Revision as of 06:16, 5 June 2015 editGedium (talk | contribs)47 editsm words "hadno" require a space between them← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 05:47, 7 January 2025 edit undoJohnuniq (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators86,676 editsm Reverted edit by 103.88.90.242 (talk) to last version by Lowercase sigmabot IIITag: Rollback | ||
(300 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header|search=yes}} | {{Talk header|search=yes}} | ||
{{olddelrev |page=Log/2007 August 16-31#26 August 2007|date=26 August 2007 |result=refer further disputes to ArbCom. Revisions prior to the first that contained the term may be restored.}} | |||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality |importance=High}} | |||
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Mid}} | |||
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=high}} | |||
{{WikiProject Pornography |importance=Top}} | |||
}} | |||
{{controversial}} | |||
{{Copied | |||
|from1=Child pornography | |||
|to1=Laws regarding child pornography | |||
|diff1=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Laws_regarding_child_pornography&oldid=327344029 | |||
|date1=22 November 2009 | |||
|from2=Child pornography | |||
|to2=Child pornography laws in the Philippines | |||
|diff2=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Child_pornography_laws_in_the_Philippines&oldid=306780666 | |||
|date2=8 August 2009 | |||
|from3=Internet child pornography | |||
|to3=Child pornography | |||
|date3=21 October 2004 | |||
|merge3=yes}} | |||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
|archiveheader = {{ |
|archiveheader = {{automatic archive navigator}} | ||
|maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
|counter = |
|counter = 7 | ||
|minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
|algo = old( |
|algo = old(180d) | ||
|archive = Talk:Child pornography/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Child pornography/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk oldafd" style="text-align:center;" | |||
| width="48px" |] || This article was ] by an administrator and restarted as a stub on 22:07 2007-05-28, due to the presence of a problematic search term. The result of the ''']''' was to refer further disputes to ArbCom. Revisions prior to the first that contained the term may be restored. | |||
|} | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1={{WikiProject Sexuality|class=B|importance=high}} | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch/WikiProjectNotice}} | |||
{{WikiProject Law|class=B|importance=Mid}} | |||
{{WikiProject Crime|class=B|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Pornography|class=B|importance=Top}} | |||
{{WikiProject Psychology|class=B|importance=High}} | |||
}} | |||
{{Copied |from=Child pornography |to=Laws regarding child pornography |diff=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Laws_regarding_child_pornography&oldid=327344029 }} | |||
{{Copied |from=Child pornography |to=Child pornography laws in the Philippines |diff=http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Child_pornography_laws_in_the_Philippines&oldid=306780666 }} | |||
{{old move|date1=16 December 2023|destination1=Child Sexual Abuse Material|result1=not moved|link1=Special:Permalink/1190731991#Requested move 16 December 2023|date2=16 August 2024|destination2=Child sexual abuse material|result2=not moved|link2=Special:Permalink/1241121078#Requested move 16 August 2024}} | |||
== Further question concerning Japan == | |||
== Gamer's Dilemma == | |||
I feel that this is largely out of place with the page as it discusses ] rather than "real" child pornography, should this be moved to the aforementioned page or similar ones or be kept as is? ] (]) 16:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I second Magi's opinion, I believe it should be moved elsewhere as it seems to be conflating the two as if they were equivalent which said relation is hotly debated at very best and can be seen as outright slanderous at worst. Though this might just be because I am not sure if the "Gamer's Dilemma" is referring specifically to hyperrealistic simulations made to be indistinguishable from actual child pornography, or instead was referring to/also including cartoon/anime pornography such as lolicon/shotacon where a direct relation between the fictional material and realistic depictions of actual child sexual exploitation is pretty much nonexistent, in general, I think it is important that we differentiate the two from each other, but I still think either way it should probably go to another article. ] (]) 00:08, 10 March 2024 (EST) | |||
== Requested move 16 August 2024 == | |||
<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top --> | |||
:''The following is a closed discussion of a ]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a ] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.'' | |||
The result of the move request was: '''not moved.''' <small>(])</small> ] ] 06:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
---- | |||
] → {{no redirect|Child sexual abuse material}} – While "child pornography" has been generally accepted as the ] for this topic, the ] is clear that that is not the only thing we must consider, and that article titles must also be ]. I think there is also an argument that the common name has shifted in more recent times, with news outlets, academia, government agencies, and NGOs increasingly shifting to use "CSAM" (and similar terms). | |||
As is outlined in ], there has been a broad shift towards using "child sexual abuse material" (or similar terms) as the more neutral term that avoids the inaccurate description of abusive material as consensual pornography. This usage is supported by experts and academics as well as industry/law enforcement organizations including ] () and the US Department of Justice () in the US, the UK Home Office () in the UK, etc. Per the : {{tq|While this phrase still appears in federal law, “child sexual abuse material” is preferred, as it better reflects the abuse that is depicted in the images and videos and the resulting trauma to the child. In fact, in 2016, an international working group, comprising a collection of countries and international organizations working to combat child exploitation, formally recognized “child sexual abuse material” as the preferred term.}} ] (she/her • ]) 17:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
* '''Oppose.''' I don't think that the current title implies that child pornography is consensual. Besides, , while "child pornography" is still the mainstream definition by a big margin. Only five of the 86 sources in this article seem to refer to this as "child sexual abuse material". Titling this article with a new term used by only a minority of reliable sources would not be neutral, at least not until the paradigm possibly changes in the future. ] (]) 21:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''support''' per nom—] 00:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Strong oppose.''' Many reliable sources continue to call it "child pornography", so it remains the current common name. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 07:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Strong oppose'''. The nominator has provided no evidence that child pornography is a non-neutral term. The opinions of these agencies don't appear to be widely held views.] (]) 17:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''', per others. It is the common name. ] (]) 18:43, 17 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
:'''Oppose''' for all the reasons we opposed it last time and the evidence that it is non-neutral is slim and do not outweigh COMMONNAME. ] (]) 19:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Just today, Jan. 7, 2014, the BBC ran another story discussing issues involving Japan and CP. There are a number of sections, but Artificially generated or simulated imagery in particular, where some inclusion of this information, in general, should be included. The "lolicon" issue, I would think, would be the apex example for inclusion. My formatting skills are quite atrocious so I'm hesitant to start making significant edits, even though I think they should certainly be made. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-30698640 <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:'''Support''' the common name is inaccurate and reflects misconceptions that child abuse sexual material could ever be in the same category as consensual pornography. The current name is non-neutral with a bias towards advocates of legalized pedophilia which is something we should strongly oppose regardless of how it was normalized in the past. ] (]) 16:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Organized crime == | |||
*'''Oppose''': The term 'child pornography' is the established and commonly used phrase. ]] 17:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' per very clear common name. Nothing has changed since the previous RM nine months ago. -- ] (]) 11:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose'''. While I can understand the motivation of those who wish to encourage alternative terminology, 'child pornography' is currently by far the most commonly used term. Misplaced Pages reflects current usage, it does not set out to change it. ] (]) 12:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: var(--color-error, red);">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from ] --> | |||
</div><div style="clear:both;" class=></div> | |||
== Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2024 == | |||
The organized crime section seemed pretty misleading about the significance of for-profit distribution of CP. That's been fixed a little bit, but there's still probably undue weight given to for-profit distribution. ] (]) 17:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
{{edit semi-protected|Child pornography|answered=yes}} | |||
== "Child sexual abuse images" == | |||
Add this to the Distribution and receipt section: | |||
In 2023, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children’s CyberTipline received 36.2 million reports of suspected child sexual exploitation, an increase of 12% from 2022.{{redacted}} | |||
References: | |||
Does that terminology apply when the images are created by the child without any encouragement from, or involvement by, another person? ] (]) 23:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
<ref>National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. “CyberTipline Data.” Last modified 2021. Accessed September 12, 2024. https://www.missingkids.org/cybertiplinedata.</ref> | |||
<ref>National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. CyberTipline 2023 Report. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, 2024.</ref> ] (]) 20:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{reflist-talk}} | |||
:{{done}} <code>]! ]? .</code> 03:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:I have removed some copyvio from this-- -- ] (]) 13:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Moving to Child sexual abuse material == | |||
:It's mentioned in the 3rd paragraph of the lead. Is there another part you are referring to?] (]) 03:28, 17 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Just wanted to add my support for this article to be moved to "Child sexual abuse material". | |||
::'''Note''': I was told via email that Ferberson was globally banned over the weekend by ]; see . A few other accounts, including ]/]/] (a person that ), were also banned over the weekend by WP:WMF. During that time, I'd recently seen two of Nathan Larson's ] accounts pop on my ] because of ] taking care of things at the user pages/talk pages of those accounts (see and ), so I already knew something was going on regarding this matter. I received the aforementioned email about the WP:WMF bans yesterday, but saw it/read it for the first time several minutes ago. I was already suspicious of the Ferberson account for ] (]) 12:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Multiple sources have already been shared above, I'll add one: Task Force Argos, an Australia police unit, clearly explains that "porn" is made between consentent people. Speaking of "child porn" (with children or even infants) completely inaccurately reflects that the children have been abused. | |||
::And, for the record, the email indicates to me that Ferberson is User:Nathan Larson/User:Tisane/User:Leucosticte. Have a careful look at Ferberson's edits to the Child pornography article, such as , and decide if any or all of those edits should be reverted. My initial mindset in this case is a ]/] one, and WP:Deny should be clearer that it does not only apply to vandals. Ferberson is not an editor anyone should want editing child sexual abuse or child sexuality topics. His edits to sexual topics that don't involve children and teenagers are also often problematic. ] (]) 12:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
https://play.listnr.com/podcast/disclosed | |||
:::Update: the Ferberson edit that I pointed to in my " 12:44, 20 January 2015 (UTC)" comment above. ] (]) 03:19, 21 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
https://www.cbc.ca/listen/cbc-podcasts/387-hunting-warhead | |||
== Does child pornography exhibit properties of quantum entanglement? == | |||
] (]) 07:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
According to "several professors", it seem it does. | |||
:This has already been discussed twice before. You can read the two discussions . ] (]) 17:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2025 == | |||
''Several professors of psychology state that memories of child abuse are maintained as long as visual records exist, are accessed, and are "exploited perversely." | |||
The children portrayed in child pornography are first victimized when their abuse is perpetrated and recorded. They are further victimized each time that record is accessed. | |||
'' | |||
{{edit semi-protected|Child pornography|answered=yes}} | |||
Orly. So, children, meaning minors, who take pictures of themselves are victimizing themselves, and every time their explicit images are viewed, they are further. | |||
SaaS Platforms used to catch what should never have never been uploaded in the first place. | |||
https://www.youtube.com/csai-match/ | |||
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/CloudService?oneroute=true | |||
https://protectingchildren.google/intl/en/#alliances-and-programs | |||
https://us.vobile.com/ | |||
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-ca/products/ai-services/ai-vision/#overview | |||
Law in United States | |||
Can one exctract energy from this mysterious effect of remote victimization? | |||
§2422. Coercion and enticement | |||
(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. | |||
(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life. | |||
For example, could one post a picture of a childs butt, send it all over the internett, and hook the child up to some kind of generator? | |||
] (]) 23:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Or maybe just viewing images has no victimization effect whatsoever, and whoever posted that tripe is such a completely idiotic social justice warrior retard, that there ought to be a law against it. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 09:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
: You have not said what change you are suggesting be made to the wording of the article. Exactly what text, if any, do you wish to see added to the article, and what text, if any, you wish to see removed? ] (]) 23:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Spelling mistake == | |||
Under the heading "International coordination of law enforcement" in the sentence "A 2008 review of child pornography laws in 187 countries by the International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (ICMEC) showed that 93 hadno laws that specifically addressed child pornography." the words "hadno" require a space between them. |
Latest revision as of 05:47, 7 January 2025
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Child pornography article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article was nominated for deletion review on 26 August 2007. The result of the discussion was refer further disputes to ArbCom. Revisions prior to the first that contained the term may be restored.. |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Text has been copied to or from this article; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
Gamer's Dilemma
I feel that this is largely out of place with the page as it discusses Simulated child pornography rather than "real" child pornography, should this be moved to the aforementioned page or similar ones or be kept as is? MagiTagi (talk) 16:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- I second Magi's opinion, I believe it should be moved elsewhere as it seems to be conflating the two as if they were equivalent which said relation is hotly debated at very best and can be seen as outright slanderous at worst. Though this might just be because I am not sure if the "Gamer's Dilemma" is referring specifically to hyperrealistic simulations made to be indistinguishable from actual child pornography, or instead was referring to/also including cartoon/anime pornography such as lolicon/shotacon where a direct relation between the fictional material and realistic depictions of actual child sexual exploitation is pretty much nonexistent, in general, I think it is important that we differentiate the two from each other, but I still think either way it should probably go to another article. GigaMigaDigaChad (talk) 00:08, 10 March 2024 (EST)
Requested move 16 August 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 06:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
Child pornography → Child sexual abuse material – While "child pornography" has been generally accepted as the WP:COMMONNAME for this topic, the article title policy is clear that that is not the only thing we must consider, and that article titles must also be neutral. I think there is also an argument that the common name has shifted in more recent times, with news outlets, academia, government agencies, and NGOs increasingly shifting to use "CSAM" (and similar terms).
As is outlined in Child pornography#Terminology and definitions, there has been a broad shift towards using "child sexual abuse material" (or similar terms) as the more neutral term that avoids the inaccurate description of abusive material as consensual pornography. This usage is supported by experts and academics as well as industry/law enforcement organizations including NCMEC (ex) and the US Department of Justice (ex) in the US, the UK Home Office (ex) in the UK, etc. Per the DOJ: While this phrase still appears in federal law, “child sexual abuse material” is preferred, as it better reflects the abuse that is depicted in the images and videos and the resulting trauma to the child. In fact, in 2016, an international working group, comprising a collection of countries and international organizations working to combat child exploitation, formally recognized “child sexual abuse material” as the preferred term.
GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. I don't think that the current title implies that child pornography is consensual. Besides, "child sexual abuse material" is used only by a small minority of reliable sources, while "child pornography" is still the mainstream definition by a big margin. Only five of the 86 sources in this article seem to refer to this as "child sexual abuse material". Titling this article with a new term used by only a minority of reliable sources would not be neutral, at least not until the paradigm possibly changes in the future. Badbluebus (talk) 21:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- support per nom—blindlynx 00:58, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose. Many reliable sources continue to call it "child pornography", so it remains the current common name. O.N.R. 07:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose. The nominator has provided no evidence that child pornography is a non-neutral term. The opinions of these agencies don't appear to be widely held views.Esolo5002 (talk) 17:39, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, per others. It is the common name. Svampesky (talk) 18:43, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose for all the reasons we opposed it last time and the evidence that it is non-neutral is slim and do not outweigh COMMONNAME. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support the common name is inaccurate and reflects misconceptions that child abuse sexual material could ever be in the same category as consensual pornography. The current name is non-neutral with a bias towards advocates of legalized pedophilia which is something we should strongly oppose regardless of how it was normalized in the past. Jorahm (talk) 16:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose: The term 'child pornography' is the established and commonly used phrase. Waqar💬 17:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per very clear common name. Nothing has changed since the previous RM nine months ago. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose. While I can understand the motivation of those who wish to encourage alternative terminology, 'child pornography' is currently by far the most commonly used term. Misplaced Pages reflects current usage, it does not set out to change it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add this to the Distribution and receipt section: In 2023, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children’s CyberTipline received 36.2 million reports of suspected child sexual exploitation, an increase of 12% from 2022.(Redacted)
References: TruthToPower2022 (talk) 20:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
References
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. “CyberTipline Data.” Last modified 2021. Accessed September 12, 2024. https://www.missingkids.org/cybertiplinedata.
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. CyberTipline 2023 Report. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, 2024.
- Done
Scaledish! Talkish? Statish.
03:38, 18 October 2024 (UTC) - I have removed some copyvio from this-- -- Diannaa (talk) 13:40, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Moving to Child sexual abuse material
Just wanted to add my support for this article to be moved to "Child sexual abuse material".
Multiple sources have already been shared above, I'll add one: Task Force Argos, an Australia police unit, clearly explains that "porn" is made between consentent people. Speaking of "child porn" (with children or even infants) completely inaccurately reflects that the children have been abused.
https://play.listnr.com/podcast/disclosed
https://www.cbc.ca/listen/cbc-podcasts/387-hunting-warhead
LexisVD (talk) 07:58, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- This has already been discussed twice before. You can read the two discussions . Badbluebus (talk) 17:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2025
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
SaaS Platforms used to catch what should never have never been uploaded in the first place. https://www.youtube.com/csai-match/ https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/photodna/CloudService?oneroute=true https://protectingchildren.google/intl/en/#alliances-and-programs https://us.vobile.com/ https://azure.microsoft.com/en-ca/products/ai-services/ai-vision/#overview
Law in United States §2422. Coercion and enticement (a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.
FedLawAuditing (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- You have not said what change you are suggesting be made to the wording of the article. Exactly what text, if any, do you wish to see added to the article, and what text, if any, you wish to see removed? JBW (talk) 23:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- High-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- B-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- High-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- B-Class Pornography articles
- Top-importance Pornography articles
- B-Class Top-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles
- Misplaced Pages controversial topics