| Revision as of 00:41, 20 December 2011 editDoncram (talk | contribs)203,830 edits →contention here too, location in Whitney Ave HD: comment on Sarek's non-participation at Talk page, a less confrontational place for possible communication← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:29, 7 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,872,826 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Architecture}}, {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Connecticut}}, {{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion |
| (7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{WikiProject NRHP|class=stub|importance=related}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|living=no|listas=Allen, William H. (architect)|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Architecture}} |
|
{{WikiProject Architecture|needs-infobox=n}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes|needs-infobox =no |needs-photo =yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Connecticut}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|listas=Allen, William H. (architect)|living=no|class=stub}} |
|
{{WikiProject Connecticut|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|importance=related}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Image requested|architects}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== contention here too, location in Whitney Ave HD == |
|
== contention here too, location in Whitney Ave HD == |
|
|
|
|
|
Here, as in other articles I've edited, another editor is following to dispute everything he can, it seems. Including contending about a location, intersection of Lawrence & Whitney, which is in fact included in the ] if you look at the latter's map or NRHP document. I wrote that article, and am familiar with the facts. SarekOfVulcan, please stop taking the most confrontation action you can at every step. Raise a question at Talk. Try seriously to discuss things rather than combat. --]]] 22:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
Here, as in other articles I've edited, another editor is following to dispute everything he can, it seems. Including contending about a location, intersection of Lawrence & Whitney, which is in fact included in the ] if you look at the latter's map or NRHP document. I wrote that article, and am familiar with the facts. SarekOfVulcan, please stop taking the most confrontation action you can at every step. Raise a question at Talk. Try seriously to discuss things rather than combat. --]]] 22:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:There's a "WILLIAM ALLEN HOUSE, 3 stories, Queen Anne, 1897, gable roof, brick, slate. Photo #22." located at 357 Whitney Avenue, according to the Whitney Avenue HD's NRHP nom document. Is that a building designed by William H. Allen, and/or where William H. Allen lived? I imagine that is likely. It is a ] in the HD. --]]] 22:24, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
:There's a "WILLIAM ALLEN HOUSE, 3 stories, Queen Anne, 1897, gable roof, brick, slate. Photo #22." located at 357 Whitney Avenue, according to the Whitney Avenue HD's NRHP nom document. Is that a building designed by William H. Allen, and/or where William H. Allen lived? I imagine that is likely. It is a ] in the HD. --]]] 22:24, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Indeed, Google maps shows that house is located at the corner of Lawrence. And the photo #22 shows a complicated house, pretty much like the ] that is mentioned in the quote as being almost an exact duplicate. --]]] 22:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
:Indeed, Google maps shows that house is located at the corner of Lawrence. And the photo #22 shows a complicated house, pretty much like the ] that is mentioned in the quote as being almost an exact duplicate. --]]] 22:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::In , SarekOfVulcan removed my specific mention of the ], which i restored in the next edit, because it was more than fully justified in the article and the discussion here. And then Sarek opened noticeboard dispute at ]. And still has not responded here. Way to go, Sarek. Your goal is to cause contention, right? --]]] 00:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC) |
|
::In , SarekOfVulcan removed my specific mention of the ], which i restored in the next edit, because it was more than fully justified in the article and the discussion here. And then Sarek opened noticeboard dispute at ]. And still has not responded here. Way to go, Sarek. Your goal is to cause contention, right? --]]] 00:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC) |
Here, as in other articles I've edited, another editor is following to dispute everything he can, it seems. Including contending about a location, intersection of Lawrence & Whitney, which is in fact included in the Whitney Avenue Historic District if you look at the latter's map or NRHP document. I wrote that article, and am familiar with the facts. SarekOfVulcan, please stop taking the most confrontation action you can at every step. Raise a question at Talk. Try seriously to discuss things rather than combat. --doncram 22:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
