Misplaced Pages

The History of the Saracens: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:00, 7 December 2009 editCharles Matthews (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators360,497 editsm copy edits← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:40, 9 January 2025 edit undoFadesga (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users266,659 edits External links 
(45 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Book by Simon Ockley}}
{{Infobox Book {{Infobox book
| name = The History of the Saracens | name = The History of the Saracens
| image = | image =
| image_caption = | caption =
| author = ] | author = ]
| cover_artist = | cover_artist =
| country = ] | country = ]
| language = ] | language = English
| subject = Caliphs<br />Islamic Empire <ref>" '']''.</ref> | subject = ]s<br />]<ref>" '']''.</ref>
| publisher = | publisher =
| release_date = 1708 vol. I<br />1718 vol. II <ref>Simon Ockley. '''' 6th Edition. London: Henry G. Bohn. 1857</ref> | release_date = 1708 vol. I<br />1718 vol. II <ref>Simon Ockley. '' The History of the Saracens'' 6th Edition. London: Henry G. Bohn. 1857</ref>
| english_release_date = | english_release_date =
| media_type = Hardback | media_type = Hardback
Line 15: Line 16:
| isbn = | isbn =
}} }}
'''''The History of the Saracen Empires''''' is a book written by ] of ] and first published in the early 18th century.<ref>The full title is "The History of the Saracens; Comprising the lives of ] and his successors, to the death of ], the Eleventh Caliph. With an account of their most remarkable battles, sieges, revolts, &c. Collected from authentic sources, especially Arabic mss."</ref> The book has been reprinted many times, including at ] in 1894.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/articles/mahdi/almahdi/04.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060219144548/http://www.al-shia.com/html/eng/articles/mahdi/almahdi/04.htm|url-status=usurped|archive-date=February 19, 2006|title=What Non-Muslims Say About 'IMAM ALI (A.S)}}</ref> It was published in two volumes that appeared a decade apart.
'''''The History of the Saracen Empires''''' is a book written by ] of ] and first published in the early 18th century.


==The author==
The full title is "The History of the Saracens; Comprising the lives of ] and his successors, to the death of ], the Eleventh Caliph. With an account of their most remarkable battles, sieges, revolts, &c. Collected from authentic sources, especially Arabic mss."


Simon Ockley, vicar of ], ], devoted himself from an early age to the study of eastern languages and customs and was appointed ] at Cambridge in 1711. The first volume of his work generally known as ''The History of the Saracens'', appeared in 1708 as '' Conquest of Syria, Persia, and Egypt by the Saracens'', the second in 1718, with an introduction dated from ], where he was then imprisoned for debt. ], who admired and used his work, speaks of his fate as "unworthy of the man and of his country."
The book has been reprinted many times including ] in 1894.<ref></ref>


==Contents==
Simon Ockley, vicar of Swavesey, Cambridgeshire, devoted himself from an early age to the study of eastern languages and customs and was appointed professor of Arabic at Cambridge in 1711. The first volume of his Conquest of Syria, Persia, and Egypt by the Saracens, generally known as ''The History of the Saracens'', appeared in 1708, the second in 1718, with an introduction dated from Cambridge gaol, where he was then imprisoned for debt. ], who admired and used his work, speaks of his fate as “unworthy of the man and of his country.” His ''History'' extends from the death of Mahomet, 632, to that of the fifth Ommiad caliph, 705; the work was cut short by the author’s death in 1720, after a life of incessant and ill-requited toil. The Life of Mohammed prefixed to the third edition of his History, which was issued for the benefit of his destitute daughter in 1757, is by ], Master of Pembroke hall, Cambridge. Ockley based his work on an Arabic manuscript in the Bodleian library which later scholars have pronounced less trustworthy than he imagined it to be.<ref name=Waller>{{cite book | last = Ward | first = A. W. | authorlink = | coauthors = A.R. Waller, W.P. Trent, J. Erskine, S.P. Sherman, and C. Van Doren | title = The Cambridge history of English and American literature: An encyclopedia in eighteen volumes | publisher = G.P. Putnam’s Sons | date = 1907–21 | location = New York, New York | pages = | url = http://www.bartleby.com/220/1202.html | doi = | id = | isbn = }}</ref>
Ockley's ''History'' extends from the death of ] in 632, to that of ] in 705; the work was left unfinished due to the author's death in 1720. ''The Life of Mohammed'' prefixed to the third edition of his ''History'', which was issued for the benefit of his destitute daughter in 1757, is by ].


==Reputation and influence of the work==
A.W. Waller described the author's work:
{{quote|His English is pure, and simple, his narrative extraordinarily vivid and dramatic, and told in words exactly suited to his subject &mdash; whether he is describing how Caulah and her companions kept their Damascene captors at bay until her brother Derar and his horsemen came to deliver them, or telling the tragic story of the death of Hosein. The book was translated into French in 1748, and was long held to be authoritative. As a history, its defects are patent, its account of the conquest of Persia, for example, is so slight that even the decisive battle of Cadesia is not mentioned; nor is any attempt made to examine the causes of the rapid successes of the Saracen arms: it reads, indeed, more like a collection of sagas than a history. Such defects, however, do not impair its peculiar literary merit.<ref name=Waller />}}


Ockley based his work on an Arabic manuscript in the ] which later scholars have pronounced less trustworthy than he imagined it to be.<ref name=Waller>{{cite book | last = Ward | first = A. W. |author2=A.R. Waller |author3=W.P. Trent |author4=J. Erskine |author5=S.P. Sherman |author6=C. Van Doren |title=The Cambridge history of English and American literature: An encyclopedia in eighteen volumes | publisher = G.P. Putnam’s Sons | date = 1907–21 | location = New York, New York |url=http://www.bartleby.com/220/1202.html }}</ref> ] in the '']'' wrote that:
{{Unreferenced section|date=October 2008}}


{{cquote|The work was based upon a manuscript in the Bodleian Library ascribed to the Arabic historian ], with additions from ], ], ], and others. ], however, has proved that the manuscript in question is not the celebrated 'Kitâb el-Maghâzî' of El-Wâkidî, but the 'Futûh esh-Sham,' a work of little authority, which has even been characterised as 'romance rather than history'
==Authenticity of Oakleys work==
}}
This book is regarded by many scholars of history as well as by some Muslim scholars as an authentic account although some may disagree with certain elements of the work, due to differences in religious belief.

citing the opinion of ] in the article on Ockley from the ]. The author in question is now known as ].<ref>], ''For Lust of Knowing: The Orientalists and their Enemies'' (2006), p. 119.</ref> Lane-Poole notes that the ''History''

{{cquote|formed for generations the main source of the average notions of early Mohammedan history.
}}

] described the author's work:

{{blockquote|His English is pure, and simple, his narrative extraordinarily vivid and dramatic, and told in words exactly suited to his subject&mdash;whether he is describing how Caulah and her companions kept their Damascene captors at bay until her brother Derar and his horsemen came to deliver them, or telling the tragic story of the death of Hosein. The book was translated into French in 1748, and was long held to be authoritative. As a history, its defects are patent, its account of the conquest of Persia, for example, is so slight that even the decisive battle of Cadesia is not mentioned; nor is any attempt made to examine the causes of the rapid successes of the Saracen arms: it reads, indeed, more like a collection of sagas than a history. Such defects, however, do not impair its peculiar literary merit.<ref name=Waller/>}}

The 1720 play '']'' by ] drew inspiration from the first volume of the work.


== References == == References ==
{{Reflist}}
<references/>


== External links == == External links ==
* '''' 6th ed. * in ''The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes'' (1907–21).

* "" in The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes (1907–21).
{{Authority control}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:History of the Saracens}} {{DEFAULTSORT:History of the Saracens}}
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]



{{Islam-book-stub}} {{Islam-hist-book-stub}}

Latest revision as of 12:40, 9 January 2025

Book by Simon Ockley
The History of the Saracens
AuthorSimon Ockley
LanguageEnglish
SubjectCaliphs
Islamic Empire
Publication date1708 vol. I
1718 vol. II
Publication placeKingdom of Great Britain
Media typeHardback

The History of the Saracen Empires is a book written by Simon Ockley of Cambridge University and first published in the early 18th century. The book has been reprinted many times, including at London in 1894. It was published in two volumes that appeared a decade apart.

The author

Simon Ockley, vicar of Swavesey, Cambridgeshire, devoted himself from an early age to the study of eastern languages and customs and was appointed Sir Thomas Adams Professor of Arabic at Cambridge in 1711. The first volume of his work generally known as The History of the Saracens, appeared in 1708 as Conquest of Syria, Persia, and Egypt by the Saracens, the second in 1718, with an introduction dated from Cambridge Castle, where he was then imprisoned for debt. Edward Gibbon, who admired and used his work, speaks of his fate as "unworthy of the man and of his country."

Contents

Ockley's History extends from the death of Mahomet in 632, to that of Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan in 705; the work was left unfinished due to the author's death in 1720. The Life of Mohammed prefixed to the third edition of his History, which was issued for the benefit of his destitute daughter in 1757, is by Roger Long.

Reputation and influence of the work

Ockley based his work on an Arabic manuscript in the Bodleian Library which later scholars have pronounced less trustworthy than he imagined it to be. Stanley Lane-Poole in the Dictionary of National Biography wrote that:

The work was based upon a manuscript in the Bodleian Library ascribed to the Arabic historian El-Wâkidî, with additions from El-Mekîn, Abû-l-Fidâ, Abû-l-Faraj, and others. Hamaker, however, has proved that the manuscript in question is not the celebrated 'Kitâb el-Maghâzî' of El-Wâkidî, but the 'Futûh esh-Sham,' a work of little authority, which has even been characterised as 'romance rather than history'

citing the opinion of William Robertson Smith in the article on Ockley from the ninth edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica. The author in question is now known as pseudo-Waqidi. Lane-Poole notes that the History

formed for generations the main source of the average notions of early Mohammedan history.

Alfred Rayney Waller described the author's work:

His English is pure, and simple, his narrative extraordinarily vivid and dramatic, and told in words exactly suited to his subject—whether he is describing how Caulah and her companions kept their Damascene captors at bay until her brother Derar and his horsemen came to deliver them, or telling the tragic story of the death of Hosein. The book was translated into French in 1748, and was long held to be authoritative. As a history, its defects are patent, its account of the conquest of Persia, for example, is so slight that even the decisive battle of Cadesia is not mentioned; nor is any attempt made to examine the causes of the rapid successes of the Saracen arms: it reads, indeed, more like a collection of sagas than a history. Such defects, however, do not impair its peculiar literary merit.

The 1720 play The Siege of Damascus by John Hughes drew inspiration from the first volume of the work.

References

  1. "Full Record Library of Congress.
  2. Simon Ockley. The History of the Saracens 6th Edition. London: Henry G. Bohn. 1857
  3. The full title is "The History of the Saracens; Comprising the lives of Mohammed and his successors, to the death of Abdalmelik, the Eleventh Caliph. With an account of their most remarkable battles, sieges, revolts, &c. Collected from authentic sources, especially Arabic mss."
  4. "What Non-Muslims Say About 'IMAM ALI (A.S)". Archived from the original on February 19, 2006.
  5. ^ Ward, A. W.; A.R. Waller; W.P. Trent; J. Erskine; S.P. Sherman; C. Van Doren (1907–21). The Cambridge history of English and American literature: An encyclopedia in eighteen volumes. New York, New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
  6. Robert Graham Irwin, For Lust of Knowing: The Orientalists and their Enemies (2006), p. 119.

External links


Stub icon

This article about a book on history of Islam is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories:
The History of the Saracens: Difference between revisions Add topic