Revision as of 08:47, 12 March 2006 editMissmarple (talk | contribs)8,421 edits thanks← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:43, 11 December 2024 edit undoLiance (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,885 edits →Happy birthday!: new section | ||
(183 intermediate revisions by 99 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-width:3; border-color:#b2a4c5; background-color:#FFFFCC; color:#000000; padding: 2em;">'''Want to be an admin?''' If you think I know you, just ask me to nominate you. I remember that ] "adminship is no big deal", so I won't ask you to jump through any hoops - all I ask for is experience and trustworthiness. | |||
</div> | |||
<center>]</ |
<div class="center">]</div> | ||
== |
==Disambiguation link notification for April 29== | ||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
I really appreciate the barnstar you gave me, for my changes to the {{tl|copyvio}} template. When I came up with them, I also felt they were remarkably ''elegant'', and it's really nice to get apprecation for them. Thanks! ] 07:21, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
(].) --] (]) 09:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
==Reverts== | |||
Okay Dan, I'll explain my reverts immediately, but could you also please explain your additions/deletions, then we'll both save a lot of time? Joe Mabel may yet want to make changes, because he feels the current wording is a bit harsh (the bit about any unsourced edit being removable), and although I don't agree with him, I see his point and won't revert him, though if you do, I also won't revert you. Despite our disagreements, I hope you accept that I'm editing in good faith, and being fussy only because I've been up against a thousand POV pushers and their various attempts to squeeze through loopholes. It's ], not ]. ;-) I sent you two emails by the way. I hope you got them. | |||
== Undue haste! Tsk == | |||
All the best to you, Dan, for Christmas/Hanukkah. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 10:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Hi Dan100, how dare you make when it's only been queried for '''more than six years'''?! Honestly, with a bit of love and care we might have nursed it to a decade or more and then we could have baked it a cake and had a nice tea party! Tsk, you young people and your haste! :) Best wishes ] (]) 07:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
:Of course I know you're acting in good faith! I still have high regard for you, in particular for standing up to PoV pushers (I just can't do that), and that won't change. I honestly thought I had explained my text move, but on checking all I'd said was a short edit summary at ]. That was a mistake, which I readily admit to making. Have a lovely Christmas, ] (]) 17:12, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for July 26== | |||
== Bot running again == | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
Hi, I've got the bot up and running again, I've put it in a loop so if it shuts down it will wait 10 minutes and then start again. I've also reduced its line rate to waiting 0.4 seconds between each line (was 0.3 seconds) so hopefully it won't get booted for flooding so easily. After Christmas I'll find out more about getting the flood protection turned off by freenode (needs Misplaced Pages to tell them it's a legit bot apparently). When it does restart it will be quiet, so you'll need to tell it to speak again. Currently this can only be done from #wikipedia-en-vandalism... Have a happy Christmas --]<sup>(<font color="mediumseagreen">]</font>)</sup> 14:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
(].) --] (]) 09:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC) | |||
== The evidence on RachelBrown et al. == | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for August 6== | |||
There is, in my opinion, solid evidence to support the allegations of sockpuppetry, based on CheckUser evidence. However, that evidence is private and cannot be published without breaching the policy we have on CheckUser data. The fact remains that for you to state that there is no evidence fails to assume good faith on your part. I think you are treading on treacherous ground here. ] (]) 15:44, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
:From what I can tell, one of the accounts is a sock (Newport) but the rest are genuine editors who happen to know each other in real life. From I've learned of the Checkuser results, several of these accounts once edited from the same computer. For people who live near each other and are friends, I don't think it's unexpected for them share a computer at some stage. | |||
(].) --] (]) 09:44, 6 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
:Further, all the accounts (apart from Newport) have very different edit histories and areas of expertise, and have been making good edits. Quite apart from anything else, Misplaced Pages the encyclopedia will suffer without those editors. | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for September 2== | |||
:Finally, the blocking policy only allows for the blocking of socks when they are being used to violate policy. As far as I can see, that's not happened. None of the other accounts have been used for anything else that could justify a ban. | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
:Have a happy and peaceful Christmas, ] (]) 16:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
(].) --] (]) 09:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
::It's not "once edited from the same computer"; there is an ongoing pattern of edits by multiple accounts from the same group of computers (both work and home). I think it is unreasonable to say that there is "no evidence" as there clearly is evidence. Your argument should not be that there is no evidence, but that you think that there is countervailing evidence based on edit content (which I did not review, since I was merely asked to review the CheckUser evidence). ] (]) 17:25, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for September 9== | |||
:::I agree that there is some evidence of sock puppetry, that IPs have been shared, and that one of the accounts can certainly be viewed as a sock puppet (Newport). ] (]) 17:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ] ( | ). | |||
== sighs == | |||
It sounds like someone's been accusing me of something. I just wish that people would stop being hostile and work to try to get along. It is frustrating sometimes that no matter how much I work to try to prove to someone that I am not against them and am not trying to fight with them, some people still insist that I am against them, and therefore think that harassing me or stalking me or going to great lengths to attack me is reasonable. Apparently I am being threatened with being banned because I tried to help a newbie in trouble and tried to right a wrong. And also being threatened with being banned because I have 2 people stalking me. So if the powers that be deem that I am required to allow people to harass me and stalk me and that I am forbidden from helping anyone out, then fine, they can ban me. I don't come here to deal with nonsense. Nobody should ever have to put up with treatment like that. ] ] <small>] ] ]</small> 17:38, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
(].) --] (]) 09:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
:I know what you mean. Months ago (long before I was an admin) a then-member of the arbcom made some very uncalled-for comments about me, and I proceeded to tell everyone I could find and demand "punishment". I was soon told that that's not how things really work. Admins ''aren't'' police officers, and it's amazing what kind of nastiness people can get away with. But know this - when they do that, they lose the respect of everyone else, and people are much less likely to listen to them or ever support them. Further, severe misbehaviour and harrasment can lead to an RfC against a user, and then an arbcom case if necessary. | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for September 19== | |||
:The key though is to take the moral high ground. Never threaten (vieled or otherwise), always be extremely civil, overlook personal attacks, never use aggresive or confrontational language etc. Do that and you'll gain respect, and if RfCs or more are ever needed, people will be on your "side". ] (]) 17:51, 24 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
==Merry Christmas!!== | |||
] 22:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)]] | |||
(].) --] (]) 09:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
==Steward votes== | |||
== September 2018 == | |||
Your votes were done anonymously according to . Could you fix them by logging in to meta, then confirming your votes ? Thanks in advance ] 09:15, 25 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
:Thanks Ant! ] (]) 16:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Points to note: | |||
==Adminship nomination== | |||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
OK, then... :-) ] 15:50, 25 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] (]) 10:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for November 9== | |||
== I fixed your Nixdorf RFA == | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
Somehow, you managed to list it within InShaneee's RFA page. I'm not sure how you managed that, but I fixed it. —] (]:]) 10:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Thanks, I'm not sure either :-) ] (]) 11:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
(].) --] (]) 10:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Adminship == | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for November 16== | |||
Hi, thanks for supporting my request for adminship. If there's ever something I can help you out with please drop me a note. Happy holidays! ] 16:31, 26 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
== Semi Protection ? == | |||
(].) --] (]) 09:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
I'm a newish admin and I wanted to ask you about the <nowiki>{{sprotect}}</nowiki> tag I've been seeing on a number of articles in recent days (Such as the article ]). I always thought protecting a page was supposed to be done only occasionally but this type of protecting now seems to be almost trendy. Has the threshhold for doing this limited protection been lowered? Is the consensus that we can semiprotect a page if it merely is a target for frequent vandalism? Thanks for passing on any info on this. Best,--] 00:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Opinion is very split over this, just see ] and ]! Some articles - GWB is a well known one, Nigger less so - just get constant IP vandalism all the time, so I'd prefer to see Semi-protection being near permanent for those pages. ''Personally'', I put it on articles when I think they need it, and then leave it. There are admins who regularly check protected pages so I leave it to them to judge when to unprotect. ] (]) 09:42, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for the info. I'm considering doing a semi protect to the William Shakespeare article, which gets hit by a regular stream of vandalism.--] 14:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
== thanks to you, my phone number is a stalker's username revising the ] page== | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Dan100. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
Dear Dan100, | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
I'm sure you unprotected the Biff Rose page in good faith, but I wish you had communicated with the admin who protected it, first. (I'm only assuming you didn't.) We have had a spate of extremely antisocial behavior from unregistered users on that page. A user on that page has been calling my home phone number as well, in the middle of the night. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
After you unprotected it, on 00:48, 27 December 2005, someone posted a revision on the ] page...using a new username consisting of MY home phone number. This is serious. This is blatant stalker behavior and an invasion of my privacy. It is probably illegal as well. | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=866998024 --> | |||
== ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
Please reconsider your unprotection. Thank you. --] 07:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
:Sorry about that. I've deleted the number. ] (]) 09:35, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Dan100. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
::I wish I'd picked a friendlier title for this section. I was a bit panicked. Anyway, thank you for your swift deletion of the number and reversal of action. I appreciate it. --] 01:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
== Why, thanks... == | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
''Ahhh, so you're the IP who mediated on the anal sex drawing case! Nice work ] (]) 15:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)'' | |||
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
:Ta. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 16:23, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/03&oldid=866998024 --> | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for November 23== | |||
== Thank you for the barnstar, and I'm now back from leave == | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
Dear Dan100: Thank you so much for the barnstar; it is greatly appreciated, and I am honoured that my actions on the medcab page did indeed assist you. :) By the way, I went AWOL since I was away at my grandparents 23-26 Dec for Christmas (''real life, 'ya know, isn't it such an inconvenience... :-D '') and I have returned once more to do battle down at the Medcab. I do hope you don't consider it impudent of me to re-add myself under Coordinators. Thank you for all of your hard work down at the Medcab; undoubtedly, had you not joined our merry throng, we would still have a one-man Cabal (i.e. myself!) rather than the emerging star we have today. All the best, --] | ] 16:50, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
(].) --] (]) 10:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Mediation on ] external links == | |||
Dan, please continue to mediate. I have reason to believe that the anon user has since registered as ]. I and others have reverted the page numerous times only to have the link re-added amid accusations of censorship. Thanks for your help. - ] 18:48, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
== Usebox 4 U! == | |||
Hello Dan, I would like to know how we are progressing here. I read where Dominic will continue to remove all links to www.truthroom.com on all articles irregardless of what happens here. Since this is his position I wonder if I should go directly to arbitration so as to settle this dispute once and for all. Thank you for your time. Whatif | |||
I noticed you are in the village stocks, so here's a userbox for you! | |||
== Biff Rose == | |||
{{usbktop}} | |||
{{usbk | User:CrazyMinecart88/BOOM}} | |||
{{usbkbottom}} | |||
<br />Thanks, ] 23:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Lion Air Flight 386 listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Lion Air Flight 386'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] if you have not already done so. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 16:28, 2 January 2019 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for July 1== | |||
Thanks for your help with the ] situation. There are so many socks in play that it's confusing. -] 18:57, 27 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are ], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].)</small> | |||
==Mediation for ]== | |||
Hi ]. Thanks for coming around. :) I think that, through the power of positive collaboration, the community here has reached a consensus on the controversy at hand. Thanks for checking in with us! --] <sup></sup> 20:38, 27 December 2005 (UTC) ''(CC'ed to ])'' | |||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC) | |||
Hello Dan and Animaed Cascade, I, too, am very happy that our negotiations and collaboration produced such a posiitive result. However, we now have a new editor to the page who is making changes with no regard to comments and discussion on the talk page. The new edits are not neutral. The editor admits to not even having read the author. This is of concern to me. I do not want this to devolve into a tit-for-tat revert fest and am unsure of how to address it. I also fear that this will be the case in the future--there is a past precedence for malicious edits on this page. If folks do not respect neutrality in the article, what is the recommended procedure? ] 13:08, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
De are the world ] (]) 06:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
Aloha Dan! I wanted to thank you belatedly for intervening in and offering to keep an eye on the dispute re the JT LeRoy article -- The Cabal is on the job :-) . After noting back in October that I know Mr LeRoy personally, I became subject to various attacks, the most harmless accusation being that I was a sock puppet of Ms Albert. (In another arena, despite my best joint efforts to achieve compromise with ] whose views on Hawaiian sovereignty and history are mostly the opposite of mine, I was attacked by ] as trying to push an agenda re ''that'' topic.) Accordingly I thought it best simply to recuse myself from Misplaced Pages entirely for awhile. Despite all WP's good-conduct policies, some editors approach their chosen subjects with unusual personal venom -- your mediation helps restore my faith that such things can be contained, and I hope to be returning soon. ] 01:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
Slowly : this world is we . . . ] (]) 06:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC) | |||
==WP:AN/I== | |||
Whoops! Sorry about that, when you're doing as many things at once as I am, it's easy to lose track there. Speaking of which, i'm heading over to AN/I right now. ] 08:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == | |||
==Poetlister== | |||
G'day Dan! | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
Another case (was thomas jefferson....) was solved on Cabal Mediation. All the best! --] ] 12:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
:By the way, is Poetlister unblocked or not? I would like that she would be unblocked. --] ] 13:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
::Poetlister isn't unblocked, and probably won't be - it was indeed a "]", and was used to vote several times on the same AfD, which is bannable offence under the ] :-(. ] (]) 19:01, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
:::Hello Dan, thanks for everything. You know I do like very much to mediate. By the way I wish you succes here ] :). --] ] 19:05, 28 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
== Reading fans == | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
Unfortunately, the ones that spend lots of their time on ] message boards (for no good reason, may I add), are. Then again, I'd say the same can probably be reciprocated about Brighton fans who hang around the Crystal Palace BBS. --] 21:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=926750232 --> | |||
==Disambiguated links== | |||
== Mediation for Stuyvesant High School == | |||
Just to let you know, Dan100, ] is now a ]. So when you link to the company, the way you did at ], please use: | |||
I have updated the mediation ] with the new information. Thanks. --] <sup>]</sup> 01:12, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
: {{code|]}} or just {{code|]}} | |||
: Hi Dan, if you could take a look at the Stuyvesant mediation case it would be rather helpful. The anonymous user is not being reasonable. --] <sup>]</sup> 20:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
See more about linking at the ] and the ]. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this''!'' ''''']''''' ] ] <small>15:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)</small> | |||
:: Assistance with the ] editorial "dispute" would be greatly appreciated. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:36, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Removing refs with dead links== | |||
==]== | |||
Regarding , we don't remove refs that have dead links. Please read ] for an explanation why that is. In this case it was easy to with ]. - ] (]) 13:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 21== | |||
Just thought you might like to know I couldn't stand by and watch Ed be railroaded. I've nominated him for ].] 04:24, 30 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
== My RfA == | |||
Hi Dan100, now that I'm an administrator, I just wanted to thank you for your support on my ]. -- ] (]) 02:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
(].) --] (]) 10:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 28== | |||
==Market Reforms of the Modern Communist== | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
(].) --] (]) 07:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
Contrary to communist theory proposed by Marx and Engles and later adapted by Lenin, Stalin, Mao the ]; the largest country whose ruling party refers to itself as communist, runs ] dedicated to capitalist enterprise, free from central government control. After opening up trade to the world under ], the People's Republic of China runs some of the most economically free regions in the world, including ], which is regarded by the Hoover Institute and the Wall Street Journal as the world's freest economy . | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for May 21== | |||
These ] have few restrictions upon businesses, industries, imports and exports, including the elimination of duties, and a free price system. Since the opening of the Free Trade Zones China has maintained a growth rate of over 8%, and originally saw growth rates around 12%. These Special Economic Zones are different than the ], as practiced in the Soviet Union, because the SEZs allow for capitalists to build and expand their industries and private property, free from the control of the central government. SEZ's operate under ] rather than the state capitalist top down ] approach. | |||
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). | |||
According to China.org "After opening Shenzhen and other three coastal cities in South China as special economic regions and then dozens of economic and technological development zones in the 1980s, the country introduced free trade zones in the early 1990s in 15 coast cities, including Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Tianjin." | |||
(].) --] (]) 11:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
Several other self proclaimed communist countries have also made pro market reforms in the last few decades including Vietnam. | |||
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message == | |||
-------------------- | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
what do you propose? | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
The only thing that needs to be done is add alittle more info on other market reforms and find the appropriate place within the communist article...which really means cleaning up the headings and reorgnizing them...which i will do as soon as the communist editors delete my section with no discussion for the 35th time. (Gibby 06:00, 31 December 2005 (UTC)) | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. ] (]) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
: It doesn't fit the context. See ]. It might find a place in more specialised articles, specifically ]. But surprise, surprise, it already contains this info, and more, except without the observation of "contrary". -- ] 06:14, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/01&oldid=990307860 --> | |||
== |
== February 2021 == | ||
] Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an ]. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! <!-- Template:Summary2 --> ] <sup>]</sup> 15:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC) | |||
When you delete a page, please make sure to delete the associated talk pages (] & ]). -- ] ] 17:01, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
==Templates== | |||
] | |||
] just undeleted all of the templates you removed as a violation of policy. Since he was the creator of these same templates, doesn't this violate Misplaced Pages procedure? ] 22:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
== thanks == | |||
<blockquote>'''does not appear to meet our notability requirements, as supported by RSs'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
{| style="border-top:1px solid grey; border-right:1px solid grey; border-bottom:2px solid grey; border-left:1px solid grey; background-color: #A1E794; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px;" | |||
|] | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
|<font color = "blue">'''Greetings Dan100,'''</font><br> I wish to offer my gratitude for supporting me on my recent ], which passed with the final tally of 65/4/3. If you would ever desire my assistance in anything, or wish to give me feedback on any actions I take, ]. Cheers! ] (]!) 08:01, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> --] (]) 18:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Unexplained revert == | |||
Hi Dan, I was just curious as to why you removed a sentence . I know it was unsourced, and I would add a reference if I am able to find one. However, it's also a somewhat minor point and not really needed. I addition, it's anachronistic, as LM didn't exist in 1982, and I would have found the correct company before restoring it. Thanks. ] (]) 02:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message == | |||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> | |||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small> | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1056562944 --> | |||
== ''The WikiEagle'' - January 2022 == | |||
{|width=100% style="border:2px solid #87CEEB; color:black; background-color:#F0FFFF;" | |||
|] | |||
|- | |||
|style="padding:0px 2em; font-size:42px; text-align:center; font-family:Times New Roman;"|The WikiEagle | |||
|- | |||
|style="text-align:center;"|The ] Newsletter | |||
|} | |} | ||
{|{{#ifeq:{{ROOTPAGENAME}}|WikiProject Aviation||class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"}} border=1 width=100% style="border:2px solid SkyBlue; border-collapse:collapse; background-color:#white;" | |||
!colspan=2 style="color:black; background-color:#87CEEB; padding:5px;"|Volume I — Issue 1 | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 style="text-align:center; padding:5px;"|]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}]{{•}}] | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 style="padding:5px; vertical-align:top;"|<span style="font-size:22px;">'''''Announcements'''''</span> | |||
---- | |||
*After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name ''The WikiEagle''. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its ]. If you wish to continue receiving ''The WikiEagle'', you can add your username to the ]. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please ]. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. | |||
*On 16 December, ] which determined ''theaerodrome.com'' to be an unreliable source. The website, which is , mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. | |||
*''Luft46.com'' has been added to the ] after ]. | |||
*The ] article was ''']''' to ''Featured Article'' status on 26 December after being nominated by {{Noping|Hawkeye7}}. | |||
*The ] article was ''']''' to ''Good Article'' status on 4 December after being nominated by {{Noping|Zawed}}. | |||
*The ] article was ''']''' to ''Good Article'' status on 22 December after being nominated by {{Noping|Amitchell125}}. | |||
*The ] article was ''']''' to ''Good Article'' status on 26 December after being nominated by {{Noping|Zawed}}. | |||
|- | |||
== ] (]) == | |||
|style="padding:5px; vertical-align:top;"|<span style="font-size:22px;">'''Members'''</span> | |||
---- | |||
'''New Members''' | |||
*{{Noping|KingAviationKid}} (Joined on 17 December) | |||
*{{Noping|PatrickChiao}} (Joined on 22 December) | |||
*{{Noping|Wp9097}} (Joined on 16 December) | |||
{{columns-list|colwidth=15em|Number of active members: 386. | |||
Total number of members: 921.}} | |||
---- | |||
<span style="font-size:22px;">'''Closed Discussions'''</span> | |||
---- | |||
] '''Featured Article assessment''' | |||
*] (]) – Closed as '''promoted''' on 26 December 2021 | |||
] '''Good Article assessment''' | |||
hi, | |||
*] (]) – Closed as '''not promoted''' on 30 December 2021 | |||
*] (]) – Closed as '''promoted''' on 26 December 2021 | |||
*] (]) – Closed as '''promoted''' on 22 December 2021 | |||
*] (]) – Closed as '''promoted''' on 4 December 2021 | |||
] '''Deletion''' | |||
allabout2006 and his ips are back to destroying the alkyl nitrites article, and i was wondering if you could help keep an eye on it as you were doing a few weeks ago. thanks --] <sup>]</sup> 15:52, 1 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
*] (]) – Closed as '''delete and redirect''' on 30 December 2021 | |||
*] (]) – Closed as '''keep''' on 25 December 2021 | |||
] '''Requested moves''' | |||
== joke templates at ] == | |||
*] → ] (]) – Closed as '''moved''' on 30 December 2021 | |||
*] → ] (]) – Closed as '''moved''' on 30 December 2021 | |||
*] → ] (]) – '''Withdrawn''' on 28 December 2021 | |||
|width=50% style="padding:5px; vertical-align:top;"|<span style="font-size:22px;">'''Article Statistics'''</span><br/><span style="font-size:12px;">This data reflects values from DMY.</span> | |||
What's going on at with the "joke" templates? Unless you want to use the somewhat-smarmy {{behave}}, as it now stands Level 1 (use sandbox), Level 2 (Could be seen as vandalism), and Level 3 (Warning) are all the message. Doesn't seem to make sense to give the same message two or three times. You mind if I have a go at it? ] 05:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
{| class="ratingstable wikitable plainlinks" style="text-align: right;" | |||
|- | |||
! colspan="3" class="ratingstabletitle" | Aviation pages by quality | |||
|- | |||
! rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: bottom" | '''Quality''' | |||
|- | |||
Can I be in your place head mediator? ] ] 15:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
! style="text-align: center;" | '''Total''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{FA-Class|category=Category:FA-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{FL-Class|category=Category:FL-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{A-Class|category=Category:A-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{GA-Class|category=Category:GA-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{B-Class|category=Category:B-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{C-Class|category=Category:C-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Start-Class|category=Category:Start-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Stub-Class|category=Category:Stub-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{List-Class|category=Category:List-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Category-Class|category=Category:Category-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Disambig-Class|category=Category:Disambig-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{File-Class|category=Category:File-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Portal-Class|category=Category:Portal-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Project-Class|category=Category:Project-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Redirect-Class|category=Category:Redirect-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Template-Class|category=Category:Template-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{NA-Class|category=Category:NA-Class_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Assessed-Class}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| {{Unassessed-Class|category=Category:Unassessed_aviation_articles}} | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
| style="text-align: center;" | '''Total''' | |||
|| '''''' | |||
|- | |||
{{User:WP 1.0 bot/WikiWork|project=Aviation|export=table}} | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 style="padding:5px; vertical-align:top;"|<span style="font-size:22px;">'''New/Ongoing Discussions'''</span> | |||
---- | |||
{{Col-begin}} | |||
{{Col-2}} | |||
] '''Featured Article review''' | |||
*''']''' (]) – Since 14 December 2021 | |||
] '''A-class Article assessment''' | |||
*] (]) – Since 21 April 2020 | |||
*] (]) – Since 22 February 2010 | |||
] '''Good Article assessment''' | |||
*''']''' (]) – Since 25 December 2021 | |||
*] (]) – Since 2 October 2021 | |||
] '''Merger proposals''' | |||
*] → ] (]) – Since 10 August 2021 | |||
*] → ] (]) – Since 10 August 2021 | |||
*] → ] (]) – Since 10 August 2021 | |||
*] → ] (]) – Since 23 June 2021 | |||
*] → ] (]) – Since 30 May 2021 | |||
*] → ] (]) – Since 29 May 2021 | |||
*] → ] (]) – Since 28 May 2021 | |||
] '''Splitting proposals''' | |||
*] (]) – Since 23 November 2021 | |||
*] (]) – Since 24 September 2021 | |||
*] (]) – Since 16 August 2021 | |||
*] (]) – Since 8 September 2019 | |||
{{Col-2}} | |||
] '''Deletion''' | |||
*''']''' (]) – Since 29 December 2021 | |||
] '''Requested moves''' | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 30 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 28 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 28 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 28 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 28 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 28 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 27 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 26 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 25 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 13 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 13 December 2021 | |||
*'''] → ]''' (]) – Since 13 December 2021 | |||
] '''Did you know''' | |||
== My ] == | |||
*''']''' (]) – Since 30 December 2021 | |||
{|width=100% style="border:solid 2px #338" | |||
*''']''' (]) – Since 26 December 2021 | |||
|width="90%" bgcolor=#e4f2ff style="padding:.5em"| Greetings, Dan100! I wanted to sincerely thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with a final result of 55/14/3. Your support means a lot to me! If you have any questions or input regarding my activities, be they adminly or just a "normal" user's, or if you just want to chat about anything at all, feel free to ]. Cheers! —] ] 07:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
*''']''' (]) – Since 6 December 2021 | |||
|bgcolor=gainsboro| | |||
*''']''' (]) – Since 3 December 2021 | |||
|bgcolor=lightgrey| | |||
{{Col-end}} | |||
|bgcolor=silver| | |||
---- | |||
|bgcolor=darkgray| | |||
<span style="font-size:22px;">'''On The Main Page'''</span> | |||
|bgcolor=dimgray| | |||
---- | |||
|bgcolor=darkslategray| | |||
'''Did you know...''' | |||
*... that the ] demonstration aircraft used by ''']''' is also used in military operations of the ]? ''(24 December)'' | |||
|- | |||
|colspan=2 style="padding:5px; font-size:12px;"| | |||
Discuss & propose changes to ''The WikiEagle'' at ''']''' page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the ''']'''.<br/> | |||
Newsletter contributor: {{Noping|ZLEA}} | |||
|} | |} | ||
] (]) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:ZLEA@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Aviation/WikiEagle/Subscribe&oldid=1063162664 --> | |||
== Concerning ] == | |||
== Thanks == | |||
Good morning to you :). I actually laughed a bit about your edit. Just as a heads-up: we have a page for ]. Cheers and happy editing. ] (]) 08:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message == | |||
== My RFA == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
Thank you for your support in my recent succesful RFA. I appreciate the trust you have shown in me. Kind regards, --] 17:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
== RfC == | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small> | |||
i have filed an RfC concerning the behavior of ] and his socks on ] which can be found ]. you reverted his edits a couple times. comments would be appreciated. thanks. --] <sup>]</sup> 04:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
==]== | |||
</div> | |||
I responded to your comments. Sorry for the month-long delay, got carried away with work etc. --<small>]<sup>]|]</sup></small> 08:43, 5 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1124425177 --> | |||
== January 2023 == | |||
==]== | |||
Hi, you've warned this user for vandalizing pages. He did it again: --] 21:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other||often}} edit without using an ]. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in ]. Thanks! <!-- Template:Summary2 --> ] (]) 08:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Anon talk page comment removals == | |||
:Hi @], I notice that almost all of your edits still either lack an edit summary, or they are completely unhelpful (“m”, “Edits” etc.) Edit summaries exist to allow other Wikipedians to quickly and easily identify what was changed on an article - please try to use meaningful edit summaries wherever possible. ] (]) 09:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
Did you intentionally remove all of the warnings/etc on ] with ? If so, in the future could you simply archive it instead? I just reblocked and had to go back to the block log to see it was a repeat vandal and then through the page history to see what had happened in the past and then readjust the block. Thanks. ]<sub>(])</sub> | |||
::Ditto. ] <sup>]</sup> 13:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
* ...and ? ]<sub>(])</sub> 02:40, 12 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
:::Dan does use edit summaries when necessary, such as (Deconfuse), which is obvious when you look at the diff. "Edit" obviously means "copyedit", and "m" minor. Editing on a mobile device may account for the terseness. Do y'all have any examples of major unexplained edits that aren't obvious? ] (]) 15:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::One of the reasons for using a summary is to help other editors decide whether to take the time to look at a diff. Not everyone can take the time to look at every single diff of every edit that pops up on his or her watchlist. It's one thing if the watcher knows the editor's history, reputation, inclinations, etc, but that is of course not always the case. 17:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::::A major edit would likely be one that involves a change in the hundreds or thousands of bytes. If it is just zero, or several bytes, it's likely minor. Taken with "Edit" or "m", one can assume it's a minor edit. I'm not trying to defend Dan, as he is capable of doing that well enough himself. I'm simply pointing out it's not all that difficult to realize what's a genuinely minor edit from one's watchlist or a recent changes list. If Dan is making major edits without any edit summary, that would be another matter. Is he? ] (]) 19:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::::Apologies, I got distracted from the thread I started! I agree that this is not an issue with missing edit summaries - but instead summaries which simply consist of "Edit" or "m"... the entire point of an edit summary is to summarise the edits that you've made to assist other editors. There is no way at all to discern what has been changed if the edit summary is nothing more than "Edit". ] (]) 23:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
:::::::@]@]@] no change yet. ] ] 19:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
::::::::Again, as long as the edits in question are genuinely minor copyedits, I don't see a problem. Take it to one of the noticeboards if you're really concerned about it, but I think you'd be wasting your time. ] (]) 21:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
:Here's an example: Removal of a "More citations needed" maintenance template with no edit summary. It's a short article with only two sections, one of which has no sources and the other is well sourced. So I'm left guessing, but I imagine he thinks we don't need to tag the article when only one section is a problem. But then why didn't he just tag the section? I have no idea. ] (]) 00:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I’m beginning to wonder if @] even looks at their talk page… because there have been no responses whatsoever from them. Certainly that falls under ]. ] (]) 12:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
:This has bothered me today. ] (]) 21:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Introduction to contentious topics == | |||
== Polling the 31/36 hour block... == | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently been editing ] which has been designated a ]. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and ''does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your editing.'' | |||
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as '''contentious topics'''. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. | |||
...]. ] ] 02:39, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
Within contentious topics, editors should edit '''carefully''' and '''constructively''', refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: | |||
== ] == | |||
:adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages; | |||
:comply with all applicable policies and guidelines; | |||
:follow editorial and behavioural best practice; | |||
:comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and | |||
:refrain from gaming the system. | |||
<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> ] ] 19:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
''The burden of evidence lies with the editor who has made the edit. Editors should therefore provide references'' From ]. Sources are required. Please revert. ]</nowiki>]] 13:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Centrifugal Compressor edit apr2023 == | |||
== vote here == | |||
hi, Please Vote here "keep" : ]. Regards, ] 24 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Current events == | |||
* {{On AFD|Chinese current events}} | |||
* {{On AFD|Indian current events}} | |||
Please contribute to the discussions. ] 12:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
hello Dan, | |||
== Misplaced Pages Project == | |||
The material you removed was not from a textbook and contributes to the article. Other revisions have distorted the flow of explanation. It is a remnant from linking pictures to paragraphs. | |||
I would like to reinstall this material with the few corrections needed. Is this okay with you. | |||
] (]) 16:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
== A kitten for you! == | |||
Hi, | |||
my name is Federico (alias Pain) and I am creating a section for nominating the best user page, I was wondering if you were interested in joining the project. | |||
] | |||
The project has just started, and we need help to spread the word and ameliorate it. | |||
This one is enjoying the fall and says, thanks for persistently keeping things tidy around here. | |||
<span style="color:#666">– ]]</span> 23:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
<br style="clear: both;"/> | |||
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
Best regards, | |||
] ] ] 14:28, 2 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
== Thanks == | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
Thank you for the barnstar :) It's nice to see that someone notices your work and appreciates it :) --] 08:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1187131902 --> | |||
== ] == | |||
Would you mind changing the name of this to something more... obvious? Thanks! ] (]) 17:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
<div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
</div> | |||
</div> | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
== Happy birthday! == | |||
<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## --> | |||
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center">]<span style="font-weight:bold;font-size:125%; padding-bottom: 1em;">Happy Birthday!</span>] | |||
Have a very happy birthday on your special day! | |||
Best wishes, ~]<sup>]</sup> 21:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
</div> | |||
:I came across your helpful edit on ] and noticed that today marks 20 years since you created your Misplaced Pages account! Always makes me happy to see someone continuing to contribute over such a long period of time. Thank you for your efforts over the years and I hope you have a great day! ~]<sup>]</sup> 21:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:43, 11 December 2024
Disambiguation link notification for April 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nike Oregon Project, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Centrowitz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Undue haste! Tsk
Hi Dan100, how dare you make this rapid-response edit when it's only been queried for more than six years?! Honestly, with a bit of love and care we might have nursed it to a decade or more and then we could have baked it a cake and had a nice tea party! Tsk, you young people and your haste! :) Best wishes DBaK (talk) 07:20, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited E-UTRA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandwidth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catalina Sky Survey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Bigelow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Griddle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julius Caesar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Britain and Siege of Mytilene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Council house, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lounge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wright R-3350 Duplex-Cyclone. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhyl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Welsh Presbyterian Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited De Havilland Comet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cone of Silence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Dan100. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Dan100. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Combined cycle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Usebox 4 U!
I noticed you are in the village stocks, so here's a userbox for you!
Code | Result | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
{{User:CrazyMinecart88/BOOM}} |
|
Usage |
Thanks, CrazyMinecart88 23:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Lion Air Flight 386 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lion Air Flight 386. Since you had some involvement with the Lion Air Flight 386 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jc86035 (talk) 16:28, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pendleton Woolen Mills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jacquard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
De are the world Kamel Lounis (talk) 06:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Slowly : this world is we . . . Kamel Lounis (talk) 06:06, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguated links
Just to let you know, Dan100, Viacom is now a disambiguation page. So when you link to the company, the way you did at My5, please use:
]
or just]
See more about linking at the help page and the project page. Thank you for your edits and for your support in this! PI Ellsworth ed. 15:55, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
Removing refs with dead links
Regarding this edit, we don't remove refs that have dead links. Please read WP:LINKROT for an explanation why that is. In this case it was easy to repair the ref with archive.org. - Ahunt (talk) 13:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doubling time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RS-88, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lockheed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alstom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcatel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
February 2021
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Eric 15:31, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Oxford University Gliding Club
The article Oxford University Gliding Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
does not appear to meet our notability requirements, as supported by RSs
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --2603:7000:2143:8500:1544:2C08:6338:A34A (talk) 18:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Unexplained revert
Hi Dan, I was just curious as to why you removed a sentence here. I know it was unsourced, and I would add a reference if I am able to find one. However, it's also a somewhat minor point and not really needed. I addition, it's anachronistic, as LM didn't exist in 1982, and I would have found the correct company before restoring it. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 02:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The WikiEagle - January 2022
The WikiEagle |
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter |
Volume I — Issue 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Announcements
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members
New Members
Closed Discussions
|
Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New/Ongoing Discussions
On The Main Page Did you know...
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Concerning Richard Desmond
Good morning to you :). I actually laughed a bit about your edit. Just as a heads-up: we have a page for pornographer. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Danners430 (talk) 08:16, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Dan100, I notice that almost all of your edits still either lack an edit summary, or they are completely unhelpful (“m”, “Edits” etc.) Edit summaries exist to allow other Wikipedians to quickly and easily identify what was changed on an article - please try to use meaningful edit summaries wherever possible. Danners430 (talk) 09:27, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ditto. Eric 13:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dan does use edit summaries when necessary, such as here (Deconfuse), which is obvious when you look at the diff. "Edit" obviously means "copyedit", and "m" minor. Editing on a mobile device may account for the terseness. Do y'all have any examples of major unexplained edits that aren't obvious? BilCat (talk) 15:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- One of the reasons for using a summary is to help other editors decide whether to take the time to look at a diff. Not everyone can take the time to look at every single diff of every edit that pops up on his or her watchlist. It's one thing if the watcher knows the editor's history, reputation, inclinations, etc, but that is of course not always the case. 17:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- A major edit would likely be one that involves a change in the hundreds or thousands of bytes. If it is just zero, or several bytes, it's likely minor. Taken with "Edit" or "m", one can assume it's a minor edit. I'm not trying to defend Dan, as he is capable of doing that well enough himself. I'm simply pointing out it's not all that difficult to realize what's a genuinely minor edit from one's watchlist or a recent changes list. If Dan is making major edits without any edit summary, that would be another matter. Is he? BilCat (talk) 19:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies, I got distracted from the thread I started! I agree that this is not an issue with missing edit summaries - but instead summaries which simply consist of "Edit" or "m"... the entire point of an edit summary is to summarise the edits that you've made to assist other editors. There is no way at all to discern what has been changed if the edit summary is nothing more than "Edit". Danners430 (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- @BilCat@Danners430@Eric no change yet. Doug Weller talk 19:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Again, as long as the edits in question are genuinely minor copyedits, I don't see a problem. Take it to one of the noticeboards if you're really concerned about it, but I think you'd be wasting your time. BilCat (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- @BilCat@Danners430@Eric no change yet. Doug Weller talk 19:42, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Apologies, I got distracted from the thread I started! I agree that this is not an issue with missing edit summaries - but instead summaries which simply consist of "Edit" or "m"... the entire point of an edit summary is to summarise the edits that you've made to assist other editors. There is no way at all to discern what has been changed if the edit summary is nothing more than "Edit". Danners430 (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- A major edit would likely be one that involves a change in the hundreds or thousands of bytes. If it is just zero, or several bytes, it's likely minor. Taken with "Edit" or "m", one can assume it's a minor edit. I'm not trying to defend Dan, as he is capable of doing that well enough himself. I'm simply pointing out it's not all that difficult to realize what's a genuinely minor edit from one's watchlist or a recent changes list. If Dan is making major edits without any edit summary, that would be another matter. Is he? BilCat (talk) 19:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- One of the reasons for using a summary is to help other editors decide whether to take the time to look at a diff. Not everyone can take the time to look at every single diff of every edit that pops up on his or her watchlist. It's one thing if the watcher knows the editor's history, reputation, inclinations, etc, but that is of course not always the case. 17:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dan does use edit summaries when necessary, such as here (Deconfuse), which is obvious when you look at the diff. "Edit" obviously means "copyedit", and "m" minor. Editing on a mobile device may account for the terseness. Do y'all have any examples of major unexplained edits that aren't obvious? BilCat (talk) 15:31, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Ditto. Eric 13:18, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Here's an example: Removal of a "More citations needed" maintenance template with no edit summary. It's a short article with only two sections, one of which has no sources and the other is well sourced. So I'm left guessing, but I imagine he thinks we don't need to tag the article when only one section is a problem. But then why didn't he just tag the section? I have no idea. GA-RT-22 (talk) 00:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- I’m beginning to wonder if @Dan100 even looks at their talk page… because there have been no responses whatsoever from them. Certainly that falls under poor communication. Danners430 (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- This has bothered me today. 84.250.15.152 (talk) 21:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently been editing climate change which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Doug Weller talk 19:43, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Centrifugal Compressor edit apr2023
hello Dan, The material you removed was not from a textbook and contributes to the article. Other revisions have distorted the flow of explanation. It is a remnant from linking pictures to paragraphs. I would like to reinstall this material with the few corrections needed. Is this okay with you. Mkoronowski (talk) 16:46, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
This one is enjoying the fall and says, thanks for persistently keeping things tidy around here.
– SJ + 23:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Template:Hiu
Would you mind changing the name of this to something more... obvious? Thanks! Primefac (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Happy birthday!
Happy Birthday!Have a very happy birthday on your special day!
Best wishes, ~Liance 21:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- I came across your helpful edit on Node.js and noticed that today marks 20 years since you created your Misplaced Pages account! Always makes me happy to see someone continuing to contribute over such a long period of time. Thank you for your efforts over the years and I hope you have a great day! ~Liance 21:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)