Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lockean One: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:55, 14 December 2013 editJosh3580 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,929 edits RE: Talk:Libertarianism: {{talkback}}← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:55, 7 April 2014 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,376 edits partly rv self: I didn't mean to revert the user's removal of posts from this page. 
(34 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== December 2013 ==
] Hello, I'm ]. I noticed that you recently removed some content from ]&nbsp;without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate ]. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> ''']''' '']'' 00:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


== Blocked indefinitely ==
<div style=clear: both></div>] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ] with <span class="plainlinks"></span>, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ]<sub>]/]</sub> 07:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)<!-- Template:Huggle/warn-delete-2 --><!-- Template:uw-delete2 -->


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for long term ], ] and ], as you did at ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the ] first. </div><!-- Template:uw-block -->
== RE: ] ==


You have been been given numerous warnings about all of these things and you continue to make it impossible for others to contribute to the page. Enough is enough. If you want to be unblocked I would suggest that a ] from everything related to ] would be the best way for you to move forward. <b>]</b> (] • ] • ]) 09:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
My apologies Lockean One. I was patrolling recent changes, and saw where you had removed the <nowiki>{{hab}}</nowiki> template with no explanation. I did not intend to disparage your comments, nor to give you the idea that I am pushing for a certain point of view here. It was simply a recent change, that removed a template with no explanation in the edit summary. ]<sub>]/]</sub> 07:43, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
:{{talkback|Josh3580}}

Latest revision as of 20:55, 7 April 2014

Blocked indefinitely

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for long term edit warring, incivility and disruptive editing, as you did at Libertarianism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You have been been given numerous warnings about all of these things and you continue to make it impossible for others to contribute to the page. Enough is enough. If you want to be unblocked I would suggest that a topic ban from everything related to Libertarianism would be the best way for you to move forward. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 09:06, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Lockean One: Difference between revisions Add topic