Revision as of 20:50, 21 April 2009 editPurplebackpack89 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers37,962 edits →Please start using edit summaries← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:00, 20 October 2023 edit undo184.15.251.36 (talk) last edit was 13 April 2010, not April 2013 | ||
(892 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Not around|date=April 2010}} | |||
{{calm talk}} | |||
{{troutme}} | |||
<center>'''EVENTUALISM IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ROUTE FOR ] CONCERNS'''</center> | |||
<div style="padding: 10px; background: #FFFFFF; border: 2px solid #992222; margin:5px 0px;"> | |||
<center> | |||
<font color=#E49B0F size=5>Welcome to my talk page!</font> | |||
<div style="margin: 1px; padding: 5px; {{round corners}}; background: #F9F9F9; border: 1px solid #999; width: 763px;"> | |||
] | |||
==citing== | |||
could you tell me how to cite infromation if you want me to cite the lil wayne stuff, because i know the website, i just dont know how to format it. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
Welcome to my talk page. Please respect ]. PLEASE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE, NOT THE TOP. Thank you. | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
</center> | |||
---- | |||
{{#if:DarkOrchid|<div style="background:white; border:2px DarkOrchid solid; padding:12px;">|}} | |||
{{#ifeq:{{{heading|}}}|true|==|'''}}{{{headtext|Welcome...}}}{{#ifeq:{{{heading|}}}|true|==|'''}} | |||
{{#switch:true|true=]|}} | |||
<p>Hello, JBsupreme, and ] Thank you for ]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. {{#switch:{{{npov}}}|true=Unfortunately, one or more of your edits {{#if:{{{article|}}}|to the page ]|}} have not conformed to ''']''', and have been reverted. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.There's a page about the ] that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole.</p><p>|}} Here are some {{#if:{{{npov|}}}|other||}} pages that you might find helpful:</p> | |||
{{#switch:{{{icons}}}|true=:] '''|*}}]{{#if:{{{icons|}}}|'''|}} | |||
{{#switch:{{{icons}}}|true=:] '''|*}}]{{#if:{{{icons|}}}|'''|}} | |||
{{#switch:{{{icons}}}|true=:] '''|*}} | |||
]{{#if:{{{icons|}}}|'''|}} | |||
{{#switch:{{{icons}}}|true=:] '''|*}}]{{#if:{{{icons|}}}|'''|}} | |||
{{#switch:{{{icons}}}|true=:] '''|*}}]{{#if:{{{icons|}}}|'''|}} | |||
{{#switch:{{{icons}}}|true=:] '''|*}}]{{#if:{{{icons|}}}|'''|}} | |||
{{#switch:{{{anon|}}}|true=<p>I would recommend that you get a username by clicking '''<span class="plainlinksneverexpand"></span>'''. You don't have to ] to read or edit articles on Misplaced Pages, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and has many ]. As a registered user, you gain the use of an ] ] of your choice, a personal ] to which you can add articles that interest you, the ability to ], and much more. Also, your ], JBsupreme, will no longer be visible to other users.</p>|}} | |||
<p>Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and ask your question there.{{#if:{{{1|}}}|</p><p>{{{1}}}</p><p>| }}{{#if:{{{nosig|}}}||Again, welcome! ] (]) 20:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)}}</p>{{#if:DarkOrchid|</div>|}} | |||
SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: I am switching from scotch to red wine for the month of August. I'm open to suggestions. ] (]) ✄ ✄ ✄ 07:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Stellar evolution== | |||
I was wondering how come you removed my edit even though it was correct | |||
I said that a nebula is also know as a stellar nursury | |||
how is that not true? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 23:45, 30 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
==W<span style="background:white; color:white; ;">h</span>ine suggestion== | |||
==DJ WARRIOR== | |||
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | |||
Call the Waaaambulance that same old someone had a fit again. There is a ton of whining about us going on with his usual supporters chiming in. It is so nice of the same to give us the ''required'' courtesy of letting us know, isn't it? ] (]) 04:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Um, actually there are many references throughout the entry, can you read? or do you just take an atto-second to look at something and say 'nope! delete'. Useless. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Maybe time for a cup of tea? == | |||
Maybe its time ] for a ]? ] (]) 21:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Rick ross (rapper) == | |||
On the ] page you changed the links at the bottom back after i had edited them?. The so called official rick ross trilla website is not anything related to rick ross any more its been used for advertising for a while now.--] (]) 18:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
: |
: How bout a glass of Scotch? First drink's on me. ] (]) ✄ ✄ ✄ 22:05, 12 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Bottoms up! ] | |||
==noble dru & phashara pages == | |||
==Blocked== | |||
please advise on the corrections that should be made to prevent the pages from being marked for deletion. | |||
you have been blocked from editing for the next 48 hours as apparently some kind of sanction is necessary to show you that this kind of edit summaries are not acceptable - also not against obvious vandals. you have received multiple (more than five) warnings about this and it has had little effect on your behaviour leaving me no other choice than to show that I am being serious. Also the reason for the block is repeated and severe uncivilty - not exactly personal attacks - but it does fall under disruptive behaviour. there just is no blocktemplate for that sepecifically. <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block1 -->] 17:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 16:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Such incivility is in violation of JBsupreme's editing restriction at ]. — '''<span class="texhtml" style="text-shadow:4em 4em 4em #004400;">] ]</span>''' 17:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
==Lil Wayne== | |||
Stop deleting the facts about gillie and lil wayne. I dont know if your mad that its true or what but i think people deserve to know the truth. So stop changing it. I am not taking sides, i just believe people need to know the truth. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
::Reviewing that, I have noted Maunus' block in the enforcement actions of the Tothwolf case - though it was not made explicitly under the arbitration case aegis, the reasoning is directly applicable and the behavior is identical. ] (]) 20:27, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::Thanks! I had to correct the year. — '''<span class="texhtml" style="text-shadow:4em 4em 4em #004400;">] ]</span>''' 01:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== |
==Read a book== | ||
{{unblock reviewed|1=I made no personal attacks. I do wish vandals would suffer slow, painful, fiery deaths. This is not a personal attack, however, as much as the blocking administrator may wish it were one. ] (]) ✄ ✄ ✄ 17:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)|decline=Please cease making comments about other editors/people. Your comments clearly violate Misplaced Pages spirit, as well as a number of policies (] for example). I'm fairly sick of seeing these ANI disscussions about whether something is a death ''threat'' or death ''wish'', I'm sure you know that neither are acceptable. I think a 48 hour block will do you some good, and I do sincerely hope that when you return you stop making these remarks. ]<sup>]</sup> (]) 17:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
It'll expire later today. If the idiots start up again, I'll put it to semi. ] (]) 17:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
I hope lots of things. ] (]) ✄ ✄ ✄ 17:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Michael Potts: AfD dialogue == | |||
Please revisit Michael Potts article (of which I am the principal author). Contrary to the assertion that Google News features only one link to "michael potts" +"rocky mountain institute," I have provided a link showing that in fact, there are eight links. For example, I have just added to the article, under External Links, a Denver Post interview with Michael Potts on March 31, 2007, in which he speaks about his personal and business philosophies. Thank you for your time. I do appreciate your help in strengthening this article.] (]) 15:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
==WikiProject Software== | |||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
|align="center"|Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. You have been invited to join ''']''', a ] dedicated to improving the ]-related articles on Misplaced Pages. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the ], and add your name to the ]. You may also wish to add ''' {{tl|User WikiProject Software}} to your userpage''' and ''' {{tlu|Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Software/Announcement-u}}''' '''to the top of your talk page''' '''with''' the heading <nowiki>==WikiProject Software Announcement==</nowiki>. If you know someone who might be interested, please pass this message onto others by pasting this code into their talk page <nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>|~~~~</nowiki>}} with the following heading <nowiki>== WikiProject Software ==</nowiki>. | |||
Thanks,<br /> | |||
] (] ● ]) 09:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:I sincerely hope that you get the message this time. It's not OK, it never has been OK, and if you keep pushing that particular button you become a liability rather than a net benefit to the community and the encyclopedia project. | |||
== Spider Loc & Young Buck controversy == | |||
:I don't want to see you pushed out the door - I value your contributions to date. But if you keep being rude to people like that, even during vandalism fighting, it's going too far. | |||
Hey boss, what is the issue you have with the Spider Loc and Young Buck controversy that you keep deleting the entire paragraph after numerous users have updated and added content to it? Are you not recognizing the beef as factual? Check out Spider Loc's homepage or MySpace page or any one of a thousand websites (including MTV) that have covered the controversy. I think at the very least, there needs to be a section for this controversy considering Spider has released several diss tracks on mixtapes and has confirmed that the primary diss track "Lean On Me" will be appear on his next album. I wont re-edit the page until I hear back from you, but please consider the addition as I think it adds a lot to the page. Thanks. (] (]) 14:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)) | |||
:] (]) 22:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
: It just needs a cite from a reliable publication, see ] - otherwise it falls under ] which is generally not permitted, especially so for ] articles. ] (]) 19:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] nomination of ] == | |||
== Whut up homie? == | |||
Why did you delete my information on the butterfly? Rob was not the "lead" in the story, plus you deleted the info on his kids, why? I take it you are a Juggalo, right? Then you sjould know how important that story is. I have been a down with ICP for 12+ years and know there history, matter of fact I am sitting here with Joes book in front of me. I am goin to go ahead and put back my stuff you deleted. MCL. | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 14:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Butterfly == | |||
I went ahead and put the chapters up on the Behind the paint link, wich the first chapter is the citation. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
== Arbitration motion regarding ] == | |||
== Joseph Bruce == | |||
I understand your edits. Thanks for your patience. But there is a problem with the user ]. He seems not to listen, and even became angry with me when I tried to explain that he is writing information that is not necessary. I'm not sure what to do with him. It seems he does not care to even listen to the rules. Maybe you can do something? ] (]) 04:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
You may wish to note that motions have been proposed that involve yourself on that page. ] ''(])'' 18:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
: There isn't much I can do, other than try to explain it the same way you did. He appears to be a newly registered editor and does not understand how Misplaced Pages operates yet. ] (]) 04:49, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Articles to be deleted == | |||
:: Well thank you anyway. ] (]) 04:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
You took part on this ], but you failed on these ones: | |||
That means F.T.F.O--] (]) 09:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
Why? Partly it makes your result of your deletion article invalid. | |||
That's why i propsed all these articles for deletion for the same reason as your previous discussion about the ] today, but ] reverted all deletion proposals. This should you know. --] (]) 16:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Arbitration motions regarding ] == | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi. Interested in your thoughts on ]. ] (]) 18:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC). | |||
Resolved by <span class="plainlinks"></span> at ] that:<br> | |||
== Jake Gyllenhaal == | |||
Hey, | |||
1) {{user3|Tothwolf}}, {{user3|Miami33139}} and {{user3|JBsupreme}} are banned from interacting with each other, broadly construed. This includes things like not editing each other's userspace, not becoming involved directly with each other in discussions, and not nominating articles for deletion which another one has started. This does not prohibit commenting in the same discussion without directly interacting or editing the same articles so long as they are not directly in conflict. They may request enforcement of this restriction at the ] board or by email to the Arbitration mailing list; they may not request enforcement or action against each other for any other reason or at any other venue. Attempts to game this restriction should be treated as a violation of the restriction. | |||
I noticed you recently reverted someone on ] and asked them to cite their sources. I thought you might like to know that the info is already in the article, well sourced and well written. :) ] (Have a nice day!) 23:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
2) {{user3|Miami33139}} is subject to an editing restriction for six months. Should Miami33139 make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith or disruptive to deletion discussions, Miami33139 may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement portion of the case. The six months starts from the day this motion passes. | |||
==The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar== | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For your excellent job with reverting vandalism and challenging unsourced information in the ] article, I hereby award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. Keep up the great work! '''<font color="#000000">]</font><font color="#FFCC00">]</font>''' 14:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
3) ] (already updated once) is changed to "{{user3|JBsupreme}} is subject to an editing restriction for six months. Should JBsupreme make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, ''or disruptive to deletion discussions'', JBsupreme may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below." The six months is reset to start from the day this motion passes. | |||
:I agree with you about requiring strong sources for any information in the article. The article is a magnet for vandalism and unsourced speculation, and just reverting the vandalism / speculation has put it in my 5 most edited articles. We need to keep being aggressive in removing all unsourced additions to the article to keep the article in compliance with ]. You've been doing a great job! '''<font color="#000000">]</font><font color="#FFCC00">]</font>''' 14:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
For the Arbitration Committee, ] (]) 15:49, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Greetings, JB. You !voted to delete the article on ] due to absence of "evidence of non-trivial coverage by multiple, reliable publications". After a few minutes of research, I found such coverage and added it to the article; would you care to revisit your comment? Thanks, <font color="404040">]</font> 23:43, 24 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] article == | |||
I have opened a new AfD for the above article at ]. As you commented at the first AfD in February, I am letting you know, in case you wish to join in the discussion. Regards, -- ''''']'''''/]|]\ 12:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Checkuser == | |||
Would you care to explain ]? Thanks! ] (]) 05:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hello, I created the page ] without aware/known that the page ] previously ] for deletion. | |||
The page created by mine has '''new layout''' and I really '''hope that it will be kept''', as I will make further improvement to it. | |||
==A little confusion== | |||
Have your say ], thank you. I will notice other users joined above AfD, too. <span style="font-family:Segoe UI;">] (]∙])</span> 08:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Hi there, I noticed you removed an artist's entire discography besides albums, as you did in . If you read ], it states: ''Pages on performers should have discography sections. These should be subdivided into albums and singles, or other simple systems as needed''. Because Tyga's discography is small, it is appropriate to have the subsections of singles, guest appearances, and so on. Removing something per a talk page, in this case ], is incorrect. Just thought I'd point it out. ]] 05:02, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
: No I would have to disagree with you on your point of guest appearances and would be willing to discuss that with you on a more appropriate talk page, such as the relevant article talk page or the WikiProject talk page. ] (]) 00:34, 5 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
== Possible Socks of Jkliajmi on Template:Regions_of_the_world == | |||
There are two IPs within range of eachother that keep making the same edits as this banned user (78.146.17.244, 78.146.70.120). I am suspecting that they are the same as Jkliajmi. What should be done to check? | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Template:Regions_of_the_world&action=history | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 16:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 20:53, 8 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
== Re:Leon Jackson == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
Since you've given the IP a "blatant vandal" warning, I can block it after the next vandalism. Thanks for letting me know. <font color="DarkGray">...</font> ] <sub>]</sub> 01:24, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:OK it's blocked. <font color="DarkGray">...</font> ] <sub>]</sub> 01:26, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 06:16, 13 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
== My bad == | |||
--] (]) 05:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
==Original Barnstar== | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For endorsing many of my never-ending prods. Thanks for the support! ]] 01:45, 14 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. | |||
== AFD spam == | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ] (]) 21:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
Could you please take a look at ]. I have added (the newly released) confirmed release date and I have expanded the article and added sources. If you still feel the article needs to be deleted, no problem. However I would be grateful if you'd take a look. Regards, --''']]''' 16:47, 17 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
== inre ] == | |||
: Sorry I did not see this sooner I've been signed off for the weekend. If there is something I missed could you please present it to ]? I cannot do much more since I am not an admin. ] (]) 04:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
You wisely offered a delete comment in January 2010. So did I. But things have changed in this actor's career in the intevening 15 months. I'd like to bring the new and improved ] back to mainpage. Please visit if you have time and offer any coments you might wish on its talk page. Best, ''']''' '']'' 08:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
== One Be Lo == | |||
I have requested that User Hoponpop explain what he/she/it means by stating that the article ''Fails to meet criteria for a music article'' on the ]. If you can provide an explanation to help others improve the page, I encourage you to do so. --] (]) 07:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I still have received no response from you, JBsupreme, or hoponpop59 about the reasoning here- was it a mistake that you seconded it for deletion? Thanks --] (]) 19:36, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM == | |||
== Hi JB == | |||
Thanks for the nice welcome back message. Let me know if I can assist you with anything, and I will try. Happy editing! Dave --<font color="#0000C0">David</font> ''']''' 15:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
{| align=center class="current" style="background:lightgreen; border: 1px solid #C0C090; padding: 6px; margin-bottom: 3px; border-radius: 15px; text-align:center; font-size: 95%; width: auto;" | |||
== Speedy db-repost == | |||
| | |||
| The current ''']''' are: <br> | |||
<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
The next collaborations will be posted on April 1, 2012. (]) | |||
|} | |||
== inconsistent deletion policy == | |||
Hi JB. Just double-checking that I was not missing something with ... The ] was "no consensus", was it not? <font face="Comic sans MS">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 03:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
I'm disappointed that you essentially just ignored my questions about the inconsistencies in your personal deletion policy with regard to tmux and things like GNU Screen and twin, for seven months, then quietly deleted my polite, well-considered questions without comment, a couple of years ago. I can, at this point, only reasonably assume you have some personal biases that prevent you from making consistent decisions about some topics. - ] (]) 23:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
: ...that is correct, sorry about that. Never mind. :-/ ] (]) 03:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
== |
== GA Thanks == | ||
On behalf of ], I would like to thank you for your contributions to ], which has fairly recently achieved ] status. {{User Good Article|Lupe Fiasco}}--] <small>(]/]/]/]/]) </small> 19:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Hiya JB! You recently undid some edits to the article on ]. For the majority what you did was right (like the ''Influece'' section, that was just ridiculous), but along with it you also took out some minor constructive edits. I've incorporated your edits into my latest revision. Kind regards, --] | ] | ] 14:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{-}} | |||
== WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM == | |||
== RFC: Clarifying "notable single" == | |||
{| align=center class="current" style="background:lightgreen; border: 1px solid #C0C090; padding: 6px; margin-bottom: 3px; border-radius: 15px; text-align:left; font-size: 95%; width: auto;" | |||
As a frequent contributor to articles related to music, you are invited to review and comment, if you see fit! Best regards, --] (]) 18:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| | |||
| {{resize|1.2em|The current monthly ''']''' are:}}<br> | |||
] | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
<center>The next collaborations will be posted on May 1, 2012. (])</center> | |||
|} | |||
== WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM == | |||
{| align=center class="current" style="background:lightgreen; border: 1px solid #C0C090; padding: 6px; margin-bottom: 3px; border-radius: 15px; text-align:left; font-size: 95%; width: auto;" | |||
==Edit summaries for PROD nominations== | |||
| | |||
Just a friendly reminder to use an ] when proposing deletion for an article. Edit summary usage is always good, but it is especially important that edit summaries are used when proposing deletion. The reason for this is that articles proposed for deletion that later have the {{tl|prod}} tag removed should not be proposed for deletion again, but rather sent to ]. The only easy way to check if an article was previously proposed for deletion is to look at the edit history and the edit summaries people have left before. Thanks! <!-- ] --> --User:Ceyockey (<small>'']''</small>) 18:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{resize|1.2em|The current monthly ''']''' are:}}<br> | |||
] | |||
== Daddy X page == | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
i want to thank you for deleting all the information on his page. i think there where just to much personal information on his page that people don't need to know. —Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
:::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
<center>The next collaborations will be posted on July 1, 2012.<br> | |||
To propose future collaborations, please ]</center> | |||
|} | |||
{{mdash}}<small><span style="font-family:arial;">]<sup>]</sup></span></small> 00:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM == | |||
You might want to check out the other members of ] as well. ] and his otters • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 00:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
*Try DRV. I have no idea how Jha Jha was kept either. ] and his otters • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 02:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
{| align=center class="current" style="background:lightgreen; border: 1px solid #C0C090; padding: 6px; margin-bottom: 3px; border-radius: 15px; text-align:left; font-size: 95%; width: auto;" | |||
== AfD setups == | |||
| {{resize|1.2em|<center>The current monthly<br> ''']''' are:</center>}}<br> | |||
Hi JB. I've mentioned this to you several times before, but I will remind you again. Please be sure to follow all the steps at ] when you nominate an article. I for you. Thanks. <font face="Comic sans MS">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 01:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
<sup></sup><sup></sup> | |||
] | |||
== CSD Taggings == | |||
<div style="font-size:100%; line-height: 1.7em;"> | |||
:::::::::*<big>''']'''</big> | |||
:::::::::*<big>''']'''</big> | |||
:::::::::*<big>''']'''</big> | |||
:::::::::*<big>''']'''</big> | |||
:::::::::*<big>''']'''</big><br> | |||
</div> | |||
<center>The next collaborations will be posted on December 1, 2012.<br> | |||
Hello, when marking pages for speedy deletion, please be sure to use ]. "''uploader has a NASTY HISTORY of uploading images with FAKE LICENSES!!!''" is ''not'' a valid reason to delete something and could constitute a ]. If you notice a user is repeatedly uploading images without copyright information, give them a warning to inform them of the situation, and contact an administrator if the situation continues. For more information on how to tag these photos, please see ]. Thank you. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 02:25, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
To propose future collaborations, please ''']'''</center> | |||
<div style="float:right"> | |||
: I suggest you check their upload history first. I would also counter that it damn well is a valid reason to speedy delete something. If you don't like it, sorry. ] (]) 02:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
<small>]{{•}} ]</small></div> | |||
== PeanutButterWiki Deletion Vote == | |||
Hi. I noticed you voted for the deletion of the PeanutButterWiki article, claiming that there were "hundreds of other wiki farms just like it", but I'm not sure you'd find this statement to be true if you had researched it. I would challenge you two find one that hosts more private wikis (over 300,000 are hosted at PBwiki) and as far as we're aware, only one provider (WetPaint) hosts more wikis (we host ~600,000 wikis, WetPaint just crossed 1m last month). We're prominently cited in a Newsweek article this week alone and have been dozens of major press publications. So I'd like to ask you to please ensure that votes you place for articles for deletion contain factually correct statements. And yes, I am the founder and chairman of PBwiki, Inc. ] (]) 08:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Thanks for your message! ] (]) 08:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Re: Misuse of associated acts == | |||
The only way this can be done is manually, unfortunately. I doubt there can be a ] delicate enough to know who belongs in the associated acts section. Just abide by the ] and clear out the section whenever it needs to be. ]] 05:44, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Lackthereof == | |||
Re: Proding of ] - you might as well grab all of that band's albums while you are at it. They are listed among the . ]/<small><small>(])/(])/(])</small></small> 03:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
You didn't provide a reason in this deletion discussion. ] and his otters • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 11:57, 26 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Yeah -- my internet dropped before I could provide rationale and add it to the daily page. :-/ ] (]) 14:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Lady Luck (rapper) == | |||
Could you check out the AfD on this you started? The article has been improved. Thanks, ] (]) 03:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Prods == | |||
Howdy. FYI, if an article is tagged with {{tl|prod}} and it is then contested, you aren't supposed the tag the article with {{tl|prod}} a 2nd time.--] (]) 05:01, 1 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
I'm aware of that. Can you please tell me where I made this mistake? I will list it on AFD as appropriate. Thanks! ] (]) 06:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
: and then again .--] (]) 07:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== AfD protocol == | |||
Hi JBsupreme. When you nominate an article for AfD, it is important that you follow the steps at ]. You did not provide the necessary summary for ], so I have taken care of that with a dummy edit . I note that this is now the fifth time I have come to your page asking you to follow those instructions, and I have not been the only one. I am asking you once again: please follow the protocols of our deletion policies if you wish to continue to nominate articles for Prod or AfD. Thank you. <font face="Comic sans MS">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 01:31, 2 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Dear JBsupreme, | |||
You deleted a section that I added to this article, could you please give a reason for it? I just wrote down what many people think and say, something that I think belongs to the truth. Now I've put it back, but if you think you can delete it, but please give a reason. Thank you. --] (]) 10:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Citing references/sources for the Thalia Biography and Artistic Career== | |||
] (]) 21:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Rocksky] (]) 21:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Hello JBsupreme, | |||
I have given many references or sources for both the Biography and Artistic Career section of Thalia page. See sources below the page. Thank you. | |||
== Thank you == | |||
Thank you for reverting the false block added to my userpage. ] ]] 21:00, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page == | |||
JBSupreme -- as it says, thanks for reverting ]'s bizarre "you have been blocked" addition to my user page. No clue why he chose me... -- ] (]) 21:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Deletion?== | |||
Hello JBSupreme, I am new to the whole wikipedia website and would like to know why is my article in the process of being deleted and is there anything I can do to prevent it from being deleted. All the information and citations are very valid and from well credited sources. (] (]) 18:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)) | |||
== Layzie Bone == | |||
Hello. I am providing a ] on ]. Please do not make any edits for today. Contrary to stated belief on the talk page; I ''have'' been able to vastly expand the article, with ] and ]. The person is clearly ] and passes ]. I agree that the article was poorly written, but have significantly improved it to meet our guidelines here at Misplaced Pages. Please do not continue to engage in edit warring on this article, I'll have it in place within two hours. Thank you, have a nice day! '''''<font color="darkgreen">]</font><font color="blue">]</font> <font color="darkgreen" size="1">]</font>''''' 18:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
:I am now finished with the article. It clearly meets ] and passes ]. Please be constructive and expand the article rather than impose you ] on it. If you simply revert it or redirect it ''without'' seeking community consensus, you will be ] immediately. Thank you and Happy Editing! :-) '''''<font color="darkgreen">]</font><font color="blue">]</font> <font color="darkgreen" size="1">]</font>''''' 21:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== October 2008 == | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Layzie Bone|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''] is how Misplaced Pages works, make your case on the talk page, don't just unilaterally redirect when you know it is controversial please. '' ] (]) 18:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}} ... I'd like a 2nd opinion on this article: | |||
*{{la|Chaundon}} | |||
The PROD-2 was contested ... do you think it's worth the hassle of an AfD? | |||
Happy Editing! — '''{{#if:72.75.82.202|{{User|72.75.82.202}}|] (])}}''' <sub>20:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)</sub> | |||
:{{Done}} … article has been rescued by Some Other Editors. :-) — ] (]) 21:40, 11 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Given that all of the stuff had taken place today within a 2 hour period, I tended to give the benefit of the doubt. I've watched the user page, and if there's one more warning after the 48 hours, I'll make it permanent. Thanks for keepin' an eye out :) ] (]) 07:16, 16 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== My dog == | |||
Well,since he was a Beagle,and was sad being cooped up in our apartment,we gave him to a hunter.In fact,he's going hunting today :D | |||
--] (]) 09:24, 18 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== AfD == | |||
Since you've taken an interest in gang articles, I was wondering if you'd take a look at this AfD? ] ] (]) 13:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Re. Proposed deletion of ] == | |||
I have deprodded this. firstly, the prod was invalid since the article has survived a previous AfD (as noted on the article's talk page). An allmusic bio and other coverage was easy to find. Please take the effort to look for sources to determine notability and improve articles before trying to delete them. Thanks.--] (]) 19:05, 22 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Edit summary usage == | |||
JBsupreme, you ''need'' to start using edit summaries; you barely ever use them at all. This is especially important when you are nominating articles for deletion, such as , just now; it is time-consuming and annoying to have to check every single one of your edits to see what you've done, especially since you tend to make large-scale changes in one edits; large trims or additions of PRODs or AfDs. I realize that you'll probably just remove this message as you have all the others, but your lack of edit summary usage of ''any'' kind, even just to say "trim" or "AfD", is testing the patience of many members of the community. Thanks. ]''']''' 16:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
: I'm trying to make it a habit to mention the article is pending deletion, if I overlook this please feel free to add a null edit summary on my behalf and point it out to me when I forget. Thanks. ] (]) 23:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Improperly sourced edits == | |||
Am I within my right to remove improperly sourced edits from a BLP-related article? I formally stated my objection on the ] of the offending article, and explained in detail to the offending user (]) why his changes violate ] and ]. Following a request for comment, a neutral editor (]) also voiced concern that the material is improperly sourced. User JJJ999 seems to beleive that editors are not allowed to undo his changes, and that they must correct the offending material for him instead, even though I believe it is low quality and beyond repair. ] (]) 17:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Without looking at the article in question, the answer in general is a resounding yes. The burden of proof is on whoever added (or restored) the unsourced edits. ] (]) 04:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Yo Majesty == | |||
Please check out my work on ]. I think it's heavily cited enough now that I removed the references needed template. Hope you agree.--] (]) 20:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Agree. ] (]) 03:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Criminal organizations list == | |||
First thing's first, good work cleaning up that article, getting rid of some of the more pointless stuff on there (wannabe gangbangers trying to rep their "set"). I have to say though I disagree with your removal of the Piromalli 'ndrina (a sourced article) and some of the yakuza clans. Dojin-kai and Goto-gumi are both sourced (I haven't bothered to check the rest, if they aren't sourced I'm sure they can be). ] (]) 15:21, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Feel free to restore anything that is sourced, although I did not see the sources you're referring to when I was cleaning them up. ] (]) 17:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
I've restored the Piromalli 'ndrina (since it was already extensively referenced in-article) and yakuza articles, about half or so of which I've managed to provide in-article references for. The other half, well that's work for another day. Give me a shout if you disagree. ] (]) 23:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== $100 == | |||
]] 07:31, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: LOL ] (]) 07:42, 17 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== The sock block == | |||
:Hm, this does appear to be a bit off IMO. First off, there is not a whole lot (behavioral wise) to link any of the accounts to JBsupreme. And second, I am not even sure why they were blocked in the first place. None of them have any prior blocks, are indef blocked accounts, and they all see to be ]. I am going to leave a note for the blocking admin, and try and contact the CheckUser in this case. Please bear with us. ] <sup>]</sup> 05:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
::I confirm Rlevse's CheckUser results. However, I don't believe there's any evidence of abusive sockpuppetry here. does appear a bit strange, though. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">] </span><sub>(])</sub> 07:06, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
::: JBsupreme, do you have anyone else (wife/kids/roommates) in your household that also edits on Misplaced Pages? You need to provide strong evidences because your IP returns 4 other accounts, which is a lot of accounts under same IP for a single household unless you're living in university's residence. I shall review my decision when you present your evidences. And if you do get unblocked, you should make an advance declaration on each user page in the same household, per ] ]] 13:47, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
←I am very disappointed in the way this was ]. For starters myself and Nishkid both have stated that there really is no evidence of abusive sockpuppetry and yet this account remains blocked. I know plenty of administrators and users who have created multiple sock-accounts in ], and choose not to use them disruptively. Just because a user has sock accounts does not mean they have violated the ]. Second, I am disapointed that the blocking admin the unblock request which clearly violates the ] policy. Ohana, I wish to avoid any unnecessary drama so I ask that you please unblock the account, with a rather forgiving unblock summary so that this does not mess up anything in the future for this user. (Also per ], users do not have to disclose sock accounts if they are operating in good faith, it is only ''recommended''.) ] <sup>]</sup> 15:24, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
:Declination rejected. Reviewing one's own blocks is flagrant administrative misconduct from both the lens of community norms and policy; this was an obvious error that needed immediate rectification. There is no abusive sockpuppetry going on here, if any, and it is patently unfair to hold a good editor's privileges hostage until they reveal details about their living situation. To JBsupreme: sequence of edits is quite strange... if you are in fact Urgblame, be aware that you've been nailed and that breaching experiments such as reverting your own unconstructive edits are unwelcome. I've unblocked you already, so happy editing and stay out of trouble. :-) <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap">] // ] // ] // 17:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
::Looks like a good course of action to me. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Unless there is something I've missed. I concur with the unblock, at least of this account. This looks like a productive, contributing editor to me. If abusive sockpuppetry was afoot, hopefully some learning has occurred, and we won't see a repeat. If a block is needed, I would suggest discussion at ] before implementing it. Cheers, ]] 19:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
::: I didn't initiated the RFCU myself. Someone else was also supicious about JBsupreme's behaviour. Furthermore, if he created these accounts in good faith, there's no harm done in disclosing and nothing to hide, right? He still hasn't answered why the IPs are related. ]] 19:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
:::: I actually initiated the RCU because of what looked like tagteaming on the ] article by JBsupreme and a mysterious ] who appeared out of nowhere to support JB's deletionism. Turns out both had muliple accounts, but no connection between them. I didn't see any sock-abuse either in JB's case (just a bunch of add alternate and little-used accounts) and so didn't request any action. I see that NajiimP has been nailed for 3-sock editing of a single article, and that's just as well, because I think he's been around WP even more than all his accounts and edits-together, suggest. JBsupreme appears a good-faith editor, albeit one who has an infuriating habit of making large deletions with in-your-face edit summaries. I'm glad to see his unblock and hope he goes on to contribute here at little less boldly when it comes to deletions, and with a little more use of article TALK pages. (hint). And JB, my apologies. To some extent if you were experimenting with alternate or ill-remembered accounts, or somebody else was with your computer, you sort of got caught in the crossfire. ]]]] 01:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Than k you. ] (]) 06:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Sorry to have been unclear == | |||
When I wrote I should have been more clear in that it was 37 strong and cogent opinions toward keeping and 30 strong and cogent opinions toward deletion. Not a vote. An effort at reaching consensus. ''']''' '']'' 03:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Gangland (TV series) == | |||
I reverted your unexplained edit to ] the result of which was simply to mess up the table. Also in reviewing your edit history, you have a habit of not using the edit summary, making many of your edit very suspect. Please note that unexplained edits with no apparent reason can be reverted as vandalism. It would greatly help other editors to understand what you are doing if you made use of the edit summary to explain why you are deleting a link or any other edit that is not self evident as to why the edit is being made. Thank you ] <sup>(])</sup> 19:16, 22 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Jak3m == | |||
I warned him about this specifically ... he hasn't been blocked in over a year and despite all the image notices, he hasn't been formally warned as policy requires. If he does it after this, he can be blocked. ] (]) 01:59, 23 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Unsourced dates of birth == | |||
Hi JBsupreme. Regarding : Unsourced dates of birth are typically not removed from BLPs unless there is some reason to believe they are incorrect. Was there a reason in this case? Or it could be that there is something in ] that I am missing or understanding differently. Thanks in advance for any clarification. <font face="Comic sans MS">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 17:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: If you have a source please reinstate it. I've seen many instances where we are perpetuating wrong dates of birth and this makes Misplaced Pages look unreliable. This problem specifically affects hip-hop biographies to a greater degree. Hope that helps you. ] (]) 18:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
:: Thanks, yes it does. I had not realized that this had been a problem with hip-hop biographies. ] lists Rocsi's date of birth as agreeing with Misplaced Pages, but IMDB is not a reliable source. I've just found a 2005 article in the ''Chicago Tribune'' which says, "she refuses to give her exact age", so it's probably best to leave it out of her biography here. <font face="Comic sans MS">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 18:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
FYI, ]. ]] ] 00:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: Thanks, left a note. ] (]) 05:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Cum shot== | |||
Just wondering why you removed the topics in the 'See also' section? They are closely linked. | |||
] (]) 17:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
: I explained why in my edit summary. If they are closely linked then you can link to them within the body of the article using prose and wiki links. ] (]) 17:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Question == | |||
(removed non-free image which was disruptively uploaded to commons) | |||
what was disruptive about uploading this image to commons? | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Lil_Wayne.jpg | |||
] (]) 06:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
fake licensing dude. ] (]) 06:30, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
I am the author. I own the copyright. What is fake about this? ] (]) 07:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Thank you for confirming this with OTRS helpdesk. ] (]) 21:31, 16 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Will be kind enough to place it back up please? ] (]) 01:41, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
== List of fictional governments == | |||
For your attention, a ] you were involved in has gone up for a deletion review ]. ] (]) 21:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Merry Christmas == | |||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" style="border: 5px solid green; background-color: #7CC576; color: white;" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; color: white; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''Merry Christmas!''' | |||
|- | |||
|<font color="white">]] is wishing you a Merry Christmas! Hope you have a great Christmas day and a happy holiday season. Stay safe! ]] 08:39, 25 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{clear}} | |||
|} | |} | ||
From: <small><span style="font-family:arial;">]<sup>]</sup></span></small> 02:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
== RfC: On Software Notability. == | |||
There is currently a RfC on the topic of software notability (whether consensus has changed or if the essay needs updating) at ]. As you previously discussed on the topic I thought you might be interested. :) ] ] 17:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== ] == | |||
:My apologies. I assumed that a proposed deletion would count as a previous nomination, and therefore I used the afd2 template. Thank you for adjusting. ] (]) 08:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
: You got it. ] (]) 22:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Article on ] == | |||
Hi, Thanks for keeping an eye on this article. You reverted my contribution to this article, by saying that these contain unreliable sources. Please reconsider it, as i added the content and links by carefully searching the info and strongly feel that these were reliable sources. If you feel this is not the case, Please tell me how to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources. Quality check 15:44, 16 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Deleting blatantly unsourced content is good and all, however, you might wanna get in the habit of removing following categories too. I have saved you the bother , but I won't always be sorting through categories. Is it possible that you've done this "mistake" on other articles? Please reply on your talk page, ] <small>(] • ])</small> 18:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
: You are the yin to my yang. ] (]) 22:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
:: You mean that in a good way? ] <small>(] • ])</small> 23:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: I think so! :) ] (]) 04:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
~ | |||
==lindsay lohan== | |||
what about the already existing screenshots of lohan in parent trap and antother world ] (]) 16:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
and what about ]'s article......he has a picture of him in the movie Equilibrium.....and anothe one in the movie The Machinist .......and he is a living person......why is it ok for his article and not for lohans.......] (]) 16:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
if u dont reply i have no choice but to revert........] (]) 16:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
: congratulations on your second block this month ] (]) 05:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
==deletes== | |||
were you implying at the Jackley Budden afd that for the dozen or so other articles today & yesterday where I've said delete, that you want to keep them? (smile)''']''' (]) 22:29, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
==Deletion review for ]== | |||
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> | |||
== debby gibson == | |||
why did you take off the link for videos? all the websites has ads and affiliated links. Its very disrespecting to the small website owners. You start a website put any content and promote it then you will know the pain. No we don't do that we just destroy the other website by deleting the external links for no reason and help the greedy corporate world. If you want to remove that link you should delete all the website that has ads and any other affiliate links. Debby Gibson is not popular like Britney spears . so im trying to spread the word for the artists i like. and you guys keep deleting if they are not popular. there is cnn.com, imbd.com and many other links that has ads. why don't you remove them? so wiki runs this website with their own money? they get donations from other websites. Where do they get these donations? from all of us its a team work we are like a family. so don't delete the link. its extremely unfair. If you invest some money and run something then you will know what it feel likes and what a business is. Ediing something on wiki that you may have no idea is not appreciated. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
] ] (]) 14:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
== spam?? == | |||
How can you say its spam? you allow webpages that has cookies ans steel your information. Its very ridiculous. I didn't do anything that to get blocked. In case if you want to do it tell them to block me. People don't come to your site. You don't have genuine reason to remove the links i posted. You can put myspace, youtube , IMDB and many sites. Im telling you one more time everyone runs their websites with affliate ads. No one runs with their own money. Im a promoter for indie artists and many artists know me. don't let teh bad word spread that your going against small websites and indie artists. They will come and complaint on your editors . | |||
] (]) 17:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Anne Frank == | |||
Are you not supposed to wikilink terms that are part of quotes? I still don't know everything. ] (]) 20:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Bushwick Bill == | |||
The interview was conducted in Hazlehurst, MS and is not posted on the internet. What do I need to do in order to have this published. The information brings up to date the biographical information of the artist. TraceySoup <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
: Well it needs to be published ''somewhere'', otherwise it isn't really verifiable. Can you read ] for me and make your best judgement on whether the source you're referring to is actually "reliable" ? ] (]) 07:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Would you please reconsider based on addition of references and content? --] (]) 18:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
Hi JB. I see you did some cleaning up on this article. For the content removed in this edit though, I didn't understand how the change improved the article. The content needs better citations, but seem to be pretty valuable. Am I missing something? ] (]) 19:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
: Yes you're missing sources which corroborate what is being written! Fix that please, if you can. We can't keep unverifiable content around forever, sorry. ] (]) 06:05, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Did you try looking for sources? You might try Google News and Google Books. Those are two good places to find citations. ] (]) 16:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: Yes I did. I did not find sources that specifically corroborated this content. Did you? ] (]) 16:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Back to the Future: The Ride == | |||
Please do not remove images, especially images of the attraction's exterior, without explanation. If you have a problem with the image, please begin a discussion on the talk page for the article before reverting it.--] (]) 16:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
: You already have a message on your talk page. You are violating copyright and our fair use policy. Stop doing that. Stat. ] (]) 16:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::No, my message concerned the potential deletion of the image, yet images on articles (even tagged ones) should not been removed unlkess a valid reason is given on the talk page. Once the image is deleted, it will be safe to delte it from the article seeing how there is no longer an image there. | |||
::Also, you may have violated ] with multiple editors in that you have been impolite to them. Please do not breach this.--] (]) 16:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: Stop stealing images. Thanks. "The website is down" doesn't mean we have permission to violate their copyright. ] (]) 16:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::Yes, but the ride which the image displays has been closed for two years, and cannot be replaced with a free variant.--] (]) 16:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::In response to your edit summary comment, it is not an opinion; read this article: http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/09/03/america/NA-GEN-US-Theme-Park-Ride.php --] (]) 17:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
==AfD nomination of Les Henderson== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. --] (]) 23:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Please start using edit summaries == | |||
Can I ask you '''again''' to please use edit summaries when making substantial changes to articles such as your edits to ]. Can I also ask before deleting large portions of text that you make an effort to determine whether that information '''can''' be verified. Deleting large chunks of text just because there are no inline citations isn't helpful. Thanks.--] (]) 06:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
I'll try to add something to my talk page about it. Thanks. ] (]) 06:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
I agree with Michig...you did the same thing, even though every other SNL cast member has an unreference impressions list ] (]) 20:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Rand Paul == | |||
] has been overhauled. This may affect your comments at ]. This message is being copied to 8 people. ] 07:51, 4 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Please expand your nomination reasoning per my comments on the AFD. On second thought they seem a bit harshly worded, but I'm confident your skin is thick enough to take it. Apologies anyway. I'll be happy to retract the comment once the issue has been resolved. - ]|] 11:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Edit summaries == | |||
I won't belabor a point that has, I see, been made before, but I am compelled to note that even if one doesn't care to use edit summaries generally, he should at least use them when affixing an XfD template to a page (see, e.g., ]). ] (]) 20:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== April 2009 == | |||
] Constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours {{#if:United Bamboo Gang|to the article ]}}{{#if:| <!-- oldid for diff: {{{2}}}-->}} has an ] that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use ] for any tests you may want to do. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-wrongsummary --> - ] (]) 08:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== sock == | |||
Hey JB. re: . You have anything in lines of a discussion, consensus, policy, RfC or anything that would somehow equate dab to self-reference? I looked and didn't see anything, but if you're familiar with how and why a disambiguation would be a self-reference I'd like to read up on that. Not trying to argue at all here .. just curious. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 16:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
: Yes I do. http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:SELFREF#Community_and_website_feature_references -- Hope this helps, its a fairly old rule of thumb. Think of it in terms of derivative works. It is a good idea to avoid wiki-linking beyond article namespace within an article. I am just one person though so if you want broader input perhaps bring it up on the Village Pump or Admin Noticeboard? ] (]) 16:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Hi,<br> | |||
::I thank you sir. (assumed gender .. lol). I'll read through that, seems like a good start. I asked JHunterJ for input too, he seems to be pretty active in the dab area. I'm not really looking to start any major discussion on it, just kind of looking around and trying to get a feel for what is and isn't right for dab. Appreciate your time, and have a good day/night ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 17:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692203726 --> | |||
==Deletion review for ]== | |||
== WP:ANI == | |||
An editor has asked for a ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> ] (]) 07:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC) | |||
==] has been nominated for renaming== | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''' has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 20:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
There is currently a thread on ] concerning your edit summaries found . — ''''']]''''' 20:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:00, 20 October 2023
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. JBsupreme has not edited Misplaced Pages since April 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: I am switching from scotch to red wine for the month of August. I'm open to suggestions. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 07:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Whine suggestion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Call the Waaaambulance that same old someone had a fit again. There is a ton of whining about us going on with his usual supporters chiming in. It is so nice of the same to give us the required courtesy of letting us know, isn't it? Miami33139 (talk) 04:45, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Maybe time for a cup of tea?
Maybe its time ] for a nice cup of tea? Active Banana (talk) 21:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- How bout a glass of Scotch? First drink's on me. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 22:05, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
you have been blocked from editing for the next 48 hours as apparently some kind of sanction is necessary to show you that this kind of edit summaries are not acceptable - also not against obvious vandals. you have received multiple (more than five) warnings about this and it has had little effect on your behaviour leaving me no other choice than to show that I am being serious. Also the reason for the block is repeated and severe uncivilty - not exactly personal attacks - but it does fall under disruptive behaviour. there just is no blocktemplate for that sepecifically.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ·Maunus·ƛ· 17:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Such incivility is in violation of JBsupreme's editing restriction at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tothwolf#JBsupreme_warned. — Jeff G. ツ 17:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Reviewing that, I have noted Maunus' block in the enforcement actions of the Tothwolf case - though it was not made explicitly under the arbitration case aegis, the reasoning is directly applicable and the behavior is identical. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 20:27, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! I had to correct the year. — Jeff G. ツ 01:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Read a book
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).JBsupreme (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made no personal attacks. I do wish vandals would suffer slow, painful, fiery deaths. This is not a personal attack, however, as much as the blocking administrator may wish it were one. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 17:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please cease making comments about other editors/people. Your comments clearly violate Misplaced Pages spirit, as well as a number of policies (civility for example). I'm fairly sick of seeing these ANI disscussions about whether something is a death threat or death wish, I'm sure you know that neither are acceptable. I think a 48 hour block will do you some good, and I do sincerely hope that when you return you stop making these remarks. Kingpin (talk) 17:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I hope lots of things. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 17:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- I sincerely hope that you get the message this time. It's not OK, it never has been OK, and if you keep pushing that particular button you become a liability rather than a net benefit to the community and the encyclopedia project.
- I don't want to see you pushed out the door - I value your contributions to date. But if you keep being rude to people like that, even during vandalism fighting, it's going too far.
- Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of fictional magic users
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of fictional magic users, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of fictional magic users (2nd nomination). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Speed of light
You may wish to note that motions have been proposed that involve yourself on that page. NW (Talk) 18:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Articles to be deleted
You took part on this Article for deletion discussion, but you failed on these ones:
- Comparison_of_text_editors
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Comparison of instant messaging clients
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Comparison of HTML editors
- List_of_disk_partitioning_software
- Comparison of XMPP server software
Why? Partly it makes your result of your deletion article invalid. That's why i propsed all these articles for deletion for the same reason as your previous discussion about the List_of_XMPP_client_software today, but User:SarekOfVulcan reverted all deletion proposals. This should you know. --91.89.137.62 (talk) 16:08, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Arbitration motions regarding Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Tothwolf
Resolved by motion at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification that:
1) Tothwolf (talk · contribs · logs), Miami33139 (talk · contribs · logs) and JBsupreme (talk · contribs · logs) are banned from interacting with each other, broadly construed. This includes things like not editing each other's userspace, not becoming involved directly with each other in discussions, and not nominating articles for deletion which another one has started. This does not prohibit commenting in the same discussion without directly interacting or editing the same articles so long as they are not directly in conflict. They may request enforcement of this restriction at the Arbitration Enforcement board or by email to the Arbitration mailing list; they may not request enforcement or action against each other for any other reason or at any other venue. Attempts to game this restriction should be treated as a violation of the restriction.
2) Miami33139 (talk · contribs · logs) is subject to an editing restriction for six months. Should Miami33139 make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith or disruptive to deletion discussions, Miami33139 may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement portion of the case. The six months starts from the day this motion passes.
3) Remedy 2 (already updated once) is changed to "JBsupreme (talk · contribs · logs) is subject to an editing restriction for six months. Should JBsupreme make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, assumptions of bad faith, or disruptive to deletion discussions, JBsupreme may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling below." The six months is reset to start from the day this motion passes.
For the Arbitration Committee, Dougweller (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Abdus Sattar Ghazali article
I have opened a new AfD for the above article at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Abdus Sattar Ghazali (2nd nomination). As you commented at the first AfD in February, I am letting you know, in case you wish to join in the discussion. Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 12:18, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Checkuser
Would you care to explain these checkuser results? Thanks! 67.80.250.138 (talk) 05:49, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
List of songs by Taylor Swift
Hello, I created the page List of songs by Taylor Swift without aware/known that the page List of Taylor Swift songs previously nominated for deletion.
The page created by mine has new layout and I really hope that it will be kept, as I will make further improvement to it. Have your say here, thank you. I will notice other users joined above AfD, too. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 08:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of List of fictional characters named Sarah or Sara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional characters named Sarah or Sara is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters named Sarah or Sara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem of joy (talk) 16:17, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of List of people with the given name Sarah or Sara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people with the given name Sarah or Sara is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of people with the given name Sarah or Sara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem of joy (talk) 06:16, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of List of people with the given name Darren for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people with the given name Darren is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of people with the given name Darren until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Anthem of joy (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
inre Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Keltz
You wisely offered a delete comment in January 2010. So did I. But things have changed in this actor's career in the intevening 15 months. I'd like to bring the new and improved User talk:MichaelQSchmidt/Jonathan Keltz back to mainpage. Please visit if you have time and offer any coments you might wish on its talk page. Best, Schmidt, 08:52, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
The current WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening Collaborations are: Hobby farm |
inconsistent deletion policy
I'm disappointed that you essentially just ignored my questions about the inconsistencies in your personal deletion policy with regard to tmux and things like GNU Screen and twin, for seven months, then quietly deleted my polite, well-considered questions without comment, a couple of years ago. I can, at this point, only reasonably assume you have some personal biases that prevent you from making consistent decisions about some topics. - Apotheon (talk) 23:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
GA Thanks
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your contributions to Lupe Fiasco, which has fairly recently achieved WP:GA status.
This user helped promote Lupe Fiasco to good article status. |
--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
The current monthly WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening collaborations are: |
WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
The current monthly WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening collaborations are: To propose future collaborations, please contribute here! |
—Northamerica1000 00:33, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening collaborations are:
To propose future collaborations, please contribute here! |
From: Northamerica1000 02:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
RfC: On Software Notability.
There is currently a RfC on the topic of software notability (whether consensus has changed or if the essay needs updating) at Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (software)#RfC: On Software Notability.. As you previously discussed on the topic I thought you might be interested. :) ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 17:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Deletion review for Ari Shaffir
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Ari Shaffir. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. X538 (talk) 07:32, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Category:Horrorcore artists has been nominated for renaming
Category:Horrorcore artists has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories: