| Revision as of 23:11, 8 April 2009 view sourceDurova (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,685 edits →True colors: reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:29, 20 February 2012 view source Nyttend (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators286,434 editsm Changed protection level of User talk:Off2riorob: User request within own user space: Requested by email; user has provided a way for others to contact him/her ( (indefinite) (indefinite)) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{NOINDEX}} | |||
| all the fun of the fair{{GFDL-self}} | |||
| ⚫ | '''Don't post here to discuss - this account has been abandoned, please respect that.''' ] (]) 22:53, 24 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | Making a few edits as ] - ] (]) 22:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| juicy mullberry.{{GFDL-self}} | |||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | |||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:Off2riorob/Archives/ | |||
| |format=Y/F | |||
| |age=480 | |||
| |index=no | |||
| |archive now={{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}, | |||
| |archivebox=yes | |||
| }} | |||
| == Warning == | |||
| I'm surprised to see you engaged in the same activity (revert warring over sources, editing the same articles) that got you blocked in the first place. Your disregarding the warnings of myself and others is not appreciated. Please stop, or you will be blocked for a longer period. Thanks. <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 19:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| I am sourceing books and inserting cites in good faith. please could I have a comment from an independant admin(] (]) 19:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)). | |||
| :I'll take a look, and reply soon. --<small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">]]</span></small> 19:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| You added a link , which was reverted by another user . You then added it again, . This is the beginnings of an edit war, and against policy. | |||
| If you add information, and another user removes it, do '''not''' add it again. Instead, go to the article discussion page (the "talk page") and discuss your proposed change, giving clear reasons why you think it should be added. Discuss it there with other users, and try to reach a ]. If you are unable to agree, follow the ]. | |||
| I hope this is clear; if you have further questions, please do ask again - and if you're ever unsure how to proceed, ask before taking action. | |||
| If you stick to the guidelines, you won't have any further problems. | |||
| Good luck, and happy editing. --<small><span style="border: 1px solid; background-color:darkblue;">]]</span></small> 19:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| Hello there. I have been monitoring your progress with interest, but I still have a few concerns. For example, ] you question the reliability of a source without actually giving the source or why you believe it is unreliable. ] you question the validity of the infobox, which is technically you're right, but do bear in mind that this person's notability derives from their crime. Therefore it is not ] to use the criminal infobox. ], as long as there is a free version available, you can suggest it. But it ''must'' be free or compliant with our ], and also, similar to my point above, this person's notability derives from the crime, so the photograph is appropriate and encyclopedic. Further up, you ] your question about the infobox, which is not appropriate; please be patient and wait for responses, rather than hitting the page with posts about different things. It just keeps the talk page cleaner, and people are much more likely to respond if they see you are waiting patiently. Here you go so far as ], which is bordering on disruptive. The page is actively maintained by {{user|Cirt}}, with acknowledged skill regarding these articles, and he does a very good job in ensuring bad content gets removed. I can only imagine this comment is the result of your past disagreements, but you must put those aside. I do not want to see you blocked ''again'' for disruptive editing, so I hope you take my advice on board in the future. Good luck. <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 18:59, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :hello peter..more threats from you to ban me again..I thought you were a bit keen the first time..still ..I am working hard to :never give you the chance to do it again. I thank you for your advice.?warning..(] (]) 19:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)) | |||
| ::I was not threatening, merely suggesting. Thank you for taking my advice on board; I hope it will benefit your editing. <font face="Arial"> ] (])</font> 19:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Thanks== | |||
| Thanks Rob, I needed that!] (]) 22:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == True colors == | |||
| Hi, would you mind sharing what my true colors are? Powder blue is a flattering shade, but I was thinking of changing to rose. You seem to be an expert on these things. ;) Cheers, <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 15:09, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi, would you like to engage in dialog? Yes, in 2007 I did make a big mistake. It's a little bit curious how you've formed such a strong opinion about events that occurred more than a year before you joined the project, and insist that I haven't changed without (so far as I'm aware) ever interacting with me. Let's talk. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 21:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hi, dialogue is not really what I am after but thanks for the invitation...your correct in saying we have never met ..I was reading some of your posts and stumbled upon your comment page ..and left a comment ..that I felt it unwise to give you any power/responsibility..after what you did with it the first time , thats all ....(] (]) 22:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)) | |||
| :::Actually that was Synergy's comment page. He didn't ask me when he started it. Are you aware I'm a sysop at three other WMF projects, or that your post to my user talk interrupted a discussion about a featured article drive by an editor I'm currently mentoring? You seem to reach conclusions quickly. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 22:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| : yes I will have first to remind you of my comment to you that ..right now.. I am not really wanting to enter into dialogue with you .. only offering a comment..thats all.(] (]) 23:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)) | |||
| ::Well, having posted to my user talk and then posted repeatedly to someone else's user page about me, including starting a threaded discussion with a question at the latter, would generally be taken as a desire for dialog. What would you expect me to do, other than this? <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 23:11, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Lack of politeness == | |||
| I would be prepared to consider any examples of my impoliteness in the current ANI you would care to cite. Unless you consider the previous sentence confrontational. :-) ] (]) 19:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:29, 20 February 2012
Don't post here to discuss - this account has been abandoned, please respect that. Off2riorob (talk) 22:53, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Making a few edits as User:Youreallycan - Off2riorob (talk) 22:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)