Revision as of 12:24, 23 June 2014 editLimestoneforest (talk | contribs)219 edits →Examples← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:09, 16 January 2025 edit undoTimeshifter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers50,536 edits →United States: Chart | ||
(504 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Society controlled by the wealthiest citizens}} | |||
{{Redirect|Merchant prince|powerful businesspeople|captain of industry|the computer game|Merchant Prince}} | |||
{{Redirect|Plutocrats|the 2012 book|Plutocrats (book)}} | |||
{{Distinguish|Plutonomy}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2013}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=December 2013}} | ||
{{Distinguish2|]}} | |||
{{Basic Forms of government}} | {{Basic Forms of government}} | ||
''' |
A '''plutocracy''' ({{etymology|grc|''{{wikt-lang|grc|πλοῦτος}}'' ({{grc-transl|πλοῦτος}})|wealth||''{{wikt-lang|grc|κράτος}}'' ({{grc-transl|κράτος}})|power}}) or '''plutarchy''' is a society that is ruled or controlled by people of great ] or ]. The first known use of the term in English dates from 1631.<ref>{{cite dictionary|title=Plutocracy|url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plutocracy|dictionary=Merriam Webster|access-date=2 June 2017}}</ref> Unlike most political systems, plutocracy is not rooted in any established ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Plutocratic Populism - ECPS |url=https://www.populismstudies.org/Vocabulary/plutocratic-populism/ |access-date=2024-02-21 |language=en-US}}</ref> | ||
==Usage== | ==Usage== | ||
The term ''plutocracy'' is generally used as a ] to describe or warn against an undesirable condition.<ref>{{cite book|last1= Fiske|first1= Edward B. | |||
|last2 = Mallison | |||
|first2 = Jane | |||
|last3 = Hatcher | |||
|first3 = Dave | |||
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=m74oSMXpnx8C | |||
|quote = Plutocracy and '''plutocrat''' are almost always used in a pejorative or negative sense. | |||
|title= Fiske 250 words every high school freshman needs to know|year= 2009 |publisher= Sourcebooks|location= ].|isbn= 9781402260797 |page= 50}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|editor-last=Coates|editor-first=Colin M. |title= Majesty in Canada: essays on the role of royalty|year= 2006|publisher= Dundurn|location= Toronto|isbn= 978-1550025866 |pages= 119}}</ref> Throughout history, political thinkers and philosophers have condemned plutocrats for ignoring their ], using their power to serve their own purposes and thereby increasing poverty and nurturing ] and corrupting societies with ] and ].{{failed verification|reason=Neither source makes these claims and the first isn't even about plutocracy|date=January 2022}}<ref>{{cite book|first1= Peter|last1= Viereck|title=Conservative thinkers: from John Adams to Winston Churchill|year=2006|publisher=Transaction Publishers |location= New Brunswick, New Jersey|isbn= 978-1412805261|pages= |url=https://archive.org/details/conservativethin00pete/page/19}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first=Alexis |last=de Tocqueville |editor-first= Roger|editor-last= Boesche|editor-link= Roger Boesche|translator-last= Toupin|translator-first= James |title=Selected letters on politics and society|year=1985|publisher=University of California Press|location= Berkeley |isbn= 978-0520057517|pages=197–198}}</ref> | |||
"]", an anglicised adaptation of the word "plutocracy", may refer to "a specifically ]n version of plutocracy".<ref> | |||
The term ''plutocracy'' is generally used as a pejorative to describe or warn against an undesirable condition.<ref>{{cite book|last=Fiske|first=Edward B.|title=Fiske 250 words every high school freshman needs to know|year=2009|publisher=Sourcebooks|location=Naperville, Ill.|isbn=1402218400|pages=250|coauthors=Mallison, Jane; Hatcher, David}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Coates|first=ed. by Colin M.|title=Majesty in Canada: essays on the role of royalty|year=2006|publisher=Dundurn|location=Toronto|isbn=1550025864|pages=119}}</ref> Throughout history, political thinkers such as ], 19th-century French ] and ] ], 19th-century Spanish ] ] and today ] have condemned plutocrats for ignoring their ], using their power to serve their own purposes and thereby increasing poverty and nurturing ], corrupting societies with ] and ].<ref>{{cite book|first=Peter Viereck; with a new preface by the|title=Conservative thinkers: from John Adams to Winston Churchill|year=2006|publisher=Transaction Publishers|location=New Brunswick, New Jersey|isbn=1412805260|pages=19–68}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Toupin|first=Alexis de Tocqueville; edited by Roger Boesche; translated by James|title=Selected letters on politics and society|year=1985|publisher=University of California Press|location=Berkeley|isbn=0520057511|pages=197–198|coauthors=Boesche, Roger}}</ref> | |||
{{cite book | |||
|last1 = Muller | |||
|first1 = Denis | |||
|date = 9 August 2021 | |||
|chapter = Democracy Under Strain | |||
|title = Journalism and the Future of Democracy | |||
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Krg8EAAAQBAJ | |||
|publication-place = Cham, Zug | |||
|publisher = Springer Nature | |||
|pages = 10–11 | |||
|isbn = 9783030767617 | |||
|access-date = 13 July 2024 | |||
|quote = The position of the United States as a 'weak democracy' had degenerated into what ] and his colleague ] called a 'dollarocracy', 'a specifically American version of plutocracy' in which corporate lobbying had corrupted Congressional processes. | |||
}} | |||
</ref> | |||
==Examples== | |||
Historic examples of plutocracies include the ]; some ]s in ]; the civilization of ]; the ] ] ] of ], ] and ]; the ]; and the pre-] ] (the '']''). According to ] and ], the modern ] resembles a plutocracy though with democratic forms.<ref name=NoamC1>{{cite news |url=http://www.salon.com/2015/10/06/noam_chomsky_america_is_a_plutocracy_masquerading_as_a_democracy_partner/ |first=Noam |last=Chomsky |author-link=Noam Chomsky |title=America is a plutocracy masquerading as a democracy |date=6 October 2015 |newspaper=Salon |access-date=13 Feb 2015}}</ref><ref name=JimmyC1>{{cite news |url=http://www.supersoul.tv/supersoul-sunday/jimmy-carter-on-whether-he-could-be-president-today-absolutely-not |first=Jimmy |last=Carter |author-link=Jimmy Carter |title=Jimmy Carter on Whether He Could Be President Today: "Absolutely Not"|date=15 October 2015 |newspaper=supersoul.tv|access-date=13 Feb 2015}}</ref> ], a former ], also believed the U.S. to be developing into a plutocracy.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/23/business/dealbook/paul-volcker-federal-reserve.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur |first=Andrew |last=Sorkin |author-link=Sorkin |title=Paul Volcker, at 91, Sees 'a Hell of a Mess in Every Direction' |date=23 October 2018 |newspaper=New York Times |access-date=28 October 2018}}</ref> | |||
One modern, formal example of a plutocracy, according to some critics,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Atkinson|first1=Rowland|last2=Parker|first2=Simon|last3=Burrows|first3=Roger|date=September 2017|title=Elite Formation, Power and Space in Contemporary London|journal=Theory, Culture & Society|language=en|volume=34|issue=5–6|pages=179–200|doi=10.1177/0263276417717792|issn=0263-2764|doi-access=free}}</ref> is the ].<ref name=Guardian1>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/oct/31/corporation-london-city-medieval |first=George |last=Monbiot |author-link=George Monbiot |title=The medieval, unaccountable Corporation of London is ripe for protest |date=31 October 2011 |newspaper=The Guardian |access-date=1 November 2011}}</ref> The City (also called the Square Mile of ancient ], corresponding to the modern financial district, an area of about 2.5 km<sup>2</sup>) has a unique electoral system for ], separate from the rest of London. More than two-thirds of voters are not residents, but rather representatives of businesses and other bodies that occupy premises in the City, with votes distributed according to their numbers of employees. The principal justification for this arrangement is that most of the services provided by the City of London Corporation are used by the businesses in the City. Around 450,000 non-residents constitute the City's day-time population, far outnumbering the City's 7,000 residents.<ref name=tribune>{{cite news|url=http://www.tribunemagazine.org/2009/02/labour-runs-in-city-of-london-poll-against-%E2%80%98get-rich%E2%80%99-bankers// |title=Labour runs in City of London poll against 'get-rich' bankers |date=12 February 2009 |author=René Lavanchy |work=] |access-date=17 January 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150115021037/http://www.tribunemagazine.org/2009/02/labour-runs-in-city-of-london-poll-against-%E2%80%98get-rich%E2%80%99-bankers// |archive-date=15 January 2015}}</ref> | |||
Examples of plutocracies include the ], some ]s in ], the civilization of ], the ]/]s of ], ], ], and pre-World War II ] (the '']'').{{cn|date=May 2014}} | |||
In the political jargon and ], ] and the ], Western ]s were referred to as plutocracies, with the implication being that a small number of extremely wealthy individuals were controlling the countries and holding them to ransom.<ref name="marxists.org">{{cite web|url=http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/fi/vol02/no02/editors2.htm|title=The Editors: American Labor and the War (February 1941)|work=marxists.org|access-date=28 August 2015}}</ref><ref name="blamires">{{cite book |title=World Fascism: A Historical Encyclopedia, Vol. 1|last1=Blamires |first1=Cyprian |last2=Jackson |first2=Paul |year=2006 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-57607-940-9 |page=522}}</ref> Plutocracy replaced democracy and ] as the principal fascist term for the U.S. and Great Britain during World War II.<ref name="blamires"/><ref>{{cite book |title=The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust|last1=Herf|first1=Jeffrey|year=2006 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-02175-4|page=311}}</ref> In ], it was often used as a ] term for ] in their ].<ref name="blamires"/> ], the ], found the term to be particularly favorable, describing it as "the main concept at which the ideological struggle will be aimed".<ref>As quoted in Boelcke, Willi A. The Secret Conferences of Dr. Goebbels: October 1939-March 1943, edited by Willi A. Boelcke; trans. Ewald Osers. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1970.</ref> | |||
One modern, formal example of - what some critics have described as - a plutocracy is the ].<ref name=Guardian1>, ], retrieved 01/11/2011</ref> The City ''(not the whole of modern ] but the area of the ancient city, which now mainly comprises the financial district)'' has a unique electoral system for its local administration. More than two-thirds of voters are not residents, but rather representatives of businesses and other bodies that occupy premises in the City, with votes distributed according to their number of employees. The principal justification for the non-resident vote is that about 450,000 non-residents constitute the city's day-time population and use most of its services, far outnumbering the City's 7,000 residents.<ref name=tribune>{{cite news|url=http://www.tribunemagazine.co.uk/2009/02/12/labour-runs-in-city-of-london-poll-against-%E2%80%98get-rich%E2%80%99-bankers/|title=Labour runs in City of London poll against ‘get-rich’ bankers|date=12 February 2009|author=René Lavanchy|publisher=]|accessdate=14 February 2009}}{{deadlink|date=May 2014}}</ref> | |||
===United States<!--'Donor Class' redirects here-->=== | |||
Another example is the United States. Some modern historians, politicians and economists state that the United States was effectively plutocratic for at least part of the '']'' and '']'' periods between the end of the ] until the beginning of the ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Pettigrew|first=Richard Franklin|title=Triumphant Plutocracy: The Story of American Public Life from 1870 to 1920|year=2010|publisher=Nabu Press|isbn=1146542747}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Calvin Reed|first=John|title=The New Plutocracy|year=1903|publisher=Kessinger Publishing, LLC (2010 reprint)|isbn=1120909155}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last= Brinkmeyer|first=Robert H.|title=The fourth ghost: white Southern writers and European fascism, 1930-1950|year=2009|publisher=Louisiana State University Press|location=Baton Rouge|isbn=0807133833|pages=331}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Allitt|first=Patrick|title=The conservatives: ideas and personalities throughout American history|year=2009|publisher=Yale University Press|location=New Haven|isbn=0300118945|pages=143}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Ryan|first=foreword by Vincent P. De Santis; edited by Leonard Schlup, James G.|title=Historical dictionary of the Gilded Age|year=2003|publisher=M.E. Sharpe|location=Armonk, N.Y.|isbn=0765603314|pages=145}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first=Peter Viereck; with a new preface by the|title=Conservative thinkers: from John Adams to Winston Churchill|year=2006|publisher=Transaction Publishers|location=New Brunswick, New Jersey|isbn=1412805260|pages=103}}</ref> In his autobiographical account of taking on monopolistic corporations as president, Theodore Roosevelt recounted that the worst form of tyranny was tyranny of a plutocracy.<ref></ref> After the enactment of the ], a handful of very wealthy heads of large corporations began to exert increasing influence over industry, public opinion and politics after the Civil War, prompting ] and journalist ] to observe that money was "the mortar of this edifice", with ideological differences among politicians fading and the political realm becoming "''a mere branch'' in a still larger, integrated business. The state, which through the party formally sold favors to the large corporations, became one of their departments."<ref>{{cite book|last=Bowman|first=Scott R.|title=The modern corporation and American political thought: law, power, and ideology|year=1996|publisher=Pennsylvania State University Press|location=University Park, Pa.|isbn=0271014733|pages=92–103}}</ref> More contemporary figures who describe the U.S. as a plutocracy include ] ]<ref>{{cite book|last=Krugman|first=Paul|title=The conscience of a liberal|year=2009|publisher=Norton|location=New York|isbn=0393333132|pages=21–26|edition=}}</ref>, ]<ref>. ] 4.09.04 | PBS</ref>, ]<ref>{{cite book |first=Chrystia |last=Freeland |authorlink= Chrystia Freeland |title=Plutocrats: the rise of the new global super-rich and the fall of everyone else|date=2012|publisher=Penguin|location=New York|isbn=9781594204098|oclc=780480424 }}</ref><ref>National Public Radio (October 15, 2012) </ref><ref>See also the Chrystia Freeland interview for the Moyers Book Club (October12, 2012) </ref> and Thomas Piketty<ref>] (2014). ''].'' ]. ISBN 067443000X p. 514: "the risk of a drift towards oligarchy is real and gives little reason for optimism about where the United States is headed."</ref>{{Relevance-inline|date=May 2014}} A study conducted by political scientists Martin Gilens (]) and Benjamin Page (]), which was released in April 2014, <ref>Gilens & Page (2014) , ''Perspectives on Politics,'' ]. Retrieved 18 April 2014.</ref> stated that their "analyses suggest that majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts." Gilens and Page do not characterize the US as an "oligarchy" or "plutocracy" per se; however, they do apply the concept of "civil oligarchy" with respect to the US.{{page needed}} | |||
{{Further|Income inequality in the United States#Effects on democracy and society}} | |||
{{See also|American upper class|Wealth inequality in the United States}} | |||
] if it had kept pace with productivity. Also, the real minimum wage.]] | |||
Some modern historians, politicians, and economists argue that the U.S. was effectively plutocratic for at least part of the ] and ] periods between the end of the ] until the beginning of the ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Pettigrew|first=Richard Franklin|author-link=Richard F. Pettigrew|title=Triumphant Plutocracy: The Story of American Public Life from 1870 to 1920|year=2010|publisher=Nabu Press|isbn=978-1146542746}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Calvin Reed|first=John|title=The New Plutocracy|year=1903|publisher=Kessinger Publishing, LLC (2010 reprint)|isbn=978-1120909152}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last= Brinkmeyer|first=Robert H.|title=The fourth ghost: white Southern writers and European fascism, 1930-1950|year=2009|publisher=Louisiana State University Press|location=Baton Rouge|isbn=978-0807133835|pages=331}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Allitt|first=Patrick|title=The conservatives: ideas and personalities throughout American history|year=2009|publisher=Yale University Press|location=New Haven|isbn=978-0300118940|pages=|url=https://archive.org/details/conservativeside00alli_0/page/143}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|editor-last1=Ryan|editor-first1=James G.|editor-last2=Schlup|editor-first2=Leonard|title=Historical dictionary of the Gilded Age|year=2003|publisher=]|location=Armonk, N.Y.|isbn=978-0765603319|pages=145}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|first1=Peter|last1=Viereck|title=Conservative thinkers: from John Adams to Winston Churchill|year=2006|publisher=Transaction Publishers|location=New Brunswick, New Jersey|isbn=978-1412805261|pages=|url=https://archive.org/details/conservativethin00pete/page/103}}</ref> President ] became known as the "trust-buster" for his aggressive use of ], through which he managed to break up such major combinations as ] and ], the largest oil company.<ref>{{cite book|title=American Entrepreneur: The Fascinating Stories of the People Who Defined Business in the United States| publisher=] Div American Mgmt Assn | year = 2009|first=Larry|last = Schweikart}}</ref> According to historian David Burton, "When it came to domestic political concerns, TR's ] was the plutocracy."<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zMdfna-aocwC&q=theodore+roosevelt+plutocracy&pg=PA104|title=Theodore Roosevelt, American Politician|access-date=28 August 2015|isbn=9780838637272|last1=Burton|first1=David Henry|year=1997|publisher=Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press }}</ref> In his autobiographical account of taking on monopolistic corporations as president, Roosevelt recounted: | |||
{{blockquote| | |||
===Modern politics=== | |||
...we had come to the stage where for our people what was needed was a real democracy; and of all forms of tyranny the least attractive and the most vulgar is the tyranny of mere wealth, the tyranny of a plutocracy.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bartleby.com/55/12.html|title=Roosevelt, Theodore. 1913. An Autobiography: XII. The Big Stick and the Square Deal|work=bartleby.com|access-date=28 August 2015}}</ref> | |||
{{See also|Upper class}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Unreferenced|section|date=May 2014}} | |||
Historically, wealthy individuals and organizations have exerted influence over the political arena. In the modern era, many democratic republics permit fundraising for politicians who frequently rely on such income for advertising their candidacy to the voting public. | |||
The ] had been enacted in 1890, when large industries reaching ] or near-monopolistic levels of ] and ] increasingly integrating corporations and a handful of very wealthy heads of large corporations began to exert increasing influence over industry, public opinion and politics after the Civil War. Money, according to contemporary ] and journalist ], was "the mortar of this edifice", with ideological differences among politicians fading and the political realm becoming "''a mere branch'' in a still larger, integrated business. The state, which through the party formally sold favors to the large corporations, became one of their departments."<ref>{{cite book|last=Bowman|first=Scott R.|title=The modern corporation and American political thought: law, power, and ideology|year=1996|publisher=Pennsylvania State University Press|location=University Park, Pa.|isbn=978-0271014739|pages=92–103}}</ref> | |||
Whether through individuals, ] or ], such donations are often believed to engender a ] or ] via which major contributors are rewarded on a '']'' basis. While campaign donations need not directly affect the legislative decisions of elected representatives, the natural expectation of donors is that their needs will be served by the person to whom they donated. If not, it is in their self-interest to fund a different candidate or political organization. | |||
In "The Politics of Plutocracy" section of his book, '']'', economist ] says plutocracy took hold because of three factors: at that time, the poorest quarter of American residents (African-Americans and non-naturalized immigrants) were ineligible to vote, the wealthy funded the campaigns of politicians they preferred, and ] was "feasible, easy and widespread", as were other forms of ] such as ] and ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Krugman|first=Paul|title=The conscience of a liberal|year=2009|publisher=Norton|location=New York|isbn=978-0393333138|pages=|edition=|url=https://archive.org/details/conscienceoflib00krug/page/21}}</ref> | |||
While ''quid pro quo'' agreements are generally illegal in most democracies, they are difficult to prove, short of a well-documented paper trail. A core basis of democracy, being a politician's ability to freely advocate policies which benefit his or her constituents, also makes it difficult to prove that doing so might be a crime. Even the granting of appointed positions to a well-documented contributor may not cross the line of the law, particularly if it happens that the contributor can actually boast a qualified ''résumé''. Some systems even specifically provide for such ]. | |||
The U.S. instituted ] in 1913, but according to ], in the 1970s, elites used their increasing political power to lower their taxes, and today successfully employ what political scientist Jeffrey Winters calls "the income defense industry" to greatly reduce their taxes.<ref>Kahn, Shamus (18 September 2012) ''Time Magazine''</ref> | |||
==As a propaganda term== | |||
In 1998, ] of '']'' referred to modern American plutocrats as "The '''Donor Class'''<!--boldface per WP:R#PLA-->"<ref name="NYT-19980719">{{cite news |last=Herbert |first=Bob |author-link=Bob Herbert |title=The Donor Class |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/19/opinion/in-america-the-donor-class.html |date=19 July 1998 |work=] |access-date=10 March 2016 }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20151010">{{cite news |last1=Confessore |first1=Nicholas |last2=Cohen |first2=Sarah |last3=Yourish |first3=Karen |title=The Families Funding the 2016 Presidential Election |url=https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/11/us/politics/2016-presidential-election-super-pac-donors.html |date=10 October 2015 |work=] |access-date=10 March 2016 }}</ref> (list of top (political party) donors)<ref name="NYT-20151010-el">{{cite news |last1=Lichtblau |first1=Eric |last2=Confessore |first2=Nicholas |title=From Fracking to Finance, a Torrent of Campaign Cash - Top Donors List |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/11/us/politics/wealthy-families-presidential-candidates.html#donors-list |date=10 October 2015 |work=] |access-date=11 March 2016 }}</ref> and defined the class, for the first time,<ref name="CS-20141226">{{cite news |last=McCutcheon |first=Chuck |title=Why the 'donor class' matters, especially in the GOP presidential scrum |url=http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/Politics-Voices/2014/1226/Why-the-donor-class-matters-especially-in-the-GOP-presidential-scrum |date=26 December 2014 |work="] |access-date=10 March 2016 }}</ref> as "a tiny group – just one-quarter of 1 percent of the population – and it is not representative of the rest of the nation. But its money buys plenty of access."<ref name="NYT-19980719" /> | |||
In the political ] and ] of ], ] and the ], western ]s were referred to as ''plutocracies'', with the implication being that a small number of extremely wealthy individuals were controlling the countries and holding them to ransom.<ref name="marxists.org">http://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/fi/vol02/no02/editors2.htm</ref><ref name ="blamires">{{cite book |title=World fascism: a historical encyclopedia, Vol. 1|last1=Blamires |first1=Cyprian |last2=Jackson |first2=Paul |year=2006 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-57607-940-9 |page=522}}</ref> ''Plutocracy'' replaced '']'' and '']'' as the principal fascist term for the United States and Great Britain during the ].<ref name ="blamires">{{cite book |title=The Jewish enemy: Nazi propaganda during World War II and the Holocaust|last1=Herf|first1=Jeffrey|year=2006 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=0-674-02175-4|page=311}}</ref> For the Nazis, the term was often a code word for "the ]".<ref name ="blamires"/> | |||
==== Post-World War II ==== | |||
In modern times, the term is sometimes used pejoratively to refer to societies rooted in state-corporate capitalism or which prioritize the accumulation of wealth over other interests.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Barker|first=Derek|title=Oligarchy or Elite Democracy? Aristotle and Modern Representative Government|journal=New Political Science|date=2013|volume=35|issue=4|pages=547–566|doi=10.1080/07393148.2013.848701|s2cid=145063601}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Etzioni|first=Amitai|title=Political Corruption in the United States: A Design Draft|journal=Political Science & Politics|date=Jan 2014|volume=47|issue=1|pages=141–144|doi=10.1017/S1049096513001492|s2cid=155071383}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Westbrook|first=David|title=If Not a Commercial Republic - Political Economy in the United States after Citizens United|journal=Louisville Law Review|date=2011|volume=50|issue=1|pages=35–86|url=http://www.louisvillelawreview.org/sites/louisvillelawreview.org/files/pdfs/printcontent/50/1/Westbrook.pdf|access-date=30 April 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140502000423/http://www.louisvillelawreview.org/sites/louisvillelawreview.org/files/pdfs/printcontent/50/1/Westbrook.pdf|archive-date=2 May 2014|url-status=dead|df=dmy-all}}</ref><ref>. '']'', 28 November 2014.</ref> According to ], author and political strategist to ], the United States is a plutocracy in which there is a "fusion of money and government."<ref>. '']'' 4.09.04 | PBS</ref> | |||
], author of '']'',<ref>{{cite book|first=Chrystia|last=Freeland|author-link=Chrystia Freeland|title=Plutocrats: the rise of the new global super-rich and the fall of everyone else|date=2012|publisher=Penguin|location=New York|isbn=9781594204098|oclc=780480424|url=https://archive.org/details/plutocratsriseof00free}}</ref> says that the present trend towards plutocracy occurs because the rich feel that their interests are shared by society:<ref>{{cite interview |first=Chrystia|last=Freeland |date=15 October 2012 |url=https://www.npr.org/2012/10/15/162799512/a-startling-gap-between-us-and-them-in-plutocrats |title=A Startling Gap Between Us And Them In 'Plutocrats' |publisher=] |access-date=12 April 2023}}</ref><ref>See also the Chrystia Freeland interview for the Moyers Book Club (12 October 2012) </ref> | |||
{{blockquote | |||
|You don't do this in a kind of chortling, smoking your cigar, conspiratorial thinking way. You do it by persuading yourself that what is in your own personal self-interest is in the interests of everybody else. So you persuade yourself that, actually, government services, things like spending on education, which is what created that social mobility in the first place, need to be cut so that the deficit will shrink, so that your tax bill doesn't go up. And what I really worry about is, there is so much money and so much power at the very top, and the gap between those people at the very top and everybody else is so great, that we are going to see social mobility choked off and society transformed. | |||
}} | |||
When the Nobel Prize–winning economist ] wrote the 2011 '']'' magazine article entitled "Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%", the title and content supported Stiglitz's claim that the U.S. is increasingly ruled by the wealthiest 1%.<ref>Stiglitz Joseph E. . '']'', May 2011; see also the '']'' interview with Joseph Stiglitz: , '']'' Archive, Thursday, 7 April 2011</ref> Some researchers have said ], as individual citizens have less impact than economic elites and organized interest groups upon public policy.<ref>] (2014). '']''. Belknap Press. {{ISBN|067443000X}} p. 514: "the risk of a drift towards oligarchy is real and gives little reason for optimism about where the United States is headed."</ref> In the ] itself, more than half of all members are millionaires.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Evers-Hillstrom |first=Karl |date=2020-04-23 |title=Majority of lawmakers in 116th Congress are millionaires |url=https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2020/04/majority-of-lawmakers-millionaires/ |access-date=2024-07-10 |website=OpenSecrets}}</ref> | |||
A study conducted by political scientists Martin Gilens of ] and Benjamin Page of ], which was released in April 2014,<ref>{{cite journal |title=Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens |author1=Martin Gilens |author2=Benjamin I. Page |name-list-style=amp |journal=] |date=2014 |volume=12 |issue=3 |pages=564–581 |doi=10.1017/S1537592714001595 |url=http://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/files/gilens_and_page_2014_-testing_theories_of_american_politics.doc.pdf|doi-access=free }}</ref> stated that their "analyses suggest that majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts". Gilens and Page do not characterize the U.S. as an "oligarchy" or "plutocracy" per se; however, they do apply the concept of "civil oligarchy" as used by ]<ref>Winters, Jeffrey A. "" Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 208-254</ref> with respect to the U.S. | |||
The investor, ], and ] ], one of the wealthiest people in the world,<ref>{{cite web |title=The World's Billionaires |url=https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130403013841/http://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/ |archive-date=3 April 2013 |access-date=1 May 2018 |website=forbes.com}}</ref> voiced in 2005 and once more in 2006 his view that his class, the "rich class", is waging class warfare on the rest of society. In 2005 Buffet said to CNN: "It's class warfare, my class is winning, but they shouldn't be."<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160430104340/http://edition.cnn.com/2005/US/05/10/buffett/index.html|date=30 April 2016}} CNN.com</ref> In a November 2006 interview in '']'', Buffett stated that "here's class warfare all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning."<ref name="Buffett_warfare">{{cite news |last=Buffett |first=Warren |date=26 November 2006 |title=In Class Warfare, Guess Which Class is Winning |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/26/business/yourmoney/26every.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170103165340/http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/26/business/yourmoney/26every.html |archive-date=3 January 2017 |newspaper=The New York Times}}</ref> | |||
==Causation== | |||
Reasons why a plutocracy develops are complex.{{citation needed|date=June 2024}} In a nation that is experiencing rapid economic growth, ] will tend to increase as the rate of return on innovation increases.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Piketty|first=Thomas|title=Capital in the Twenty-First Century|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=2013|isbn=9781491534649}}</ref> In other scenarios, plutocracy may develop when ] due to ] as the elites attempt to hoard the diminishing wealth or expand debts to maintain stability, which will tend to enrich ] and ]. Economists have also suggested that free market economies tend to drift into monopolies and oligopolies because of the greater efficiency of larger businesses (see ]). | |||
Other nations may become plutocratic through ] or ].{{citation needed|date=February 2024}} | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{Portal|Politics}} | {{Portal|Politics}} | ||
{{div col|colwidth=30em}} | |||
<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;-webkit-column-count:3"> | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
</div> | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
{{div col end}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | {{Reflist|30em}} | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
{{refbegin}} | |||
* Howard, Milford Wriarson (1895). New York: Holland Publishing. | |||
* |
* Howard, Milford Wriarson (1895). . New York: Holland Publishing. | ||
* |
* Norwood, Thomas Manson (1888). . New York: The ]. | ||
* ] (1921). ''''. New York: The Academy Press. | |||
* Reed, John Calvin (1903). New York: Abbey Press. | |||
* |
* Reed, John Calvin (1903). . New York: Abbey Press. | ||
* Winters, Jeffrey A. (2011). ''''. Cambridge University Press | |||
{{refend}} | |||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{wiktionary}} | |||
* {{Wiktionary-inline}} | |||
{{Wikiquote}} | |||
{{Corruption}} | |||
{{Extreme wealth}} | |||
{{Political philosophy}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 05:09, 16 January 2025
Society controlled by the wealthiest citizens "Merchant prince" redirects here. For powerful businesspeople, see captain of industry. For the computer game, see Merchant Prince. "Plutocrats" redirects here. For the 2012 book, see Plutocrats (book). Not to be confused with Plutonomy.
Part of the Politics series | ||||||||
Basic forms of government | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
List of forms · List of countries | ||||||||
Source of power
|
||||||||
Power ideology
|
||||||||
Power structure |
||||||||
Related |
||||||||
Politics portal | ||||||||
A plutocracy (from Ancient Greek πλοῦτος (ploûtos) 'wealth' and κράτος (krátos) 'power') or plutarchy is a society that is ruled or controlled by people of great wealth or income. The first known use of the term in English dates from 1631. Unlike most political systems, plutocracy is not rooted in any established political philosophy.
Usage
The term plutocracy is generally used as a pejorative to describe or warn against an undesirable condition. Throughout history, political thinkers and philosophers have condemned plutocrats for ignoring their social responsibilities, using their power to serve their own purposes and thereby increasing poverty and nurturing class conflict and corrupting societies with greed and hedonism.
"Dollarocracy", an anglicised adaptation of the word "plutocracy", may refer to "a specifically American version of plutocracy".
Examples
Historic examples of plutocracies include the Roman Empire; some city-states in Ancient Greece; the civilization of Carthage; the Italian merchant city-states of Venice, Florence and Genoa; the Dutch Republic; and the pre-World War II Empire of Japan (the zaibatsu). According to Noam Chomsky and Jimmy Carter, the modern United States resembles a plutocracy though with democratic forms. Paul Volcker, a former chair of the Federal Reserve, also believed the U.S. to be developing into a plutocracy.
One modern, formal example of a plutocracy, according to some critics, is the City of London. The City (also called the Square Mile of ancient London, corresponding to the modern financial district, an area of about 2.5 km) has a unique electoral system for its local administration, separate from the rest of London. More than two-thirds of voters are not residents, but rather representatives of businesses and other bodies that occupy premises in the City, with votes distributed according to their numbers of employees. The principal justification for this arrangement is that most of the services provided by the City of London Corporation are used by the businesses in the City. Around 450,000 non-residents constitute the City's day-time population, far outnumbering the City's 7,000 residents.
In the political jargon and propaganda of Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany and the Communist International, Western democratic states were referred to as plutocracies, with the implication being that a small number of extremely wealthy individuals were controlling the countries and holding them to ransom. Plutocracy replaced democracy and capitalism as the principal fascist term for the U.S. and Great Britain during World War II. In Nazi Germany, it was often used as a dog whistle term for Jewish people in their antisemitic propaganda. Joseph Goebbels, the Reich Minister of Propaganda, found the term to be particularly favorable, describing it as "the main concept at which the ideological struggle will be aimed".
United States
Further information: Income inequality in the United States § Effects on democracy and society See also: American upper class and Wealth inequality in the United StatesSome modern historians, politicians, and economists argue that the U.S. was effectively plutocratic for at least part of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era periods between the end of the Civil War until the beginning of the Great Depression. President Theodore Roosevelt became known as the "trust-buster" for his aggressive use of antitrust law, through which he managed to break up such major combinations as the largest railroad and Standard Oil, the largest oil company. According to historian David Burton, "When it came to domestic political concerns, TR's bête noire was the plutocracy." In his autobiographical account of taking on monopolistic corporations as president, Roosevelt recounted:
...we had come to the stage where for our people what was needed was a real democracy; and of all forms of tyranny the least attractive and the most vulgar is the tyranny of mere wealth, the tyranny of a plutocracy.
The Sherman Antitrust Act had been enacted in 1890, when large industries reaching monopolistic or near-monopolistic levels of market concentration and financial capital increasingly integrating corporations and a handful of very wealthy heads of large corporations began to exert increasing influence over industry, public opinion and politics after the Civil War. Money, according to contemporary progressive and journalist Walter Weyl, was "the mortar of this edifice", with ideological differences among politicians fading and the political realm becoming "a mere branch in a still larger, integrated business. The state, which through the party formally sold favors to the large corporations, became one of their departments."
In "The Politics of Plutocracy" section of his book, The Conscience of a Liberal, economist Paul Krugman says plutocracy took hold because of three factors: at that time, the poorest quarter of American residents (African-Americans and non-naturalized immigrants) were ineligible to vote, the wealthy funded the campaigns of politicians they preferred, and vote buying was "feasible, easy and widespread", as were other forms of electoral fraud such as ballot-box stuffing and intimidation of the other party's voters.
The U.S. instituted progressive taxation in 1913, but according to Shamus Khan, in the 1970s, elites used their increasing political power to lower their taxes, and today successfully employ what political scientist Jeffrey Winters calls "the income defense industry" to greatly reduce their taxes.
In 1998, Bob Herbert of The New York Times referred to modern American plutocrats as "The Donor Class" (list of top (political party) donors) and defined the class, for the first time, as "a tiny group – just one-quarter of 1 percent of the population – and it is not representative of the rest of the nation. But its money buys plenty of access."
Post-World War II
In modern times, the term is sometimes used pejoratively to refer to societies rooted in state-corporate capitalism or which prioritize the accumulation of wealth over other interests. According to Kevin Phillips, author and political strategist to Richard Nixon, the United States is a plutocracy in which there is a "fusion of money and government."
Chrystia Freeland, author of Plutocrats, says that the present trend towards plutocracy occurs because the rich feel that their interests are shared by society:
You don't do this in a kind of chortling, smoking your cigar, conspiratorial thinking way. You do it by persuading yourself that what is in your own personal self-interest is in the interests of everybody else. So you persuade yourself that, actually, government services, things like spending on education, which is what created that social mobility in the first place, need to be cut so that the deficit will shrink, so that your tax bill doesn't go up. And what I really worry about is, there is so much money and so much power at the very top, and the gap between those people at the very top and everybody else is so great, that we are going to see social mobility choked off and society transformed.
When the Nobel Prize–winning economist Joseph Stiglitz wrote the 2011 Vanity Fair magazine article entitled "Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%", the title and content supported Stiglitz's claim that the U.S. is increasingly ruled by the wealthiest 1%. Some researchers have said the U.S. may be drifting towards a form of oligarchy, as individual citizens have less impact than economic elites and organized interest groups upon public policy. In the U.S. Congress itself, more than half of all members are millionaires.
A study conducted by political scientists Martin Gilens of Princeton University and Benjamin Page of Northwestern University, which was released in April 2014, stated that their "analyses suggest that majorities of the American public actually have little influence over the policies our government adopts". Gilens and Page do not characterize the U.S. as an "oligarchy" or "plutocracy" per se; however, they do apply the concept of "civil oligarchy" as used by Jeffrey A. Winters with respect to the U.S.
The investor, billionaire, and philanthropist Warren Buffett, one of the wealthiest people in the world, voiced in 2005 and once more in 2006 his view that his class, the "rich class", is waging class warfare on the rest of society. In 2005 Buffet said to CNN: "It's class warfare, my class is winning, but they shouldn't be." In a November 2006 interview in The New York Times, Buffett stated that "here's class warfare all right, but it's my class, the rich class, that's making war, and we're winning."
Causation
Reasons why a plutocracy develops are complex. In a nation that is experiencing rapid economic growth, income inequality will tend to increase as the rate of return on innovation increases. In other scenarios, plutocracy may develop when a country is collapsing due to resource depletion as the elites attempt to hoard the diminishing wealth or expand debts to maintain stability, which will tend to enrich creditors and financiers. Economists have also suggested that free market economies tend to drift into monopolies and oligopolies because of the greater efficiency of larger businesses (see economies of scale).
Other nations may become plutocratic through kleptocracy or rent-seeking.
See also
- Aristocracy
- Banana republic
- Corporatocracy
- Elitism
- Kleptocracy
- Neo-feudalism
- Oligarchy
- Overclass
- Plutonomy
- Timocracy
- Upper class
- Wealth concentration
- Property qualification
References
- "Plutocracy". Merriam Webster. Retrieved 2 June 2017.
- "Plutocratic Populism - ECPS". Retrieved 21 February 2024.
- Fiske, Edward B.; Mallison, Jane; Hatcher, Dave (2009). Fiske 250 words every high school freshman needs to know. Naperville, Ill.: Sourcebooks. p. 50. ISBN 9781402260797.
Plutocracy and plutocrat are almost always used in a pejorative or negative sense.
- Coates, Colin M., ed. (2006). Majesty in Canada: essays on the role of royalty. Toronto: Dundurn. p. 119. ISBN 978-1550025866.
- Viereck, Peter (2006). Conservative thinkers: from John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. pp. 19–68. ISBN 978-1412805261.
- de Tocqueville, Alexis (1985). Boesche, Roger (ed.). Selected letters on politics and society. Translated by Toupin, James. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 197–198. ISBN 978-0520057517.
-
Muller, Denis (9 August 2021). "Democracy Under Strain". Journalism and the Future of Democracy. Cham, Zug: Springer Nature. pp. 10–11. ISBN 9783030767617. Retrieved 13 July 2024.
The position of the United States as a 'weak democracy' had degenerated into what McChesney and his colleague John Nichols called a 'dollarocracy', 'a specifically American version of plutocracy' in which corporate lobbying had corrupted Congressional processes.
- Chomsky, Noam (6 October 2015). "America is a plutocracy masquerading as a democracy". Salon. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
- Carter, Jimmy (15 October 2015). "Jimmy Carter on Whether He Could Be President Today: "Absolutely Not"". supersoul.tv. Retrieved 13 February 2015.
- Sorkin, Andrew (23 October 2018). "Paul Volcker, at 91, Sees 'a Hell of a Mess in Every Direction'". New York Times. Retrieved 28 October 2018.
- Atkinson, Rowland; Parker, Simon; Burrows, Roger (September 2017). "Elite Formation, Power and Space in Contemporary London". Theory, Culture & Society. 34 (5–6): 179–200. doi:10.1177/0263276417717792. ISSN 0263-2764.
- Monbiot, George (31 October 2011). "The medieval, unaccountable Corporation of London is ripe for protest". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 November 2011.
- René Lavanchy (12 February 2009). "Labour runs in City of London poll against 'get-rich' bankers". Tribune. Archived from the original on 15 January 2015. Retrieved 17 January 2015.
- "The Editors: American Labor and the War (February 1941)". marxists.org. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
- ^ Blamires, Cyprian; Jackson, Paul (2006). World Fascism: A Historical Encyclopedia, Vol. 1. ABC-CLIO. p. 522. ISBN 978-1-57607-940-9.
- Herf, Jeffrey (2006). The Jewish Enemy: Nazi Propaganda During World War II and the Holocaust. Harvard University Press. p. 311. ISBN 978-0-674-02175-4.
- As quoted in Boelcke, Willi A. The Secret Conferences of Dr. Goebbels: October 1939-March 1943, edited by Willi A. Boelcke; trans. Ewald Osers. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1970.
- Pettigrew, Richard Franklin (2010). Triumphant Plutocracy: The Story of American Public Life from 1870 to 1920. Nabu Press. ISBN 978-1146542746.
- Calvin Reed, John (1903). The New Plutocracy. Kessinger Publishing, LLC (2010 reprint). ISBN 978-1120909152.
- Brinkmeyer, Robert H. (2009). The fourth ghost: white Southern writers and European fascism, 1930-1950. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. p. 331. ISBN 978-0807133835.
- Allitt, Patrick (2009). The conservatives: ideas and personalities throughout American history. New Haven: Yale University Press. pp. 143. ISBN 978-0300118940.
- Ryan, James G.; Schlup, Leonard, eds. (2003). Historical dictionary of the Gilded Age. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe. p. 145. ISBN 978-0765603319.
- Viereck, Peter (2006). Conservative thinkers: from John Adams to Winston Churchill. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. pp. 103. ISBN 978-1412805261.
- Schweikart, Larry (2009). American Entrepreneur: The Fascinating Stories of the People Who Defined Business in the United States. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.
- Burton, David Henry (1997). Theodore Roosevelt, American Politician. Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press. ISBN 9780838637272. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
- "Roosevelt, Theodore. 1913. An Autobiography: XII. The Big Stick and the Square Deal". bartleby.com. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
- Bowman, Scott R. (1996). The modern corporation and American political thought: law, power, and ideology. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press. pp. 92–103. ISBN 978-0271014739.
- Krugman, Paul (2009). The conscience of a liberal ( ed.). New York: Norton. pp. 21–26. ISBN 978-0393333138.
- Kahn, Shamus (18 September 2012) "The Rich Haven't Always Hated Taxes" Time Magazine
- ^ Herbert, Bob (19 July 1998). "The Donor Class". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
- Confessore, Nicholas; Cohen, Sarah; Yourish, Karen (10 October 2015). "The Families Funding the 2016 Presidential Election". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
- Lichtblau, Eric; Confessore, Nicholas (10 October 2015). "From Fracking to Finance, a Torrent of Campaign Cash - Top Donors List". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 March 2016.
- McCutcheon, Chuck (26 December 2014). "Why the 'donor class' matters, especially in the GOP presidential scrum". "The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 10 March 2016.
- Barker, Derek (2013). "Oligarchy or Elite Democracy? Aristotle and Modern Representative Government". New Political Science. 35 (4): 547–566. doi:10.1080/07393148.2013.848701. S2CID 145063601.
- Etzioni, Amitai (January 2014). "Political Corruption in the United States: A Design Draft". Political Science & Politics. 47 (1): 141–144. doi:10.1017/S1049096513001492. S2CID 155071383.
- Westbrook, David (2011). "If Not a Commercial Republic - Political Economy in the United States after Citizens United" (PDF). Louisville Law Review. 50 (1): 35–86. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 May 2014. Retrieved 30 April 2014.
- Full Show: The Long, Dark Shadows of Plutocracy. Moyers & Company, 28 November 2014.
- Transcript. Bill Moyers Interviews Kevin Phillips. NOW with Bill Moyers 4.09.04 | PBS
- Freeland, Chrystia (2012). Plutocrats: the rise of the new global super-rich and the fall of everyone else. New York: Penguin. ISBN 9781594204098. OCLC 780480424.
- Freeland, Chrystia (15 October 2012). "A Startling Gap Between Us And Them In 'Plutocrats'" (Interview). National Public Radio. Retrieved 12 April 2023.
- See also the Chrystia Freeland interview for the Moyers Book Club (12 October 2012) Moyers & Company Full Show: Plutocracy Rising
- Stiglitz Joseph E. "Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%". Vanity Fair, May 2011; see also the Democracy Now! interview with Joseph Stiglitz: "Assault on Social Spending, Pro-Rich Tax Cuts Turning U.S. into Nation 'Of the 1 Percent, by the 1 Percent, for the 1 Percent'", Democracy Now! Archive, Thursday, 7 April 2011
- Piketty, Thomas (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Belknap Press. ISBN 067443000X p. 514: "the risk of a drift towards oligarchy is real and gives little reason for optimism about where the United States is headed."
- Evers-Hillstrom, Karl (23 April 2020). "Majority of lawmakers in 116th Congress are millionaires". OpenSecrets. Retrieved 10 July 2024.
- Martin Gilens & Benjamin I. Page (2014). "Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens" (PDF). Perspectives on Politics. 12 (3): 564–581. doi:10.1017/S1537592714001595.
- Winters, Jeffrey A. "Oligarchy" Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 208-254
- "The World's Billionaires". forbes.com. Archived from the original on 3 April 2013. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
- Buffett: 'There are lots of loose nukes around the world' Archived 30 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine CNN.com
- Buffett, Warren (26 November 2006). "In Class Warfare, Guess Which Class is Winning". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 January 2017.
- Piketty, Thomas (2013). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press. ISBN 9781491534649.
Further reading
- Howard, Milford Wriarson (1895). The American plutocracy. New York: Holland Publishing.
- Norwood, Thomas Manson (1888). Plutocracy: or, American white slavery; a politico-social novel. New York: The American News Company.
- Pettigrew, Richard Franklin (1921). Triumphant Plutocracy: The Story of American Public Life from 1870 to 1920. New York: The Academy Press.
- Reed, John Calvin (1903). The New Plutocracy. New York: Abbey Press.
- Winters, Jeffrey A. (2011). Oligarchy. Cambridge University Press
External links
Extreme wealth | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Concepts |
| ||||||||
Lists |
| ||||||||
Related |
| ||||||||
Political philosophy | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Terms | |||||||||||
Government | |||||||||||
Ideologies |
| ||||||||||
Concepts |
| ||||||||||
Philosophers |
| ||||||||||
Works |
| ||||||||||
Related |
| ||||||||||