sock of Sinofdreams. ] too, which somehow had slipped thru the cracks. --] (]) 17:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

== peer review request for the Spokane article ==

Hey, Smashville. Im searching for an editor to peer review the ] GAN in the near future (after it gets done being reviewed -which I expect to happen before next week). If you are interested, please contact me on my talk page so I can stop scouting out editors. Thanks! ] (]) 22:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

: Im taking your silence as a 'no'. Ill find someone else then, thanks anyway. ] (]) 06:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
::Sorry...Didn't mean to not respond...never got around to looking into it. GAN's are an area that I haven't spent much time, so I don't know that you'd be getting a fair deal with me...--]] 06:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

== MfD nomination of ] ==

], a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 04:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)



== Requested semi-protection ==

Hi, could you please semi-protect ] page for vandalism by IP's? Thanks. '''<span style="border: 2px black solid;background:Red;font-family:Chiller;">&nbsp;]]&nbsp;</span>''' 21:12, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
:It doesn't look like it has enough going on to warrant a semi- at this point. --]] 22:44, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

== thanks ==
thanks for the welcome template.--] (]) 23:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
:Quite welcome! (no pun intended) --]] 23:31, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

== Sixteenth note ==

I restored ]. I think you meant to revert, not delete. =) -- ] (]) 23:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
:Indeed...my downstairs neighbor heard my massive four letter word string...--]] 23:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 09:09, 3 April 2022

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Archiving icon
Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. –xeno 04:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Churchill Downs 6-16-07 - Patten 025.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:28, 15 September 2019 (UTC)