Misplaced Pages

User:Prioryman/Youreallycan RfC: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Prioryman Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:28, 5 August 2012 editPrioryman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers27,963 edits Created page with '<-- To remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and...'  Latest revision as of 14:43, 5 August 2012 edit undoPrioryman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers27,963 edits Redirected page to Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Youreallycan 
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
<--
To remain listed at ], at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the ''same'' dispute with a ''single'' user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with <nowiki>&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;</nowiki>. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: ~~<includeonly>~</includeonly>~~), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: <tt>{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)</tt>.-->
----
*{{user3|{{{1|Youreallycan}}}}}

----
''Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. '''All''' signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to ].''

==Statement of the dispute==
''This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.''

Over the cause of the last seven months alone, {{userlinks|Youreallycan}} has racked up 7 blocks and a further 12 blocks between March 2009 - November 2011 under his former username, {{userlinks|Off2riorob}}. The blocks have been for the following reasons:

* Disruptive editing / edit-warring / 3RR violations - 12 blocks
* Personal attacks - 6 blocks
* Making legal threats - 1 block

He has repeatedly promised to desist but has just as repeatedly failed to keep his promises. He took on a mentor, ], in May 2012 but has shown few signs of improvement and is continuing to rack up blocks at the rate of one a month on average (and twice in July alone). He edit-wars repeatedly, makes personal attacks, fails to assume good faith, refuses to accept consensus and has failed to reform his behaviour despite being given numerous chances and advice. This is clearly a situation where a user has a long-term behavioural problem. Although he has repeatedly expressed willingness to change his behaviour and will no doubt do so again in this RfC, his repeated relapses indicate that he lacks the self-control to overcome his negative behaviours.

=== Desired outcome ===
''This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus.''

The ideal outcome of this RfC would be that Youreallycan will:

* Desist from further edit-warring;
* Cease all personal attacks;
* Come into line with generally held community guidelines in terms of conduct.

However, given his record I do not have any expectation whatsoever that this will happen and his repeated failure to keep his promises makes me believe that further promises will be worthless. I anticipate that arbitration will ultimately be necessary to resolve this issue.

=== Description ===
See statement above.

=== Evidence of disputed behavior ===
:#
:#

=== Applicable policies and guidelines ===
:# ]
:# ]
:# ]
:# ]
:# ]
:# ]

=== Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute ===
(Provide diffs of the comments. As with anywhere else on this RfC/U, links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

==== Attempts by certifier C1 ====
<!-- Please replace "C1" with the username of the first certifier.-->
:#
:#

==== Attempts by certifier C2 ====
<!-- Please replace "C2" with the username of the second certifier.-->
:#
:#

==== Other attempts ====
:#
:#


=== Users certifying the basis for this dispute ===
''{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}''
<!-- Please note: If you did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, but agree with the summary's presentation of events, please sign in the next section. Remember to notify the subject, via his/her talk page, that a conduct dispute has been raised.-->
:#
:#

=== Other users who endorse this summary ===
<!-- If you agree with the summary's presentation of events but did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, please sign in this section. -->
:#
:#

==Response==
''This section is reserved for the use of the user whose conduct is disputed. Users writing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section, and the person writing this section should not write a view below. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but no one except the editor(s) named in the dispute may change the summary here.''


{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it.}


Users who endorse this summary:
#

==Views==
''This section is for statements or opinions written by users not directly involved with this dispute, but who would like to add a view of the dispute. Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. '''All''' signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to ]. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" or "Response") should not normally edit this section, except to endorse another person's view.''

===Outside view by ExampleUsername===

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.}

Users who endorse this summary:
#

===Outside view by ExampleUsername===

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.}

Users who endorse this summary:
#

==Reminder to use the talk page for discussion==
''All'' signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to ]. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.<!--


Do not comment below. Please read the instructions above.

-->

<--
<noinclude>
]
</noinclude>
-->

Latest revision as of 14:43, 5 August 2012

Redirect to:

User:Prioryman/Youreallycan RfC: Difference between revisions Add topic