| Revision as of 20:23, 24 February 2011 editSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,571 edits new sanction per http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Sandstein&oldid=415744489#Mass_killings_sanction← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 19:00, 16 January 2023 edit undoDreamy Jazz (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators105,825 edits fix |
| (9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Contentious topics/page restriction editnotice|e-e|expiry=|1RR=yes|other=}} |
|
{{ombox |
|
|
| type = speedy |
|
|
| text = In application and enforcement of the ]'s decision at ], the following '''discretionary sanctions''' apply to the article {{La|1=Mass killings under Communist regimes}}: |
|
|
*No editor may make edits to the article unless such edits are either |
|
|
:*minor edits as described at ] and marked as minor, |
|
|
:*reverts of obvious vandalism or an obvious ] violation, |
|
|
:*or have consensus as described below, and the edit summary contains a link to the talk page discussion establishing that consensus. |
|
|
{{collapse top|1=Procedural details}} |
|
|
#The rules at ] apply to reverts of vandalism or BLP violations. (For clarity's sake, the removal or addition of cleanup tags, for any reason, are neither minor edits nor vandalism.) |
|
|
#For the purpose of this sanction, an edit may only be deemed to have ] if the following ''minimum'' procedural requirements are met: |
|
|
#:*It has been proposed on the talk page, in a dedicated section or subsection, for at least 72 hours. |
|
|
#:*In that section, the proposal has been either unopposed or at least four registered editors (including the proposer) have commented about the proposal. |
|
|
#:*The proposal does not substantially duplicate a previous proposal that failed to achieve consensus, or seek to undo a previous change that did achieve consensus, if that previous proposal or change was made less than a month before the new proposal. |
|
|
#The editor who makes an edit is responsible that the edit has consensus as outlined above. To prevent the risk of being sanctioned in the event that an administrator finds that the edit did not have consensus, any editor may ask on a community forum for an uninvolved administrator to determine whether or not consensus exists for the proposal. Such determinations are binding for the purpose of this sanction, but do not prevent ] by way of a new proposal. Administrators may ask for continued discussion if they believe that this would help consensus-finding, and they may weigh the arguments advanced in the light of applicable Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines in order to determine consensus or the lack thereof. |
|
|
{{collapse bottom}} |
|
|
*Editors who violate this editing restriction may be sanctioned with escalating blocks or other discretionary sanctions per ]. |
|
|
*In addition, a ] restriction concerning this article continues to apply. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 20:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
}} |
|
