| Revision as of 08:11, 26 October 2012 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,391 edits Fixed.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:04, 18 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| (52 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] | |||
| ⚫ | ==Notice of |
||
| {{archive box|auto=yes}} | |||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at ] regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "]". Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> ] <sup>''] / ]''</sup> 12:01, 14 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Edit Summary== | |||
| :Hi Tristan! Not meaning to be confrontational, but I'm concerned that our little dispute at '']'' won't get anywhere until a volunteer assesses the Dispute Resolution request. I am given the impression that it takes longer (or may not even happen) if one of the opening comments is more than the requested 2,000 characters in length. Under these circumstances, your comment is a bit long. You began by saying you would keep your comments to a minimum, but you are actually the only one of the four of us who exceeded the 2,000 characters. For future reference, it is the un-wikied text one types in, ''not'' the text that appears on the actual page, that is counted. ] (]) 01:26, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| We would all appreciate it if you would describe your edits in the "Edit Summary Section" after you edit. It saves us all valuable time. Example: Mojave Desert. Your edits are very good, however, Please summarize. Thanks ] (]) 19:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Italics == | |||
| ::Just a note to alert you to the fact that discussion has now been opened at ]. --] (]) 19:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Yes, I see what you mean. There are some minor mistakes in articles when it come to italics, but it's not much of a big deal really. You could fix them to help improve the article. Many editors view italics differently though, and tend to question the other editor's way of implementing italics in an article. Usual, many editors tend to ignore the issue because it's tough to determine how to use italics. It's best to ignore the issue until after an article has been rated for being good or a featured article on Misplaced Pages, then you can deal with italics. I highly recommend getting another editor who knows how to determine italics or deals with grammar editing frequently. Personally, I don't really deal with italics because italics can be confusing for me. I only deal with minor edits such as double spaces or just basic typos. -- ]]11:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks for the heads-up. I've placed my comments at dispute resolution already and will wait for further discussion or queries from the volunteer referee or moderator before determining if it is useful to contribute more.] (]) 17:29, 17 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| * Thanks, Jerm. Though ] seems clear on the issue (viz., no italics or quotation marks for “scriptures of large, well-known religions”), you’re probably right. Let the inconsistent use of italics lie for now. If the article can be reviewed for GA status at a later date, that’s the best time to iron out these problems of style.] (]) 03:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Your comments at '']'' == | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ] Please do not ] other editors. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692210171 --> | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for February 10== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == ]: Voting now open! == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Tristan noir. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/31&oldid=750614956 --> | |||
| ⚫ | ==Notice of noticeboard discussion== | ||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding my IBAN against you being redundant. The thread is "]". Thank you.<!--Template:AN-notice--> ] (<small>]]</small>) 00:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
| :Your interaction ban has been by consensus. <span style="font-family:Courier New;font-size:3">]</span><sup>]</sup> 15:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:04, 18 February 2023
 Archives |
Edit Summary
We would all appreciate it if you would describe your edits in the "Edit Summary Section" after you edit. It saves us all valuable time. Example: Mojave Desert. Your edits are very good, however, Please summarize. Thanks Pocketthis (talk) 19:36, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Italics
Yes, I see what you mean. There are some minor mistakes in articles when it come to italics, but it's not much of a big deal really. You could fix them to help improve the article. Many editors view italics differently though, and tend to question the other editor's way of implementing italics in an article. Usual, many editors tend to ignore the issue because it's tough to determine how to use italics. It's best to ignore the issue until after an article has been rated for being good or a featured article on Misplaced Pages, then you can deal with italics. I highly recommend getting another editor who knows how to determine italics or deals with grammar editing frequently. Personally, I don't really deal with italics because italics can be confusing for me. I only deal with minor edits such as double spaces or just basic typos. -- ♣Jerm♣729 11:31, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jerm. Though WP:MOST seems clear on the issue (viz., no italics or quotation marks for “scriptures of large, well-known religions”), you’re probably right. Let the inconsistent use of italics lie for now. If the article can be reviewed for GA status at a later date, that’s the best time to iron out these problems of style.Tristan noir (talk) 03:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Magic Tower and Other One-Act Plays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Streetcar Named Desire. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Tristan noir. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding my IBAN against you being redundant. The thread is "Time to remove Tristan noir's ban?". Thank you. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Your interaction ban has been lifted by consensus. The Wordsmith 15:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)