Misplaced Pages

User talk:Eaglestorm: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:50, 1 December 2012 editEaglestorm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,735 edits Undid revision 525821765 by 134340Goat (talk)rvt nonsense← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:53, 11 October 2018 edit undoDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,409 editsm Reverted edits by Ry Incognito (talk) to last version by EaglestormTag: Rollback 
(194 intermediate revisions by 51 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}} {{#tag:ref||group="nb"|name=""}}{{talkheader}}
{{busy}} {{busy}}
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} {{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
Line 7: Line 7:
# ] # ]
# ] # ]
# ]}} # ]
# ]
# ]
# ]}}


== Your edit summary == == Blocked ==


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for making ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. </div>
type of edit summary is certainly not welcomed at Misplaced Pages. --] <sup>]</sup> 14:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
<!-- Template:uw-aoablock -->
Per the consensus at ], I have blocked you indefinitely for personal attacks and incivility. This is a collaborative project on which ] is one of the ]; personal attacks and an almighty lack of ] towards your fellow editors are not acceptable. I suggest you take some time out and ] with an unblock request when you feel you can edit here without attacking fellow editors. ] (]) 16:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed|reason=This is clearly another attempt at persecution and you people play along with them, nothing more than another act to legitimize the ruining of many years' hard work. You already blocked me before and you still couldn't leave enough alone. what ANI thread? that one where everyone tries to force various tenets of policy just to pull me down? Personal attacks and incivility... have I expressed any of that these past few weeks? Samwalton this block is not justifiable and since that notice went in effect, I have stayed away. I have been minding my own business and opening that ANI discussion is wrong to the point that I don't have to dignify it by joining there. this is not right. I'm very disappointed in you all. You don't want "attacks on other editors"? Stay the hell out of my way and that so-called "almighty lack of AGF" is a twisted way to legitimize putting me down. --] (]) 12:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)|decline=Misplaced Pages is not your personal property where others should avoid you if they don't want to be insulted (and yes, you have engaged in all kinds of personal attacks, ranging from unfounded accusations of bad faith to outright insults, over the past few weeks). Since you cannot even see why your behaviour is unacceptable, much less credibly claim to change it, I cannot unblock you. ] (]) 15:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)}}


*Hi {{u|Eaglestorm}}, I see you're a long-term contributor to Misplaced Pages, and perhaps you're getting a bit stressed by the poor competence that characterizes a lot of the contributions here? I've been here for some time myself and I got burned out for similar reasons, and I found my temper was getting short and I had little tolerance for what I saw as the same problems over and over again. My solution was to hand in my admin bit and take a long time off - in fact, I intended never to return. But I still see enormous benefit in the project, and I'm back again and have even returned to admin duties. And those incompetent edits? Well, they have to happen, because it's new people every day who don't yet know how to contribute properly (and the barrage of Misplaced Pages polices can be quite daunting for a newcomer). Anyway, I'm not trying to tell you what to do, I'm just hoping that some thoughts from me might help. ] (]) 15:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
: Certainly not, especially since you did, in fact, violate ]. Calling a fellow editor a troll and edit warring would usually be grounds for a block, especially since you've been both warned and blocked for similar things in the past. I'm not blocking you for now, just don't do it again, m'kay? <strong>]<small>•]</small></strong> 14:44, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
::His actions already indicate trolling and disruption to the project. Looking at other Metal Gear pages, this is the first time that particular banned editor with almost the same IP tangled with me, especially when that guy's edit summary language is more or less, the same. A rangeblock of the 68.XXX.X.XXX IP is much better. --] (]) 15:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)


==The reemergence of a blocked editor==
::: Blocking almost 17 million IP addresses to get one person seems a bit excessive, but let me know if he persists and I can semi-protect the article. Anyway, 1) it was ] you called a troll in the edit summary, and 2) the fact that someone else is misbehaving isn't an excuse. <strong>]<small>•]</small></strong> 16:34, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
::::You can easily identify the errant IP sock by the language they use, and I was not referring to SMSarmad as the troll in that summary - it was that IP sock. Call that Fragments-of-Jade-sock-in-denial anything you may, but when people like him try to fix something that ain't broken and goes around telling people to f off I'm-not-this-and-that, not to mention going after the admins undoing their changes, you know he's not gonna contribute anything. Banned means banned, as Sjones23 said in a recent edit. That IP sock is one of many others I've encountered in my years of editing (including one I've relished putting on the SPI page), and quite frankly, most of them if not all are just big . --] (]) 17:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC) I noticed Bilorv deleting personal attacks by an IP editor claiming I "got" what I supposedly deserved. I think I know who it i is: It's Whitmore8621, whose SPI reports I filed from September to October 2010 caught him redhanded. I have tracked down the and it's user history is more or less the same as that blocked editor. I know that due to my undeserved status, I can't file SPI reports again, but given that he's been editing on a lot of subjects he got hot water for before, he can't be let off the hook just because I'm out of the game. N--] (]) 09:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)


== ]: Voting now open! ==
== Philippine WikiCon ==


{{Ivmbox|Hello, Eaglestorm. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this should you signify interest. --] (]) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
:I appreciate the invitation, but I will not make myself a target for people who turn out to be editors I've butted heads in the past couple of years since Manila 5 - especially edit warriors who messed with me. Thanks anyway. --] (]) 11:28, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
== "The Magician's Code" ==


If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
I put in an ] because I didn't know when the page would be fully fleshed out. Now that the plot has been expanded, hopefully the page will stabilise. ] (]) 02:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/22&oldid=750585861 -->
== Good Crazy edit war ==
{{discussiontop}}
Please don't revert content without providing any valid reasons. "shorter doesnt matter" does not mean anything. The continuity reference is completely valid, taking it out to make a section one line smaller is not a valid reason to remove it. Looking through the page history, you've reverted similarly phrased comments over and over again. Please refrain from reverting, or I will have to call in an admin over the issue. ] (]) 03:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
: If you check the edit history for the page, you will see that a persistent vandal with a myriad of IP addresses (and a few one-time-only-use registered names) has been re-adding this bit of info for the last two weeks. But the claim is original research. It cannot be added without a valid source to back it up. ] (]) 03:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
:: I just referenced it, see my new edit. ] (]) 03:56, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
:: Also, everything in the continuity section is technically OR then, since nothing there is referenced. ] (]) 03:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
::: I am staying away from the page for awhile, but I am going to inform an admin about your behavior. ] (]) 04:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

:::: You don't seem to understand what counts as a source. All of the other items are sourced by the episodes. All we know from this episode is that Marshal is smoking and that his child (of indeterminate gender) is about to be born. It is an assumption that (1) this is his son and (2) that he won't have another cigarette before the child is born, even if it is a son. That we see him smoking does not tell us that it is the last. The episode does not source the claim. ] (]) 04:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
:::::If you watched today's season finale, you would know it is a boy, Marvin Wait-for-it Erickson. Nonetheless, I am still referring you to an admin. ] (]) 04:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
:::::: Now all you need to do is explain how you know he did not have another cigarette between the one he had in ""Good Crazy" and when the boy was born. It is only an assumption that he didn't. ] (]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added 04:13, 15 May 2012 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Hey Greyanomalywhatever, you don't seem to understand the thrust of those revisions...and blogging about it doesn't help. It's even bizarre why you had to bring it to my talk page when you could have brought it up at the article's discussion page. Now that I think of it, I will post everything there.--] (]) 07:10, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
{{discussionbottom}}

==WP:FILMPLOT==
Will do. On deadline at the moment, but I'd be glad to help bring things to guideline standards later today. --] (]) 17:28, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
:Note canvassing is not a good thing. FWiW ] (]) 14:40, 16 July 2012 (UTC).

==Negapedia==

See . That should explain it all! - ] (]) 23:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

== Watch out... ==

You should better watch your language when commenting on other editors , or your report at ANI will become a boomerang. Just a friendly reminder. ] (]) 09:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

== Paysites as sources ==

Regarding at ], paysites are quite acceptable as sources. ] addresses this, saying "''The principle of verifiability implies nothing about ease of access to sources: some online sources may require payment, while some print sources may be available only in university libraries.''" Paying to access a website is no different to having to purchase a book. -- <font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#fee72c 0em 0em 0.8em,gold -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000000">] (])</font> 04:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
:Isn't that the same as certain sites where the ref is only accessible if you are a member? --] (]) 07:00, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
::Like the Hollywood Reporter, where access to archived articles requires subscription? WP:V doesn't excludes such sources. -- <font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#fee72c 0em 0em 0.8em,gold -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000000">] (])</font> 13:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

== Requesting input on a few HIMYM edits. ==

Darrenhusted and I have recently been discussing a few edits to some HIMYM episode pages and seem unable to agree on a few of them. Since you do a lot of editing of HIMYM episode pages, I was hoping you might check out the edits in question and offer additional input. The two pages in question are ] and ]. In the first case, there is one item in dispute and in the second one there are three separate items. Darrenhusted and I have been discussing these edits (and others that now seem settled) on his talk page here: ], so if you want to make a comment that might be the place to go. Thanks. ] (]) 00:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

== Comments ==

Please refrain from making personal attacks like you did . I know Niemti can be difficult to deal with, but comments like that are not helping either. If anything, you may end up being blocked. So, please stop. ] (] - ]) 17:30, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
:How about nailing HanzoHattori/Niemti's hide for good? It's just another case of deflection attacks- if anyone deserved those personal attack warnings, it's him. I'm simply addressing the way he bashes other people just to escape being banned - and repeated thumping of his chest about the work he has done doesn't impress me. It's pathetic and Joefromranddb's whiteknighting for him doesn't help. Oh, and why go after me all of a sudden, because my language probably struck a much more raw nerve than Sergecross73 et al have? Ditch the sarcasm, address the concerns, and make the effort to humble himself before the community. If he can't do that, leave.

:I'd rather see that bastard smashed with the banhammer - the sooner, the better we'll get on with other editing work. If he doesn't want to, he ought to invoke RTV. A lesson in not unbanning unrepentant people for you. --] (]) 19:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
:::I am no one's "white knight". The satire of my post was obviously lost. I wasn't actually calling for you to be blocked. Personally, I don't give a shit if you call someone a bastard or sugggest they check into an asylum. I was pointing out the irony. Unless you truly think that you should be exempt from NPA while others are banned, in which case you may wish to consider your own advice. ] (]) 05:40, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
::::Spare me the explanation. I don't tolerate such nonsense even if you try to mask it as "satire." --] (]) 09:58, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
:::::Spare ''me'' the bullshit. ] (]) 13:16, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
::::::Right back at you. Andthanks to people like you, the discussion has gone down to no consensus. Have a cookie! --] (]) 04:32, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
::Oh, I get it now. I understand your concern. Cheers, ] (] - ]) 03:42, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

== Stay History ==

Hello. Has the ''Stay History'' issue been fixed yet in the Pinoy Unlimited article? I need to add a similar table to the Indian version but the timeline is going gaga. --<small><span style="border:2px solid #2E8B57;">]</font></span></small> <sup>]</sup> 09:03, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
:Why approach me about some edits to Bigg Boss? Do you think I watch the show?--] (]) 04:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
:: I'm talking about the Pinoy edition, einstien. It had a timeline for stay history. I saw your edits in the ''Pinoy Unlimited'' view history so approached you. --<small><span style="border:2px solid #2E8B57;">]</font></span></small> <sup>]</sup> 13:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:53, 11 October 2018

Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

This is Eaglestorm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Archiving icon
Archives
  1. 2007
  2. 2008
  3. 2009
  4. 2010
  5. 2011
  6. 2012
  7. 2013
  8. 2015

Blocked

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per the consensus at this ANI thread, I have blocked you indefinitely for personal attacks and incivility. This is a collaborative project on which civility is one of the five pillars; personal attacks and an almighty lack of good faith towards your fellow editors are not acceptable. I suggest you take some time out and come back with an unblock request when you feel you can edit here without attacking fellow editors. Sam Walton (talk) 16:41, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Eaglestorm (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is clearly another attempt at persecution and you people play along with them, nothing more than another act to legitimize the ruining of many years' hard work. You already blocked me before and you still couldn't leave enough alone. what ANI thread? that one where everyone tries to force various tenets of policy just to pull me down? Personal attacks and incivility... have I expressed any of that these past few weeks? Samwalton this block is not justifiable and since that notice went in effect, I have stayed away. I have been minding my own business and opening that ANI discussion is wrong to the point that I don't have to dignify it by joining there. this is not right. I'm very disappointed in you all. You don't want "attacks on other editors"? Stay the hell out of my way and that so-called "almighty lack of AGF" is a twisted way to legitimize putting me down. --Eaglestorm (talk) 12:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Misplaced Pages is not your personal property where others should avoid you if they don't want to be insulted (and yes, you have engaged in all kinds of personal attacks, ranging from unfounded accusations of bad faith to outright insults, over the past few weeks). Since you cannot even see why your behaviour is unacceptable, much less credibly claim to change it, I cannot unblock you. Huon (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Hi Eaglestorm, I see you're a long-term contributor to Misplaced Pages, and perhaps you're getting a bit stressed by the poor competence that characterizes a lot of the contributions here? I've been here for some time myself and I got burned out for similar reasons, and I found my temper was getting short and I had little tolerance for what I saw as the same problems over and over again. My solution was to hand in my admin bit and take a long time off - in fact, I intended never to return. But I still see enormous benefit in the project, and I'm back again and have even returned to admin duties. And those incompetent edits? Well, they have to happen, because it's new people every day who don't yet know how to contribute properly (and the barrage of Misplaced Pages polices can be quite daunting for a newcomer). Anyway, I'm not trying to tell you what to do, I'm just hoping that some thoughts from me might help. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

The reemergence of a blocked editor

I noticed Bilorv deleting personal attacks by an IP editor claiming I "got" what I supposedly deserved. I think I know who it i is: It's Whitmore8621, whose SPI reports I filed from September to October 2010 caught him redhanded. I have tracked down the IP and it's user history is more or less the same as that blocked editor. I know that due to my undeserved status, I can't file SPI reports again, but given that he's been editing on a lot of subjects he got hot water for before, he can't be let off the hook just because I'm out of the game. N--Eaglestorm (talk) 09:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eaglestorm. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Eaglestorm: Difference between revisions Add topic