| Revision as of 16:35, 6 February 2006 edit86.10.231.219 (talk) →How Can I Help You?: Allopathic or "conventional" medicine?← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:14, 7 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Replaced obsolete html tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (219 intermediate revisions by 77 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{not around|3=September 2007}} | |||
| ] | |||
| *] | |||
| *] | |||
| '''Taking very long - perhaps permanent - Wikibreak''' | |||
| If you have replies to any ongoing discussions now in ], please restart the thread on this page. ] 19:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC) | If you have replies to any ongoing discussions now in ], please restart the thread on this page. ] 19:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == |
== '']'' == | ||
| Please see my suggestion regarding ] on ]. Cheers. --] 18:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==COI Templates.== | |||
| Hi, I'm sending you a message because of your involvement with the ] discussion. The result of the TfD was no-consensus, but there was a significant expressed consensus for editing the templates to bring them into line with good practice. Unfortunately this has not happened, and the templates have been left pretty much in the state they were before the TfD. Would you like to assist in bringing these templates in line with good practice? --] 16:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| No idea if you will receive this, per your wikibreak, but I have edited the Alfred Crosby article in hopes of making it more neutral. Since you originally noted the bias, I thought you might be interested. Best wishes, --] |]|]| 08:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == The Chain Barnstar of Recognition == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Chain Barnstar of Recognition''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |For making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. ] 01:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==The Chain Barnstar of Merit == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Chain Barnstar of Merit''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |For your hard work! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 4 others with 1500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. ] 01:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == The Chain Barnstar of Diligence == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Chain Barnstar of Diligence''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |For shaping Misplaced Pages! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3 others with 2500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. ] 01:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |For building Misplaced Pages! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 2 others with 5000+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. ] 01:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==]== | |||
| ] | |||
| Another editor has added the <code>{{tl|prod}}</code> template to the article ], suggesting that it be deleted according to the ] process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also ] and ]). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages or discuss the relevant issues at ]. If you remove the <code>{{tl|prod}}</code> template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to ], where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. <!-- Template:PRODNote --> ] (]) 20:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ==Afd of Mucoid plaque== | |||
| ] is up for AFD... again. | |||
| The ]. As a previous participant in a AFD discussion for this article, you are encouraged to contribute to ongoing consensus of whether or not this article meets Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion.--] (]) 02:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| As the editor of the Rome and Greece subsection of the history of lesbianism, I was wondering whether you could tell me where I might find the full source for the story of the egyptian princess Berenice who marries another woman. I'd be very grateful 'cos I'm very interested in this particular story. (] (]) 22:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>I have nominated ], an article that you created, for ]. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> ] 16:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Unreferenced BLPs== | |||
| ] Hello Tearlach! Thank you for your contributions. I am a ] alerting you that '''1''' of the articles that you created is tagged as an]. The ] policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure ], all biographies should be based on ]. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current '']'' article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{tl|unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article: | |||
| # ] - <small>{{findsources|Katharine Weber}}</small> | |||
| Thanks!--] (]) 20:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| You seem to have some concerns expressed here ] | |||
| I have recently proposed to merge ] into ]. Since you participated in the ], I would like to invite you to share your views on the proposed merger. Thank you very much. ] (]) 22:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
| First time I have heard of them. Might be worthwhile spelling out what is bothering you to see if there is anything I can help you with. | |||
| == Deletion discussion about ] == | |||
| Hello, Tearlach, and thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages! | |||
| I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at ] whether the article The American Monomyth should be in Misplaced Pages. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia. | |||
| Look forward to hearing from you. | |||
| The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving The American Monomyth, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the ]. | |||
| ] 16:51, 3 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks again for your contributions! <!--Template:AfD-notice-rand/new--> ] (]) 17:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :The only part pertaining to your edits is my comment on ''openly stated bad faith assumptions about editors who disagree...''. In my view, the material at ] is well within the area of ], and a breach of ]. Such 'hit lists' and detailed documentation of perceived wrongs are never seen as creditable to a user. The objections are well summed up at ]. ] 18:45, 5 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ::Does the dialogue here ] today with ] assist? ] 23:42, 5 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::No. If you want to infer motives or collect evidence for whatever takes your fancy, there's nothing stopping you doing it privately. Doing it publicly is the breach of the personal attack policy and good faith guideline. ] 01:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=691991546 --> | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| ::::Thank you. I have taken a further look at the personal attack policy. Whilst I am not sure I agree with your interpretation, I will modify my user page in the light of your comments. ] 01:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| <blockquote>'''The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing ] and the more detailed ] requirement. ] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ] through ] or by leaving a note at ]. Thank you.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| :::::Thanks also. You might also reconsider the bit ''I understand that conventional western medicine is termed "allopathy", and its practitioners are termed "allopaths"''. As you'll gather from the page ], it is used by (and taken by) some as a derogatory term, so it could be taken as antagonistic. ] 05:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| ::::::There are practical issues over this terminology. Calling the kind of medicine that is currently practised "conventional" means everything else is "unconventional", whereas the Chinese would disagree, as might the Indian sub-continent, such as Ayurvedic practitioners and some others - there are two billion people to choose from in those regions against maybe our 1 billion in the West. They, I think would be rightly miffed by that kind of terminology. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 07:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Also, treating "disease" and symptoms and relying on a system of pre-packaged commercially available pharmaceuticals is a very distinct approach. It is an identifiable approach and one, not unlike others of course, that has its own limitations. | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| ::::::Doctors should be given their skills back in treating the whole patient and looking to deal with causes as well as alleviating symptoms. Many papers published are about finding drug based treatments for symptoms. There do not appear to be so many looking at causes and prevention. There is financial interest here for research funders who are looking to develop new pharmaceuticals. They would not pay for the research otherwise. Why fix it if you can keep treating it over and over and be paid to do so? | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 08:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::We really should also consider giving pharmacists back their right to make medicines on the premises and to dispense herbal and other remedies, in conjunction with physicians and broaden the scope of tools available for treatment and perhaps reduce the numbers of them. | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ::::::Having had direct involvement in the conventional pharmaceutical industry's drive to capture herbal knowhow and turn it into packaged pharmaceuticals, I know the considerable effort being made. The value of supposedly "unconventional" herbal remedies are well recognised by those who know and the commercial guys have been putting their money up to prove it for years now. You only have to look at some of the market leaders that have sprung from nowhere in the field. Then there are cosmeceuticals which can take advantage of the medical benefits without having the rigour of clinical trials to contend with. The whole world is being trawled from Sangomas in Africa to traditional Chinese herbal medicines. Yep, "witch doctors" being signed up by conventional drug companies to pass on their knowhow - very cheaply in some cases regrettably for their cultures, which could well end up losing the Sangoma skillsets in the process. The drug companies however have not always been so successful in finding out how these traditional remedies work in order to turn them into packaged pharmaceuticals. The disadvantage of this is that the herbal version rarely emerges as a medicine as no one will invest in trials and market them without any patents to be had. | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this ''']''' will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article.   The nominator also raised the following concern: | |||
| ::::::So there is clearly a case for a defined approach to the practice of medicine in our corner of the world. Who knows, maybe the Chinese will turn our practices on their head anyhow and a different term will come to the fore? | |||
| :<b>This article contains no in-line citation and is written as a resume. The subject of this article does not appear to meet basic criteria for ] or ]. The existing references all appear to link to an online biography of the subject. ThePhantom65 (talk) 18:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)</b> | |||
| If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp/dated}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Lee Wagstaff|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> ] (]) 18:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I hope that explains and that there clearly is a need for a name to describe our western kind of medical practice. ] 16:35, 6 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:14, 7 January 2022
 | This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Tearlach has not edited Misplaced Pages since September 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Taking very long - perhaps permanent - Wikibreak
If you have replies to any ongoing discussions now in Archive1, please restart the thread on this page. Tearlach 19:10, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Law Practice Today
Please see my suggestion regarding Law Practice Today on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Law Practice Today. Cheers. --Edcolins 18:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
COI Templates.
Hi, I'm sending you a message because of your involvement with the Misplaced Pages:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_18#Template:COI_and_Template:COI2 discussion. The result of the TfD was no-consensus, but there was a significant expressed consensus for editing the templates to bring them into line with good practice. Unfortunately this has not happened, and the templates have been left pretty much in the state they were before the TfD. Would you like to assist in bringing these templates in line with good practice? --Barberio 16:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Alfred Crosby
No idea if you will receive this, per your wikibreak, but I have edited the Alfred Crosby article in hopes of making it more neutral. Since you originally noted the bias, I thought you might be interested. Best wishes, --SuperNova |T|C| 08:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
The Chain Barnstar of Recognition
|
The Chain Barnstar of Recognition | |
| For making a difference! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3-5 others with 500+ edits but no barnstar. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Chain Barnstar of Merit
|
The Chain Barnstar of Merit | |
| For your hard work! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 4 others with 1500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Chain Barnstar of Diligence
|
The Chain Barnstar of Diligence | |
| For shaping Misplaced Pages! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 3 others with 2500+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour
|
The Wikipedian's Chain Barnstar of Honour | |
| For building Misplaced Pages! This Barnstar isn't free, this is a chain barnstar, as payment please give this star to at least 2 others with 5000+ edits but no barnstar or has few barnstars. So that everyone who deserves one will get one. Hpfan9374 01:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC) |
Zurna (IRC)
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Zurna (IRC), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not and Misplaced Pages:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Misplaced Pages or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Afd of Mucoid plaque
Mucoid plaque is up for AFD... again.
The latest discussion is here. As a previous participant in a AFD discussion for this article, you are encouraged to contribute to ongoing consensus of whether or not this article meets Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion.--ZayZayEM (talk) 02:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
As the editor of the Rome and Greece subsection of the history of lesbianism, I was wondering whether you could tell me where I might find the full source for the story of the egyptian princess Berenice who marries another woman. I'd be very grateful 'cos I'm very interested in this particular story. (Sourlemons (talk) 22:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC))
Articles for deletion nomination of Poekoelan Tjimindie Tulen
I have nominated Poekoelan Tjimindie Tulen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Poekoelan Tjimindie Tulen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. *** Crotalus *** 16:20, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Tearlach! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 14 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Katharine Weber - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Philosophical Institute
Hello,
I have recently proposed to merge Philosophical Institute into Palacký_University_of_Olomouc#Philosophy. Since you participated in the Discussion about the article's deletion, I would like to invite you to share your views on the proposed merger. Thank you very much. Cimmerian praetor (talk) 22:32, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about The American Monomyth
Hello, Tearlach, and thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages!
I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The American Monomyth whether the article The American Monomyth should be in Misplaced Pages. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.
The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving The American Monomyth, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.
Thanks again for your contributions! Oddbodz (talk) 17:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Auchenshoogle
The article Auchenshoogle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Misplaced Pages:General notability guideline and the more detailed Misplaced Pages:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Auchenshoogle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Auchenshoogle is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Auchenshoogle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Lee Wagstaff
The article Lee Wagstaff has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Misplaced Pages policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
- This article contains no in-line citation and is written as a resume. The subject of this article does not appear to meet basic criteria for WP:NPOV or WP:N. The existing references all appear to link to an online biography of the subject. ThePhantom65 (talk) 18:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ThePhantom65 (talk) 18:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Categories: