Revision as of 20:09, 11 March 2013 editDrmies (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators407,389 edits →False accusations of vandalism are a serious matter← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:05, 10 April 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(275 intermediate revisions by 42 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Editing against consensus == | |||
⚫ | |||
is contrary to established consensus. Please discuss this issue and establish a consensus to support the change before doing this again. Thanks. - ] (]) 05:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Robert Swift == | |||
: | |||
] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. - ] (]) 06:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Discussion page edits == | |||
] might interest you. ]''']''' 03:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
When posting to discussion pages do not interpose comments in the middle of other editor's posts as you did . Also, do not re-order the discussion as you did . These are disruptive practices as they make the thread difficult to follow. ]] 07:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
== False accusations of vandalism are a serious matter == | |||
⚫ | :Understood, thanks for the pointer! =//= ] 01:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
== AN/I: Community restrictions == | |||
] Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as ], such as the edit at ], are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages policy. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can ]. Please read ] for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-notvand --> --] | ] 18:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Hello, | |||
] Please ] other editors, as you did on ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> --] | ] 18:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
::Are you serious? "Personal attacks"? No such thing took place. ] (]) 19:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
I closed the {{diff2|588759576|Proposal|AN/I discussion}} with regards to your edits on "In popular culture" / "Trivia" sections. As a result, community consensus has restricted you to a ] throughout the project, and you are prohibited from changing the title of section headings to "Trivia", broadly construed. You may appeal these restrictions in the future by requesting it at ]. ''']]''' 04:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
And edit warring is a serious matter as well, as you should remember . I think you've reverted seven or eight times by now and the only reason I'm not blocking you immediately is that I have good faith in humanity. But one more revert and you will be blocked, and one more personal attack and you will be blocked longer. ] (]) 18:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Your "name"? == | |||
::I am not involved in an "edit war". I simply added a Trivia tag to some Trivia. ] (]) 19:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Hey there, I was scanning very quickly down the edit history of an article when your "name" jumped out at me. I stopped and stared for a couple of seconds. Then it hit me, and I laughed. So I just can't resist inquiring, is your choice of name purely coincidental, or are you an ] fan? :) | |||
::You are repeatedly adding the same removed material. That is edit warring. Making accusations of vandalism against editors who merely disagree with you counts as personal attack. I'd suggest you back it up before you get blocked. <font style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px;">] (])</font> 19:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
== March 2014 == | |||
:::Ah! So the person repeatedly removing my legitimate addition of the Trivia template has no responsibility not to remove a legitimate template? I see. Yes, this is typical, editors with ] issues, but get away with it because they have Admin friends who are willing to strong-arm other editors. It’s pretty common at Misplaced Pages, and is one of the primary reasons that editors flee. Yes, I understand now, you are threatening me with having my account banned. Why not just say it? =//= ] 19:49, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ], but you didn't provide a ]. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to ] and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the ] tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> ] (]) 17:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC) | |||
::::Your admin conspiracy song was already tedious last time you popped it in the 8-track player, and it hasn't improved. You were wrong, you edited against the consensus of three or more editors, and of course it's someone else's fault. Denying that you were edit-warring is, well, stupid since it flies in the face of reality. It's called "]" and really needs an article. ] (]) 20:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
==Sockpuppet investigation== | |||
{{Ivmbox | |||
|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into ] by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at ], where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with ], and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you ''have'' been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community.{{#if:yes| ] (]) 03:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
|] | |||
}} | |||
== Blocked for sockpuppetry == | |||
{{Tmbox | |||
| style = background: #f8eaba | |||
| image = ] | |||
| text = '''''This account has been ] indefinitely''''' from editing for a period of '''indefinite''' for ]{{#if:]| per evidence presented at ]}}. Note that multiple accounts are ], but using them for '']'' reasons '''is not''', and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans ]. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include "tlx|". -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the ] first. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-sockblock -->}} |
Latest revision as of 09:05, 10 April 2022
Editing against consensus
This is contrary to established consensus. Please discuss this issue and establish a consensus to support the change before doing this again. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Johnny_Squeaky_and_.22Trivia.22 regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 06:44, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Discussion page edits
When posting to discussion pages do not interpose comments in the middle of other editor's posts as you did here. Also, do not re-order the discussion as you did here. These are disruptive practices as they make the thread difficult to follow. Tiderolls 07:41, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- Understood, thanks for the pointer! =//= Johnny Squeaky 01:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
AN/I: Community restrictions
Hello,
I closed the AN/I discussion with regards to your edits on "In popular culture" / "Trivia" sections. As a result, community consensus has restricted you to a one-revert rule throughout the project, and you are prohibited from changing the title of section headings to "Trivia", broadly construed. You may appeal these restrictions in the future by requesting it at WP:AN/I. LFaraone 04:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Your "name"?
Hey there, I was scanning very quickly down the edit history of an article when your "name" jumped out at me. I stopped and stared for a couple of seconds. Then it hit me, and I laughed. So I just can't resist inquiring, is your choice of name purely coincidental, or are you an opera fan? :)
March 2014
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Tanning addiction, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Misplaced Pages account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny Squeaky, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Misplaced Pages administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Misplaced Pages policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Misplaced Pages community. Betty Logan (talk) 03:04, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnny Squeaky. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:54, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
|