Misplaced Pages

:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:37, 4 December 2013 view sourceCasliber (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators200,925 edits done← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:25, 17 January 2025 view source Cyberbot I (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors1,722,226 edits Clerking main page and moving requests to appropriate subpages.Tag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{adminbacklog}}<!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically.--><noinclude><!-- Please put protection templates *inside* the noinclude, because this page is transcluded. -->{{Short description|Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages}}{{/Header}}{{Floating link|class=sysop-show|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}{{pp-move-indef|small=yes}}{{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp|1=vandalism|action=edit|small=yes|expiry=}}}}<!-- Put interwikis at the Wikidata entry and categories in /Header instead of this page -->
<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef}}{{/Header}}{{Floatinglink|Administrator instructions|Administrator instructions}}
__FORCETOC__</noinclude><!-- Do not hide or modify this, a bot named "Cyberbot I" will manage it automatically-->
<!-- Put interwikis at the WikiData entry and categories in /Header instead of this page -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT THIS PAGE. The formatting is enforced by Cyberbot. To make changes, please contact Cyberpower678. -->
__TOC__{{noadminbacklog}}</noinclude><!--Do not hide or modify this, a bot will manage it automatically-->


<!-- Please copy the following example code to add a new entry at the bottom of the correct subpage:
== Current requests for increase in protection level ==
=== ] ===
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
* {{pagelinks|Example}} ~~~~
-->


== Current ] in protection level ==
===={{la|Next Greek legislative election}}====
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button protect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Increase}}
'''Indefinite semi-protection:''' There have been a series of IP edits over the last few months changing the political party Golden Dawn's political adjective from neo-nazi to something else (sometimes nationalist, sometimes ultranationalist, and maybe a few others.) Although the IP address changes, I feel fairly confident most of them are the same person.
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Current ] in protection level ==
There's really nothing to say here. They've only responded once, calling neo-nazi a "political propaganda term."
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button unprotect}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Decrease}}
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Current ] to a protected page ==
The ] article isn't even the place to dispute something like this in the first place, it just reflects the party's article. The IP has been reverted by multiple people and directed to the Golden Dawn page several times. Since they've been doing it over the course of several months, I think its finally time to ask for semi-protection. --] (]) 13:27, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Button edit}}{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Edit}}
<!-- DO NOT PUT NEW REQUESTS HERE. GO TO THE SUBPAGE ABOVE -->


== Handled requests ==
==== {{la|Saryupareen Brahmins}} ====
''A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at ].''
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' There is an ongoing problem regarding removal of sourced content. I've left a note on the article talk page but anon(s) keep deleting mentions of the Bhumihar community without ever responding. Although the IP address changes, I'm pretty sure it is the same person doing this stuff and they've been doing it for a while. We need to get them talking. ] (]) 12:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:Please note that an identical problem exists on other articles, involving the same IPs working in batch fashion. See for a list of the relevant articles. Similar notes have been left on the talk pages of those without getting any response. - ] (]) 12:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:{{rfpp|pend|1 month}} I've applied the same to all of them. ]] 12:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|IEMLabs}} ====
'''Indefinite create protection:''' Repeatedly recreated. ] (]) 09:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Automated comment:''' This page appears to already be protected. Please confirm.—] ]<sub style="margin-left:-6.0ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 10:05, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|t}} (shortly after the deletion and before the request) by {{adminlinks|Deb}} ] (]) 11:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Gotse Delchev}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' High level of IP-vandalism and dubious unsourced additions. 07:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s|3 months}} ]] 12:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|M.A. Jalil Ananta}} ====
'''Indefinite pending changes:''' ] policy violations – Vandalism after page protection expires. <font style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ED791A 0em 0em 0.8em,##0B2161 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#C0C0C0 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;color:#000040">]|] </font> 06:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:{{rfpp|pend|6 months}} ]] 12:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

===={{la|Disney XD (Asia)}}====
'''Indefinite semi-protection''', unreferenced creation and test edits. ] (]) 06:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Automated comment:''' This page appears to already be protected. Please confirm.—] ]<sub style="margin-left:-6.0ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 07:03, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
::{{RFPP|s|2 weeks}} No Cyberbot, it wasn't protected at all. ]] 12:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

===={{la|Liberty University}}====
'''Full Protection:''' Ongoing edit-warring over multiple issues, including misleading ] reports. ] (]) 04:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
* This is a naked attempt to ] the system and "win" a content dispute by a user who hasn't found much support for his arguments at the article's Talk page. The AN3 case MilesMoney refers to is here . The patrolling admin can decide for him- or herself whether it is "misleading". ] (]) 05:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
::Immediately before requesting page protection, I reverted myself. I caution you to ] here. ] (]) 06:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:::Immediately before? LOL! I think you meant to say "35 minutes later". An honest mistake, I'm sure.
::::]
:::*04:24, 4 December 2013 (diff | hist) . . (+235)‎ . . Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection ‎ (→‎Current requests for increase in protection level)
:::*03:50, 4 December 2013 (diff | hist) . . (-596)‎ . . Liberty University ‎ (self-revert)
::::] (]) 07:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:::::Why stop there?
:::::* 05:23, 4 December 2013‎ Dougweller (talk | contribs)‎ . . (69,255 bytes) (+596)‎ . . (but the source is RS for this, so WP:BURDEN is met, I disagree about WP:UNDUE, no consensus to remove, go to RSN if you are claiming burden & RS not met) (undo | thanked)
:::::At the time I requested protection, the article was still in the state I left it when I self-reverted. Your continuing pattern of personal attacks and accusations of bad faith, not to mention your edit-warring, are a big part of why this article needs full protection. ] (]) 07:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
::::::Personal attack? Moi? Oh, no no, not at all. I merely pointed out the innocent mistake you made when you said "Immediately before requesting page protection, I reverted myself." I was trying to be ''helpful'', because I'm quite sure that you wouldn't want to be seen requesting administrator action under false pretenses. Right? ] (]) 07:31, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:::::::Your ] mentality, particularly your nasty sarcasm and refusal to ], are deeply counterproductive. They're also irrelevant to your attempt to keep the article unlocked so that you can continue to edit war over it. I say we lock it down to force people like you to talk instead of fight. ] (]) 08:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|p|2 weeks}} ]] 12:46, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

==== {{lat|Neymar}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' The article was just semi-protected (and I strongly suggest that this protection is extended.) Now the talk page is being vandalized by brand-new accounts and by IPs; BLP violations a-plenty. I know SP on these pages is a rare thing, but this is an extraordinary circumstance. ] ] 15:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Automated comment:''' This page appears to already be protected. Please confirm.—] ]<sub style="margin-left:-6.0ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 15:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|semi|2 hours}} Hopefully that will convince them to give it up. I'd rather get in early then have to search through the page history and figure out which accounts are good and which aren't. Hopefully this will convince them not to bother. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 15:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/URheading}}

==== {{la|Tom Daley}} ====
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' ] policy violations – Mr Daley has recently announced that he is in a relationship with another gentleman, one who has not ben named. The other gentleman;s article has been receiving BLP violations and have been semi protected. Please may we do the same for Mr Daley's. Inexperienced editors have been adding unsourced press speculation and gossip to the article. While this is being reverted on sight the assistance of Semi-protection would be appreciated. ] ] 12:51, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
*'''Automated comment:''' This page appears to already be protected. Please confirm.—] ]<sub style="margin-left:-6.0ex;color:green;font-family:arnprior">Online</sub> 12:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:*If it is already protected then that is fine. This request may be ignored if so. ] ] 12:54, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
::*Are you sure you've posted this in the right section, Tim? This is under the "Current requests for reduction in protection level" section. :) ] ] 12:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:::{{rfpp|ap}} Yeah, it's already protected. I've protected the other article too. ]] 13:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

==== {{la|Bukharan Jews}} ====
'''Unprotect'''
Due to an edit-warring SPA IP that refused to engage on the Talk page or provide sources, this page was unduly placed under indefinite (instead of temporary) full protection.

I had been in the process of launching a complaint against the IP at AN/I after placing a tacit warning about edit warring on the IP's Talk page when protection was implemented. The IP has been warned by an uninvolved editor ]. The result of the AN/I was the following thread at RS/N. As can be seen from the RS/ thread, the edits by the IP amount to ], and do not meet the requirements of ].--]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 06:48, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
:{{rfpp|d}} Please ask {{user|Casliber}}, as I'm sure he had a reason for indef in the first place. Chances are it was always intended to be removed when the dispute's resolved, but you should ask him first. ]] 13:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
::{{done}} As I said on the talk page at ], anyone is welcome to change my protection -I don't own it. I've just unprotected. Go for it folks. ] (] '''·''' ]) 13:37, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

== Current requests for edits to a protected page ==
{{See|Misplaced Pages:Edit requests}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/SRheading}}

== Fulfilled/denied requests ==
''A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at ].''

<noinclude>
]
</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 03:25, 17 January 2025

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators.
Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.
Wikimedia noticeboard for requesting protection of pages "WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Requests for permissions, Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission, or Misplaced Pages:Random page patrol.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Skip to requests for protection
    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit
    this header: viewedit


    Archiving icon
    Archives

    2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Shortcuts

    Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Kassia Sule

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. consarn (speak evil) (see evil) 22:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

    Nepalese royal massacre

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term persistent vandalism by IP editors. Apocheir (talk) 23:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

    Jesse Winker

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent in Additional of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — 64.18.11.5 (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

    Josh Shapiro

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 54rt678 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    EuroLeague

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism Betoota44 (talk) 00:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    History of South Africa

    Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP Users. Kurogaga (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    EJ Johnson

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by I.P editors. Flat Out (talk) 01:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    List of programs broadcast by UniMás

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced content increased by IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Lake Tritonis

    Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Skitash (talk) 01:45, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Kingdom of Israel (Samaria)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editor is disrupting article with POV and modern politics. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 02:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Serial Mom

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An ip address mislabeling the film as a 'slasher' even though no reliable film sources label it as such. (note: this is my first time using Twinkle). Clammodest (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Talk:Donald Trump

    Even shorter TLDR - temporary semiprotection Talkpage spam (mostly IPs) repeatedly making edit requests/new discussions about Trump's new picture. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 02:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Longer reason: See Talk:Donald Trump § Duplicate edit requests/discussions for the discussion I opened on this issue. Long story short, ever since Trump's "official" inaugural photo was released, there has been a plethora of users attempting to get it replaced/added on many pages - the most prevalent being his page, for obvious reasons. The issue is that there is no evidence whatsoever this image is a free image, and there is actually evidence that the image is non-free (either copyrighted, or barred by a NC restriction). See, for example, the current deletion request on Commons. For historical reference, this also happened in 2017 - Trump "hijacked" a private photographer's image (including posting it on whitehouse.gov claiming it was public domain after his inauguration) without their permission, and the photographer confirmed to VRT/OTRS on Commons (confirmed by multiple VRT members in that discussion in 2017) that they never permitted such. It seems likely that the same is happening here, as a user on Commons has claimed that they spoke to the photographer who wants a NC restriction on this image.

    Sorry for the length of this request, but TLDR: there's tons of talk page spam (edit requests or otherwise) from mostly IP editors trying to get this almost-certainly-copyrighted image replaced in his page. I know talkpages are rarely protected, but I'm requesting temporary (maybe a week, to cover the inauguration itself) semiprotection of the talkpage to see if it may help. Any alternative ideas are welcome on the talkpage itself. -bɜ:ʳkənhɪmez | me | talk to me! 02:36, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    As one of those dealing with the problem firsthand, I'm mixed. In my view, the copyright issue isn't really relevant here; that's just background. Rather, it's the recent onslaught of drive-bys who (1) are misusing the edit request facility because they are too fucking lazy to read the information put in front of them during the edit request path (a continuous problem not unique to this situation), and (2) for some unfathomable reason assume they are the first to think of proposing the new image, so don't bother to look for an existing discussion before edit-requesting. (At the Trump article and other well-attended articles, the edit request facility is always far more trouble than it's worth—probably 95%+ of edit requests at Trump are "not done", and the other 5%− could just as easily use the normal "New section" path—but that's a different discussion.) Ultimately, I think the question is how much useful contribution is the ATP getting recently from IPs and brand-new accounts, and I think the answer is not a lot. I guess I'd lean toward supporting temp semi. ―Mandruss  06:06, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Prinsesa ng City Jail

    Reason: The page protection for the article just expired few hours ago, and it appears the sockpuppeteer behind two recently blocked accounts, is restoring their unreferenced edits once again. Hotwiki (talk) 03:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 06:03, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Darrin Bell

    Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated WP:SUSPECT violations following his recent arrest: . Badbluebus (talk) 03:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 05:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Q Link Wireless

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aqurs1 (talk) 04:15, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Matthew Miller (spokesperson)

    Semi-protection: Continued BLP violations/vandalism after previous protection expired. – Recoil16 (talk) 05:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Censorship of TikTok

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism Bluethricecreamman (talk) 06:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Misplaced Pages:Edit requests


    Gaza genocide

    Add “by June 30, 2024” to the sentence: The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries. Seahumidity (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

    Joe Biden

    In paragraph 4 is this assertion: "In private, White House staffers and Biden's family took measures to conceal and compensate for apparent declines in his acuity." There is no source cited for this consequential claim. The "apparent decline" of mental acuity in Biden, a lifetime stutterer, is a topic of contention. Rnperry (talk) 15:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

     Done Removed. We must source EVERYTHING, especially in BLPs. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    What? Nothing is directly sourced in the entire lead for that article, it generally follows the practice of citations in body, not lead, from MOS:LEADCITE. There is however, an entire section in that article that backs up that point. Does the OP think that:
    A tight-knit group of select staffers and Biden's family emerged during his presidency that insulated him from others. Biden's staff routinely adapted his schedule and activities to accommodate his needs as he aged and conceal signs of declining cognitive ability. White House staffers took on unusually strong roles as gatekeepers for Biden, limiting meetings with cabinet secretaries, lawmakers, and other officials, and restricting the information made available to him. Events Biden attended were tightly scripted and limited.
    was because he had a stutter? There are multiple sources backing it up, from the NYT, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and Axios. KiharaNoukan (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Israel-Hamas War

    I would like to request that... (the status section for the front page should be labeled as “ceasefire” until the ceasefire ends. This is in accordance with the recently-reached agreement.) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 04:55, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/Archive.

    Category:
    Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions Add topic