Revision as of 22:37, 23 December 2013 editNick-D (talk | contribs)Administrators106,202 edits add← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 15:34, 11 February 2023 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''delete'''. ] (]) 22:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}} | |||
:{{la|Sotera Defense Solutions}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Sotera Defense Solutions}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
:({{Find sources|Sotera Defense Solutions}}) | :({{Find sources|Sotera Defense Solutions}}) | ||
promotional article for defense information services contractor . Makes a great deal of trivial community relations contributions, contains list of all the execs, no major national level awards, and no third party sources that aren't straight POR. ''']''' (]) 06:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC) | promotional article for defense information services contractor . Makes a great deal of trivial community relations contributions, contains list of all the execs, no major national level awards, and no third party sources that aren't straight POR. ''']''' (]) 06:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ★☆ ]☆★ 17:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ★☆ ]☆★ 17:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ★☆ ]☆★ 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ★☆ ]☆★ 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ★☆ ]☆★ 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ★☆ ]☆★ 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ★☆ ]☆★ 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ★☆ ]☆★ 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
*'''Delete''' Per nom: this looks suspiciously like one of the cookie-cutter articles on companies posted by spammers. According to post by the article creator, it was written by an employee of the company (who appears to be under the not uncommon, but mistaken, belief that companies have some sort of entitlement to a Misplaced Pages entry). ] (]) 22:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Per nom: this looks suspiciously like one of the cookie-cutter articles on companies posted by spammers. According to post by the article creator, it was written by an employee of the company (who appears to be under the not uncommon, but mistaken, belief that companies have some sort of entitlement to a Misplaced Pages entry). ] (]) 22:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom. ] ] 21:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Latest revision as of 15:34, 11 February 2023
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:50, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
Sotera Defense Solutions
- Sotera Defense Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
promotional article for defense information services contractor . Makes a great deal of trivial community relations contributions, contains list of all the execs, no major national level awards, and no third party sources that aren't straight POR. DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military -related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 17:56, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom: this looks suspiciously like one of the cookie-cutter articles on companies posted by spammers. According to this post by the article creator, it was written by an employee of the company (who appears to be under the not uncommon, but mistaken, belief that companies have some sort of entitlement to a Misplaced Pages entry). Nick-D (talk) 22:32, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Buckshot06 (talk) 21:27, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.