| Revision as of 10:36, 9 April 2011 view sourceDeskana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,062 edits →User:Socialservice: reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:34, 18 January 2025 view source Beeblebrox (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators114,050 edits →User:Drdr150: Not done With barely 200 mainspace edits, you are right on the line for when we will even consider granting this. I think you are off to a decent start in combatting vandalism, but I think you need a bit more experience before this is granted. I notice someone suggested that you might want to use WP:TWINKLE for this and I agre fully with that, it's a great tool for helping users interested in removing vandalism and warning disruptive editors. (using [[User:MusikAnimal/... | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <noinclude>{{Short description|Place to request rollback rights}} | |||
| ===Rollback <small>(<span class="plainlinks"></span>)</small>=== | |||
| {{pp-semi-indef}}{{pp-move-indef}}{{WP:PERM/Nav}}{{WP:PERM/Backlog|none}}<!-- do not remove, managed by bot --></noinclude> | |||
| ⚫ | <noinclude> |
||
| {{Shortcuts|WP:PERM/R|WP:RFP/R}} | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
| </noinclude> | |||
| ⚫ | <!-- |
||
| ===<span id="rperm-rollback"></span>Rollback=== | |||
| ⚫ | ====]==== | ||
| {{WP:PERM/Subpage|shortcut=R|subpage=Rollback|notice=<noinclude> | |||
| *<span class="plainlinks">] · (] · ] · ] · ] · {{ plainlink | url=http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t={{urlencode:Artoasis}}| name=wikichecker}} · · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:Artoasis}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · · · · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · </span>) (]) | |||
| Please review ''']''' before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have: | |||
| :I have contributed regularly to ]s, and would like to have another tool to deal with unconstructive vandalism. Thank you. ] (]) 06:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| # At least {{Misplaced Pages:Rollback/Mainspace count}} ] edits. | |||
| ::{{done}}. ] <FONT SIZE="-2">] | ])</FONT> 06:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| # At least a month of experience patrolling ]. | |||
| ⚫ | ====]==== | ||
| # No recent history of ]. | |||
| *<span class="plainlinks">] · (] · ] · ] · ] · {{ plainlink | url=http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t=Jim+Sweeney&l={{urlencode:Jim Sweeney}}| name=wikichecker}} · · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:Jim Sweeney}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · · · · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · </span>) (]) | |||
| # A track record of consistently ] editors when reverting their edits. | |||
| :I have contributed regularly to ] articles and encountering more and more non-constructive edits and vandalism. I now believe I have been around Misplaced Pages long enough to know when and how to use this tool.Thank you. ] (]) 11:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is available if you wish to gain experience in handling vandalism. | |||
| ::{{done}}. ] <FONT SIZE="-2">] | ])</FONT> 16:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | </noinclude>}} | ||
| ⚫ | ====]==== | ||
| ⚫ | <!--Please do not edit the section above. Place new requests below. Thanks.--> | ||
| *<span class="plainlinks">] · (] · ] · ] · ] · {{ plainlink | url=http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t={{urlencode:Jamietw}}| name=wikichecker}} · · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:Jamietw}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · · · · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · </span>) (]) | |||
| :I have confirmation and voice on the #cvn-wp-en counter vandalism channel and when alerted to vandalism I revert it and warn the vandal, but this process can take time and so I would like the rollback right so that I can revert the vandalism easier, I would be especially interested in using Huggle but this requires the Rollback Right. I am a reviewer on the English Misplaced Pages and I also have AWB rights and as such I use Auto Wiki Browser regularly, I am a New Page Patroller and as such I have knowledge of Misplaced Pages Policies, I also help new users and have auto voice on the English Misplaced Pages Help IRC Channel. Thank you, ] (]) 15:08, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{done}}. ] <FONT SIZE="-2">] | ])</FONT> 16:25, 8 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ====]==== | ||
| *<span class="plainlinks">] · (] · ] · ] · ] · {{ plainlink | url=http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t={{urlencode:Liveon001}}| name=wikichecker}} · · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:Liveon001}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · · · · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · </span>) (]) | |||
| :I contribute quite often to articles pertaining to ] and the ] region and occasionally encounter vandalism that should be reverted. I would like to be able to use the rollback option to do so more efficiently. Thank you. ] (]) 03:48, 9 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{done}}. ] <FONT SIZE="-2">] | ])</FONT> 04:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
| *{{rfplinks|1=Jingiby}} | |||
| *<span class="plainlinks">] · (] · ] · ] · ] · {{ plainlink | url=http://en.wikichecker.com/user/?t={{urlencode:Socialservice}}| name=wikichecker}} · · {{ plainlink | url=http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/pages/index.php?name={{urlencode:Socialservice}}&namespace=0&redirects=noredirects | name=pages created}} · · · · ] · ] · ] · ] · ] · </span>) (]) | |||
| Hello everyone. I would like to request rollback rights here. I have a long and controversial history on the English Misplaced Pages but hope that especially in recent years, I have proved as to other editors, as well to the administrators, a positive change in my editorial behavior. I myself, don't forgive and don't forget my mistakes, but believe that with my experience and knowledge on the ], I will be useful in the fight against vandalism in this complicated question. Even though I'm worried, I remember ] 7:7-8: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." Thanks. ] (]) 09:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :Reason for requesting rollback I have contributed regularly to Sports pages and have encountered vandalism many times.I would like to have another tool to deal with non-constructive vandalism. Thank you. ] (]) 08:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Hello Jingiby. You had rollback declined a few years ago (June 20, 2018), per . At that time, reviewers mentioned your prior blocks on enwiki and an indef block on the Macedonian Misplaced Pages. The admin who declined your rollback was ]. Have there been any new developments since 2018 that you would like to bring to our attention here? ] (]) 23:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{not done}} In , you used the edit summary 'rvv', which stands for "reverting vandalism" — yet the previous edits did not appear to be vandalism. It's important to distinguish between unconstructive edits made in good faith, and intentional vandalism, as the rollback tool may be used on the latter, but not the former. Read ] and ], manually revert some vandalism, use proper edit summaries, and feel free to reapply later. ] <FONT SIZE="-2">] | ])</FONT> 09:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :: |
::I haven't been blocked on the Macedonian Misplaced Pages for years, but in general, the attitude towards Bulgarian editors on historical topics there is a quite special. ] (]) 06:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| :::By the way, during the last 15 years I am busy to deal with . ] (]) 12:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Honestly, there's not a lot to go on here. The user has done very little anti-vandalism work as far as I can tell, and has made similar reversions of non-vandalism edits using the undo feature , with the default edit summary. The rollback tool can cause a moderate amount of damage if misused, which is why it's not enabled by default. It rather hurts to be called "petty" over this. ] <FONT SIZE="-2">] | ])</FONT> 10:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Regarding my mistakes of the past, those of 10 years ago, I will strive to avoid them and not repeat them again. There are no ideal people, but I am neither a paid agent of the Bulgarian authorities, nor are there specially trained propagandists hiding behind my nickname, as some IPs are trying to present me. I am an ordinary person. ] (]) 19:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::What you said before was petty, but what you've said now wasn't. Thanks. --] ] 10:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Third user comment:''' I coincide with this user often, everytime I check their contributions they're filled with reverts of IPs and warning messages. I checked and they were unblocked from Macedonian Misplaced Pages in 2019, plus their claim probably has at least some truth, it's a small Balkan Misplaced Pages after all. It's also been 6 years and a half since their last request; it had been one year here since they were unblocked at that time, and now it's almost eight, no small amount. I'd recommend a trial period on this user. They'd probably do well. ] ] ] 23:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hi, ], and thanks for your comment. ] (]) 04:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| * '''Third user comment:''' I am not really sure how exactly rollback works, but regarding Jingiby, with whom I happened to interact a few times in the past, I'd say that they are indeed a pretty hardworking and dedicated editor in Balkan-related history articles. They have been doing an immense work with reverting IPs and vandals for years and WP would certainly be in a much worse place right now, if it weren't for them. If this rollback feature is going to help with their editing, I believe they deserve it, in my humble opinion. ] (]) 21:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::Hi, ], thank you. ] (]) 04:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} Frankly, I don't know what half the above discussion is about. This user has quite a number of blocks ''here'' but they are all well in the past and rollback really isn't that big of a deal. ] ] 00:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ====]==== | ||
| *{{rfplinks|1=Cyberdog958}} | |||
| I am requesting rollback rights for the ability to use a tool-assisted diff viewer, either huggle or ]. I have a lot of experience doing recent changes patrolling and fighting vandals and am interested in doing so with the semi-automated tools available. I have read the policy for using rollback and always warn users when reverting their edits. ]<sup>]</sup> 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} ] ] 00:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ====]==== | ||
| *{{rfplinks|1=Callmehelper}} | |||
| Hi, | |||
| I've been editing Misplaced Pages for about a year, with more active contributions over the past 5-6 months. i edited over 1000 edits and made some pages as well. During this time, I've frequently reverted vandalism and unconstructive edits and have become familiar with handling such challenges. | |||
| While I’m still learning some aspects of Misplaced Pages policies, I feel that rollback rights would help me revert vandalism and const. edits more efficiently, especially when i have to do repeated cases. I’m committed to using these rights responsibly to maintain the quality of Misplaced Pages. | |||
| Much Regards. ] (]) 03:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{not done}} One of the things we look for when evaluating these request is relevant experience with combatting vandalism. You assert that you have this experience, but your contributions to the user talk namespace do not show you warning users for vandal edits, as would be expected of someone familiar with how to deal with vandalism. If you go into your preferences and turn on ], you will find it very useful in dealing with vandalism and issuing warnings for you. Maybe give that a try for a while before re-applying here. ] ] 00:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | |||
| *{{rfplinks|1=Wildfireupdateman}} | |||
| Hi! I've been editing for half an year (less than others I know) and have amassed a total of 1600 edits, with about half of those being in mainspace. I have patrolled recent changes for a while, and have been adequately warning users since I learned about Twinkle. Note that the block I have received was a self-block to study for finals. I want rollback permissions in order to use tools such as Huggle effectively. ] (]) 20:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} ] ] 00:20, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ====]==== | ||
| *{{rfplinks|1=Sundostund}} | |||
| Hello. I am requesting this permission in order to fight vandalism in a faster and more efficient manner, when I encounter it in my work here (with ] being one of the worst examples I've seen so far). If granted, I intend to use it responsibly (and just occasionally – when needed), in the same way as I am using other permissions that were granted to me so far. Of course, I am aware that this tool is supposed to be used, basically, just to target vandalism – not at all in content disputes, etc. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with {{circa}} 150,000 edits. — ] ] <sup>(] / ])</sup> 16:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{done}} — ] (] • they/them) 16:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ====]==== | ||
| *{{rfplinks|1=Drdr150}} | |||
| I would like the rights to utilise rollback to aid in reverting vandalism more easily. I have seen numerous instances in which someone has added several instances of vandalism on the same page, preventing me from reverting it. I have warned people after their vandalism (if someone else doesn't beat me to it) and have not violated MOS in two years. ] (]) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{comment|Automated comment}} This user has <!-- mb-mainSpaceCount -->197<!-- mb-mainSpaceCount-end --> edits in the ]. <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>] <sup>]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 19:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :I just wanted to leave a note that the user has today been auto reported on AIV for tripping edit filter 1311 (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3AAbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Drdr150). Another admin ] looked at the report and believed it to be a false positive. I have just been looking at the contributions too, and also looked like a false positive to me, but then I noted this request, and thought that I should at least mention it here. ] (]) 21:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ::What I was saying was that while I believed it to be a false pos, I was not familiar enough with what I was reviewing to say so with the highest degree of confidence. ] (]) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'm not 100% sure what that edit filter is trying to tell us, but I can't see any serious issue with those edits either. Will proceed with {{checking}} if they are otherwise qualified for this user right. ] ] 00:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :::::{{not done}} With barely 200 mainspace edits, you are right on the line for when we will even consider granting this. I think you are off to a decent start in combatting vandalism, but I think you need a bit more experience before this is granted. I notice someone suggested that you might want to use ] for this and I agree fully with that, it's a great tool for helping users interested in removing vandalism and warning disruptive editors and can help you easily get the kind of experience looked for when evaluating these requests. ] ] 00:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:34, 18 January 2025
Place to request rollback rights| Requests for permissions | |
|---|---|
| Common | |
| Uncommon | |
| Logs | |
| Special | |
Rollback
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts Please review Misplaced Pages:Rollback before making a request. Successful applicants will usually have:- At least 200 mainspace edits.
- At least a month of experience patrolling Special:RecentChanges.
- No recent history of edit warring.
- A track record of consistently notifying editors when reverting their edits.
User:Jingiby
- Jingiby (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
Hello everyone. I would like to request rollback rights here. I have a long and controversial history on the English Misplaced Pages but hope that especially in recent years, I have proved as to other editors, as well to the administrators, a positive change in my editorial behavior. I myself, don't forgive and don't forget my mistakes, but believe that with my experience and knowledge on the Macedonian issue, I will be useful in the fight against vandalism in this complicated question. Even though I'm worried, I remember Matthew 7:7-8: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello Jingiby. You had rollback declined a few years ago (June 20, 2018), per this link. At that time, reviewers mentioned your prior blocks on enwiki and an indef block on the Macedonian Misplaced Pages. The admin who declined your rollback was User:Swarm. Have there been any new developments since 2018 that you would like to bring to our attention here? EdJohnston (talk) 23:53, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- I haven't been blocked on the Macedonian Misplaced Pages for years, but in general, the attitude towards Bulgarian editors on historical topics there is a quite special. Jingiby (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- By the way, during the last 15 years I am busy to deal with such IPs' activity. Jingiby (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Regarding my mistakes of the past, those of 10 years ago, I will strive to avoid them and not repeat them again. There are no ideal people, but I am neither a paid agent of the Bulgarian authorities, nor are there specially trained propagandists hiding behind my nickname, as some IPs are trying to present me. I am an ordinary person. Jingiby (talk) 19:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- By the way, during the last 15 years I am busy to deal with such IPs' activity. Jingiby (talk) 12:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- I haven't been blocked on the Macedonian Misplaced Pages for years, but in general, the attitude towards Bulgarian editors on historical topics there is a quite special. Jingiby (talk) 06:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Third user comment: I coincide with this user often, everytime I check their contributions they're filled with reverts of IPs and warning messages. I checked and they were unblocked from Macedonian Misplaced Pages in 2019, plus their claim probably has at least some truth, it's a small Balkan Misplaced Pages after all. It's also been 6 years and a half since their last request; it had been one year here since they were unblocked at that time, and now it's almost eight, no small amount. I'd recommend a trial period on this user. They'd probably do well. Super Ψ Dro 23:12, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, User:Super Dromaeosaurus, and thanks for your comment. Jingiby (talk) 04:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Third user comment: I am not really sure how exactly rollback works, but regarding Jingiby, with whom I happened to interact a few times in the past, I'd say that they are indeed a pretty hardworking and dedicated editor in Balkan-related history articles. They have been doing an immense work with reverting IPs and vandals for years and WP would certainly be in a much worse place right now, if it weren't for them. If this rollback feature is going to help with their editing, I believe they deserve it, in my humble opinion. Piccco (talk) 21:10, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, User:Piccco, thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
Done Frankly, I don't know what half the above discussion is about. This user has quite a number of blocks here but they are all well in the past and rollback really isn't that big of a deal. Beeblebrox 00:07, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
User:Cyberdog958
- Cyberdog958 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
I am requesting rollback rights for the ability to use a tool-assisted diff viewer, either huggle or meta:SWViewer. I have a lot of experience doing recent changes patrolling and fighting vandals and am interested in doing so with the semi-automated tools available. I have read the policy for using rollback and always warn users when reverting their edits. cyberdog958 10:49, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
User:Callmehelper
- Callmehelper (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
Hi, I've been editing Misplaced Pages for about a year, with more active contributions over the past 5-6 months. i edited over 1000 edits and made some pages as well. During this time, I've frequently reverted vandalism and unconstructive edits and have become familiar with handling such challenges.
While I’m still learning some aspects of Misplaced Pages policies, I feel that rollback rights would help me revert vandalism and const. edits more efficiently, especially when i have to do repeated cases. I’m committed to using these rights responsibly to maintain the quality of Misplaced Pages.
Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 03:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Not done One of the things we look for when evaluating these request is relevant experience with combatting vandalism. You assert that you have this experience, but your contributions to the user talk namespace do not show you warning users for vandal edits, as would be expected of someone familiar with how to deal with vandalism. If you go into your preferences and turn on TWINKLE, you will find it very useful in dealing with vandalism and issuing warnings for you. Maybe give that a try for a while before re-applying here. Beeblebrox 00:16, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
User:Wildfireupdateman
- Wildfireupdateman (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
Hi! I've been editing for half an year (less than others I know) and have amassed a total of 1600 edits, with about half of those being in mainspace. I have patrolled recent changes for a while, and have been adequately warning users since I learned about Twinkle. Note that the block I have received was a self-block to study for finals. I want rollback permissions in order to use tools such as Huggle effectively. Wildfireupdateman :) (talk) 20:12, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
User:Sundostund
- Sundostund (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
Hello. I am requesting this permission in order to fight vandalism in a faster and more efficient manner, when I encounter it in my work here (with this being one of the worst examples I've seen so far). If granted, I intend to use it responsibly (and just occasionally – when needed), in the same way as I am using other permissions that were granted to me so far. Of course, I am aware that this tool is supposed to be used, basically, just to target vandalism – not at all in content disputes, etc. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria 16:01, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- Done — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 16:07, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
User:Drdr150
- Drdr150 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
I would like the rights to utilise rollback to aid in reverting vandalism more easily. I have seen numerous instances in which someone has added several instances of vandalism on the same page, preventing me from reverting it. I have warned people after their vandalism (if someone else doesn't beat me to it) and have not violated MOS in two years. Drdr150 (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 197 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot 19:00, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- I just wanted to leave a note that the user has today been auto reported on AIV for tripping edit filter 1311 (https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special%3AAbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Drdr150). Another admin User:Daniel Case looked at the report and believed it to be a false positive. I have just been looking at the contributions too, and also looked like a false positive to me, but then I noted this request, and thought that I should at least mention it here. TigerShark (talk) 21:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- What I was saying was that while I believed it to be a false pos, I was not familiar enough with what I was reviewing to say so with the highest degree of confidence. Daniel Case (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not 100% sure what that edit filter is trying to tell us, but I can't see any serious issue with those edits either. Will proceed with
Checking... if they are otherwise qualified for this user right. Beeblebrox 00:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not done With barely 200 mainspace edits, you are right on the line for when we will even consider granting this. I think you are off to a decent start in combatting vandalism, but I think you need a bit more experience before this is granted. I notice someone suggested that you might want to use TWINKLE for this and I agree fully with that, it's a great tool for helping users interested in removing vandalism and warning disruptive editors and can help you easily get the kind of experience looked for when evaluating these requests. Beeblebrox 00:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not 100% sure what that edit filter is trying to tell us, but I can't see any serious issue with those edits either. Will proceed with
- What I was saying was that while I believed it to be a false pos, I was not familiar enough with what I was reviewing to say so with the highest degree of confidence. Daniel Case (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
