Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tiptoety: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:28, 18 August 2009 editTiptoety (talk | contribs)47,300 edits →Undo: re← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:38, 28 November 2024 edit undo64.110.133.230 (talk)No edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp-semi-protected|small=yes}}
{{User:Tiptoety/Nav}} {{User:Tiptoety/Nav}}
| style="width:100%; margin:auto; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #{{User:Tiptoety/Color 2}}; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; vertical-align: top;" | | style="width:100%; margin:auto; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 1px solid #{{User:Tiptoety/Color 2}}; border-right-width:4px; border-bottom-width:4px; vertical-align: top;" |

{{tmbox {{tmbox
| type = notice | type = notice
Line 13: Line 11:
| text = ] | text = ]
}} }}

{| style="float:right;" {| style="float:right;"
| |
Line 26: Line 23:
{|class="userboxes" style="margin-left: 1em;; margin-bottom: 0.5em; width: 248px; border: #{{User:Tiptoety/Color 2}} solid 1px; background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #000000; float: right; text-align: center;" {|class="userboxes" style="margin-left: 1em;; margin-bottom: 0.5em; width: 248px; border: #{{User:Tiptoety/Color 2}} solid 1px; background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #000000; float: right; text-align: center;"
|- |-
| ''']'''<br />], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]<br />], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
|
{{WM|float|User:Prodego/Wikistress|01}}
|-
| ''']'''<br />], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]<br />], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]
|} |}
|} |}
Line 36: Line 30:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|algo = old(7d) |algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:Tiptoety/Archive 27 |archive = User talk:Tiptoety/Archive 37
}} }}
{{not around|has left Misplaced Pages|Tiptoety|November 4, 2015}}
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== Temporary case clerk need to cover Abd-WMC case ==

Hi there. You are listed as active at the clerks page. Would you be able to have a look ? I'm looking for one of the currently active clerks to look after the case for a few days until Hersfold is back? If one of the five clerks listed as active could volunteer, that would be great. Thanks. ] (]) 18:06, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

== Delete ==

Can you delete ]? It seems to just be vandalism or something along the lines. The article had a GA template on it, but was never placed on ] it seems plus was never reviewed.--]] 10:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
:{{Done}} - ] <sup>]</sup> 20:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

== Template ==

I'm looking for a template(s) like "List of the cast/character is too long, Please removed some inappropriate to make it shorter". It's something similar as described. I've searching for it and it seems negative... ] <sup>] • ]</sup> 11:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

Could you explain this block? I looked through the user's edit history and almost all of it seems to be messing around with the sandbox and/or other testing. Is there some larger context I'm missing? ]]<sup>]</sup> 00:45, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

:Well, I have a pretty good feeling he is a sock, based upon his , specifically those to the IPs userpage, and {{User|VSS Monitoring, Inc}}'s userpage (whom was blocked no more than 24 hours ago). ] <sup>]</sup> 00:48, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hello,

You recently deleted ] as an expired PROD. Unfortunately, the content from this article had been merged to another location (as stated in the prod nomination) and so the article shouldn't have been deleted. (I have restored it.)

When ever a merge is performed, a redirect has to be left behind (along with certain other steps outlined in ]) to allow for proper attribution.

As such, consider this a friendly reminder to read prod nominations (and also check the history) to be sure you aren't deleting something you shouldn't be. (Per the instructions, the deleting admin is supposed to make an independent judgment call about the article's validity.)

Thank you and have a nice day, ] (]) 00:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

:Yes. I am very well aware of all that, but thanks for the reminder. When I looked at the article, is what I saw, which did not really indicate it had been merged to the other article. That said, thanks for fixing my mistake. Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 00:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

== Resignation? ==

So, did you as a clerk for sockpuppet investigations? --<font color="#414797" face="times">]</font> <sup>''<font color="#8447C1" face="times">]</font> • <font color="#8447C1" face="times">]</font>''</sup> 05:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
:No. I did not resign, but am taking an indefinite break, so I am not really sure when I will be back. I could have added myself to the away list, but it is really intended for clerks who are on a period of temporary absence from clerking. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:09, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
::I see, though I would put myself in the "away" list if I was a clerk, even if I was taking an indefinite break from clerking. According to the , you have 67.6% support for the tool, Hersfold having 95.5%, J.delanoy having 97.7%, Bjweeks having 92.4%, and VirtualSteve having 67.3%. You and VirtualSteve are highlighted yellow, while the other three are highlighted green. Whether you'll get to be a checkuser or not, I don't know, since the results haven't been officially announced yet, and won't be announced later than August 17 according to the election page. It appears that you're taking a break in preparation to get the tools, or it is for some other reason? --<font color="#414797" face="times">]</font> <sup>''<font color="#8447C1" face="times">]</font> • <font color="#8447C1" face="times">]</font>''</sup> 02:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
:::I am not blind. I can read the results just as well as you can. As for my reasons for taking a step back, to be honest they are personal and none of your business. Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 03:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
::::Well, okay. --<font color="#414797" face="times">]</font> <sup>''<font color="#8447C1" face="times">]</font> • <font color="#8447C1" face="times">]</font>''</sup> 03:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

== Welcome back, welcome back, welcome back, Mr. COTW ==

Howdy after a long message absence to those of ] To answer a common question, no you did not get removed from the COTW notification list, I was just too busy to send out the notification for the last change. So, thank you to all those who helped improve Central Oregon and Mount Jefferson, as well as those who added infoboxes and adopted a governor. For this edition of the COTW, we have partly by request and in honor of the return of college football, ''']''' and ''']'''. If you are a fan of neither, maybe go back and work on a governor or add infoboxes this time around. As always, ], or ] to make a suggestion for a future COTW. ] (]) 06:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

== Misuse of Power ==

Sir, this user ] who has been given the rollback rights has been misusing his powers. He keeps deleting a picture that cites all the sources to prove its authenticity. Here is the article ].

:My reply can be found . Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 16:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

== per TP header ... ==

*Knock - Knock — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 09:10, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

*Who's there? ] <sup>]</sup> 16:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

* Emma — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 18:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

*Emma who? ] <sup>]</sup> 21:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

* "Emma ] no moea." Sorry for the lousy accent. More to the point, sorry you've had a couple crappy weeks buddy. Don't pay it no nevermind. You're one of the best we have here - and there's plenty of folks that'll back me up on that! Hope things get better quickly for ya. Cheers. ;-) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 23:04, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

:* /me chuckles. Thanks for noticing Ched. All that said, I will probably be limiting my time here significantly. ] <sup>]</sup> 23:06, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

::* understood. And thanks to you for all the help you've given me here. Best of luck in all you do, and I look forward to seeing you here and there when time and inclination permits. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 23:17, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

== Process question re arbitration remedies ==

Pure curiosity only, so apologies in advance if I end up being one of a stream of people knocking at your door today, but I'm genuinely wondering. I noticed that the remedies in the date delinking case were updated based on the revisions that were passed recently. I'm just wondering if there's a usual way that the case page is updated for something like this? It appears that you overwrote the new remedies on top of the old ones, with the original date and vote totals remaining in place — as a result, without checking the history, it looks as though that were the original remedy. In a different remedy revised earlier, the new remedy was entered with the current date and vote total, and the original remedy was placed into a collapse box. It's probably as simple as different clerks, different approaches, but I guess I was a little surprised there's no defined process for something like this. Regards, ] (]) 17:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

:Hi Mlaffs. Good question by the way, I did sit for a few minutes before enacting and closing to motion trying to decide how I was going to go about doing it. Like you said, there is really not "defined process" that clerks must follow when archiving a motion, as each motion is so very different. That said, there is a kind of SOP, or unwritten process which guides us when closing motions. Because of this, each clerk has there own slight variation on how they do things.
:In this specific case, I decided not to place the old remedies in collapse boxes because of how the motion was written (note the section I placed in bold below):
:<blockquote>All remedies in the decision providing that a specified user is topic-banned from editing or discussing "style and editing guidelines" (or similar wording) '''''are modified by replacing these words with the words''''' "style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates".</blockquote>
:While on the other hand, the John amendment (the one what was placed in collapse boxes) was written like this:
:<blockquote>The ruling restricting ], ], is '''''vacated''''' and replaced with "{{user|John}} is admonished for edit-warring to remove the linking of dates."
</blockquote>
:Note the differences in the wording here, and I think you will understand why I went about it the way I did. That said, it may be a good idea to add something like "Amended by a X to X motion on <nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>" below each amended remedy, just for clarity's sake. ] <sup>]</sup> 21:08, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

::Thanks for taking the time to respond. Perfectly logical explanation when you put it that way. I'd agree though — for the sake of transparency, adding an explanatory note like that would be a great idea. Thanks again, ] (]) 22:24, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedian of the Day ==

<div style="background:cornsilk;border:1px solid burlywood;font-family:century gothic">
] Congratulations, Tiptoety! For your kindness to others, your hard work around the wiki, and for being a great user, you have been awarded the "]" award for today, August 18, 2009! Keep up the great work!<br /><small>'''Note:''' You could also receive the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week! <br /> If you wish, you can add <nowiki>{{</nowiki>]|August 18, 2009<nowiki>}}</nowiki> to your userpage.</small>

Happy editing!

<font face="tahoma">'''</font>]] </font>]]'''</font> 00:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

</div>

:Thank you. ] <sup>]</sup> 00:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

== Goramon ==

Well, that was fast. I wasn't even done formatting it before you blocked. Impressive efficiency. ] (]) 01:29, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

:All I needed was a link to the article in question, and well the rest is history. Cheers, ] <sup>]</sup> 02:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

== Undo ==

I'd be inclined to use the undo feature moreso if there was some form of giving the user more room to type in the edit summary. I find that even with the preferences feature to add 50 characters, undoing edits by IP addresses which can take up to 134 characters of the edit summary (and users with fairly long usernames make hat worse) hinders the purpose of allowing the edit summary to not be automated.—] (]) 06:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
:You do not have to leave the automatic undo summary. You can remove that and write your own: "Undid edit by User:X because...". ] <sup>]</sup> 16:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

==BLP==
I would have left the AfD on Janet Allison run the full time, to get a wider exchange of views and decrease the likelihood of a deletion review. The result may be the same, but there is a case to be made that the subject has a claim to significant international attention and relevance to national policy. . People who would defend the article need a chance to get there. ''']''' (]) 07:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
At last, thank you for PP on this article the vandalism and personal attacks against myself have been ongoing for quiet a while now and it is good that the article is now protected for a while. <span style="border:1px solid green;padding:0px;">]</span> 08:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
== Someting about the block of ] ==
Good morning,
I would know something more about the ]. I have followed some articles on en.Misplaced Pages because we have had different vandalism in it.wikipedia (I am sysop of it.wikipedia). Ragusino seemed to have a different vision to that of Direktor but not so bad considering some concerns.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
The position of Ragusino seemed to be correct and I have asked some justifications in the talk page of ] because the concerns of Ragusino are also my concerns considering that in the header of page we can read the coat of army of the house (taken from a croatian book) and the name is Caboga and any historical book reports the name of Caboga (which is not the italian name but the dalmatian name and dalmatian was the official language of Republic of Ragusa until XVIII century).
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Reading at the block of Ragusino I don't understand the justification for his block because the check user has not displayed any "clear" proof for his sockpuppeteer. It seemed to me that a war edit has been in favor of one part instead of investigate in detail the problem.


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
In my opinion the difference of vision should be solved in another way considering that the other part is strongly oriented in a vision not shared by a big part of the historical literature.


== I miss you Tiptoetry! ==
What I understand is that Ragusino=Cristian.Bilicic but it's only a suspect.


Hi ]! Wow, has it been a ''long time'' since we've interacted. I'm sure I knew this before, but I thought of you and saw that (from what it appears) you've ] from Misplaced Pages. I am sad... Regardless, I wanted to let you know that I was thinking about you, and I hope you're doing well and that life is treating you with nothing but happiness. :-) I hope that our paths cross again... Yours truly - ]<sup><small><b>] ]</b></small></sup> 07:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
I would suggest a more detailed investigation not only by check user side but also a more "neutral" resolution of conflict.
==MfD nomination of ]==
] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:Mfd notice --> <span style="font-family:monospace;">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ]) 09:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
==] nomination of ]==
]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice that ], a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the ], by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
*The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See ].) If the page you created was a test, please use the ] for any other experiments you would like to do.
*It appears to be a test page. (See ].) Please use the ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.


If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <span style="font-family:monospace; font-weight: bold"><span style="color:ForestGreen">]</span>: ] <span style="">$</span></span> 00:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you


--] (]) 09:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC) @] ] (]) 19:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:38, 28 November 2024

10:38 pm, 16 January 2025 (PDT) Tiptoety's userpage | talk | e-mail | contribs | subpages | edit count | awards | adoption program
CommentImportant: This talk page is becoming very boring. Please consider leaving hilarious knock-knock jokes so as to spruce things up a little. Thanks!
CommentMisplaced Pages:Don't Feed the Divas
Our environment, the world in which we live and work, is a mirror of our attitudes and expectations.
Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37

This user has left Misplaced Pages. Tiptoety has not edited Misplaced Pages since November 4, 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Nomination of Gresham Police Department (Oregon) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gresham Police Department (Oregon) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gresham Police Department (Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. tedder (talk) 16:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Jackson County Sheriff's Office (Oregon) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackson County Sheriff's Office (Oregon) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jackson County Sheriff's Office (Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. tedder (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Lincoln City Police Department (Oregon) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lincoln City Police Department (Oregon) is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Lincoln City Police Department (Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. tedder (talk) 16:53, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

I miss you Tiptoetry!

Hi Tiptoety! Wow, has it been a long time since we've interacted. I'm sure I knew this before, but I thought of you and saw that (from what it appears) you've retired from Misplaced Pages. I am sad... Regardless, I wanted to let you know that I was thinking about you, and I hope you're doing well and that life is treating you with nothing but happiness. :-) I hope that our paths cross again... Yours truly - ~Oshwah~ 07:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Misplaced Pages:Spib

Misplaced Pages:Spib, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Spib and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Misplaced Pages:Spib during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 09:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Misplaced Pages:Spib

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a notice that Misplaced Pages:Spib, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 00:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

@Tiptoety 64.110.133.230 (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories:
User talk:Tiptoety: Difference between revisions Add topic