| Revision as of 14:20, 11 July 2014 editTarnishedPath (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers17,775 edits →Nomination of List of Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel, 2013 for deletion← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:48, 13 January 2025 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,383,763 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Jalapenos do exist/Archive 2. (BOT)Tag: Manual revert | ||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | ||
| |archiveprefix=User talk:Jalapenos do exist/ | |archiveprefix=User talk:Jalapenos do exist/Archive | ||
| |format=%%i | |format= %%i | ||
| |numberstart=1 | |||
| |age=2160 | |age=2160 | ||
| |maxarchsize=100000 | |||
| |maxkeepbytes=50000 | |||
| |index=yes | |index=yes | ||
| |archivebox=yes | |archivebox=yes | ||
| |box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == June 2014 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki>articles/0,7340,L-4530169,00.html Hamas angered by PA help in search for missing teens], Reuters </nowiki>{{red|'''('''}}<nowiki>published in Ynet News 14-06-2014</ref></nowiki> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 07:42, 15 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == 1rr violation at ] == | |||
| Your recent edits at the page are in violations of ARBPIA 1rr restrictions applicable to all topics related to the Israel Palestine conflict. I notice that you have been and previously . Given these previous warnings and because, , your edit pattern at the page is fundamentally at odds with our ] policy, unless you self revert I am going to make a report at the appropriate board looking for sanctions. ] (]) 14:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| :The edits violate neither WP:1RR nor WP:NPOV. I note that you are a serially combative user who has been blocked for edit warring. ] (]) 15:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Jalapenos_do_exist_reported_by_User:Dlv999_.28Result:_.29 Regards ] (]) 15:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2014 == | |||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] decision (]), for violating ] on the page ], you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. ] (]) 16:13, 15 June 2014 (UTC) <hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a ]: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Administrators who reverse this block without the clear authorisation described in that procedure will be summarily desysopped.</small></p></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=The block is a response to two supposed reverts that would violate ]. Edit #1 is not a revert, but a modification of an addition by another user which preserves its essence. Edit #2 preserves one out of the two ideas introduced by the user, so I don't see it as a revert either, but I suppose this could be contested. I made both edits to uphold WP:RS and WP:NPOV. Three further points. 1. Until the block, I had contributed a large part, if not most, of the content of the article. Most of this content deals with bland diplomatic statements and is relatively non-contentious 2. The article deals with a current event, and the block obviously impairs my ability to keep the article up to date. 3. The requester of the block, who is serially combative and has himself been blocked for edit warring , has expressed discomfort with the content of the page but has contributed virtually no content of his own . Together, these facts suggest that the block request is gamesmanship aimed at hindering timely development of the article. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 17:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)</span></small> | decline = (1) Here are two edits, roughly two and a half hours apart, each of which removes significant content placed by one or more other editors: . Those are two reverts. (2) The fact that you have written a significant part of the article, and another editor hasn't, does not somehow give you more authority over the article than the other editor, or give you the right to ignore Misplaced Pages policies. (3) Ad hominem attacks on another person will not increase the likelihood of your being unblocked, as your unblock request is assessed on the basis of what '''you''' have done, irrespective of the merits or demerits of anyone else's action. Indeed, using an unblock request as an opportunity to throw accusations at another editor is, if anything, likely to decrease the likelihood of being unblocked, as further disruptive editing is further reason for being blocked. (4) Yes, of course yoour block "impairs ability" to edit the article your editing of which led to the block. | |||
| <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 12:37, 16 June 2014 (UTC)}} | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for June 16== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (] | ]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article or image appears to be a clear ] infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Terrorism/rockets2011.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be ]'''. | |||
| If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at ]. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see ]. You might want to look at ] for more details, or ask a question ]. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-copyvio-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 15:04, 10 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 14:09, 11 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 14:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 14:15, 11 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 14:19, 11 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> ] (]) 14:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:48, 13 January 2025
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |