Revision as of 15:57, 11 March 2009 editWw2censor (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers108,006 edits Where is remedy #2?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:42, 3 December 2023 edit undoScolaire (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,739 edits →ARCA: links | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WPBS| | |||
{{IECOLL|notes= Everybody is invited to participate in discussions here. The discussion is moderated by a panel appointed by ArbCom, which currently consists of ], ] and ]. Moderators can moderate the discussion and delete any off-topic conversation; in particular personal attacks will be deleted. <!-- (please uncomment when the word "Moderators" gets changed back to "Members":) Please consider using {{TL|OT}} for clarity. --> If you have a complaint about a user, please try to resolve it on their talk page first. For any complaints, please always be specific and provide links. | |||
{{WikiProject Ireland}} | |||
{{WikiProject Northern Ireland}} | |||
Please, for the moment, refrain from discussing the individual Ireland naming options until we agree on a procedure. | |||
{{WikiProject Unionism in Ireland}} | |||
{{WikiProject Irish Republicanism}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
{| class="infobox" width="150" | |||
|archiveheader = {{aan}} | |||
|- align="center" | |||
|maxarchivesize = 150K | |||
| ] | |||
|counter = 34 | |||
''']''' | |||
|minthreadsleft = 4 | |||
---- | |||
|algo = old(15d) | |||
|- align="center" | |||
| |
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | |||
] | |||
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn | |||
|} | |||
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes | |||
}} | |||
{{archive box |bot=lowercase sigmabot III |age=15 |units=days |auto=yes |search=yes |index=/Archive index }} | |||
{{Shortcut|WT:IECOLL}} | {{Shortcut|WT:IECOLL}} | ||
== Move: Republic of Ireland → Ireland (country) == | |||
=General and housekeeping = | |||
{{atop}} | |||
As an Irish citizen, I was shocked and surprised to find that the title of the Misplaced Pages page for my country does not bear the actual name of my country. | |||
= Ireland naming question = | |||
== Status == | |||
ArbCom now officially announced moderators at ]. — ] 20:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
We're still waiting for a third moderator. — ] 08:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:And still waiting. <small>Remainer of post moved to ].</small> ] (]) 19:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
We have a third moderator since Feb 19, so we're complete. — ] 01:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Goals and expectations == | |||
: ''Clarification of the title: "expectations" refers to ''where'' we want to be, not ''how'' to get there. For the latter, pls refer to the specific sections, such as ] above or ] below. — ] 20:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
I realize I rushed this initially, before finding out what everybody's expectations are. All we know for sure is that ArbCom wants this settled somehow. But what are the priorities for people here? Is it more important to be fast, to avoid discussions, or to include everyone and every viewpoint - or some other important criteria, which I forgot? Are there any goals that we should set ourselves? Please let us know; you're the experts on this issue! — ] 10:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
: A final solution that as many people as possible are prepared to defend should be the goal. Trying to resolve the problem quickly will end up leaving out some people and will make the final choice harder to defend. All views should be taken into account and all options, but the aim should be to find the least controversial / offensive / unacceptable option. When trying to decide which is the best option, the amount of strong opposition to a certain choice should be taken very seriously otherwise theres going to be many people who will find it hard to respect the result. ] (]) 10:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:: Agree with BritishWatcher, <small>].]</small> --] <small>]</small> 11:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Publicity / notice== | |||
Could I ask the appointed mediators to widely advertise the existence of this project and more importantly the tasks at hand of deciding on a mechanism for Ireland-related-article-naming and following through on that mechanism till a decision is arrived at? ]<sup>]</sup> 10:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
: I think we should wait with that until the moderator panel is complete and agrees on its task, because we're not really operational yet. I am sorry, it was my mistake to already announce this at ]; I just thought I could take advantage of the momentum there and get this project going. I also don't see a need to advertize this much further than at ]. My reason for that is that I believe that people who are really interested in Ireland have either the article or the project on their watchlist. If you disagree, please provide a reason that refutes this point. — ] 11:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
::While probably most people will see it at ], the issue has previously been debated extensively in other places, including, off the top of my head, ] and especially ]. If we're to have "closure" on the issue arising from whatever is decided, I believe we should have as many participants as possible. No problem holding off for the moment until the panel is complete. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: Sounds reasonable. Unless there are any objections, let's go with that. — ] 18:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::'''Yes, can we please have more formal and clear announcements?''' One of the problems with the last "polls" was that one of them was conducted in ]. To the closing admin, it looked like it was a proper location and widely contributed to project but to the community it was a contested space. | |||
:::This project was unknown of before the announcement that the Ireland/Republic of Ireland dispute would move on to this theatre (see: and ). It didn't even have any members! | |||
:::I am also worried about word above that discussion will only take place between the "members" of a project. As an IP-based contributor, by "membership" of a project would be a tenuous concept since I have no username to sign them membership list. --] (]) 13:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::: Maybe we should start publicizing this already despite the panel not being complete. Are there any objections? Maybe we could have wording along these lines: "While the main process has not begun yet, as our panel is not complete yet, we would like to invite people to help in preparing and selecting the process." {{interrupted|SebastianHelm}} | |||
Now that we are taking statement should we start letting people know? I can inform all users who posted at the ] using ] if we wish ] (]) 23:44, 11 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
: Yes, we should have done that. Sorry, it seems we all overlooked this discussion. Now that we've been waiting for so long, I would like to first clean up the page, so that newcomers don't get overwhelmed. I archived those sections that had been resolved for a while and added new resolved tags or comments to sections that I would like to resolve, and I think we can archive them in three days. Or, alternatively, should we move everything that's still relevant to the "Statements" subpage or another subpage? — ] 02:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I'd be bold and move tidy up no, we can pull out from archive if needed .] (]) 11:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: Fine with me. — ] 20:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I plan to inform anyone who posted at ] and our parent project, should anyone else be informed? ] (]) 11:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: I originally only though of posting it at the few related articles and projects, as Bastun proposed above. But I have no objection to your proposal, other than that it's more work. — ] 20:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::AWB will make short work of it. We just need to agree the text of the notice now ] (]) 21:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::: Ah, of course! I'll create a sandbox at ], so we can edit it together. — ] 21:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
I realize I accidentally volunteered myself to do the cleanup here, so I did that now. :-) I also archived ] and ], but I didn't want to tread on other wikiprojects' turf and I left them unarchived. So, as far as I'm concerned, the publicity / notice can begin. Please archive this section, and the Hello and proposed text sections, too, when there is no objection. — ] 18:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Carrying out Edokter's plan == | |||
''(Headline inserted for better visibility. This was a reply to Sebastian's message of 00:20, 6 February 2009.)'' | |||
When I volunteered for this job, I had no idea about the complexities behind the whole affair. Until the ArbCom case, there was much discussion with plenty of proposals, but sadly no consensus. Since Remedy #2 started, there has been only discussion about discussion, and I feel we're not getting anywhere. I made one proposal ], which has no responses to date, which is not very motivating. If I am to continue as a moderator, I am going to insist on a procedure that is simple, concise and to the point. | |||
This discussion needs to be based on fact, not opinion. I am going to go ahead with what I proposed above and hold a non-rebuttal debate; I want statements which members can either endorse or oppose, nothing more. I need a structured exchange of ideas, because I do not look forward to have to dig through pages of open talk each day and even try to understand the current state of consensus. I expected to steer the discussion, not to discuss the steering. | |||
When this was sent to ArbCom, people expected a ruling. I believe most members still want a ruling at some level, if only because they are tired of discussion. We can not rule as moderators, but we can guide the discussion, and I think it is time to do so by simply setting the rules instead of asking for them. That is my proposal, and my role as moderator is tied to it. I will say this now before it's too late; I will ''fail'' as a moderator and will retire if I am not expected to guide this discussion toward a satisfying conclusion. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 23:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
: I support this. Its time we tried something, and this is as good an idea as any other. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 00:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
: (ec) Thank you for stepping up to the challenge. Since it's your plan, I have no problem letting you take the lead. Are there any objections? — ] 00:24, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
: Sounds fine to me. A moderated/closed debate is fine. I think the most important point isn't so much what the process is as that whatever process is followed it be controlled and enforced and that it be conducted with an understanding that there *will* be a conclusion reached at the end. I don't mean to say that any old process will do--just that ultimately someone is going to have to say "This is going to be the process.", pressumably having incorporated the best ideas from the different suggestions made. ] (]) 13:49, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I concur eith Edokter's suggestion. (Yes, I expected a ruling.) Just tell us where to debate and what the rules are. -- ]·] 14:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Fine by me. ] ]] 15:08, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:That proposal also seems fine to me. ]<sup>]</sup> 14:04, 8 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
: Sounds like a good plan, i fully support it. ] (]) 14:46, 8 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I had understood that to be the original plan. Remedy#1 was that we would come up with our own way to reach a decision. (Although, I must add that I had also understood that we had reached the same decision on this matter time and time again since 2002.) | |||
:Remedy#1 failed. Remedy#2, I thought, was that ArbCom would tell us how to reach a decision and that decision would be binding for two years. Let's have it (... and lo! we might even arrive at the same decision again for the 7th year running!). --] (]) 00:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Very well. I see Gnevin has already set up the discussion. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 15:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{OT|by=User:DrKiernan|who=User:Gnevin|rev=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ireland_Collaboration&oldid=269526452}} | |||
==Statement process== | |||
In order to keep this page tidy and readable .Please create you statements at ]. When you have add it to ] in the correct subsection ] (]) 13:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
: If this is to be similar to RfC pages, wouldn't it be more appropriate to have just one page for all? — ] 06:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:: I prefer the AFD style of discussion so I can watch or unwatch discussions and see the related differences between discussions not every change that happens, this page may get quite active. This way is easier to follow ] (]) 17:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
===General statements=== | |||
Should statements be limited to just the problems or is ] ok ? ] (]) 21:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:I used 'general' because I had a little trouble categorizingRTG's statement. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 22:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
=== Important ! This a no rebuttal process=== | |||
I've had to remove 3 comments with in the last day. Please read ]. User are requested to indicate their support or disagreement on the statement pages by signing their name. Use the statements talk if you wish to discuss a statement ] (]) 14:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Sorry ~ ].].] 17:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:: So how do I challenge the erroneous assumption in the propositions that Ireland (country) is the same as Ireland (state)? ] ] --] (]) 21:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Use the talk page if you really want to discuss it ] (]) 21:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::But this ''is'' the talk page... Or is there another talk page? --] (]) 21:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::Well if I wanted to discuss a point about your statement i would do so at ] ] (]) 21:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::The whole point is not to ''discuss'', but to gather viewpoints. You can create your own statement page (which you've already done). <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 23:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Index of statements== | |||
{{Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration/Statement}} | |||
{{Special:PrefixIndex/Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration/statement}} | |||
I agree that Ireland, the island, pre-dates the establishment of either state on the island and therefore the article "Ireland" should refer to the island. The use of parenthetical disambiguation is a fair, accurate and unbiased solution. | |||
I created ] with the links to the 4 pages that are currently in this list. This allows to watch all of them together via ]. The problem, of course, is that that page doesn't get updated automatically, as the above list does. I just thought I'd post this here in case anyone finds it helpful. — ] 22:31, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Any reference to "The Republic of Ireland Act 1948" in relation to the name of the country is irrelevant, as the act made no reference to the name of the country and the name is clearly defined in the Irish constitution of 1937 and no subsequent amendment has changed the name. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en/html#part2 | |||
:, this will show the related changes as statements are added ] (]) 23:05, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
It should also be noted that since the 2009 poll on this topic, Misplaced Pages has introduced auto suggest in the search field on the homepage. When a user enters the word “Ireland” into the search field the country is not in the list of suggested articles, as it is currently identified by a reference that is obscure to most. ] (]) 15:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC) (]) 15:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC) <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:: That helps a bit, and I now transcluded that page in the watchlist, so at least the WP pages get automatically included. However, the talk pages are still not in the list, which is not good, as can be seen at ]. — ] 02:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:{{tpq|As an Irish citizen, I was shocked and surprised to find that the title of the Misplaced Pages page for my country does not bear the actual name of my country.}} Why? '''Most''' countries aren't at their official name on Misplaced Pages. Very, very few 'state' articles actually reside at the official name of the state in question - see, e.g.: ], ], ], ], and ] - all doing well at page titles other than the official. "Ireland" is also the name of the island, which doesn't have a natural disambiguator. "Republic of Ireland" is a natural disambiguator for the state and is its official description. This has worked perfectly well both before and after the ]. If you read through ''that'', and the archives of this page, and can still then bring something new to the table, then of course it can be discussed - ] can change. But if your argument is solely that this isn't the name of the state, that won't serve to change anything. ]<sup>]</sup> 15:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Hello? == | |||
::Thanks for pointing me towards the historical discussion on this topic, it made for fascinating, yet disappointing, reading. I would counter that the current naming isn't working, as requests for change are made so frequently, much to the chagrin of mods. | |||
{{resolved}} | |||
::What surprised me (and offends others) is the simple fact that the name of the country is Ireland and that Misplaced Pages does not reflect that (internationally recognised) fact. Very few other countries actually bother to define their name in their constitution, yet Ireland clearly has, in both Irish and English. | |||
What is going on here? Arbcom gave you the job of sorting this out and nothing seems to be happening. Things got to this stage as there is no consensus for the current situation. Can you sort this out then?] (]) 01:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::For 85 years, this self-determination has been undermined by anti-Irish elements in an attempt to delegitimise the country, hence many Irish people balk at the forced imposition of the name "Republic Of Ireland". This delegitimisation is further perpetuated across Misplaced Pages as users link to a description rather than a country ( I know ] does have a guideline to use <nowiki>]</nowiki> when linking, but in practice that is unlikely to happen as many casual editors will just copy the title of the Ireland article). | |||
::All of the states you mentioned above have been afforded the respect of redirecting from their official title to their respective articles. | |||
::The argument that using "Republic Of Ireland" as the name is weak, as it is akin to using "Sparkling Soft Drink with Vegetable Extracts" in place of Coca-Cola to distinguish it from Pepsi, as both are official descriptions. | |||
::In my opinion, parenthetical disambiguation of "Ireland (country)" is a fair, balanced, inoffensive and factual disambiguator for the page. There is precedence in the disambiguation between ] and ], even with there already being a natural disambiguation as the official title of the US state is "State Of Georgia". ] (]) 13:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::The most persuasive of your arguments is the one regarding the search field in the opening comment, but here you undermine your own position by posting an absurd and unsubstantiated rant in your third paragraph that reveals more about your own prejudices and bias than other people's and writing logically incoherent nonsense in the fifth and sixth paragraphs. ] and ] are disambiguated and ] covers both. No article is at ]. ] and ] are disambiguated and ] covers both. No article is at ]. ] is a state. ] (]) 14:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::The clearest examples of attempts to undermine the constitutional name of Ireland are by the British government in both the Eire Act 1938<ref>{{cite web | title=Eire (Confirmation of Agreements) Act, 1938 | url=https://vlex.co.uk/vid/eire-confirmation-of-agreements-808327717}}</ref> and the Ireland Act 1949<ref>{{cite web | title=Ireland Act 1949 | url=https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/12-13-14/41/enacted}}</ref>, neither of which acknowledged the name of Ireland. These choices were politically motivated as there was still a degree of animosity between the newly independent Ireland and the former empire at the time. This position has subsequently changed<ref>{{cite web | title=Country names: The Permanent Committee on Geographical Names for British official use | url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/country-names/country-names-the-permanent-committee-on-geographical-names-for-british-official-use}}</ref>. | |||
::::@] As for the Coke/Pespi example, just like your "Island in the Atlantic Ocean" example, it is absurd and was made to highlight how irrespective of how official a description is, it is not the name. | |||
::::That aside, it would be good to discuss the negative impact the page title has on the discoverability/usability in the search field. ] (]) 16:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
{{reflist-talk}} | |||
The work that editors and moderators do on Misplaced Pages is fantastic and I appreciate it very much. | |||
I'm sure many are jaded by this topic rearing it's head so frequently and are reluctant to entertain a change to the status quo. | |||
Thirteen years have past since the last major debate over the naming of the articles, yet the issue keeps coming up as many see it as factually incorrect and it can no longer be dismissed as recently established consensus. | |||
Building a consensus is obviously the only way a change can be made here. | |||
May I ask, who determines that consensus has changed? ] (]) 21:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
:The community. As you can see in the archives here the subject has come up many times. No new information seems to be raised in the conversations and they always (to date) end with the same consensus. There was even an attempt on this very page in the section immediately above, where the proposal was completely shot down. Now ] but it also doesn't have to change. I have zero issues with people re-opening the conversation and trying to alter or establish a new consensus, just as long as it isn't continuously happening. ] ] 21:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
::I did see that it was recently discussed but the topic had been closed so was unable to reply within context. | |||
::As a relatively inexperienced contributor to Misplaced Pages (historically only making small additions), this WikiProject is quite an obscure corner of the platform that many users do not know about, but is a great way to discuss and gain agreement for changes. | |||
::Coupled with how intimidating it can be to new editors when an admin or moderator dismisses their suggestion, it's no surprise as to why the topic of fixing the title of ] is destined to always be classified as ]. | |||
::Might I suggest that, given the frequency of contributions on this matter, a topic be left permanently open for discussion? ] (]) 17:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::{{ping|Cashew.wheel}} You seem to be under a number of misconceptions here. 1) There is no position of "moderator" on Misplaced Pages, so {{tq|requests for change are made so frequently, much to the chagrin of mods}}, for example, makes no sense. 2) There is a position of administrator, but nobody has taken any admin action in the discussions here or at ] or ]. All that has happened is that other users like yourself have put forward their views, countering your arguments – not dismissing them. 3) Discussions like the three above end up as WP:SNOW because a great majority of those who take the trouble to ] are opposed to any move (8–1 in the most recent move request), not because "new editors" are "intimidated" against !voting. 4) The topic ''is'' left permanently open for discussion; otherwise we wouldn't be discussing it now. An individual ''thread'' is closed when there has been no additions for a reasonable amount of time, as was the case in the three threads above. Not a misapprehension as such, but I completely disagree that the name "Ireland" {{tq|has been undermined by anti-Irish elements in an attempt to delegitimise the country}}, that ROI is imposed by force (by whom?), that many Irish people "balk" at it, or indeed that Irish people in general find it offensive in the real world. For this reason, as well as all the reasons given above, I am opposed to any change in the status quo. ] (]) 14:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::@] Thanks for clarifying about editors, admins and topics. I am new to discussing edits and as such am unfamiliar with the terminology, process and etiquette (I didn't even know to sign my first comment). I was not accusing anyone of intimidation, just noting that it can be intimidating for new editors to engage on a talk page with more seasoned editors who reply with terms, conventions, history and even markdown that they are unfamiliar with and may be put off from returning to contribute more. | |||
::::I have found the editor community welcoming and fair when engaging in constructive, albeit repetitive, discussion. | |||
::::The only case that I know of where the term "Republic Of Ireland" was actually forced on an Irish entity, is the 1953 ruling by FIFA on the name of teams fielded by the Football Association Of Ireland.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.fai.ie/domestic/news/fai-history-chapter-6-%E2%80%93-fifa-rules-on-irish-issue| title=FIFA rules on Irish issue}}</ref>. Other none-forced cases referred to the refusal of the British government to acknowledge the official name of the country until the late 1990s, the downstream impact that had on reporting by the media and thus the spread of the use of the incorrect name of the country. | |||
::::We can agree to disagree as to the degree as to proportion of the population that might take offence, it is subjective after all. ] (]) 17:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
{{reflist-talk}} | |||
*The country's official description is "Republic of Ireland" and as someone in England I'd not even known the country's actual (short) name was just "Ireland" until I came across this debate in 2017. Many countries have official descriptions that aren't in common usage like ] and aren't really ambiguous so we use the official (short) name namely ]. ''']''' (]) 17:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
{{abot}} | |||
==Opposition to name change== | |||
:My plan was to invoke statements from the involved editors in order to gather the curerent viewpoints, but that seems to go a little slow. Perhaps all those involved are a little tired of having to write down their perspectives yet again, or they much rather enter into discussion. Or this procedure is not advertised enough. I don't know. I did expect far more statements. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 20:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{atop|result=Discussion ended: closed to allow eventual archiving. ] (]) 17:05, 17 December 2022 (UTC)}} | |||
Forgive me but its time to finally call this out. But it seems from looking at the history of the wiki contributors who object to having the above change, 99% of them come from a British nationalist persuasion judging by many of their edit history and interactions, and are completely unimpartial in this regard. | |||
I question the validity and feasbility of WikiProject Ireland now as it has clearly been hijacked by British nationalist and Northern Ireland unionist/loyalist editors projecting their political agenda and bias on an encyclopedia, as evidenced by the proposed requested move hiding behind "consensus" (between themselves) and "previous discussions" (agreed amongst themselves) they have become the gate-keepers now of this project and topic. Many Irish editors have simply given up on this project and can't be bothered dealing with this project anymore. This has clearly escaped the attention of the Arbritration Committee who should intervene in this issue and that of the move discussion on 'Ireland'. It seems like some radical Irish republicans and British nationalists have something in common by opposing the usage of the term Ireland also in that regard, leaving all the reasonable people scratching their heads. ] (]) 11:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::I don't think speed is a priority; however, some evidence of progress or explanations for lack of might be appropriate. <span style="border: 1px #F10; background-color:cream;">''']''' *]</span> 20:35, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:All is forgiven. ooOOOh I do love a good conspiracy theory. Go on then, don't be a tease - give us more juicy facts / examples of hijacking. ] (]) 12:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::: Mediators can only mediate. If editors do not wish to participate, there is little that can be done to force that. Personally, I think everyone is just sick of the whole thing. ]<font color="black">e</font>] 21:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::At least this question of its hijacking is out in the open now. Hardly a conspiracy theory when its so obvious to outside observers who will read and dig through the history and discussion on all this. I think everyone who wants to look can look at editors' like yourself and this project's contribution and talk history, same with the Ireland page, can judge for themselves and agree. At least on wikipedia people can see everything if they want to search. :) ] (]) 12:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::] in fairness I don't think we have informed the users we are taking statements . Maybe we should ] (]) 21:19, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Ooooh I do love a good title that has to wrap, even on a desktop. Succinctness is overrated. ] (]) 12:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::Yes we should. A link on the ArbCom case page, and a note on this project pages might help. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 21:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::You're welcome. ] (]) 12:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::: There have been a hundred statements, what is needed is a process to isolate the issues and then resolve them. --] (]) 21:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::<small>The prevtious heading for this section was {{tq|Hijacking of the WikiIreland Project by British Nationalists + Opposition to name-change to 'Ireland' (actual name of country) from 'Republic of Ireland' (description)}}. I changed it to {{tq|Opposition to name change}} on 9 December. ] (]) 11:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
::::::A hundred? I only see six so far. This statement process is intended to do exactly that; identifying the issues. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 21:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:While I welcome support for a change of consensus on the name of Ireland, the aggressive, confrontational tone is not going to achieve anything. Also by not being a user, you lack accountability & credibility. ] (]) 12:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::::: I think Snowed was talking about previous statements like the many made to get Arbcom to take this case in the first place. I was rather stunned when after that we seemed to come back to stage one again. Anyway perhaps we should post on all the Ireland articles linking to this page again (and statement page) and give people a deadline to submit their statements. Because at the moment there seems to be just strong support for one statement, and if thats the case progess could and should be made. ] (]) 21:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::I have had an account for many years, but it was inactive for a while and cannot remember my log in details and username anyway so I stopped using it (I am not a sockpuppet a CheckUser will confirm that), me being a user or IP shouldn't matter anyway as the point still stands, the tone may be considered aggressive and confrontational by some, but when bad faith and political bias interfere with encyclopedic work and its impartiality then assertiveness is required to address it, I am sure any reasonable and impartial reader here would agree with that statement. ] (]) 12:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::::::I think setting a deadline is a good idea. Should we give editors another week? ] (]) 00:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::Oooohh I '''do''' love a good stream-of-consciousness paragraph. Punctuation is overrated. ] (]) 13:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::::::: Id support some form of deadline like a week, and if agreed someone should really post an announcment on all the Ireland articles so no one is left out and doesnt find out about it afterwards that leads to more disputes. There seemed to be alot more people with problems about the ireland naming issue and in previous debates than here now. I understand some have clearly had enough and a few retired because of it but i do worry there might be some who arrive at the last minute when it looks like the issue is close to resolution and cause all sorts of problems. We need clear announcments on all of the pages to try and reduce the chances of something like that happening. from the page i saw it seemed to get bogged down in long debate about arbcom, so this link isnt very clear. ] (]) 01:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Ooooh I do love a good conspiracy theory. Let's have the evidence shall we? ] ] 13:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::The proof is in the pudding as they say, you and the editors with British nationalist sentiments who are all over the WikiIreland project and oppose Ireland having an article being referred to by its actual name is amongst the evidence. Why don't you rename the France article "the Republic of France' or Spain 'the Kingdom of Spain' while you are at it? ] (]) 15:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::I'm not a British nationalist, I fully expect a United Ireland in my lifetime, something I never thought I'd see but the UK shot itself in the foot on that one. Do not make such attacks on other editors. My only objection to having the country at Ireland is that that is where the island is and the island is the primary topic. We prefer not to have clumsy brackets in topic names if it can be avoided such as Ireland (state). Thankfully the Irish government and legislation gave us a very handy disambiguation alternative. (Plus almost every single country on Misplaced Pages is not at the country's actual name, not the United States of America, not the Commonwealth of Australia, not the State of Israel, not the Republic of Korea and not even the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.) Not a single person on here denies that the name of the country is Ireland. And as I've clearly stated many times, consensus can change but nothing new has been brought to the table to result in enough of a discussion to alter that consensus. It's hardly anyone here's fault that when they formed the country they choose the same name as the island it was on despite not being all of the island. ] ] 15:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::Additionally stop accusing other editors of being nationalist editors and gatekeepers, if you continue with that you will be blocked for personal attacks. ] ] 15:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::Feels a bit disingenuous to compare - I believe some of those list acceptable alternatives and none of those were imposed on them by former colonial overlords (who still occupy territory!) despite decades of trying to stop that former overlord using the incorrect name. | |||
::::Republic of Ireland isn't an alternative name, it's a description of the state. As far as I knew Misplaced Pages generally uses accurate names instead of descriptions of things - is that not for the text in an article? ] (]) 03:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::::I am forced to repeat: "End the tryanny inflicted on the ]! Liberate the ]! Stop the oppression of the ]! Won't someone please think of the ]?" (Ok, in fairness, someone actually ''did'' end the tyranny inflicted on the ] pretty soon after I originally wrote the preceding sentence - but for several years that ''was'' the official name of the state!) So, er, ''no'', actually... Misplaced Pages uses ], and, in situations where there is ambiguity (as there is between the name of the state and the name of the Ireland), we use a disambiguator. ''Most'' 'state' articles aren't at the official name of the state. <small>Why do I have to keep pointing this out...</small> ]<sup>]</sup> 10:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::::Probably because it continues to be an issue. As mentioned previously, in my opinion parenthetical disambiguation of the article, while retaining the MOS ] in it's current form, would probably prevent the issue being brought up so frequently. ] (]) 13:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::::Um Republic of Ireland as the official description of the state was suggested and signed into legislation in Ireland by the government of Ireland in 1948, not by some colonial overlord. ] ] 13:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
* What are you proposing here? Are you proposing to move the country to "Ireland" and the island to "Ireland (island)" or are you proposing to move the country to "Ireland (country)"? As has already been discussed "Republic of Ireland" is the common name and the island serves as broad-concept article. Personally I'm from England and until I came across this about 5 years ago knew very little about Ireland, I wouldn't even have known which country Belfast and Dublin were the capital of, if someone asked me where either of them were I would have answered "Ireland". And I also had no awareness the country's official name is just "Ireland" I'd always heard it called "Republic of Ireland". ''']''' (]) 16:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
*:Genuinely hilarious - unless I'm misinterpreting this you're literally arguing this from a British point of view. Why should the Irish put up with an incorrect name imposed on them by Brits and have that defended by Brits saying "oh it's just what we knew" ] (]) 03:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
*Just looking from {{oldid|Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration|1101164007|the top of this page}}, I see support for the status quo coming from myself ({{U|Scolaire}}), {{U|SeoR}}, {{U|Laurel Lodged}}, {{U|Guliolopez}}, {{U|Nicknack009}}, {{U|FDW777}} and {{U|ww2censor}}, all of whom (correct me if I'm wrong) are Irish, and none of whom are of a "British nationalist persuasion" as can be seen from their edit history and interactions. What intrigues ''me'' is the number of anon editors and ] who have opened discussions on this page and {{oldid|Talk:Republic of Ireland|1097040363|Talk:Republic of Ireland}} in the last few months saying they are to find that the title is being foisted on good faith Misplaced Pages users by a cabal of British editors! After ten years of nobody making any comment. I'll say no more. ] (]) 17:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
** How interesting! The last time I checked, I had a Dutch passport. But I confess, I live in the Free Fenian Republic of Ireland on the ]. {{smiley}} <span style="border:1px solid green; padding:0 2px">] ]</span> 18:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::And I've never revealed my nationality or anything. In all my years in the Ireland related space I've been called a Protestant, Catholic, Unionist, Republican, British, Irish, IRA sympathiser, UDA whore, and every single possible variant combined with as many expletives as you'd like. I really should make a list as I'm honestly not sure which side of the divide I've been accused of being on the most by people interested in maintaining a divide and continuing to foster divisions. ] ] 10:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
:::Ha! My "I know who/what you really are!" Misplaced Pages accusations CV includes an ETA member, a muslim, Sepp Blatter, Ian Duncan Smith and, based on an article I created, . It's almost always those busting a gut to push a POV that make such charges, ironically enough. ] (]) 15:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::Oh yeah I've been accused of many other things (usually by people who are blocked very shortly after.) I was just restricting to the Ireland related articles :) ] ] 19:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
{{abot}} | |||
==Why not a disambiguation page?== | |||
:::::::::: How about "1 week after it has been announced"? (See Gnevin's statement above and section ].) — ] 01:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{atop|result=Discussion ended: closed to allow eventual archiving. ] (]) 16:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)}} | |||
I read through some of the recent discussion on renaming this page and the argument generally seemed to be "there can be only one article named Ireland and so that is the island" and that's the way it's always been so that's the way it should always be. | |||
There seems to be some inconsistency here with respect to how ] is treated though. That goes to a disambiguation page that suggests Britain could commonly either refer to the island of Great Britain or the United Kingdom. Why would Ireland likewise not default to a disambiguation page that says Ireland most often refers to the island or the Republic of Ireland? ] (]) 05:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::There were a lot of statements to get Arbcom to take the case but they did not take the case... AfD also maintains a poor show of opinions. One week is cutting it fine if you do not announce it on each previously concerned editors talk page and that is often done to provide interest in discussions like this. ~ ].].] 11:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::: <small>(discussion about publicity moved to ])</small> | |||
:I see no need for consistency between these articles and ]. Ireland defaulting to a disambiguation page was one of the options in the ] in 2009. It did not reach consensus. There is no reason to believe that consensus has changed since then. It's fine to have the British dab page at Britain and the Irish dab page at ]. 20:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
==Publicity / notice proposed text== | |||
::As someone else said above, "Thirteen years have past since the last major debate over the naming of the articles, yet the issue keeps coming up as many see it as factually incorrect and it can no longer be dismissed as recently established consensus." ] (]) 20:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
{{resolved}} | |||
:::Nobody said that it is a "recently established consensus." It has been the consensus since 2002, and that consensus was clearly shown in the 2009 poll. The fact that there has been no major debate since 2012 is itself evidence that consensus has not changed. You have made a reasonable suggestion here – though one with which I disagree – but there was no rush of support for it, just as there was no rush of support for any of the other recent proposals, from which I conclude that consensus still hasn't changed. ] (]) 10:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
You are receiving this message because you have previously posted at a Ireland naming related discussion. In an effort to solve this issue ] is now taking statements. Before creating or replying to a statement please consider the ] ,the ] and current ] . | |||
::::"You have made a reasonable suggestion here – though one with which I disagree – but there was no rush of support for it, just as there was no rush of support for any of the other recent proposals, from which I conclude that consensus still hasn't changed." | |||
::::Thank you for agreeing that I've made a reasonable suggestion. Reasonable minds can certainly disagree, just as I disagree with your conclusion that the supposed lack of support for my proposal on this page is evidence that consensus hasn't changed. I would argue that there was no "rush of support" for the same reason there was no rush of opposition, because this discussion page is difficult to find and has low visibility. Even as someone who was interested in addressing the topic, it took me awhile to find it, and only because I actually cared about posting in the designated area. | |||
::::If you want to limit discussion to people who have already made up their minds, and are already aware that this page exists, then that's an easy but questionable way to maintain consensus for the status quo. If, on the other hand, you want to get a sense of what the broader Misplaced Pages community thinks about this, you'd be better served revisiting this topic on the actual discussion page for ] and/or ]. ] (]) 04:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::::You are actually unusual in raising the issue on this page. Mostly, discussions about naming ''are'' started at Talk:Ireland or Talk:Republic of Ireland. This is followed by somebody pointing out that discussions must take place on this page (by order of the ], not "people who have already made up their minds"), at which point either the discussion moves here, or it lapses. Either way, the outcome is the same: people are made aware of the discussion but do not turn turn up in numbers to overturn consensus. Thus the consensus remains. ] (]) 12:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
::Disambiguation pages are usually not necessary where there are only two alternate pages, as in the case with Ireland; in the case of Britain, there's a decent list there. While I personally prefer to refer to the state as Ireland where possible, and think it could actually be done so more extensively on Misplaced Pages without confusion than is the case at present, it is an official description of the state in Irish law. According to ], where there is a natural disambiguation, that is typically the best term to use, as '''Republic of Ireland''' qualifies as that. ] (]) 11:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
Note the statement process is a ]. ] (]) 11:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::"Disambiguation pages are usually not necessary where there are only two alternate pages, as in the case with Ireland; in the case of Britain, there's a decent list there." | |||
:::How do you figure? There are only 11 entries on the disambiguation page for ] and 25 on ]. In both instances, there are only two main disambiguation links - to the island and the country. ] (]) 20:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
:After all these years, I'm not seeing any consensus for changing the title of this page ''or'' for making it into a disambiguation page. The ], are down to just the bones. ] (]) 18:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
:For all the talk that "consensus can change" ], it's just a fallacy. Those against change hide behind it as an excuse while those in favour of change grow disillusioned by the vague arbitrary goalposts being set. I would support a disambiguation page and the use of parental disambiguation. ] (]) 18:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
::"Consensus can change" is not a fallacy. See for instance ] on whether to make "China" a redirect to China (disambiguation) instead of to "Chinese civilization" (the then current setting), and compare it with ] which decided that "China" should be the article for the People's Republic of China. In that case there was a clear and obvious change in consensus, which led to the desired change. It wasn't a case of "twenty people over the last five years have expressed dissatisfaction so we'll have to change it." Nothing similar has happened on these pages. Also, please ]. Neither I nor anybody else is hiding behind anything as an excuse. We're replying to your arguments, that's all. And what in the world are these "vague arbitrary goalposts"? The reasons for keeping the status quo are concrete and clearly (and consistently) stated. ] (]) 12:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::Further to my point above about where this discussion should take place to truly determine current consensus, I note that those 2006 and 2011 discussions on ] that you mentioned took place on the actual talk page for Chinese civilization (which was the default redirect at the time). ] (]) 04:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::An earlier ArbCom ruling has stated that this discussion on moving Ireland, renaming the articles on Ireland and Republic of Ireland, must take place here. Unless that ArbCom ruling is withdrawn or rescinded then here is the only place any such discussion may take place. I will agree though that that does have a measure of potentially limiting involvement in the discussion which could be an issue, however anytime anyone brings up this topic elsewhere they do get redirected here and there are headers on the relevant pages directing to this one. ] ] 12:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::::Well, I'm glad you agree that does potentially limit involvement in the discussion. While ] mentions that most people initially raise the issue on the ] or ] talk page, he also says that the discussion almost immediately gets rerouted here. That probably has the same net effect of limiting both visibility and participation in the discussion. | |||
:::::However long ago that ArbCom decision may have been made, it might be time to revisit it, if only temporarily. if there's an actual desire to take the temperature on current consensus, then I think it's quite frankly unlikely to happen as long as the discussion is limited to this page. | |||
:::::I do appreciate, whatever other differences of opinion we may have on the matter, that you both acknowledge my suggestions here have not been unreasonable. ] (]) 06:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::::I don't accept that rerouting the discussion "has the same net effect of limiting both visibility and participation in the discussion". If there was a substantial number of people wanting change (i.e. enough people to overturn the consensus), they would see the request at the Ireland or ROI talk page, see that the discussion was moved, and follow the link to this page. Compare {{oldid|Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration|1143899445|the current version}} of this page with ], which I picked at random out of 34 archive pages(!), and see the amount of discussion and the number of people that contributed over a period of just three days. That simply wouldn't happen today. | |||
::::::I would have no problem with somebody asking ArbCom to change its ruling, and allow naming discussions to be held at the article talk pages. ] (]) 15:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::Since {{U|TempDog123}} raises the same point twice, I'll answer it twice. More often than not, requests to rename the pages ''are'' initially made on Talk:Ireland or Talk:Republic of Ireland, so people are aware of the request but do not turn up in numbers to overturn the consensus. To reiterate, consensus can change, but in this case it just hasn't. Sorry. ] (]) 13:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::::Also it's worth nothing that most requests to move the page are by drive by accounts with no real skin in the game, just new accounts or editors that fly by after being outraged at it, post some angry messages, and then leave with no actual desire to engage in actual real conversation or debate on the topic beyond a couple of hours. When this is the instigation and participation, it's no wonder that there isn't any further progress on anything. ] ] 13:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
{{abot}} | |||
== Credibility bot == | |||
: That seems fine to me, although we need to make sure the message is clear on all the article talk pages as well as posting to people previously involved in the debate. ] (]) 21:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
As this is a highly active WikiProject, I would like to introduce you to ]. This is a bot that makes it easier to track source usage across articles through automated reports and alerts. We piloted this approach at ] and we want to offer it to any subject area or domain. We need your support to demonstrate demand for this toolkit. If you have a desire for this functionality, or would like to leave other feedback, please endorse the tool or comment at ]. Thanks! ] (]) 17:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
:: What do you mean concretely by "clear on all the article talk pages"? — ] 22:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: I just mean under a clear title on each of the article talk pages. For example if we look at the ] page the link to this collaboration page gets lost in huge paragraphs and sections on trying to decide how to proceed. Alot of that old debate should really be put in the archive box and a new section linking to this page created at the bottom of the page. And ofcourse the link to this page currently appears nowhere on ] which is the actual article some have a problem with. ] (]) 23:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::I'd suggest ] for article talk pages ] (]) 23:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::: Yes something like that would be great and clearly couldnt be missed by people. ] (]) 00:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Oops, I overlooked that. In the meantime, I created a different proposal here: ]. — ] 21:58, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ARCA == | |||
I am merging your proposal into ] for now. I think we can leave out the extra paragraph about the rebuttal, because that is already covered in the procedure description. — ] 22:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Resolved, so I should start informing people ? ] (]) 22:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Message look OK. Please do. <span style="font-family: verdana;"> — ] • ] • </span> 01:15, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Yes, please go ahead. ] (]) 14:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::204 users informed and 8 pages tagged with {{tl|IECOLL-talk}}, I've missed a group of editors or a discussion please let me know and I will do a other run. ] (]) 18:38, 5 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: Good job, well done guys. Will be interesting to see if we get flooded with people now. :)] (]) 13:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::Here is the first of the flood. I've been out of the loop for quite some time, could someone update me on where we are? ] (]) 00:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::Very long story short, after numerous requested move , a ]. A ] has ordered a procedure be found to find a long term solution. The procedure has been decided and statements are now being taken ] (]) 19:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
There is a discussion at ] about changing the notices to say discussion about the Ireland articles should take place on this project's talk page rather that the project page its self. I'm not suggesting any other changes are needed or that the articles should be moved. ''']''' (]) 22:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
==Where is remedy #2== | |||
:Now that such discussions are allowed to take place on the ] & the ] talkpages? Maybe this WikiProject could be retired. Since there's already ] in existance. ] (]) 06:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
Because the Arbitration Remedy #1 failed is this supposed to be ]? There is no indication this is the status of this collaboration because it deals with the content not with the naming. It seems no action, or any other progress, has taken place on the Remedy #2 front and this collaboration stands independently from Remedy #2. Am I missing something? Where is Remedy #2 for the naming of the Ireland/Republic of Ireland articles, or has it fallen off the radar? ] (]) 15:57, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Inevitably, some lover of drama or good-faith new editor will propose a move. Seeing as that will effect, at minimum, the Ireland, Republic of Ireland and Ireland (disambiguation) pages, it makes sense to have a "neutral" central place to have the discussion. There is also a '''lot''' of material here that people will want to link in any ensuing discussion. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::"Retired" doesn't mean deleted. Linking to here in any future discussion may be useful, but moving the discussion to here would be directly counter to the ArbCom decision. ] (]) 13:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::PS: See ] for links. ] (]) 13:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 13:42, 3 December 2023
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Move: Republic of Ireland → Ireland (country)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
As an Irish citizen, I was shocked and surprised to find that the title of the Misplaced Pages page for my country does not bear the actual name of my country.
I agree that Ireland, the island, pre-dates the establishment of either state on the island and therefore the article "Ireland" should refer to the island. The use of parenthetical disambiguation is a fair, accurate and unbiased solution. Any reference to "The Republic of Ireland Act 1948" in relation to the name of the country is irrelevant, as the act made no reference to the name of the country and the name is clearly defined in the Irish constitution of 1937 and no subsequent amendment has changed the name. https://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en/html#part2
It should also be noted that since the 2009 poll on this topic, Misplaced Pages has introduced auto suggest in the search field on the homepage. When a user enters the word “Ireland” into the search field the country is not in the list of suggested articles, as it is currently identified by a reference that is obscure to most. Cashew.wheel (talk) 15:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC) (talk) 15:42, 16 May 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cashew.wheel (talk • contribs) 15:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
As an Irish citizen, I was shocked and surprised to find that the title of the Misplaced Pages page for my country does not bear the actual name of my country.
Why? Most countries aren't at their official name on Misplaced Pages. Very, very few 'state' articles actually reside at the official name of the state in question - see, e.g.: State of Libya, French Republic, United Mexican States, State of the City of the Vatican, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland - all doing well at page titles other than the official. "Ireland" is also the name of the island, which doesn't have a natural disambiguator. "Republic of Ireland" is a natural disambiguator for the state and is its official description. This has worked perfectly well both before and after the huge debate of 2009. If you read through that, and the archives of this page, and can still then bring something new to the table, then of course it can be discussed - consensus can change. But if your argument is solely that this isn't the name of the state, that won't serve to change anything. Bastun 15:52, 16 May 2022 (UTC)- Thanks for pointing me towards the historical discussion on this topic, it made for fascinating, yet disappointing, reading. I would counter that the current naming isn't working, as requests for change are made so frequently, much to the chagrin of mods.
- What surprised me (and offends others) is the simple fact that the name of the country is Ireland and that Misplaced Pages does not reflect that (internationally recognised) fact. Very few other countries actually bother to define their name in their constitution, yet Ireland clearly has, in both Irish and English.
- For 85 years, this self-determination has been undermined by anti-Irish elements in an attempt to delegitimise the country, hence many Irish people balk at the forced imposition of the name "Republic Of Ireland". This delegitimisation is further perpetuated across Misplaced Pages as users link to a description rather than a country ( I know WP:IMOS does have a guideline to use ] when linking, but in practice that is unlikely to happen as many casual editors will just copy the title of the Ireland article).
- All of the states you mentioned above have been afforded the respect of redirecting from their official title to their respective articles.
- The argument that using "Republic Of Ireland" as the name is weak, as it is akin to using "Sparkling Soft Drink with Vegetable Extracts" in place of Coca-Cola to distinguish it from Pepsi, as both are official descriptions.
- In my opinion, parenthetical disambiguation of "Ireland (country)" is a fair, balanced, inoffensive and factual disambiguator for the page. There is precedence in the disambiguation between Georgia_(country) and Georgia_(U.S._state), even with there already being a natural disambiguation as the official title of the US state is "State Of Georgia". Cashew.wheel (talk) 13:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- The most persuasive of your arguments is the one regarding the search field in the opening comment, but here you undermine your own position by posting an absurd and unsubstantiated rant in your third paragraph that reveals more about your own prejudices and bias than other people's and writing logically incoherent nonsense in the fifth and sixth paragraphs. Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola are disambiguated and cola covers both. No article is at Sparkling Soft Drink with Vegetable Extracts. Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland are disambiguated and Ireland covers both. No article is at Island in the Atlantic Ocean to the west of Great Britain. Georgia is a state. DrKay (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- The clearest examples of attempts to undermine the constitutional name of Ireland are by the British government in both the Eire Act 1938 and the Ireland Act 1949, neither of which acknowledged the name of Ireland. These choices were politically motivated as there was still a degree of animosity between the newly independent Ireland and the former empire at the time. This position has subsequently changed.
- @DrKay As for the Coke/Pespi example, just like your "Island in the Atlantic Ocean" example, it is absurd and was made to highlight how irrespective of how official a description is, it is not the name.
- That aside, it would be good to discuss the negative impact the page title has on the discoverability/usability in the search field. Cashew.wheel (talk) 16:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- The most persuasive of your arguments is the one regarding the search field in the opening comment, but here you undermine your own position by posting an absurd and unsubstantiated rant in your third paragraph that reveals more about your own prejudices and bias than other people's and writing logically incoherent nonsense in the fifth and sixth paragraphs. Coca-Cola and Pepsi Cola are disambiguated and cola covers both. No article is at Sparkling Soft Drink with Vegetable Extracts. Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland are disambiguated and Ireland covers both. No article is at Island in the Atlantic Ocean to the west of Great Britain. Georgia is a state. DrKay (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
References
- "Eire (Confirmation of Agreements) Act, 1938".
- "Ireland Act 1949".
- "Country names: The Permanent Committee on Geographical Names for British official use".
The work that editors and moderators do on Misplaced Pages is fantastic and I appreciate it very much. I'm sure many are jaded by this topic rearing it's head so frequently and are reluctant to entertain a change to the status quo. Thirteen years have past since the last major debate over the naming of the articles, yet the issue keeps coming up as many see it as factually incorrect and it can no longer be dismissed as recently established consensus. Building a consensus is obviously the only way a change can be made here. May I ask, who determines that consensus has changed? Cashew.wheel (talk) 21:29, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- The community. As you can see in the archives here the subject has come up many times. No new information seems to be raised in the conversations and they always (to date) end with the same consensus. There was even an attempt on this very page in the section immediately above, where the proposal was completely shot down. Now WP:CONSENSUSCANCHANGE but it also doesn't have to change. I have zero issues with people re-opening the conversation and trying to alter or establish a new consensus, just as long as it isn't continuously happening. Canterbury Tail talk 21:34, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- I did see that it was recently discussed but the topic had been closed so was unable to reply within context.
- As a relatively inexperienced contributor to Misplaced Pages (historically only making small additions), this WikiProject is quite an obscure corner of the platform that many users do not know about, but is a great way to discuss and gain agreement for changes.
- Coupled with how intimidating it can be to new editors when an admin or moderator dismisses their suggestion, it's no surprise as to why the topic of fixing the title of Ireland is destined to always be classified as WP:SNOW.
- Might I suggest that, given the frequency of contributions on this matter, a topic be left permanently open for discussion? Cashew.wheel (talk) 17:51, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Cashew.wheel: You seem to be under a number of misconceptions here. 1) There is no position of "moderator" on Misplaced Pages, so
requests for change are made so frequently, much to the chagrin of mods
, for example, makes no sense. 2) There is a position of administrator, but nobody has taken any admin action in the discussions here or at Talk:Ireland or Talk:Republic of Ireland. All that has happened is that other users like yourself have put forward their views, countering your arguments – not dismissing them. 3) Discussions like the three above end up as WP:SNOW because a great majority of those who take the trouble to !vote are opposed to any move (8–1 in the most recent move request), not because "new editors" are "intimidated" against !voting. 4) The topic is left permanently open for discussion; otherwise we wouldn't be discussing it now. An individual thread is closed when there has been no additions for a reasonable amount of time, as was the case in the three threads above. Not a misapprehension as such, but I completely disagree that the name "Ireland"has been undermined by anti-Irish elements in an attempt to delegitimise the country
, that ROI is imposed by force (by whom?), that many Irish people "balk" at it, or indeed that Irish people in general find it offensive in the real world. For this reason, as well as all the reasons given above, I am opposed to any change in the status quo. Scolaire (talk) 14:55, 23 May 2022 (UTC)- @Scolaire Thanks for clarifying about editors, admins and topics. I am new to discussing edits and as such am unfamiliar with the terminology, process and etiquette (I didn't even know to sign my first comment). I was not accusing anyone of intimidation, just noting that it can be intimidating for new editors to engage on a talk page with more seasoned editors who reply with terms, conventions, history and even markdown that they are unfamiliar with and may be put off from returning to contribute more.
- I have found the editor community welcoming and fair when engaging in constructive, albeit repetitive, discussion.
- The only case that I know of where the term "Republic Of Ireland" was actually forced on an Irish entity, is the 1953 ruling by FIFA on the name of teams fielded by the Football Association Of Ireland.. Other none-forced cases referred to the refusal of the British government to acknowledge the official name of the country until the late 1990s, the downstream impact that had on reporting by the media and thus the spread of the use of the incorrect name of the country.
- We can agree to disagree as to the degree as to proportion of the population that might take offence, it is subjective after all. Cashew.wheel (talk) 17:19, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Cashew.wheel: You seem to be under a number of misconceptions here. 1) There is no position of "moderator" on Misplaced Pages, so
References
- The country's official description is "Republic of Ireland" and as someone in England I'd not even known the country's actual (short) name was just "Ireland" until I came across this debate in 2017. Many countries have official descriptions that aren't in common usage like Republic of France and aren't really ambiguous so we use the official (short) name namely France. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Opposition to name change
Discussion ended: closed to allow eventual archiving. Scolaire (talk) 17:05, 17 December 2022 (UTC)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Forgive me but its time to finally call this out. But it seems from looking at the history of the wiki contributors who object to having the above change, 99% of them come from a British nationalist persuasion judging by many of their edit history and interactions, and are completely unimpartial in this regard.
I question the validity and feasbility of WikiProject Ireland now as it has clearly been hijacked by British nationalist and Northern Ireland unionist/loyalist editors projecting their political agenda and bias on an encyclopedia, as evidenced by the proposed requested move hiding behind "consensus" (between themselves) and "previous discussions" (agreed amongst themselves) they have become the gate-keepers now of this project and topic. Many Irish editors have simply given up on this project and can't be bothered dealing with this project anymore. This has clearly escaped the attention of the Arbritration Committee who should intervene in this issue and that of the move discussion on 'Ireland'. It seems like some radical Irish republicans and British nationalists have something in common by opposing the usage of the term Ireland also in that regard, leaving all the reasonable people scratching their heads. 51.37.118.212 (talk) 11:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- All is forgiven. ooOOOh I do love a good conspiracy theory. Go on then, don't be a tease - give us more juicy facts / examples of hijacking. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- At least this question of its hijacking is out in the open now. Hardly a conspiracy theory when its so obvious to outside observers who will read and dig through the history and discussion on all this. I think everyone who wants to look can look at editors' like yourself and this project's contribution and talk history, same with the Ireland page, can judge for themselves and agree. At least on wikipedia people can see everything if they want to search. :) 51.37.118.212 (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ooooh I do love a good title that has to wrap, even on a desktop. Succinctness is overrated. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- You're welcome. 51.37.118.212 (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- The prevtious heading for this section was
Hijacking of the WikiIreland Project by British Nationalists + Opposition to name-change to 'Ireland' (actual name of country) from 'Republic of Ireland' (description)
. I changed it toOpposition to name change
on 9 December. Scolaire (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- The prevtious heading for this section was
- You're welcome. 51.37.118.212 (talk) 12:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ooooh I do love a good title that has to wrap, even on a desktop. Succinctness is overrated. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:07, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- At least this question of its hijacking is out in the open now. Hardly a conspiracy theory when its so obvious to outside observers who will read and dig through the history and discussion on all this. I think everyone who wants to look can look at editors' like yourself and this project's contribution and talk history, same with the Ireland page, can judge for themselves and agree. At least on wikipedia people can see everything if they want to search. :) 51.37.118.212 (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- While I welcome support for a change of consensus on the name of Ireland, the aggressive, confrontational tone is not going to achieve anything. Also by not being a user, you lack accountability & credibility. Cashew.wheel (talk) 12:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have had an account for many years, but it was inactive for a while and cannot remember my log in details and username anyway so I stopped using it (I am not a sockpuppet a CheckUser will confirm that), me being a user or IP shouldn't matter anyway as the point still stands, the tone may be considered aggressive and confrontational by some, but when bad faith and political bias interfere with encyclopedic work and its impartiality then assertiveness is required to address it, I am sure any reasonable and impartial reader here would agree with that statement. 51.37.118.212 (talk) 12:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oooohh I do love a good stream-of-consciousness paragraph. Punctuation is overrated. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have had an account for many years, but it was inactive for a while and cannot remember my log in details and username anyway so I stopped using it (I am not a sockpuppet a CheckUser will confirm that), me being a user or IP shouldn't matter anyway as the point still stands, the tone may be considered aggressive and confrontational by some, but when bad faith and political bias interfere with encyclopedic work and its impartiality then assertiveness is required to address it, I am sure any reasonable and impartial reader here would agree with that statement. 51.37.118.212 (talk) 12:21, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ooooh I do love a good conspiracy theory. Let's have the evidence shall we? Canterbury Tail talk 13:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- The proof is in the pudding as they say, you and the editors with British nationalist sentiments who are all over the WikiIreland project and oppose Ireland having an article being referred to by its actual name is amongst the evidence. Why don't you rename the France article "the Republic of France' or Spain 'the Kingdom of Spain' while you are at it? 51.37.118.212 (talk) 15:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not a British nationalist, I fully expect a United Ireland in my lifetime, something I never thought I'd see but the UK shot itself in the foot on that one. Do not make such attacks on other editors. My only objection to having the country at Ireland is that that is where the island is and the island is the primary topic. We prefer not to have clumsy brackets in topic names if it can be avoided such as Ireland (state). Thankfully the Irish government and legislation gave us a very handy disambiguation alternative. (Plus almost every single country on Misplaced Pages is not at the country's actual name, not the United States of America, not the Commonwealth of Australia, not the State of Israel, not the Republic of Korea and not even the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.) Not a single person on here denies that the name of the country is Ireland. And as I've clearly stated many times, consensus can change but nothing new has been brought to the table to result in enough of a discussion to alter that consensus. It's hardly anyone here's fault that when they formed the country they choose the same name as the island it was on despite not being all of the island. Canterbury Tail talk 15:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Additionally stop accusing other editors of being nationalist editors and gatekeepers, if you continue with that you will be blocked for personal attacks. Canterbury Tail talk 15:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Feels a bit disingenuous to compare - I believe some of those list acceptable alternatives and none of those were imposed on them by former colonial overlords (who still occupy territory!) despite decades of trying to stop that former overlord using the incorrect name.
- Republic of Ireland isn't an alternative name, it's a description of the state. As far as I knew Misplaced Pages generally uses accurate names instead of descriptions of things - is that not for the text in an article? Saoirserose (talk) 03:53, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- I am forced to repeat: "End the tryanny inflicted on the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya! Liberate the French Republic! Stop the oppression of the United Mexican States! Won't someone please think of the State of the City of the Vatican?" (Ok, in fairness, someone actually did end the tyranny inflicted on the State of Libya pretty soon after I originally wrote the preceding sentence - but for several years that was the official name of the state!) So, er, no, actually... Misplaced Pages uses common names, and, in situations where there is ambiguity (as there is between the name of the state and the name of the Ireland), we use a disambiguator. Most 'state' articles aren't at the official name of the state. Why do I have to keep pointing this out... Bastun 10:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Probably because it continues to be an issue. As mentioned previously, in my opinion parenthetical disambiguation of the article, while retaining the MOS WP:IRE-IRL in it's current form, would probably prevent the issue being brought up so frequently. Cashew.wheel (talk) 13:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Um Republic of Ireland as the official description of the state was suggested and signed into legislation in Ireland by the government of Ireland in 1948, not by some colonial overlord. Canterbury Tail talk 13:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- I am forced to repeat: "End the tryanny inflicted on the Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya! Liberate the French Republic! Stop the oppression of the United Mexican States! Won't someone please think of the State of the City of the Vatican?" (Ok, in fairness, someone actually did end the tyranny inflicted on the State of Libya pretty soon after I originally wrote the preceding sentence - but for several years that was the official name of the state!) So, er, no, actually... Misplaced Pages uses common names, and, in situations where there is ambiguity (as there is between the name of the state and the name of the Ireland), we use a disambiguator. Most 'state' articles aren't at the official name of the state. Why do I have to keep pointing this out... Bastun 10:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not a British nationalist, I fully expect a United Ireland in my lifetime, something I never thought I'd see but the UK shot itself in the foot on that one. Do not make such attacks on other editors. My only objection to having the country at Ireland is that that is where the island is and the island is the primary topic. We prefer not to have clumsy brackets in topic names if it can be avoided such as Ireland (state). Thankfully the Irish government and legislation gave us a very handy disambiguation alternative. (Plus almost every single country on Misplaced Pages is not at the country's actual name, not the United States of America, not the Commonwealth of Australia, not the State of Israel, not the Republic of Korea and not even the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.) Not a single person on here denies that the name of the country is Ireland. And as I've clearly stated many times, consensus can change but nothing new has been brought to the table to result in enough of a discussion to alter that consensus. It's hardly anyone here's fault that when they formed the country they choose the same name as the island it was on despite not being all of the island. Canterbury Tail talk 15:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- The proof is in the pudding as they say, you and the editors with British nationalist sentiments who are all over the WikiIreland project and oppose Ireland having an article being referred to by its actual name is amongst the evidence. Why don't you rename the France article "the Republic of France' or Spain 'the Kingdom of Spain' while you are at it? 51.37.118.212 (talk) 15:06, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- What are you proposing here? Are you proposing to move the country to "Ireland" and the island to "Ireland (island)" or are you proposing to move the country to "Ireland (country)"? As has already been discussed "Republic of Ireland" is the common name and the island serves as broad-concept article. Personally I'm from England and until I came across this about 5 years ago knew very little about Ireland, I wouldn't even have known which country Belfast and Dublin were the capital of, if someone asked me where either of them were I would have answered "Ireland". And I also had no awareness the country's official name is just "Ireland" I'd always heard it called "Republic of Ireland". Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Genuinely hilarious - unless I'm misinterpreting this you're literally arguing this from a British point of view. Why should the Irish put up with an incorrect name imposed on them by Brits and have that defended by Brits saying "oh it's just what we knew" Saoirserose (talk) 03:49, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Just looking from the top of this page, I see support for the status quo coming from myself (Scolaire), SeoR, Laurel Lodged, Guliolopez, Nicknack009, FDW777 and ww2censor, all of whom (correct me if I'm wrong) are Irish, and none of whom are of a "British nationalist persuasion" as can be seen from their edit history and interactions. What intrigues me is the number of anon editors and SPAs who have opened discussions on this page and Talk:Republic of Ireland in the last few months saying they are shocked, shocked to find that the title is being foisted on good faith Misplaced Pages users by a cabal of British editors! After ten years of nobody making any comment. I'll say no more. Scolaire (talk) 17:26, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- How interesting! The last time I checked, I had a Dutch passport. But I confess, I live in the Free Fenian Republic of Ireland on the island of Ireland. The Banner talk 18:43, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- And I've never revealed my nationality or anything. In all my years in the Ireland related space I've been called a Protestant, Catholic, Unionist, Republican, British, Irish, IRA sympathiser, UDA whore, and every single possible variant combined with as many expletives as you'd like. I really should make a list as I'm honestly not sure which side of the divide I've been accused of being on the most by people interested in maintaining a divide and continuing to foster divisions. Canterbury Tail talk 10:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ha! My "I know who/what you really are!" Misplaced Pages accusations CV includes an ETA member, a muslim, Sepp Blatter, Ian Duncan Smith and, based on an article I created, God. It's almost always those busting a gut to push a POV that make such charges, ironically enough. Valenciano (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Oh yeah I've been accused of many other things (usually by people who are blocked very shortly after.) I was just restricting to the Ireland related articles :) Canterbury Tail talk 19:15, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Ha! My "I know who/what you really are!" Misplaced Pages accusations CV includes an ETA member, a muslim, Sepp Blatter, Ian Duncan Smith and, based on an article I created, God. It's almost always those busting a gut to push a POV that make such charges, ironically enough. Valenciano (talk) 15:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- And I've never revealed my nationality or anything. In all my years in the Ireland related space I've been called a Protestant, Catholic, Unionist, Republican, British, Irish, IRA sympathiser, UDA whore, and every single possible variant combined with as many expletives as you'd like. I really should make a list as I'm honestly not sure which side of the divide I've been accused of being on the most by people interested in maintaining a divide and continuing to foster divisions. Canterbury Tail talk 10:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Why not a disambiguation page?
Discussion ended: closed to allow eventual archiving. Scolaire (talk) 16:48, 26 March 2023 (UTC)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I read through some of the recent discussion on renaming this page and the argument generally seemed to be "there can be only one article named Ireland and so that is the island" and that's the way it's always been so that's the way it should always be.
There seems to be some inconsistency here with respect to how Britain is treated though. That goes to a disambiguation page that suggests Britain could commonly either refer to the island of Great Britain or the United Kingdom. Why would Ireland likewise not default to a disambiguation page that says Ireland most often refers to the island or the Republic of Ireland? TempDog123 (talk) 05:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- I see no need for consistency between these articles and Britain. Ireland defaulting to a disambiguation page was one of the options in the poll on Ireland article names in 2009. It did not reach consensus. There is no reason to believe that consensus has changed since then. It's fine to have the British dab page at Britain and the Irish dab page at Ireland (disambiguation). 20:21, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- As someone else said above, "Thirteen years have past since the last major debate over the naming of the articles, yet the issue keeps coming up as many see it as factually incorrect and it can no longer be dismissed as recently established consensus." TempDog123 (talk) 20:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Nobody said that it is a "recently established consensus." It has been the consensus since 2002, and that consensus was clearly shown in the 2009 poll. The fact that there has been no major debate since 2012 is itself evidence that consensus has not changed. You have made a reasonable suggestion here – though one with which I disagree – but there was no rush of support for it, just as there was no rush of support for any of the other recent proposals, from which I conclude that consensus still hasn't changed. Scolaire (talk) 10:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- "You have made a reasonable suggestion here – though one with which I disagree – but there was no rush of support for it, just as there was no rush of support for any of the other recent proposals, from which I conclude that consensus still hasn't changed."
- Thank you for agreeing that I've made a reasonable suggestion. Reasonable minds can certainly disagree, just as I disagree with your conclusion that the supposed lack of support for my proposal on this page is evidence that consensus hasn't changed. I would argue that there was no "rush of support" for the same reason there was no rush of opposition, because this discussion page is difficult to find and has low visibility. Even as someone who was interested in addressing the topic, it took me awhile to find it, and only because I actually cared about posting in the designated area.
- If you want to limit discussion to people who have already made up their minds, and are already aware that this page exists, then that's an easy but questionable way to maintain consensus for the status quo. If, on the other hand, you want to get a sense of what the broader Misplaced Pages community thinks about this, you'd be better served revisiting this topic on the actual discussion page for Ireland and/or Republic of Ireland. TempDog123 (talk) 04:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- You are actually unusual in raising the issue on this page. Mostly, discussions about naming are started at Talk:Ireland or Talk:Republic of Ireland. This is followed by somebody pointing out that discussions must take place on this page (by order of the Arbitration Committee, not "people who have already made up their minds"), at which point either the discussion moves here, or it lapses. Either way, the outcome is the same: people are made aware of the discussion but do not turn turn up in numbers to overturn consensus. Thus the consensus remains. Scolaire (talk) 12:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Nobody said that it is a "recently established consensus." It has been the consensus since 2002, and that consensus was clearly shown in the 2009 poll. The fact that there has been no major debate since 2012 is itself evidence that consensus has not changed. You have made a reasonable suggestion here – though one with which I disagree – but there was no rush of support for it, just as there was no rush of support for any of the other recent proposals, from which I conclude that consensus still hasn't changed. Scolaire (talk) 10:57, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- As someone else said above, "Thirteen years have past since the last major debate over the naming of the articles, yet the issue keeps coming up as many see it as factually incorrect and it can no longer be dismissed as recently established consensus." TempDog123 (talk) 20:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Disambiguation pages are usually not necessary where there are only two alternate pages, as in the case with Ireland; in the case of Britain, there's a decent list there. While I personally prefer to refer to the state as Ireland where possible, and think it could actually be done so more extensively on Misplaced Pages without confusion than is the case at present, it is an official description of the state in Irish law. According to WP:NCDAB, where there is a natural disambiguation, that is typically the best term to use, as Republic of Ireland qualifies as that. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 11:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- "Disambiguation pages are usually not necessary where there are only two alternate pages, as in the case with Ireland; in the case of Britain, there's a decent list there."
- How do you figure? There are only 11 entries on the disambiguation page for Britain and 25 on Ireland (disambiguation). In both instances, there are only two main disambiguation links - to the island and the country. TempDog123 (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Disambiguation pages are usually not necessary where there are only two alternate pages, as in the case with Ireland; in the case of Britain, there's a decent list there. While I personally prefer to refer to the state as Ireland where possible, and think it could actually be done so more extensively on Misplaced Pages without confusion than is the case at present, it is an official description of the state in Irish law. According to WP:NCDAB, where there is a natural disambiguation, that is typically the best term to use, as Republic of Ireland qualifies as that. Iveagh Gardens (talk) 11:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- After all these years, I'm not seeing any consensus for changing the title of this page or for making it into a disambiguation page. The poor old horse's remains, are down to just the bones. GoodDay (talk) 18:03, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- For all the talk that "consensus can change" WP:CCC, it's just a fallacy. Those against change hide behind it as an excuse while those in favour of change grow disillusioned by the vague arbitrary goalposts being set. I would support a disambiguation page and the use of parental disambiguation. Cashew.wheel (talk) 18:37, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- "Consensus can change" is not a fallacy. See for instance this 2006 discussion on whether to make "China" a redirect to China (disambiguation) instead of to "Chinese civilization" (the then current setting), and compare it with this 2011 discussion which decided that "China" should be the article for the People's Republic of China. In that case there was a clear and obvious change in consensus, which led to the desired change. It wasn't a case of "twenty people over the last five years have expressed dissatisfaction so we'll have to change it." Nothing similar has happened on these pages. Also, please assume good faith. Neither I nor anybody else is hiding behind anything as an excuse. We're replying to your arguments, that's all. And what in the world are these "vague arbitrary goalposts"? The reasons for keeping the status quo are concrete and clearly (and consistently) stated. Scolaire (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- Further to my point above about where this discussion should take place to truly determine current consensus, I note that those 2006 and 2011 discussions on China that you mentioned took place on the actual talk page for Chinese civilization (which was the default redirect at the time). TempDog123 (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- An earlier ArbCom ruling has stated that this discussion on moving Ireland, renaming the articles on Ireland and Republic of Ireland, must take place here. Unless that ArbCom ruling is withdrawn or rescinded then here is the only place any such discussion may take place. I will agree though that that does have a measure of potentially limiting involvement in the discussion which could be an issue, however anytime anyone brings up this topic elsewhere they do get redirected here and there are headers on the relevant pages directing to this one. Canterbury Tail talk 12:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Well, I'm glad you agree that does potentially limit involvement in the discussion. While Scolaire mentions that most people initially raise the issue on the Ireland or Republic of Ireland talk page, he also says that the discussion almost immediately gets rerouted here. That probably has the same net effect of limiting both visibility and participation in the discussion.
- However long ago that ArbCom decision may have been made, it might be time to revisit it, if only temporarily. if there's an actual desire to take the temperature on current consensus, then I think it's quite frankly unlikely to happen as long as the discussion is limited to this page.
- I do appreciate, whatever other differences of opinion we may have on the matter, that you both acknowledge my suggestions here have not been unreasonable. TempDog123 (talk) 06:26, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- I don't accept that rerouting the discussion "has the same net effect of limiting both visibility and participation in the discussion". If there was a substantial number of people wanting change (i.e. enough people to overturn the consensus), they would see the request at the Ireland or ROI talk page, see that the discussion was moved, and follow the link to this page. Compare the current version of this page with this one, which I picked at random out of 34 archive pages(!), and see the amount of discussion and the number of people that contributed over a period of just three days. That simply wouldn't happen today.
- I would have no problem with somebody asking ArbCom to change its ruling, and allow naming discussions to be held at the article talk pages. Scolaire (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Since TempDog123 raises the same point twice, I'll answer it twice. More often than not, requests to rename the pages are initially made on Talk:Ireland or Talk:Republic of Ireland, so people are aware of the request but do not turn up in numbers to overturn the consensus. To reiterate, consensus can change, but in this case it just hasn't. Sorry. Scolaire (talk) 13:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Also it's worth nothing that most requests to move the page are by drive by accounts with no real skin in the game, just new accounts or editors that fly by after being outraged at it, post some angry messages, and then leave with no actual desire to engage in actual real conversation or debate on the topic beyond a couple of hours. When this is the instigation and participation, it's no wonder that there isn't any further progress on anything. Canterbury Tail talk 13:19, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- An earlier ArbCom ruling has stated that this discussion on moving Ireland, renaming the articles on Ireland and Republic of Ireland, must take place here. Unless that ArbCom ruling is withdrawn or rescinded then here is the only place any such discussion may take place. I will agree though that that does have a measure of potentially limiting involvement in the discussion which could be an issue, however anytime anyone brings up this topic elsewhere they do get redirected here and there are headers on the relevant pages directing to this one. Canterbury Tail talk 12:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- Further to my point above about where this discussion should take place to truly determine current consensus, I note that those 2006 and 2011 discussions on China that you mentioned took place on the actual talk page for Chinese civilization (which was the default redirect at the time). TempDog123 (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
- "Consensus can change" is not a fallacy. See for instance this 2006 discussion on whether to make "China" a redirect to China (disambiguation) instead of to "Chinese civilization" (the then current setting), and compare it with this 2011 discussion which decided that "China" should be the article for the People's Republic of China. In that case there was a clear and obvious change in consensus, which led to the desired change. It wasn't a case of "twenty people over the last five years have expressed dissatisfaction so we'll have to change it." Nothing similar has happened on these pages. Also, please assume good faith. Neither I nor anybody else is hiding behind anything as an excuse. We're replying to your arguments, that's all. And what in the world are these "vague arbitrary goalposts"? The reasons for keeping the status quo are concrete and clearly (and consistently) stated. Scolaire (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
Credibility bot
As this is a highly active WikiProject, I would like to introduce you to Credibility bot. This is a bot that makes it easier to track source usage across articles through automated reports and alerts. We piloted this approach at Misplaced Pages:Vaccine safety and we want to offer it to any subject area or domain. We need your support to demonstrate demand for this toolkit. If you have a desire for this functionality, or would like to leave other feedback, please endorse the tool or comment at WP:CREDBOT. Thanks! Harej (talk) 17:42, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
ARCA
There is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Ireland article names about changing the notices to say discussion about the Ireland articles should take place on this project's talk page rather that the project page its self. I'm not suggesting any other changes are needed or that the articles should be moved. Crouch, Swale (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- Now that such discussions are allowed to take place on the island & the country talkpages? Maybe this WikiProject could be retired. Since there's already WP:IRELAND in existance. GoodDay (talk) 06:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Inevitably, some lover of drama or good-faith new editor will propose a move. Seeing as that will effect, at minimum, the Ireland, Republic of Ireland and Ireland (disambiguation) pages, it makes sense to have a "neutral" central place to have the discussion. There is also a lot of material here that people will want to link in any ensuing discussion. Bastun 10:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- "Retired" doesn't mean deleted. Linking to here in any future discussion may be useful, but moving the discussion to here would be directly counter to the ArbCom decision. Scolaire (talk) 13:30, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- PS: See here for links. Scolaire (talk) 13:42, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Inevitably, some lover of drama or good-faith new editor will propose a move. Seeing as that will effect, at minimum, the Ireland, Republic of Ireland and Ireland (disambiguation) pages, it makes sense to have a "neutral" central place to have the discussion. There is also a lot of material here that people will want to link in any ensuing discussion. Bastun 10:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
- Project-Class Ireland pages
- NA-importance Ireland pages
- Project-Class Ireland articles of NA-importance
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- Project-Class Northern Ireland-related pages
- NA-importance Northern Ireland-related pages
- All WikiProject Northern Ireland pages
- NA-Class Irish republicanism pages
- NA-importance Irish republicanism pages
- WikiProject Irish republicanism articles