Revision as of 00:02, 5 February 2015 editArzel (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers12,013 edits →Recentism and Undue Weight← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:55, 14 November 2024 edit undoThe Grid (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers22,279 edits Notification: proposed deletion of Plaza South Tower.Tag: Twinkle | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=March 2022}} | |||
{{User:MrX/navbar}} | |||
== 😔 == | |||
--] (]) 19:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
{{Archive box|box-width=160px|collapsed=yes| | |||
:I think we can agree on that one. Me and MrX rarely agreed either but that does not mean I wanted to see them leave like this. I do hope you return. ] (]) 19:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
'''2011'''<br> | |||
::I endorse this comment. I always viewed MrX as someone I could approach for a better discussion no matter if we disagreed on the content. ] (]) 20:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
*]<br><br> | |||
: Well that's a shame. I was going to ask MrX to help write a refinement of the RfC guidelines to cover challenged closes, because we have terrible processes around this and it is probably the only area on Misplaced Pages where a single person can effectively mandate specific content. ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 21:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
'''2012'''<br> | |||
:MrX, I do hope you return to the project, even if after you take time off. Your contributions have been superb, and greatly valued - certainly by me and many others. You know, I'm strongly reminded of a by ], talking about a difficult case: | |||
*]<br> | |||
::"Any time ] disagrees, you know you're in a difficult area. And the function of his dissent, to make us focus on what we were deciding and to make sure that we felt we were doing the right thing, I think was well-served." | |||
*]<br><br> | |||
:We the community - and ultimately our end-user, the reader - have always been well served by your contributions and wisdom. And it would be regrettable if this one messy disagreement between you and ] — two users I respect very much — led you to part ways with the project permanently. Be well, and all best wishes. --]<sup>]</sup> 21:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
'''2013'''<br> | |||
::{{u|Neutrality}}, Thank you. I like and respect MrX. I am mystified by the trajectory this has taken, and genuinely mortified that he has expressed a desire to leave, on which I hope he reconsiders. I hope people will take a look at {{section link|Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment|Process for challenging closes}}. ''']''' <small>(] - ])</small> 21:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
*]<br> | |||
* I'm sorry that you're taking a break because of this, it's unnecessary, except of course as merited holiday if stress was too high. It's unfortunate when what should be a hobby becomes responsibility, work and no play (and that of course happens because we care about the project). I hope to see you around again when you feel like it, —]] – 02:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
*Best of luck with what you do. ] (]) 13:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
*]<br><br> | |||
'''2014'''<br> | |||
This is a sad turn of events, but here's to happiness in your break, and in your life, MrX. ''']] (])''' 03:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
*]<br> | |||
*]<br> | |||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
*]<br> | |||
*] | |||
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
}} | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
You have shown interest in articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> - ]] 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | If you ever come back, here's some tea for you. Lucky wiki-tea doesn't get cold. ''']] (])''' 14:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
*Rather late here due to my break, but like others I wish you well and happiness in your life. I'll never forget the help you gave me when I first started here and even after that, you remained someone I could look up to as an editor for his wisdom and who always remained civil even amidst the most controversial discussions. -] (]) 14:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC) | |||
:::Thank you {{U|Neutrality}}, {{u|Starship.paint}}, {{U|Kraose}}, {{U|Ugog Nizdast}}, and {{U|Mr Ernie}}. I appreciate your heartfelt kindness. - ]] 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
::::MrX, I am so happy to hear from you. I hope that you are well, these have been tough times indeed. ''']] (])''' 12:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
== A toast sandwich for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Looks like I missed something a few months ago, and only just realized I hadn't seen your name around in a while. | |||
Looking at the food or drink items in the WikiLove gadget like greeting cards, I'm thinking about the signification of the various options. Something sweet? Savory? Coffee/tea seem pretty generally friendly, I guess. I'll go with toast sandwich because I have no idea what that would mean to receive a toast sandwich. Kind of a "huh?" -- but maybe a "huh?" that draws your attention to Misplaced Pages long enough to come back after a break. — <samp>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></samp> \\ 16:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:Thank you ]. I appreciate your sentiment. And I've always appreciated your insightful comments that accrue to the benefit of Misplaced Pages. - ]] 20:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Some baklava for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Also miss having MrX around. Great contributor. ] (]) 18:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:Thank you, ], for your kindness. - ]] 20:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Precious anniversary == | |||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} | |||
miss you --] (]) 12:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC:) | |||
:Thank you ] for you making Wikipeidia exceptional, as you always do. - ]] 20:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="font-family: Times;">] (] • ])</span> 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed == | |||
Hello '''MrX'''! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to ] may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the ]. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at ]. Thank you! <span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <span style="font-weight:bold">] <sup>]</sup></span></span> 17:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Boo! == | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000; background-color:#FFB924; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">]] | |||
{{Center|'''''{{resize|187%|Happy ]!}}'''''}} | |||
---- | |||
'''Hello {{{user|{{<includeonly>SUBST:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}}}}:<br>Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable ]!'''<br /> —usernamekiran • sign the ] • ] 22:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)<br /><br /></div> | |||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
== Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>(])</sup> 00:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
== 4RR == | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
Excluding a revert of an IP and a minor revert, you are now at 4RR in under 24 hours on the Scalise article. You might wish to consider stepping away for a day or so as a result. Happy New Year! ] (]) 02:50, 1 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|Collect}} I certainly did not intend to edit war, and I don't think I have crossed 3RR, but I may have missed something. Would you be so kind as to provide diffs to four reverts that I have made in a 24 hour period? Many thanks.- ]] 03:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
# 16:59 et seq | |||
# 19:40 | |||
# 20:08 et seq | |||
# 21:02 | |||
# 23:40 | |||
Seems to add up to 4RR in under 7 hours. | |||
And your edit at 15:38 on 30 Dec makes 5RR in 32 hours. I did not count your edits which did not affect prior recent edits. Cheers. ] (]) 12:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
:Are you serious Collect? | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
:# Yes, this is a revert, although not a wholesale one. | |||
:# This is ''adding'' new content (sources), not reverting. However, ''you'' did subsequently revert my edit . | |||
:# This one is especially absurd. I corrected a title in a cite, changed the date format on cites that I previously added, and I added information to the cites that I previously added. | |||
:# Again, this is ''adding'' new content. Why would you ever think this is a revert? | |||
:# This trivial change of your grammar error from "...he had spoken at a ] group founded '''''leader''''' ]." to "...he had spoken at a ] group founded '''''by''''' ].", in practice this would not count as a revert, and it certainly isn't edit warring. | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
:I'm deeply troubled that you would raise this issue with me. Essentially, there is one revert in the diffs you listed. I suspect that you wish this to have a chilling effect to keep me from editing ]. Or perhaps it is meant to teach me a lesson for warning you of your own unambiguous edit warring. In either case, I believe it's petty and vexatious, and indicative of an obvious ] mentality that I've observed in you for several years. | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
:{{U|Collect}}, please consider this a good faith warning to stop this nonsense and start editing collaboratively; stop edit warring; and stop twisting policies and wikilawyering to suit whatever personal agenda you have. If you continue in this vein, I will have no choice but to escalate these issues, as I believe they are ultimately harmful to the project. Thank you.- ]] 13:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
:::I was tripped once on a "one letter change" and if you read ] it does indeed say that even a single letter may be counted as a "revert". Cheers -- Hold yourself to the same standards to which you wish to hold others. Meanwhile I suggest that you recognize that my note was polite and not a template - which I trust you noted but forgot to mention. ] (]) 13:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
::::I do appreciate your polite warning, however, you have not addressed the substance of my rebuttal to your accusation. If we have admins who are blocking people for changing one letter (assuming it doesn't materially change meaning), then that's a pretty clear abuse of their authority and a disregard for the purpose of ] which is to encourage collaborative editing and discourage disruption. | |||
::::If you sincerely believe that I was edit warring, I implore you to open a case at ] or ], because if my edits on ] are actually considered edit warring, then I will no longer be contributing to this project. Best.- ]] 13:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
;For future reference | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
Making note of the fact that was met with a .- ]] 22:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
== alert == | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
{{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
:Thank you.- ]] 15:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
And the ] posting as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#MrX ] (]) 15:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''', to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | |||
The discussion will take place at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
{{u|Sandstein}} the notice above was made by using the ds/alert|BLP template subst, but I wrote BLP rather than blp for the argument to the template. I have updated the alert, so the notice now correctly points to the decision. That template links to a special edit confirmatoin window asking to make sure you aren't duplicating notices. I wonder if it would be possible to make the template also check for an incorrect argument somehow. ] (]) 17:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
== blpsps == | |||
==Request to remove TBAN== | |||
Replying here so as to not clutter the AE post. The very first word of ] is "Never". That seems pretty hard and fast to me. ] (]) 18:41, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
.] (]) 05:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
:Is there anything in my comment "WP:BLPSPS advises against using blogs as BLP sources, however it was '''''my recollection''''' that this was not a hard rule,..." that would lead you to believe that I don't grasp that at this point? We shouldn't castigate people for making honest mistakes, especially after they admit such.- ]] 18:48, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
::Sorry, I was not meaning to castigate, I interpreted your statement to mean you still held that opinion that it wasn't a hard and fast rule, so I was trying to clarify. I think its likely neither of our reports are going to go anywhere. I hope we can continue to work together productively in the article. | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
::My main issue with the article is this. Imagine this was something about Obama, that an anonymous poster put on a marxist website saying obama did something a decade ago, then a random blog (conservative treehouse?) picked it up, and then that was echoed out by Fox, NRO and other conservative media. What would your argument be about the ultimate sourcing of this and how that affects the entirety of the issue. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | |||
::For a (real) analogous issue, how much coverage does Obama launching his Senate career from the house of a terrorist get in his article? Oh, I think the answer is none, yet that was also covered by numerous reliable sources. (And yes there are extenuating circumstances and people who disagree on characterization. Just like this issue) | |||
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> –] (]]) 01:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
== You have been pruned from a list == | |||
::I'm not saying we shouldn't cover this incident. But there is a pretty clear double standard on whats notable/reliable for a conservative vs whats notable/reliable for a liberal, and it shouldn't dominate the article like it does now. It needs to get trimmed to 2-3 sentences. ] (]) 18:59, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::I consider you a valuable editor and would like us to be able to edit collaboratively. You tend to be considerable more aggressive with reverting than me, which makes it less likely that my edits stick. I would be willing to retract the 3RR/N report if you would agree to limit yourself to no more than one revert in a 24 hour period, of any non-vandalism edit made in the previous seven days. I would of course agree to hold myself to the same restriction. | |||
:::FWIW, I agree that there is a systemic bias with regard to conservative viewpoints on Misplaced Pages, which results in somewhat of a double standard. The way to change that is with solid reasoning, consensus building, and compromise. Anyway, let me know what you think of a mutual 1RR restriction on this article for, let's say, the next 30 days.- ]] 19:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
::::Are you proposing a general 1RR, or a "Azrel-style" specific edit 1RR? ] (]) 19:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::::Not exactly. Here would be the rules: | |||
:::::#The restriction applies to ] | |||
:::::#Only one non-minor revert (with the sole exception of reverting unambiguous vandalism) is allowed in any rolling <u>24 hour period</u> | |||
:::::#A revert counts as any edit which removes, substantially changes, or alters the meaning of any edit made by any editor in the previous 7 days (168 hours) | |||
:::::#Fixing grammar/spelling/punctuation, formatting, fixing refs, and other gnomish edits do not count as revert (removing entire citations counts as revert) | |||
:::::#The 1RR restriction would end until 00:00 GMT on the 31st day from when we agree on this | |||
:::::#Proxy editing is obviously not allowed | |||
:::::#The restriction can be lifted, or extended, at any time, by unanimous mutual agreement | |||
:::::#Violation may be reported for admin action | |||
:::::You in?- ]] 19:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
{{od}} Sure, why not. ] (]) 20:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Great! I will notify EW/N.- ]] 20:03, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
'''Hi MrX!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at ], but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 3 months. | |||
== A cookie for you! == | |||
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting ]. | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
'''Thank you!''' | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for writing ]! ] (]) 21:23, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Message delivered to you with love by ] :) | Is this wrong? Contact ]. | Sent at 18:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
:My pleasure. Thanks for the cookie!- ]] 21:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Precious anniversary == | |||
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Eight}} | |||
--] (]) 06:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
==Happy holidays!== | |||
] | |||
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, MrX! | |||
The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Misplaced Pages friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — <samp>] <sup style="font-size:80%;">]</sup></samp> \\ 18:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Basically ]. Non-notable product. Orphaned for a decade.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] ] 19:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Chuice Logo.png== | |||
] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 02:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad spur, not a "community" and never was. Two of the cited sources are GNIS (which is insufficient for notability); the fourth is the census bureau (which has no such entry), and reference 1 plainly says this was a rail spur. Therefore the article is inaccurate as well as a failure of ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable location, sourced only to GNIS and a place-names gazetteer, neither of which is sufficient for notability. I can find several references to artesian wells in the Moxee area, for example, but none of these refer to a "community" of Artesian. Post office does not count for notability, and the coordinates locate to empty farmland. Fails ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad point. The sources cited are insufficient for notability; the only one with any information is reference 4, which plainly states this was a "station". The 1950 USGS topo map shows Ashue as a siding with a couple of buildings in the surrounding area, but no "town": . Several mentions of an Ashue Grange can be found in local newspapers, but all these mentions are passing, and grange halls were usually just meeting halls for local farms, not anything connected to a formal "community". Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Another non-notable Yakima County rail point being falsely described as a community. Zero mentions could be found in local press or any books; only reference 4 has any information at all, which is basically copy-pasted into the article. Birchfield does show up on the 1936 Yakima East USGS topo map: , as an intersection near the tracks with a couple of buildings. There is now a Birchfield Road through the area; every hit I got for Birchfield was to the road. Fails ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable location. I can find several passing mentions to a "Blackrock district" or "Blackrock lands" in local press, mostly from the 1900s and 1910s, nothing more recent than 1939. But all of these are trivial mentions about the daily happenings of Joe Blow "of Blackrock district" as rural newspapers often used to publish. This does not ever seem to have been a "community", though, and no other information was found; the coordinates locate to empty grasslands, with a small "Black Rock Cemetery" nearby. This must have been a place significant to some people, but we have no record of it and therefore can't have an article; fails ] because it wasn't legally-recognized and fails ] for lack of SIGCOV.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad point sourced only to GNIS (reference 3 does not mention Emerald and is just a link to the US Census website). No coverage found of any type; 1965 USGS topo map does show Emerald as a cluster of a few buildings along the tracks: . Today the railroad is gone and the site is just a couple of barns; not a community and never was. Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Another non-notable railroad waypoint; no information found. Reference 4 is the only mention of Farron that could be found anywhere, and its statement "the town never grew large enough for a post office" is boilerplate text that the NPRRHS inserted in many entries on minor railroad stations. Coordinates locate to empty farmland today. Complete failure of ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad spur, as per Reference 1, which is the only piece of information that could be found about this place. Not a community; fails ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 16:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable location; only information found was appearance on the 1958 Wiley City USGS topo map: , where it is just an intersection with a church; and a mention in the 1922 Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide , a directory. That's pretty thin gruel for coverage; the article cites only GNIS, which is insufficient for notability. Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad point; the NPRHA document (reference 4) inconsistently describes Holtzinger as a "spur" and a "town". This is the only mention of Holtzinger that could be found, other than the 1958 Naches USGS topo, which shows it as a level crossing with a large building, probably a fruit warehouse: . Nothing else found; fails ] and ]. GNIS is not sufficient for notability.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''No information about this location found. Sources cited are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the Census Bureau, which does not have any entry for a Liberty in Yakima County. Appears on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map as a schoolhouse: , and also as a dot on the 1979 Toppenish map. Current sattelite view shows only a farming area with a couple of agricultural buildings. Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Just a railroad siding, not a "community". All sources cited describe it as a rail point; having a post office is insufficient for notability as rural post offices were often not located in "communities" at all. Fails ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable railroad junction; only information found (other than the cited sources, which do not establish notability) is the word "Midvale" at a rail wye on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map: . Complete failure of ] and ]; is not and never was a community.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
==Notice of Reliable Sources Noticeboard discussion== | |||
Hello, MrX. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ].The discussion is about the topic ].<!--Template:RSN-notice--> Thank you. --] (]) 18:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Gaming the system== | |||
Please stop gaming the system. ] (]) 19:29, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Pardon me?- ]] 19:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== unreliable sources? == | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
Why did you put that warning on the page; ]? ] (]) 11:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>'''East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.'''</blockquote> | |||
:It's not actually a warning, it's a ]. Their purposes are to foster improvement of the encyclopedia by alerting editors to changes that need to be made. Cleanup tags are meant to be temporary notices that lead to an effort to fix the problem, not a permanent badge of shame to show that you disagree with the article or a method of warning the readers against the article. | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
:I placed it because some of the article's sources don't quite meet our standard for reliability (see ]). For example last.fm is a ]. Several are commercial websites, so of course their reviews are somewhat suspect. Some appear to be blogs, and ], possibly generated from press releases. Anyway, it's not a substantial issue, but a few more solid sources would be helpful. is one source that would probably be considered reliable. and possibly . - ]] 14:07, 8 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
== Clarification Request == | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hi MrX. This is a courtesy message to advise that your request for clarification on the American politics case has been closed, and archived ]. If you haven't already, please familiarise yourself with the arbs' discussion. On behalf of the committee, ] <sup>(])</sup> 11:33, 9 January 2015 (UTC). | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
==Talkback== | |||
<blockquote>'''East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.'''</blockquote> | |||
{{talkback|Tchaliburton|Double ANEW|ts=17:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)}} | |||
]<sup>]</sup> 17:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
== The article I created earlier == | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Hello there, | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 23:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
I got your message about me creating that article about ]. I saw that you said it may not confirm to Misplaced Pages's ]. I also want to say I'm sorry if I did violate any rule while I made the article. Let me tell you about it. | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
I don't know if you know it, but today was someone's execution, and I made that article because it was the first execution of 2015, and I wanted to get the article created before someone else did. Again, I do say I am sorry if I did violate a rule. I am a little new to this.--] (]) 02:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
:That's OK{{emdash}}it's not a problem. The main reason for my message was to provide you with a link to the guidelines for creating new articles, as well as links to other Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines. The main thing is that you need sources, especially when ] are involved (no pun intended).- ]] 02:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
== ] == | |||
<blockquote>'''There is not a single mention of this place in a single newspaper anywhere. There are not enough reliable sources available to expand this article.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
Can you please explain why you think this might be a hoax? The new user has created several articles, templates, etc., all apparently revolving around the same thing. If this is all bogus, then the situation needs to be addressed beyond just one or two articles tagged for deletion. I'm assuming FIBA Americas is a reliable source, although I confess my knowledge about sports is next to nil.--] (]) 17:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:The source does not seem to have anything to do with the Peru/Columbia/Ecuador women's national basket ball team. Call it a gut instinct, but I suspect that the user who created the articles is ] Unfortunately, I have limited time right now to fully investigate.- ]] 17:32, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
::I haven't looked at the SPI and am not familiar with that particular master. However, the Peruvian source seems to support the article. That's the only one I really looked at. The source starts off talking about the men's basketball team, but lower down it mentions the women's.--] (]) 19:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::Yes, I see it now. I've reverted myself.- ]] 20:00, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
== Formal mediation has been requested == | |||
{{Ivmbox | |||
| <!---MedComBot-Do-not-remove-this-line-Notified-America: Imagine the World Without Her--->The ] has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "America: Imagine the World Without Her". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. ] is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the ], the ], and the ], '''please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.''' Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 26 January 2015. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.<br> | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
<small>Message delivered by ] (]) (chairperson) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 18:40, 19 January 2015 (UTC)</small> | |||
] | |||
}} | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
It was the response to this:https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Breitbart_again . I was going to go back and inform everyone that responded to that thread, but that might be overkill. But that is why.] (]) 03:07, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>'''There is not one mention of Weikel being a place in the local papers. Not enough reliable sources to expand this article.'''</blockquote> | |||
:OK. Since I'm not involved in the article, I'm going to sit this one out.- ]] 03:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Fag Army logo.png== | |||
<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">''']'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> ] (]) 21:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 00:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Hi Mr. X. I noticed that you were active on the BLP noticeboard and was wondering if you could chime in on an issue regarding this page. I am affiliated with the article-subject. Currently almost all of Misplaced Pages's content on Bresch is regarding a controversy, which also has its own page. I raised the issue on the BLP noticeboard. While there seems to be consensus the controversy is excessive (also ), no actual edits have taken place and I suspect it will soon be archived off the board without action. If you could take a look it would be greatly appreciated! ] (]) 00:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:I looked at it. The controversy section is too large compared with the rest of the bio. Your draft seems to be an improvement overall. It sounds like you will have to discuss the content piece by piece on the talk page in order to gain support for your copy edits.- ]] 02:35, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
::What I had suggested on the Talk page was implementing the majority of my draft and leaving the controversy separate for individual discussion. Does that sound ok? Nomoskedasticity, who I believe originally authored the excessive controversy, hasn't responded to that suggestion for over a week. I kinda thought he/she might have been waiting for input from others, like FreeRange who commented, but said they were too busy to get more involved. ] (]) 16:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::It sounds OK to me. I am also too thinly spread to get involved in the article.- ]] 16:25, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 01:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Citing visual info from an archived TV episode == | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
Hi MrX, | |||
<blockquote>'''Non-notable rail point, not a community. Only two mentions of this place could be found, both from 1914: , about the comings and goings of people loading potatoes onto trains at "Nass Siding", and , a similarly trivial mention of a couple of locals going about their lives. Complete failure of ] and ]. Furthermore, the census bureau listing in the references is a dishonest attempt to make this place appear better-documented than it is; there is no entry for Nass.'''</blockquote> | |||
Another day, another question. I'm currently working on fixing up the article on ], and one of the best sources for otherwise obscure info about her is a Public Broadcasting episode which has been archived online. I understand, of course, that anything we hear during the video can be cited, but I'm wondering about citing what we see. This is especially important in the case of Mary Catherine, an artist whose entire living space reflected her artistic interests. So, for example, since the video shows her workroom with its many shelves and drawers full of the fabric pieces and findings she turned into quilts, would it be acceptable to say in the article, "Mary Catherine's attic workroom was packed with vintage fabrics and findings of every kind which she used to make her quilts" and then cite the video? In other words, can we use what we see even if it isn't described in words? Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this! ] (]) 23:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Hi Ailemadrah. I'm not certain, but I would think that you describing what you saw on the video may be considered ]. In the example you raise, it would probably be OK (per ] and ]) to say that "Mary Catherine's attic workroom contains fabrics and findings which she used to make her quilts", if the video identifies the room as an attic workroom and you see here assembling quilts in there. However, in your construct, "packed" is an opinion (yours). "Finding of every kind" is not really encyclopedic wording. It would be better to say "a variety of findings". "Vintage fabrics" could be a problem, unless it can supported by another source.- ]] 02:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
::Understood. Thank you, as always. ] (]) 02:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
== Leelah's Law == | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
30 days?! When the hell are discussions required to stay open for 30 days?! Standard deletion discussion length is 7 days, and I see no reason whatsoever to keep it open longer than people are commenting. I know very well there is a discussion going on, as I started it. But there is also no reason to require an admin, as unlike deletion, no admin permissions are required to make changes. I'll leave the discussion a few more days to see if anyone else comments (not stagnation for three more weeks), but there is a clear consensus that the topics are related and should be merged, and moreover this article has zero unique information that warrants a separate article. <font color="#1EC112">]</font><sup><font color="#45E03A">]</font></sup> 20:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:They are not the hell your whales. It's best to wait until a discussion goes stale for at least a few days and then allow an admin or experienced (uninvolved) editor to assess consensus and close the discussion. Here is the applicable guide: ]. By my count three editors have simply ]D to ], which is an essay that simply reinforces ]. Three arguments state that the petition is not as popular as other petitions and that there's "nothing to suggest there will be any independent long-term significance to the petition" which is a fallacious argument (see ]). One argument is from an SPA, and probably a meatpuppet or a logged out user (sock). Like AfD discussions, merge discussions are ]. At this point, there is no consensus for a merge, so it makes sense to wait for others to comment to see if a consensus emerges. By the way, this does not seem to be a flash in the pan. Here is a source published yesterday: .- ]] 21:38, 21 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Woxsen School of Business == | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
Sorry about that, I'm new to editing Misplaced Pages. We were trying to follow on the lines of the ] page. You mentioned verifiable sources other than the school's website, however, on ]'s page, the reference for the Student Clubs is their own website. I was wondering if we could do the same for our Academic Courses. Sorry again about the errors made.] (]) 04:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>'''An HOA is not a "populated, legally-recognized place"; furthermore, the fact that the author of this stub describes Pinecliff as 20 miles west of Ellensburg indicates they have no idea what they're talking about; this development is well over an hour from Ellensburg by car (due to terrain), and unless you can fly, the closest town is Yakima. First 2 sources are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the third has no such listing, apparently added to pad the reference list. Total failure of ] and ].'''</blockquote> | |||
:Hi Abhijit3288. You can use the school's website as a reference, but you need other reference for verification. Notice that Indian School of Business has a number of newspaper, magazine and book references (see ] and ]). Most importantly, the article should be written in concise, factual manner without marketing language. For example, statements like "The Woxsen Trade Tower is essentially an incubator where students’ business ideas are primed to create long-term impact" is not encyclopedic. Nor is "Classroom interactions with world-renowned academics and seasoned practitioners will help students acquire the perspective that is needed to appreciate the intricacies of business." Anything that you might find in a mission or vision statement doesn't belong. A long list of faculty members is not needed either. Phrases like " state of the art", "path defining experience", "insightful new ideas", "action-based experiential learning", and "High-end content" are ] phrases and are not informative for our purposes. Here are some examples of good university articles: ]. I hope this helps.- ]] 14:47, 22 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
== note == | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
I was ''not'' the one who accused you of pediophagia. Really! <g> ] (]) 16:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:I think I'll just stick with the '']'' and a juice box. {{Smiley3|teeth}} - ]] 16:21, 24 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 01:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== editing Daniel O'Keeffe (commissioner) == | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
Thanks for helping with Daniel O'Keeffe (commissioner). However I have a couple of questions: | |||
<blockquote>'''No evidence found that this was ever a community. Apart from reference 4 (which describes it inconsistently as a town and a rail junction), only two mentions could be found: One line in Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide from 1922(), and one passing mention from 1956: "Mr. and Mrs. Basil Kimmel of Sawyer were dinner guests..." (). This is about as trivial as coverage gets. Current satellite image shows a warehouse surrounded by farmland, with a Sawyer Fire Station nearby. Fails ] and ]. Not a notable place.'''</blockquote> | |||
1. Is it possible to change the title Daniel O'Keeffe (jurist)? Commissioner is not the best way to identify him imho. He is a former High Court judge, eminent lawyer etc. | |||
2. I am puzzled why someone removed the external links and categories. I am not going to do re-do them as it took me hours to put them together. | |||
Cheers | |||
] (]) 17:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:You're welcome. Sure, you can move the article, which is how articles are renamed. All you have to do is go to the article, hover over the "More" drop down menu near the top right of the page and select "move". You then just replace the word commissioner with the word jusrist, add a brief note in the reason field and click the move "page button".- ]] 17:22, 25 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
== Alain Hubert: translation of an FR page == | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
Thanks for your review of the translation I made of the Alain Hubert FR page in English. I am trying to improve it as per your remarks. I assumed that, since pages exist in FR and NL, it would be worthy of an EN translation. What could would be your suggestions to improve the sources I have referenced along with the page? I have tried to reference neutral and verifiable sources but maybe I am misunderstanding something. Any pointers would be much appreciated.{{unsigned|Intpolarfoundation}} | |||
:Hi Intpolarfoundation. Thank you for making the translation. If you click on the links in the "This article has multiple issues" box near the top of the article, you will be able to find out about what is considered reliable sources and how notability is determined. ] will tell you how to include footnote citations so that readers know which references support specific content. not a source, but merely a link to buy the subjects books. It's considered spam. doesn't discuss the subject, so it shouldn't be included. I hope that helps.- ]] 16:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
It does. Removed non relevant links and added references in context as requested. Feel free to suggest other improvements and thanks for helping out a newbie. Do you go back and check the article yourself and remove warnings accordingly, do I remove some of them myself? How does this work?]] 11:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Anyone can add or remove cleanup templates, as long as it's done in good faith. Currently, the vast majority of the references in the article are closely connected sources. Other than watching for vandalism and ] violations, I will probably not edit the article any further.- ]] 15:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 02:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== CFAA speedy deletion == | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
Sir, | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 23:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Thank you for the comments, and my apologies if I violated any terms. It should be noted however that this seems like a notable association given that it is the premier association dedicated to the corporate finance profession. After much research it is apparent that no other affiliations, organization or group is solely dedicated to this industry - a notable accomplishment in my mind. | |||
== Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
<div class="afd-notice"> | |||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
With kind regards ] (]) 00:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Hi JCPerty. Notability (for Misplaced Pages's purposes) is determined by independent, ]. If you can find some books, magazines, journals or even newspapers that discuss the organization in detail, you can ] them in the article. That said, it seems implausible that an organization founded mere weeks ago would be notable at all. - ]] 00:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] (]) 00:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
Sir, I kindly disagree - I have literally no vested interest in this association whatsoever but on principal, there are other associatons with less notability on wikipedia - why were they approved? for example https://en.wikipedia.org/American_Finance_Association | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
Such a site seems to self-promote, listing its meetings, services etc. My article merely highlights it's notable quality, the fact that it is the premier association dedicated solely to corporate finance? A second example would be https://en.wikipedia.org/European_Finance_Association where their source is a press release written likely by someone with ties to the association. For the sake of providing accurate, relevant and novel information to the wikipedia community, would you kindly remove your speedy deletion tag? | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
With kind regards ] (]) 01:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
<blockquote>'''Satellite shows a small cluster of houses at the base of the dam, the airport is in a different city despite being very nearby. Google says it's in the county. Local paper coverage runs from the 1890's to 1988. In 1899 it is a geological feature (https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-sheep-roadway/141277727/) Fast forward to 1920, and it's become a popular camp site, many people go camping and hunting there. (example:https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-camping-at-rimrock/141278267/). In 1925 the lake was created and afterward Fishing was added to the list of activities. (https://www.newspapers.com/article/grandview-herald-rimrock-lake/141278748/). I remember reading about elk being reintroduced, and sure enough rimrock is good for that too (1936: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-1936-not-a-town/141279168/) I goes on like that for decades, people picnicking, fishing etc all the way to modern times. There is no town there now and I've documented very thoroughly that there wasn't ever one. It's GNIS confabulating a geological feature into a town.'''</blockquote> | |||
:What is it that you disagree with? That the subject doesn't meet Misplaced Pages's ]? You claim that the organization is the "premier association dedicated solely to corporate finance?" According to who? Please follow some of the links in the welcome message on your user talk page to get a better idea of what Misplaced Pages's purpose is, and to learn about our content policies and guidelines. I am not inclined to remove the speedy deletion because there is no evidence that the subject is notable.- ]] 01:38, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
According to the Association's website and LinkedIn company page, two sources that seems to be relevant on other wikipedia articles. I disagree with your tag specifically in that the source, the nonprofit's webpage other pages (no writeups from what I can see thus far), provide membership solely to those working in corporate finance. Have you seen another association offering the same? I have not which is why I wrote the article and considered it to be notable. I realize such an organization may not be relevant or particularly notable to all, especially those without a particular interest in this field, but its a major deal to those who have followed the profession closely (corporate finance departments are in every company in every city around the world). Would you kindly reconsider your tag? Kind regards ] (]) 01:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Sorry, no. Would you please read some of the policies and guidelines that I suggested, then come back with any questions about how they apply to this article? Thanks.- ]] 01:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
== Request for mediation rejected == | |||
{{Ivmbox | |||
| The ] concerning America: Imagine the World Without Her, to which you were listed as a party, has been ]. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the ], which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the ] of the Committee, or to the ]. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see ]. | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
For the Mediation Committee, ] (]) 14:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)<br> | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
<small>(Delivered by ], ] the Mediation Committee.)</small> | |||
] | |||
}} | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
== I need help after messing up some Wikimedia uploads == | |||
<blockquote>'''The article says nothing is there now, the satellite says nothing is there now. Fortunately, the newspapers cover the area from the 1890's to the late 80's. There are many mentions of Wenas as a valley where people live, and lake where people recreate. There are no mentions of a town named Wenas to be found. GNIS likely confabulated the lake or the wildlife area into a town. Here is a sampling of the nature of the place. | |||
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-1899-wenas-valley/141290709/ | |||
Hi MrX – Apologies for needing you to help me out of a mess again. This time I uploaded some images for the article ] using Upload Wizard, and since the Wizard process doesn't come with a warning about lack of proper license, I didn't realize I'd done something wrong until I heard from a Wikimedia user that he'd tagged the images for deletion. Now I understand that I need to get permission from the photographer using the Declaration of Consent template, including the appropriate license, and then have him forward that permission to OTRS. This will fortunately be easy to do, as I am acquainted with the photographer, but there will be a delay since he's currently abroad. I would like to ensure that the images won't be deleted at the end of this week, but the procedure as described on the ] page doesn't seem to allow me to do what ] suggested, per this Q&A: | |||
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-of-the-wenas-1909/141291255/ | |||
::Just one more question: will the images automatically be deleted on January 30th, one week after they were tagged with the warning? Or do I have time to wait for the photographer to return to the U.S. so I can get his permission per the OTRS requirements? Thanks again! --Ailemadrah (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-in-the-wenas-1/141291970/ | |||
::The will be deleter if they do not have license template, but they can stay much longer with a license and the OTRS pending template if you know the license. --Jarekt (talk) 04:40, 25 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-wenas-valley/141292628/'''</blockquote> | |||
How do I accomplish this, given that the images are already uploaded and already tagged for deletion? I don't know where/how to insert the license and OTRS pending notice. Thanks in advance for your wise counsel! --] (]) 22:50, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:The instructions are here: ]. You will have to put '''<nowiki>{{OTRS pending}}</nowiki>''' after '''|Permission=''' in the Information section for the file. The copyright owner will need to send an email to the OTRS email address, listing each uploaded file and explicitly agree to offer each photo freely under a compatible license (Usually Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0). The copyright owner will still own the copyright, but anyone will be able to use the photo for almost any purpose, including commercial use. If OTRS doesn't receive an email from the copyright owner in a reasonable amount of time, the file will be deleted. | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
:Let me know if you have any other questions, although I am not an expert on Commons processes.- ]] 23:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
::Many thanks, as always!! I'll get to this later today. --] (]) 00:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
:::A little correction: Images will be deleted unless they have a license, so adding it should be a first order of businesses. --] (]) 15:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] (]) 21:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Reopening of ] == | |||
==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:Mfd notice --> ] (]) 12:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 30#Misplaced Pages:RACIST}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> --] ] 00:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
==Concern regarding ]== | |||
You were, of course, quite right. It was careless of me, and thank you for correcting my mistake. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 13:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
] Hello, MrX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that ], a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months ], so if you wish to retain the page, please ] again or ] that it be moved to your userspace. | |||
:No problem. I wasn't sure if I should re-open the AfD or start a new one. - ]] 13:55, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
::Actually, I think it might have been better to start a new one, but I don't see it as making a lot of difference either way, and certainly just closing the case without opening a new one was not a good thing to do. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 16:33, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
If the page has already been deleted, you can ] so you can continue working on it. | |||
== Apologies == | |||
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 16:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Sorry bout that, didn't notice that it was a bundled deletion discussion. Again sorry. ]] 05:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
==Your draft article, ]== | |||
:That's OK. I'm adding a conspicuous note.- ]] 05:47, 31 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
] | |||
Hello, MrX. It has been over six months since you last edited the ] submission or ] page you started, "]". | |||
==Disambiguation link notification for February 2== | |||
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can . An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. | |||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> ] (]) 22:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== ] of ] == | |||
] | |||
The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
== Please sign your comment == | |||
<blockquote>'''Notability not demonstrated per ] for buildings.'''</blockquote> | |||
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
Hey, thanks for participating the discussion on deletion of ]. I think your forgot to sign . ] (]) 19:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:Oops. Thanks.- ]] 19:10, 4 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
== Recentism and Undue Weight == | |||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> – ] (]) 20:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
? Misplaced Pages is not a newspaper and there is no evidence of long term notability or even that it is controversial just because a couple of people start crying about it. Some of your edits appear to be quite transparent in your goals. ] (]) 23:38, 4 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
:I really don't need to be reminded that Misplaced Pages is not a newspaper, nor does it apply. It's notable now. Don't you think it is extraordinary that Fox News would do something as taboo as publishing a video and stills of a man being burned to death? Don't you think that it's notable that they would do so while transparently politicizing the incident? - ]] 23:53, 4 February 2015 (UTC) | |||
::Your answer speaks volumes about your purpose here. There is no evidence that this has long lasting notability, your statement has no weight. The event was political to begin with even if your man is trying to hide the fact behind stupid words and a cluelessness about reality. ] (]) 00:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 20:55, 14 November 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. MrX has not edited Misplaced Pages since March 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
😔
--Floquenbeam (talk) 19:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- I think we can agree on that one. Me and MrX rarely agreed either but that does not mean I wanted to see them leave like this. I do hope you return. PackMecEng (talk) 19:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- I endorse this comment. I always viewed MrX as someone I could approach for a better discussion no matter if we disagreed on the content. Mr Ernie (talk) 20:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well that's a shame. I was going to ask MrX to help write a refinement of the RfC guidelines to cover challenged closes, because we have terrible processes around this and it is probably the only area on Misplaced Pages where a single person can effectively mandate specific content. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- MrX, I do hope you return to the project, even if after you take time off. Your contributions have been superb, and greatly valued - certainly by me and many others. You know, I'm strongly reminded of a quote by John G. Roberts, Jr., talking about a difficult case:
- "Any time Judge Garland disagrees, you know you're in a difficult area. And the function of his dissent, to make us focus on what we were deciding and to make sure that we felt we were doing the right thing, I think was well-served."
- We the community - and ultimately our end-user, the reader - have always been well served by your contributions and wisdom. And it would be regrettable if this one messy disagreement between you and Guy — two users I respect very much — led you to part ways with the project permanently. Be well, and all best wishes. --Neutrality 21:29, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Neutrality, Thank you. I like and respect MrX. I am mystified by the trajectory this has taken, and genuinely mortified that he has expressed a desire to leave, on which I hope he reconsiders. I hope people will take a look at Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment § Process for challenging closes. Guy (help! - typo?) 21:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that you're taking a break because of this, it's unnecessary, except of course as merited holiday if stress was too high. It's unfortunate when what should be a hobby becomes responsibility, work and no play (and that of course happens because we care about the project). I hope to see you around again when you feel like it, —PaleoNeonate – 02:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Best of luck with what you do. Kraose (talk) 13:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a sad turn of events, but here's to happiness in your break, and in your life, MrX. starship.paint (talk) 03:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
- MrX 🖋 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
If you ever come back, here's some tea for you. Lucky wiki-tea doesn't get cold. starship.paint (talk) 14:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC) |
- Rather late here due to my break, but like others I wish you well and happiness in your life. I'll never forget the help you gave me when I first started here and even after that, you remained someone I could look up to as an editor for his wisdom and who always remained civil even amidst the most controversial discussions. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you Neutrality, Starship.paint, Kraose, Ugog Nizdast, and Mr Ernie. I appreciate your heartfelt kindness. - MrX 🖋 21:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
- MrX, I am so happy to hear from you. I hope that you are well, these have been tough times indeed. starship.paint (exalt) 12:38, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
A toast sandwich for you!
Looks like I missed something a few months ago, and only just realized I hadn't seen your name around in a while.
Looking at the food or drink items in the WikiLove gadget like greeting cards, I'm thinking about the signification of the various options. Something sweet? Savory? Coffee/tea seem pretty generally friendly, I guess. I'll go with toast sandwich because I have no idea what that would mean to receive a toast sandwich. Kind of a "huh?" -- but maybe a "huh?" that draws your attention to Misplaced Pages long enough to come back after a break. — Rhododendrites \\ 16:47, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
- Thank you Rhododendrites. I appreciate your sentiment. And I've always appreciated your insightful comments that accrue to the benefit of Misplaced Pages. - MrX 🖋 20:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
Also miss having MrX around. Great contributor. Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 18:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Stefka Bulgaria, for your kindness. - MrX 🖋 20:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Seven years! |
---|
miss you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:29, 8 August 2021 (UTC:)
- Thank you Gerda Arendt for you making Wikipeidia exceptional, as you always do. - MrX 🖋 20:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Boden, Florida for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boden, Florida is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Boden, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:33, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello MrX! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II 17:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
Boo!
Happy Halloween!Hello MrX:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Misplaced Pages, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
—usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 22:19, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Good source
Template:Good source has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • 00:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Vista, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vista, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vista, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Richland Junction, Richland for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richland Junction, Richland, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Richland Junction, Richland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Chaffee, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaffee, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chaffee, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Whitcomb, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Whitcomb, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Whitcomb, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Apricot, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apricot, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Apricot, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of North McNary, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North McNary, Washington, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/North McNary, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Request to remove TBAN
here. Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Hydrogen water for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hydrogen water is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hydrogen water until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
You have been pruned from a list
Hi MrX! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Misplaced Pages in over 3 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Biography/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:43, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Eight years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
Happy Holidays and Happy New Year, MrX!
The other day, I was having a conversation with someone about holiday cards and social media. It occurred to me that, in the years since I left Facebook, the site I use most to communicate with people I like isn't actually a social media site at all. If you're receiving this, it's pretty likely I've talked with you more recently than I have my distant relatives and college friends on FB, at very least, and we may have even collaborated on something useful. So here's a holiday "card", Misplaced Pages friend. :) Hope the next couple weeks bring some fun and/or rest. — Rhododendrites \\ 18:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Chuice
The article Chuice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Basically WP:PROMO. Non-notable product. Orphaned for a decade.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 19:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Chuice Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Chuice Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Venner, Washington
The article Venner, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad spur, not a "community" and never was. Two of the cited sources are GNIS (which is insufficient for notability); the fourth is the census bureau (which has no such entry), and reference 1 plainly says this was a rail spur. Therefore the article is inaccurate as well as a failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Artesian, Washington
The article Artesian, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location, sourced only to GNIS and a place-names gazetteer, neither of which is sufficient for notability. I can find several references to artesian wells in the Moxee area, for example, but none of these refer to a "community" of Artesian. Post office does not count for notability, and the coordinates locate to empty farmland. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:14, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Ashue, Washington
The article Ashue, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad point. The sources cited are insufficient for notability; the only one with any information is reference 4, which plainly states this was a "station". The 1950 USGS topo map shows Ashue as a siding with a couple of buildings in the surrounding area, but no "town": . Several mentions of an Ashue Grange can be found in local newspapers, but all these mentions are passing, and grange halls were usually just meeting halls for local farms, not anything connected to a formal "community". Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Birchfield, Washington
The article Birchfield, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Another non-notable Yakima County rail point being falsely described as a community. Zero mentions could be found in local press or any books; only reference 4 has any information at all, which is basically copy-pasted into the article. Birchfield does show up on the 1936 Yakima East USGS topo map: , as an intersection near the tracks with a couple of buildings. There is now a Birchfield Road through the area; every hit I got for Birchfield was to the road. Fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:31, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Blackrock, Washington
The article Blackrock, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location. I can find several passing mentions to a "Blackrock district" or "Blackrock lands" in local press, mostly from the 1900s and 1910s, nothing more recent than 1939. But all of these are trivial mentions about the daily happenings of Joe Blow "of Blackrock district" as rural newspapers often used to publish. This does not ever seem to have been a "community", though, and no other information was found; the coordinates locate to empty grasslands, with a small "Black Rock Cemetery" nearby. This must have been a place significant to some people, but we have no record of it and therefore can't have an article; fails WP:GEOLAND because it wasn't legally-recognized and fails WP:GNG for lack of SIGCOV.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Emerald, Washington
The article Emerald, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad point sourced only to GNIS (reference 3 does not mention Emerald and is just a link to the US Census website). No coverage found of any type; 1965 USGS topo map does show Emerald as a cluster of a few buildings along the tracks: . Today the railroad is gone and the site is just a couple of barns; not a community and never was. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:54, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Farron, Washington
The article Farron, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Another non-notable railroad waypoint; no information found. Reference 4 is the only mention of Farron that could be found anywhere, and its statement "the town never grew large enough for a post office" is boilerplate text that the NPRRHS inserted in many entries on minor railroad stations. Coordinates locate to empty farmland today. Complete failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Flint, Washington
The article Flint, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad spur, as per Reference 1, which is the only piece of information that could be found about this place. Not a community; fails WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Givens Corner, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Givens Corner, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Givens Corner, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Birchfield, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Birchfield, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Birchfield, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Ashue, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashue, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ashue, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Farron, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farron, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Farron, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Blackrock, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blackrock, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Blackrock, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Harwood, Washington
The article Harwood, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable location; only information found was appearance on the 1958 Wiley City USGS topo map: , where it is just an intersection with a church; and a mention in the 1922 Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide , a directory. That's pretty thin gruel for coverage; the article cites only GNIS, which is insufficient for notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Holtzinger, Washington
The article Holtzinger, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad point; the NPRHA document (reference 4) inconsistently describes Holtzinger as a "spur" and a "town". This is the only mention of Holtzinger that could be found, other than the 1958 Naches USGS topo, which shows it as a level crossing with a large building, probably a fruit warehouse: . Nothing else found; fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. GNIS is not sufficient for notability.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Liberty, Yakima County, Washington
The article Liberty, Yakima County, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No information about this location found. Sources cited are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the Census Bureau, which does not have any entry for a Liberty in Yakima County. Appears on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map as a schoolhouse: , and also as a dot on the 1979 Toppenish map. Current sattelite view shows only a farming area with a couple of agricultural buildings. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Lichty, Washington
The article Lichty, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Just a railroad siding, not a "community". All sources cited describe it as a rail point; having a post office is insufficient for notability as rural post offices were often not located in "communities" at all. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Midvale, Washington
The article Midvale, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable railroad junction; only information found (other than the cited sources, which do not establish notability) is the word "Midvale" at a rail wye on the 1965 Granger USGS topo map: . Complete failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG; is not and never was a community.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of East Selah, Washington
The article East Selah, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pomona, Washington
The article Pomona, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
East Selah and Pamona are same place and a thorough reading of the local paper shows no town with either of these names. East Selah was farming district. And Pamona was only ever mentioned as a place here https://wwwnewspapers-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/article/the-yakima-herald-east-selah/140757627/. Otherwise it is some kind of social club for farmers.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Yethonat, Washington
The article Yethonat, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is not a single mention of this place in a single newspaper anywhere. There are not enough reliable sources available to expand this article.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Weikel, Washington
The article Weikel, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There is not one mention of Weikel being a place in the local papers. Not enough reliable sources to expand this article.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 00:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Artesian, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Artesian, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Artesian, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nass, Washington
The article Nass, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable rail point, not a community. Only two mentions of this place could be found, both from 1914: , about the comings and goings of people loading potatoes onto trains at "Nass Siding", and , a similarly trivial mention of a couple of locals going about their lives. Complete failure of WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Furthermore, the census bureau listing in the references is a dishonest attempt to make this place appear better-documented than it is; there is no entry for Nass.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pinecliff, Washington
The article Pinecliff, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
An HOA is not a "populated, legally-recognized place"; furthermore, the fact that the author of this stub describes Pinecliff as 20 miles west of Ellensburg indicates they have no idea what they're talking about; this development is well over an hour from Ellensburg by car (due to terrain), and unless you can fly, the closest town is Yakima. First 2 sources are GNIS (not sufficient for notability) and the third has no such listing, apparently added to pad the reference list. Total failure of WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 01:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Sawyer, Washington
The article Sawyer, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence found that this was ever a community. Apart from reference 4 (which describes it inconsistently as a town and a rail junction), only two mentions could be found: One line in Bullinger's Postal and Shippers Guide from 1922(), and one passing mention from 1956: "Mr. and Mrs. Basil Kimmel of Sawyer were dinner guests..." (). This is about as trivial as coverage gets. Current satellite image shows a warehouse surrounded by farmland, with a Sawyer Fire Station nearby. Fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. Not a notable place.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of East Selah, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article East Selah, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/East Selah, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.James.folsom (talk) 23:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Pomona, Washington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pomona, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pomona, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.James.folsom (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Rimrock, Washington
The article Rimrock, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Satellite shows a small cluster of houses at the base of the dam, the airport is in a different city despite being very nearby. Google says it's in the county. Local paper coverage runs from the 1890's to 1988. In 1899 it is a geological feature (https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-sheep-roadway/141277727/) Fast forward to 1920, and it's become a popular camp site, many people go camping and hunting there. (example:https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-camping-at-rimrock/141278267/). In 1925 the lake was created and afterward Fishing was added to the list of activities. (https://www.newspapers.com/article/grandview-herald-rimrock-lake/141278748/). I remember reading about elk being reintroduced, and sure enough rimrock is good for that too (1936: https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-sunnyside-times-1936-not-a-town/141279168/) I goes on like that for decades, people picnicking, fishing etc all the way to modern times. There is no town there now and I've documented very thoroughly that there wasn't ever one. It's GNIS confabulating a geological feature into a town.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Wenas, Washington
The article Wenas, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article says nothing is there now, the satellite says nothing is there now. Fortunately, the newspapers cover the area from the 1890's to the late 80's. There are many mentions of Wenas as a valley where people live, and lake where people recreate. There are no mentions of a town named Wenas to be found. GNIS likely confabulated the lake or the wildlife area into a town. Here is a sampling of the nature of the place.
https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-1899-wenas-valley/141290709/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-yakima-herald-of-the-wenas-1909/141291255/ https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-in-the-wenas-1/141291970/
https://www.newspapers.com/article/daily-sun-news-wenas-valley/141292628/
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James.folsom (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert
Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Nikola Tesla/nationality alert during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Joy (talk) 12:25, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
"Misplaced Pages:RACIST" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Misplaced Pages:RACIST has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 30 § Misplaced Pages:RACIST until a consensus is reached. --MikutoH 00:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ruth, Washington
Hello, MrX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruth, Washington, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 16:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Ruth, Washington
Hello, MrX. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ruth".
In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Plaza South Tower
The article Plaza South Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Notability not demonstrated per WP:GEOFEAT for buildings.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – The Grid (talk) 20:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)