Misplaced Pages

User talk:Robofish: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:52, 17 February 2010 editEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 edits →ArbCom clerks' noticeboard: new posting← Previous edit Latest revision as of 16:33, 28 August 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,306,673 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Robofish/Archive 2) (bot 
(479 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 1 |counter = 2
|algo = old(90d) |algo = old(90d)
|archive = User talk:Terraxos/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Robofish/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}
{{archive box|auto=long}} {{archive box|auto=long}}
'''Notes:'''
'''Note on RFA Messages:''' I often participate in discussions at ]. If I have participated in your RFA, I will check the page later to see the result. I do not wish to receive a template message thanking me for my support (or opposition). Thanks for your cooperation.

'''Additional notes:'''
* This talk page is not a forum; it is meant for messages to me only. Please take off-topic discussion elsewhere. * This talk page is not a forum; it is meant for messages to me only. Please take off-topic discussion elsewhere.
* If you leave a message here, I will reply on your talk page unless requested otherwise. * If you leave a message here, I will reply here and tag your username to notify you, unless you request otherwise.
* If I leave a message on your talk page, I prefer for you to either reply here, or notify me of your reply with the {{tl|Talkback}} template. * If I leave a message on your talk page, I prefer for you to either reply here, or notify me of your reply by tagging my username.


{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%" {| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%"| |class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top;color:#000000;font-size: 85%"|
{| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA" {| width="100%" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#CEF2E0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #084080; text-align:left; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;"> Hello <font color=#0000FF>Terraxos</font>, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! ] 10:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)</div> ! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#CEF2E0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #084080; text-align:left; color:#082840; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;"> Hello <span style="color:#0000FF;">Robofish</span>, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! ] 10:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)</div>
|} |}
{| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%" {| style="border-spacing:8px;margin:0px -8px" width="100%"
Line 80: Line 78:
|} |}


== Request to re-assess article quality ==
== Thanks! ==

Thanks for the heads-up about the larger, related, existing article. You are correct, and I have asked for administrative deletion... ] (]) 04:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

== Military Brat ==

I responded to your question on the Military Brat page.---''']''' '']'' 22:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

== AfD ==

Please see: ]. ] (]) 15:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi Terraxos,
I been noticing your edits on the ], I would like to let you know and invite you to take part in getting this list to featured list status. As it will be a very time consuming project I have started a new page ] to avoid it looking messy while in public view before going live with it. You will notice a to do list on the discussion page as to what needs to be done. Your input would be most valued and hope you take part. Best wishes.--] ] 05:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
:Welcome aboard, I have been at it for the last few hours and not even past Bb, I have been double checking all possible references before adding documentary's. It is amazing how many articles that have listed the wrong directors/producers which I have also been changing also. Thanks for you reply and I look forward to see you over there.--] ] 15:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
::P.S. All of the edit history will be merged with the actual article when the page goes live.--] ] 15:29, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

== Putinjugend ==

At the AfD for ], another editor has requested that you withdraw the nomination. I would ask that you don't for the reasons stated when I have changed my opinion from '''Redirect''' to '''Delete'''. I would be approaching such "things" with ]. --] <sup>] ]</sup> 19:56, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

== Reply ==

I quickly checked your recent edits and think they are good. ] is obviously not notable. So, I labeled it as "Prod". ] is notable, but someone removed most of the content to make the article look poor (I restored main part of that). ] is certainly fine as a redirect or disambing. page, and it could even meet notability criteria as an independent article (similar to ]). Thank you.] (]) 23:44, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

== R.Santorum ==

Hi Terraxos, and to you a joyous "Day of Prophets (& List-Makers)". But I fear I recently must've described myself elsewhere as being ]- So I guess it's only justice I'm now 'here' in Terraxosh realms. I submit myself, for either punishment or... or an etymology lesson: Isn't a "Terraxos" some kinda proprietary commercial fantasy character? Maybe soon...</br>
>>re: ] Are you actually interested in working on this humongous article? Editing could become a real drag- a potential revert-war. Perhaps tho' the time's coming soon when it's safe to edit ]. Your specific suggestion is brilliant. Spin-offs are EZ & non-controversial. But: Even at present size the article needs more suggestions for where to stash it all. Can your intuition now reveal more? </br>
>>ps: ] = notable. He's more notable than all these emo bands with WP fansites. So what he's not famous to Anglo-centrics? Humbug.
Alex.Zhukhov is Russia's face for the international audience on matters of official bad-news and related ] politics- Real info from one big country.
BUT- if politician Alex.Zhukov, immediate successor to the Russian President, is related to People's Hero Marshal ] of WWII fame, then he's XXtra-notable-- He'd represent the Russian/FSU political-dynasties at their very elite finest. So... Related? No?
:::::♦♦♦ Happy New Yarrr, O Wise Editor. ] (]) 23:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


Say Te₪axos; thanx for the info. Yer name ist tres euphonious…+fun to say. I could make it a habit; I'd advise you to ₢egister "TERRAXOS" asap, O terr-ific one :-) In case some local developer heard me. E-Z'ly done too.</br>
♠ re:]-Moi??? Twist muh' arm. But, IT'S SO BIG- 'n' I feel not expert enuf to break it up happily <sub>(I probly read more ] than ])</sub>-- Xactly why I'm inspired by your brill suggestion identifying one ] I'd use.
But we'll fish around ] for ace editors. Then If/When *you* (or someone) ID's appropriate spin offs- Then yes, I can happily administer just what the two tags advise ;-\ </br>
re:] I'm more 'hands-off' than wanting any 'hand-off' of this deleted article. However I meant another 'Alexander Zhukov':</br>
♠ Googling "Alexander Zhukov" today the top returns relate to a current figurehead- one Russian "Deputy Prime Minister". This 'Alexander Zhukov' is quoted in the last line of ] -But there must be _hundreds_, if not kilos of 'em. Who knows what Marshall Z. got up to once he disappeared into the 'Security state' role of ] ;-? Another article entirely. ♠ T'anks <sub>T</sub>erR<sup>A</sup>Xo<sub>s</sub>;
G^8 Happy New You 8-D ] (]) 22:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

Yes, I agree with your edit to remove the POV material. I also updated it and added a citation. ] (]) 19:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

==Stub templates==
Is there any special reason for going around putting stub templates on pages that are at least several paragraphs long, have references, and are clearly not stubs??--] (]) 21:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

There is another option for the talk page should the soft redirect be deleted: move it to ] (and deleting the resulting redirect). This will preserve the talk page - and still leaves options for Wikilinking to it when/if it is appropriate. Since the historic use of this is self referencing to begin with, the move into project space (or, in this case, project talk space) is long overdue. ] (]) 14:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

==AfD: ]==
Hi! I've nominated the article ] for '''deletion''' because I deem that it is not notable and cannot become notable, because of the inherent contradiction in this political phrase. I'm giving you a notice on this because you have contributed to the article and I deem you have rights to have a say in the matter. My elaborate analysis of the failures of the article can be read in ]. The discussion for (and against) deletion is kept in ]. Be welcome to partake! ... said: ] (]) 13:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

----

Hello,

You left a message on my talk page about wes cravens nightmare??? or something like that. Not only have I never edited it but i've never even heard of it.

==Cookie==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]

] (]) has given you a ]! Cookies promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! <br />

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{tls|Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{tls|munch}}!
{{clear}}
</div><!-- Template:Cookie -->

:Congrats Robofish, you were the first person to send me a munch. Ever. Here's a pint to comemmorate the event
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000000; background-color:#aa9944; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]

] (]) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the ] by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers! <br />
Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{tls|WikiPint}} to their talk page with a friendly message.</div><!-- Template:WikiPint --> <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Request to move article ] incomplete==
]
You recently filed a request at ] to move the page ] to a different title - however your request is either '''incomplete''' or '''has been contested''' for being controversial, and has been moved to the ]. Requests that remain incomplete will be removed after five days.

Please make sure you have completed '''all three''' of the following:

# Added '''<nowiki>{{move|NewName}}</nowiki>''' at the top of the ], replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
# Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the ]. This can easily be accomplished by adding '''<nowiki>{{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}}</nowiki>''' to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
# Added '''<nowiki>{{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}}</nowiki>''' to the top of today's section ].

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at ] or contact me on my talk page. <!-- Template:RMinc --> - ] (]) 21:12, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

==RE: Charles Brown (California politician)==

My original edit, as you noted, was not meant to be destructive. I have adjusted the infobox to a more relevant format. ] (]) 16:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

== thankspam ==

Hi Robofish, very very belated thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed by an embarrassingly wide margin, there's a full glitzy Oscar style version of my acceptance speech ]. Oh and congratulations on your new name. '']]<span style="color:DarkOrange">Chequers''</span> 22:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

== Userbox vandalism ==

Thank you for spotting and correcting that. It just shows how long since I properly looked at my userpage. ] (]) 19:37, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

==Happy Easter!==
]
On behalf of ], I just wanted to wish my fellow Wikipedians a Happy Easter! Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 07:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

== Quick note on RfA ==

I recently added a discussion re: Goodmorningworld's neutral !vote. I encourage you if you have time to read , and Goodmorningworld's own additions to his commentary. Thanks. (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;]&nbsp;'''</span>]) 10:38, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

==Jason Steed==

It wasn't found to be non-notable, it just didn't have enough (online) 'reliable references.' This happened over the Easter bank holiday, when everything closed down for four days, and I wasn't able to get hold of newspapers/magazines etc to confirm things. I explained this, but the wonderful WP admins deleted anyway.--] (]) 16:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

== CoM RfA ==

re: . Great Minds think alike eh? ;) ... actually, I ran into an edit conflict (probably with your post), and I just refreshed and tried to post again - when I read what you had to say ... I thought, yea .. Robo's got it right! ;) — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 07:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

==]==

like i said in the discussion, lets add the links back; it had links and this guy ] didn't like the article and erased the links., ] (]) 14:07, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

==Thanks==
Hi Robo. Thanks very much for the consideration and thoughtful comments you contributed to the discussion on my canddidacy for Adminship. Your comments were very constructive and I appreciate the time and care you put into them. I thought they were the most accurate and helpful in the discussion and I agree with what you said. Cheers. ] (]) 20:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

==HELP!!!==

I am the author of the site "Ethnomethodology" - you helped me before over the question of citations. I have been decended upon by a guy named Jonathan Bishop . He has inserted various statements into the text which are inaccurate and contextually innappropriate. He has absolutely no background in this area, yet he claims that he is a "professional researcher". Despite my telling him that he is in error and showing him the error of his way, he continues his mantra of "professional researcher". I want to either get him off the site and finish the article, or nuke all of my prior entries and leave the site to the vultures. Can you assist me? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 20:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== ] ==

If you have time, I'd appreciate your looking in at ] and either comment, advise, or contribute. I think something like this should have been a while ago so as to help stop the bickering at AfDs. ''']''' '']'' 21:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

== Defaultsort/LIVING --> Listas parameter ==

I notice that you have been adding the WP Biog banner to articles as appropriate. Please remember to complete the listas parameter so that, for example, the Talk page for Ellen Bard, where all the project information is posted, will be sorted in its relevant categories under "B" rather than "E". It is not possible to track the pages that have or lack a DEFAULTSORT value or a sort value in the LIVING tag but there are categories for Biography talk pages with or without the listas parameter. I realize that this will mean extra time for you but it will save some one else opening the Talk Page, checking the article for a sort value, creating or fixing the sort value if necessary and copying that sort value to the listas parameter on the talk page.

Thank you.
:] (]) 21:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

== Victims of political repression ==

This is to notify you that ], which you participated in, reached no consensus to delete, but has been relisted to ] in order to determine if consensus can be reached on other alternatives. Your further input would be appreciated.--] (]) 06:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

==WIC==
The first three hits on Google are about the United States program, the other pages listed at the dab page are far less likely to be known as "WIC", and there is precedent for keeping an article at its acronym name (see ], ], ], ], and so forth). As this, I believe, more than satisfies the primary topic requirements, I suggest undoing your actions. —] • ] • ] 09:23, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
:I can get an admin to undo your move, but obviously I would want your agreement on this (I'd rather avoid the week long discussion that would need to take place at ], and I do believe the move is largely uncontroversial). If this is okay with you, let me know. —] • ] • ] 09:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
::Certainly no urgency, I'll open a discussion at ] then. =) —] • ] • ] 09:45, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
:::I've started a discussion ], if you're interested in participating. —] • ] • ] 09:56, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

== TfD nomination of ] ==

] has been nominated for deletion by ]. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in ], I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at ]. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of ], following the ].) — Regards. <!--Template:Tfdnotice-->&nbsp;<span style="border:1px solid;color:#000085">]</span> 19:26, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

== AfD ==

I was asked to participate in the AfD of "Home and family blog". I looked up the relevant guidelines, and have posted them at ] for your consideration. ''''']''''' 22:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

== Rhianna Pratchett ==

Hello. You wrote that the subject is, 'according to one list the 2nd most important woman in the game industry'. Which list is that? Are you referring to this - ? That list is arranged in alphabetical order and she therefore appears at no. 2 on p. 9, falling between Powers and Ray. Or is there another list that I haven't seen?--] (]) 01:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

== re: welcome ==

Hi, Robofish.
Thanks for the welcome. Was there anything specific I'd done wrong or was it simply an automatic heads-up? ] (]) 12:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

== Smiles ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]

'''Robofish''', Gaia Octavia Agrippa has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! ]<sup> ]</sup> | <sub> ]</sub> 19:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC) <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small>
</div><!-- Template:smile -->

== It is a mistake to try to shoehorn traditional Arabic names into the European naming scheme of inherited surnames... ==

You are the sixth volunteer, in as many weeks, I have asked to refrain from trying to shoehorn ] into the European naming scheme of inherited surnames.
Arabic names don't work that way.

Please reconsider this effort. ] (]) 16:36, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

:The same applies to most Eastern names as well. The conventions for Japanese and Chinese names does employ an inheritable component. But the inheritable component comes first, not last. And the robot editing tool's advise is doubly wrong. If you look at the article this individual's birth name was Hideyuki Hirano. I renew my suggestion you stop taking surname advice from robots. ] (]) 18:31, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

==Drv for ]==
An AfD for this article, which you participated in, was recently closed as "no consensus." I have request a deletion review here .] (]) 16:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

== AWB error ==

'''Thanks''' Believe it or not, I noticed this error myself in other edits and amended them. I'm glad that you caught it as well. Please correct me in the future if I am as sloppy. —]❤]☮]☺]☯ 02:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

== Thanks ==
Thanks for the alert, Robofish. <big>'']]]]]''</big> 22:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

== Tags ==

Robofish,

I saw your tags on ]. I fixed the issue with the tags as far as I know. Feel free to double check me, and if it's not right in your eyes, feel free to re-add the tag, I won't revert!

Thanks!
<span style="color:#333;font-face:Trebuchet MS;solid #FAECC8;background-color:#FAF6ED;padding:2px 15px;letter-spacing: 1px;"><sub>]<i>] 12:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


'''Robofish''' <br />

I got your message and was able to link Bill Pearce with the Kurt Kaiser article. It's the same person as the same meeting is metioned. (I wrote both articles). Is it now okay to remove that tag ? (I won't touch it without asking you first. :) )
<span style="color:#333;font-face:Trebuchet MS;solid #FAECC8;background-color:#FAF6ED;padding:2px 15px;letter-spacing: 1px;"><sub>]<i>] 22:10, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

== Wikify? ==

Hi Robofish,

I just saw the Wikify template added to http://en.wikipedia.org/Kenny_Marquez. I read through the various links on that notice, but I'm not sure I totally understand the message it's trying to convey. I went through and made some changes and added some sections. Can you take a look and let me know what I need to do to make it meet all the "wikify" requirements. Thanks --] (]) 08:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Again Robofish,

I added several third party references and hope you find it satisfactory. Can you please take another look and let me know. Thanks --] (]) 21:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

== Hi there ==

Hello, I'm new here. What happens after one of the redirect pages I put up for deletion gets a "delete per nom" comment? Should I go ahead and delete the redirect myself, or will a moderator/admin do that job?

I put the ] redirect up for deletion on May 26. -] (]) 10:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

--
Okay, great, thank you! -] (]) 20:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

==Deletion review==
See ]. You were a participant in the deletion discussion. ] <sup>]</sup> 02:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

==Transgender Day of Empowerment==

Thanks for the note. I've nominated it at AfD - one article in a local gay paper does not reliable sources make. ] (]) 16:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

== The Onion Girl ==

You stuck an unreferenced tag on the article for '']'', and I am wondering why, since all I did in creating the article was basically a plot synopsis and list of characters. I realize that the article needs more content, but what's there right now isn't in need of references, according to Misplaced Pages guidelines. ] (]) 22:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
:: Thank you for providing me with a detailed explanation for your actions, and for removing the tag when you realized it was inappropriate. I knew the article was far from complete, which is why I added a stub tag. But I have now searched for and found a secondary source--an interview with Charles de Lint--and I have added it to the article. It's just a start, but I was able to find it through Google News archive search. I also searched my local library's magazine and newspaper database but did not find much. ] (]) 04:16, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

== Invitation ==

Since you are one of the editors who has participated in the discussion about renaming ] to ], I'd like to invite you to comment upon my proposals for this category ]. ] (]) 16:07, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

== bot ==

are u a bot? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 01:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Happy ]!==
Dear fellow Wikipedian, on behalf of ], I just want to wish you a Happy Bastille Day, whether you are French, Republican or not! :) Happy Editing! Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 23:27, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

== Archie Humanoid Robot ==
Just a friendly note on ]. I declined the speedy because a robot doesn't really fall into any of the categories in A7. If you think the article isn't notable, try prod or AfD. HTH!--] | ] 21:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
:Will do. I applied A7 under "Group" as it was built by a group of students a s a project, but it is understandable how that may not apply ] (]) 22:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
::Hi there,

::You left a reply on my talk page about this article. Since I haven't seen it or edited it before, I'm guessing it wasn't meant for me - you probably meant to reply to ], right? But since you've brought it to my attention, I'll take a look at the article anyway... perhaps there's something I can do for it. ] (]) 15:01, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
:::Good lord, sorry. Yes, was not meant for you, was meant for Fabrictramp. The article seems non-notable to me if you want to look at it (i.e. a science group project that has no secondary sourcing). ] (]) 16:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

Since ] ] the <nowiki>{{notability}}</nowiki> template does not belong on the article. ] (]) 18:33, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
:Thanks for your prompt reply, and have a wonderful day! ] (]) 13:16, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

== Thank you for making ] a success! ==

Thank you again for your support of the Great Misplaced Pages Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at ] with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:

*] for Did You Know nominations
*] for Good Article nominations
*] for Featured Article nominations
*] for Featured List nominations
*] for Featured Picture nominations

Again, thank you for making this event a success! --].].] 02:46, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

{{ {{#ifeq:|{{void}}|void|Error:must be substituted}}|PRODWarning}}
==Proposed deletion of South Park title sequence==
]

The article ] has been ]&#32; because of the following concern:
:<b>non-notable - no third party sourcing</b>

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be ].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the ], but other ]es exist. The ] can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> -- ] 15:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

== Emanuel article ==

Thanks for the welcome back. I don't have any particular opinions about the content of the article, my only interactions with it were administrative. I suppose I should have re-deleted the redirect when it was created, but it didn't seem to be doing any harm, and arguably was helpful. I didn't imagine a conflict would arise about which article it should re-direct to. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 00:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

I had been led to believe that it was an official trailer for an upcoming animated film. Considering that I can no longer find any sort of valid or reasonable link to it or mention of it, as far as I'm concerned, it's fodder for deletion; I'll happily send it to Speedy deletion, or barring that, to AfD. --] (]) 19:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

== Orphan tagging ==

Hi there. I'm curious why you decided to retag ] with {{tl|orphan}} after I already removed it? I think it's great that you're helping to identify articles which are orphaned however, the current ] of orphaned articles is so huge right now (second only to unreferenced articles) that per consensus reached at the ] talk page we decided to focus on tagging only those articles which have NO incoming links from other articles. I know the criteria says 3 incoming articles but until we can make a bit of a dent in the backlog our goal right now is to get ''at least'' one or two relevant incoming links and that should be enough to remove the tag. There's also a bot we can set loose that automatically tags any articles as an orphan depending on the criteria we give it, whether that be 1, 2 or 3 incoming links. So once again, although I can't tell you to stop, you can do whatever you think is best, but it would really help if you could only tag as orphaned those articles that have absolutely zero incoming links from other articles or lists (disambig pages don't really count but even they help too.. anything to help get that tag off). Btw, see my ] for some examples of what I deem to be enough to remove the tag. Thanks. -- ]] 23:53, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

==User Lida Vorig==
Hello, I would like to ask advise from you as user named ] flags all Azerbaijani articles due she is armenian and her anti-Azerbaijanism hate. Where I can complain?--] (]) 14:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

== {{tl|Recent death}} ==

Please see ] which is related to a proposed change to {{tl|Recent death}}. An example of how this change would appear is on ]. --''] /<sup>]</sup>'' 00:22, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hey Robofish. Regarding your addition of {{tl|notability}} to ]. I'm not sure what you are looking for. The article already quotes multiple, reliable, and secondary sources (e.g. ] and ]). And an ] discussion concluded that this individual is notable per ]. If you disagree, please let me know, and suggest ways to improve it. Otherwise, could we please remove the tag? Thanks - ]<sup>]</sup> (]) 23:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
:Thanks for removing the tag. Hehe, can't say I look forward to the AfD ;), I'll keep my eyes peeled for any thing more from him - ]<sup>]</sup> (]) 23:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

==Happy ]!==
Dear colleague, I just want to wish you a happy, hopefully, extended holiday weekend and nice end to summer! Your friend, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 04:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

== Stephen Eyre ==

Thanks for the note.

Over the next month or so, I'm planning to dredge through all the constituency articles for the upcoming election and try to identify the various borderline candidate articles (there's a ''lot''), so that hopefully we can have the worst of them tidied away well before it becomes an issue, and keep the rest watched to make sure they remain of a decent standard. If you'd like, I'll let you know when the master list's ready for poring over. ] | ] | 22:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

==AfD nomination of YIMBY==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.<!-- Template:Adw --> ] (]) 13:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

== Lucas Gonze ==

Hi Robofish, about the conflict of interest comment you left at http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Lucas_gonze , see the notes I left at http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Lucas_Gonze

But the case for me editing my own bio page is:

* I didn't create the bio page in the first place.
* My edits were minimal as possible.
* I documented my edits ahead of time and followed responsible practices for community involvement.
* The substance of the edits wasn't random self-promotion.
* The page as it was left by ordinary social processes misprepresented me and needed a little bit of gardening.

--] (]) 00:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

==Encounter group/T-group (social psychology) merge proposal==
A late reply, if you're still interested after all this time: . I think it's okay to have two articles; there seem to be enough sources which draw a distinction between the two. If you agree, let's remove the merge proposal, and perhaps put a "See also" in each article. Cheers, --'''<font color="#0000FF">]</font><font color=" #FFBF00">]</font>''' 22:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

==Alright, you listen up here mister==
] <-- redlink. are you happy now? you broke my heart with your comment on my discussion page. i mean, you didnt even call me to tell me... you did it over the internet... thats how i know you are a certified noob. no courage to tell someone they violate some crusty wikipedia blp policy in person, huh? you eat boogers. any idea how the eff to get ] to stfu and stop spamming my wall?
==Pornopedia article==
I've added some references at the article. Are there enough in order to remove the notability templates? Thank you ] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 16:05, 8 October 2009 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== lookout ==

thanks for watching my back and correcting that. i appreciate your help and understanding. happy editing.<br />>>>> Posted By ] (]) 03:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

== RFA spam ==

]
:&mdash;](]) 18:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
:(Note to readers: I de-transcluded the above message as I felt it was taking up too much space, but left it as a link. ] (]) 18:12, 21 October 2009 (UTC))

== Invitation ==

]. - Dank (]) 17:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

==Happy Halloween!==
]
{{clear}}
As Halloween is my favorite holiday, I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to ], supportive enough to ], etc., a Happy Halloween! Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 16:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

== Chronology of Star Wars ==

An AFD discussion that you have previously participated in has been reignited. See ] for more the new discussion. ''']''' 11:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

== Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop ==

As you participated in the recent ] election, or in one of two ] that relate to the use of ] for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the ]. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.<br/>
<br/>
For the Arbitration Committee, <br/>
] (]) 08:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
<!-- EdwardsBot 0005 -->

==Lifetime==
You seem to be replacing defaultsort and categories with the lifetime template. This is pointless, as Lifetime is a convenience template. It only exists to make writing articles easier; if someone has already put in the information longhand, Lifetime is redundant.

From ]:
:"<nowiki>{{Lifetime}}</nowiki> is s shortcut to generate birth and death categories and DEFAULTSORT. Automatic bots regularly replace it with the expanded form, but editors can still use lifetime to save on typing."

] 23:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

re your comments there - you've echoed what I've been thinking for some time, but haven't yet got down to writing. My own view is that those who perpetuate the inclusionist/deletionist split (which is less of a split than it was, seems to me) are those who feel in some way validated by it - by belonging to an in-group within the larger group. If you do write anything I'd be interested in taking a look. &nbsp;<span style="border-left: 1px solid #c30;">]</span><sub style="text-shadow: 3px 3px 3px rgba(255,255,0,0.75); color: #c30;">].</sub> 23:34, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

==Happy Thanksgiving!==
]
{{clear}}
I just wanted to wish those Wikipedians who have been nice enough to ], supportive enough to ], etc., a Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 16:20, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

== Requested move (please comment) ==

Hey Robofish, I noticed that you had participated in an AfD discussion regarding the Honduran articles, and I would appreciate your comment here: ] I hope that you can kind of understand the logic of what I was saying there, even if you don't agree with the move. Thanks! ] (]) 12:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

== Please suggest replacement template ==

Hi. You recently participated in a template deletion discussion which resulted in the deletion of a template, Template:OtherusesSubtopicAlias, used at the top of the article ]. The deletion discussion did not mention which template should be used as a replacement. I can't even see what the text was that was formerly at the top of the article as created by the template. Could you please suggest an alternate template to use at the top of this article? (I'm also posting this request to the talk pages of others involved in the deletion discussion.) ] (]) 02:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
:Ah, according to the Google cache, it used to read, "This article includes a subtopic, Continuous pressure devices, which is often known as CPAP. For other uses of this term, see CPAP." ] (]) 02:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks, see reply on my talk page. If ] was a direct redirect to ] (as it used to be, and, IMO, ought to be), what would the appropriate replacement template have been? ] (]) 18:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

== RfC at ] regarding mention of the constitutional crisis in the lede ==

Sorry to bother you again, but I'd like your opinion, and that of other editors that have been interested in the Honduran articles, at ]. Thanks! ] (]) 21:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

== Joe McElderry ==

The ] for ] which you participared in closed as '''Redirect''' to ]. There is a proposal now at ] to restore an independent article and your opinion would be welcome there. ] (]) 19:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

== Requested edit on Body burden article ==

Hi, Robofish -- I noticed that, earlier this year, you placed a warning tag on the ] article and a comment on its Talk page regarding a POV section. (Some time after, the template was removed without explanation.) I agree with this complaint about the article -- and have several others. Over the past few months I've been working on an alternative to this article which is currently ]. It is now finished and addresses all of the problems I have with the current version. But I haven't replaced it yet because I have a potential conflict with the subject matter: the public debate in which the body burden concept figures is a matter of import to the ], which is a client of my employer. That's why I've decided to open it up for another editor to review and see if they agree with my judgment calls and, if so, implement my suggestions. (]) Since you had expressed some interest in fixing the article, I thought I would reach out to you now. Let me know if you decide to take up the matter. Cheers, ] (]) 02:54, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

==]==
Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial ], you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at ]. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! ] (]) 04:42, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

Would you please copy the text from that talk page to my userspace somewhere? I was working on an article... thanks. ] (]) 03:05, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

==Merry Christmas==
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]

]<sup>'']''</sup> is wishing you a ] ]! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow! <br />

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{]:]}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
</div> To those who make ], who are ], or ]. Sincerely, --]<sup>'']''</sup> 18:07, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

I had meant to AfD it following the contested PROD, but didn't get around to it. Thanks for taking the initiative. Cheers, and have a great new year. --] (]) 16:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

== Gladstone (humorist, writer): Consider 'Needs references' tag? ==

Hi Robofish--
At the end of November you quite justifiably tagged this article as needing references. It was in its beginning stages at the time and has undergone several revisions. Could you give it a look and either consider removing the tag or give some more specific feedback now that it's more developed? Thanks.
--] (]) 11:24, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks & thanks for the advice. Going to talk it over with a couple of people & get back to it. --] (]) 22:56, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

Just a quick reminder that the ] has begun. Please log any work you do at ]. Good luck! --]''''']''''' 01:47, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

== Important notice about VOTE 3 in the CDA poll ==


You are receiving this message as you have voted in ''']''' at the Community de-Adminship 'Proposal Finalization' Poll.

It has been pointed out that VOTE 3 was confusing, and that voters have been assuming that the question was about creating an actual two-phase CDA process. The question is merely about having a two-phase <u>poll</u> on CDA at the eventual RfC, where the community will have their vote (eg a "yes/no for CDA” poll, followed a choice of proposal types perhaps).

As I wrote the question, I'll take responsibility for the confusion. It does make sense if read through to the end, but it certainly wasn't as clear as it should have been, or needed to be!

Please amend your vote if appropriate - it seems that many (if not most) people interpreted the question in the way that was not intended.

Regards, ] (]) 15:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

== Reply from tomalak_geretkal ==

Hi; please see my reply to your message at ]. Cheers. ] (]) 20:08, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

== Yellowface and Racebending ==

I do agree that the Yellowface article may need to have a separate entry for ].

I attempted to improve an article for racebending, but it was deleted. I then created my own, but that too was deleted.

The reasons were supposedly due to a neologism created by Avatar: The Last Airbender fans.

I currently have it on my userpage and you are welcome to peruse and perhaps give pointers on how to improve it for publication.

] (]) 14:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
--] (]) 14:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
{{Talkback|Nemogbr}}
{{Talkback|Pgallert}}

==Mentorship==
I write because you participated in editing ]. In the months since I created this article, the topic has taken on an unanticipated personal relevance. I wonder if you might consider joining other co-mentors in a mentorship committee for me?

Perhaps you might consider taking a look at an old edit at ? In the search for a ], I cite this as a plausible context for discussing what I have in mind.

Please contact me by e-mail or on my talk page. --] (]) 02:42, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
:Thank you for your time and consideration. As a gesture of appreciation, may I share a rhetorical question from the : "Is it not pleasant to learn with a constant perseverance and application?"

:I have sent you further details in an e-mail. --] (])

] evoke a ], searching together for a ]?]]
::May I offer a proposal? Please replace your username with your signature (four tildes <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) in the list of "active mentors" at . This is necessary step in a constructive direction.

::You may find that what I'm asking for is probably less than you imagine in the short term, or perhaps more than you anticipate in the long term. --] (]) 06:47, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

== My username ==

It has been bought up a few times before, going through all the discussion processes. In my opinion, if someone views my userpage it's pretty obvious I'm not that other fella. Regards, --<b>]</b><sup>]]</sup> 12:42, 31

January 2010 (UTC)


Sorry I removed the stub template from Omar Amanat article by mistake. Can you please re-add it?

] (]) 02:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
==]==
] Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed{{#if:Climatic Research Unit hacking incident|, ],}} is on ]. {{#if:Misplaced Pages:General sanctions/Climate change probation|A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at ].|}} {{#if:|{{{3}}}|Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''}}<!-- Template:uw-probation --> -- ] 00:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

== Your VOTE 2 vote at ] ==

Hi Robofish,

you are receiving this message as you voted in VOTE 2 at the recent ]. Unfortunately, there is a hitch regarding the "none" vote that can theoretically affect all votes.

'''1)''' Background of VOTE 2:

In a working example of CDA; ater the 'discussion and polling phase' is over, if the "rule of thumb" baseline percentage for Support votes has been reached, the bureaucrats can start to decide whether to desysop an admin, based in part on the evidence of the prior debate. This 'baseline' has now been slightly-adjusted to 65% (from 70%) per VOTE 1. VOTE 2 was asking if there is a ballpark area where the community consensus is so strong, that the bureaucrats should consider desysopping 'automatically'. This 'threshold' was set at 80%, and could change pending agreement on the VOTE 2 results.

'''This was VOTE 2;'''

:<u>Do you prefer a 'desysop threshold' of '''80% or 90%''', or having none at all?</u>

:As a "rule of thumb", the Bureaucrats will automatically ] the Administrator standing under CDA if the percentage reaches this 'threshold'. Currently it is 80% (per proposal 5.4).

:Please vote "80" or "90", or "None", giving a second preference if you have one.

'''This is the VOTE 2 question without any ambiguity;'''

:<u>Do you prefer a "rule of thumb" 'auto-desysop' percentage of '''80%''', '''90%''', or "'''none'''"?</u>

:Where "none" means that there is no need for a point where the bureaucrats can automatically desysop.


Dear Robofish, please check out the more detailed message I left for you here: ]. I would like to request your re-assessment of the article's quality. Thank you. (]) ] 7:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
:Please vote "80" or "90", or "None", giving a second preference if you have one.


== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
'''2)''' What was wrong with VOTE 2?


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
Since the poll, it has been suggested that ambiguity in the term "none at all" could have affected some of the votes. Consequently there has been no consensus over what percentage to settle on, or how to create a new compromise percentage. The poll results are summarised ].
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
'''3) ''' How to help:


If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
'''Directly below this querying message, please can you;'''


</div>
* Clarify what you meant if you voted "none".
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1124425177 -->


== 10 years ago ==
* In cases where the question was genuinely misunderstood, change your initial vote if you wish to (please explain the ambiguity, and don't forget to leave a second choice if you have one).


In at a ] I quoted your commenting at a Signpost arbcom report 10 years ago. Thank you for that, back then. Feel free to comment in the current discussion, which is about whether Signpost should try to be NPOV or allow itself to take one-sided positions with respect to open Arbcom actions. --Doncram (],]) 23:43, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
* Please do nothing if you interpreted the question correctly (or just confirm this if you wish), as this query cannot be a new vote.


:Hi,
I realise that many of you clarified your meaning after your initial vote, but the only realistic way to move forward is to be as inclusive as possible in this vote query. Sorry for the inconvenience,
:Thanks for the notification! Wow, you reached into the past to find that one. :)
:I'm not active here any more, haven't read the Signpost in years, so I don't think I'll involve myself in the current discussion. But thanks anyway. ] (]) 23:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 24#Mary Bale}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (] &#124; ]) 16:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)


== London book event for "The Editors" ==
] (]) 10:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


Hello - Reaching out because I saw that you were listed as a Wikipedian from London.
:What I meant by 'none' was precisely that: that I don't think there should be a threshold of support beyond which bureaucrats must ''automatically'' desysop admins. However, as a guideline/rule of thumb, I would be happy to put it at 80%. (Actually, I'd put it even lower at 75%, as long as we're only talking about a guideline and not a strict rule.) ] (]) 12:20, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


I am a writer who has for Slate, The Washington Post, and other publications.
== CRU article name ==


My novel '''' is inspired by Misplaced Pages and was published earlier this month. As part of the book tour, I will be in London on Thursday 29 of August at 6:30 PM at Newspeak House.
Hello,


Details for the event here: https://lu.ma/ubri3176
I am writing you this message because you have participated in the RfC regarding the name of the ] article. As the previous discussion didn't actually propose a name, it was unfocused and didn't result in any measurable consensus. I have opened a new discussion on the same page, between the existing name and the proposed name ]. I have asked that no alternate names are proposed at this time. Please make your opinion known ]. Thanks, ] (]) 05:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


Sorry for the short notice, but if you are able to attend the event, it would be great to see you there! No RSVP required; just show up at Newspeak house on Thursday evening. ] (]) 22:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
==ArbCom clerks' noticeboard==
Is this something you need to know? Your name is included in a new posting at ? As for what happens next, we'll see? --] (]) 08:52, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 16:33, 28 August 2024

Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Notes:

  • This talk page is not a forum; it is meant for messages to me only. Please take off-topic discussion elsewhere.
  • If you leave a message here, I will reply here and tag your username to notify you, unless you request otherwise.
  • If I leave a message on your talk page, I prefer for you to either reply here, or notify me of your reply by tagging my username.
Hello Robofish, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Budgiekiller 10:03, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Misplaced Pages rules
Getting help
Getting along
Getting technical

Request to re-assess article quality

Dear Robofish, please check out the more detailed message I left for you here: Talk:Yearbook on International Communist Affairs. I would like to request your re-assessment of the article's quality. Thank you. (talk) user:Al83tito 7:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

10 years ago

In this diff at a I quoted your commenting at a Signpost arbcom report 10 years ago. Thank you for that, back then. Feel free to comment in the current discussion, which is about whether Signpost should try to be NPOV or allow itself to take one-sided positions with respect to open Arbcom actions. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 23:43, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi,
Thanks for the notification! Wow, you reached into the past to find that one. :)
I'm not active here any more, haven't read the Signpost in years, so I don't think I'll involve myself in the current discussion. But thanks anyway. Robofish (talk) 23:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

"Mary Bale" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mary Bale has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 24 § Mary Bale until a consensus is reached. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 16:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

London book event for "The Editors"

Hello - Reaching out because I saw that you were listed as a Wikipedian from London.

I am a writer who has covered Misplaced Pages for Slate, The Washington Post, and other publications.

My novel The Editors is inspired by Misplaced Pages and was published earlier this month. As part of the book tour, I will be in London on Thursday 29 of August at 6:30 PM at Newspeak House.

Details for the event here: https://lu.ma/ubri3176

Sorry for the short notice, but if you are able to attend the event, it would be great to see you there! No RSVP required; just show up at Newspeak house on Thursday evening. Stephenbharrison (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)