Revision as of 11:57, 18 October 2015 edit110.21.36.30 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:10, 5 December 2024 edit undoSpookyaki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,230 edits Assessment: banner shell, Human rights (Top), Politics (Rater) |
(119 intermediate revisions by 69 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
⚫ |
{{controversial}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech |importance=high}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Human rights |importance=Top}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Journalism |importance=top}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Top}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Media |importance=high}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Philosophy |importance=low |ethics=yes |social=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low|libertarianism=yes|libertarianism-importance=mid}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Pornography |importance=high}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{Copied |
|
|
| from = Internet censorship |
|
|
| from_oldid = 298795207 |
|
⚫ |
| to = Censorship |
|
|
| to_diff = 299045696 |
|
|
| date = 28 June 2009 |
|
|
}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 250K |
Line 5: |
Line 24: |
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
|archive = Talk:Censorship/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Censorship/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}}{{talkheader}} |
|
⚫ |
{{controversial}} |
|
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Society|class=C}} |
|
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell| |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Freedom of speech|class=C|importance=high}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Human rights|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Law|class=C|importance=Top}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Media|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Journalism|class=C|importance=top}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Philosophy|ethics=yes|social=yes|class=C|importance=low}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=low}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Pornproject|class=C|importance=high}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Communication Studies - 1== |
⚫ |
== Video Game Censorship == |
|
|
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Rollins_College/Introduction_to_Communication_Studies_-_1_(Spring_2023) | assignments = ], ] | reviewers = ] | start_date = 2023-01-18 | end_date = 2023-05-09 }} |
|
|
|
|
Seeing as there is an article on video game censorship, shouldn't it be given its own heading under "Censorship by medium"? --] (]) 14:34, 2 August 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:{{Done}} -] (]) 13:23, 5 August 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Notification of a TFA nomination == |
|
|
|
|
|
In the past, there have been requests that discussions about potentially controversial TFAs are brought to the attention of more than just those who have WP:TFAR on their watchlist. With that in mind: '']'' has been nominated for an appearance as Today's Featured Article. If you have any views, please comment at ]. — ''']''' (]) 20:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by ] (]) 12:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)</span> |
|
== Voroshilov, Molotov, Stalin, with Nikolai Yezhov image == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Inclusion of Censorship | Fandom as external reference == |
|
Is reference to the ] image a good example of censorship? I would regard it more essentially as being an example of PR and spin and don't see the content as central to the article topic. ] ] 06:00, 16 December 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I want to discuss if the website {{cite web |title=Censorship {{!}} Fandom |url=https://censorship.fandom.com/Index}} can be used as external source to view which content is censored and how. That website is a primary source of information, and it's user-driven. It has to be that way, since no official movie producer discloses (or has to) what is censored and why, not even less compare with other countries. |
|
== Category for editing wikipedia articles to remove information or add bias? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's something that probably amounts to attempting to suppress an impression: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
] (]) 09:54, 20 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2015/03/nypd-wont-punish-cops-for-sanitizing-wikipedia-police-brutality-entries/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:No. We don't use self published sites and/or open wikis as sources, see ]. We also don't use reddit, and we don't use conduct ] to make points not present in cited sources. ] (]) 11:45, 20 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
I'm not sure which of the methods it falls under. Does anyone want to have an opinion? |
|
|
] (]) 23:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 26 June 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Censorship|answered=yes}} |
|
== Hypocrisy in Cartoon Censorship == |
|
|
|
Would like to add for further reading: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gosztonyi, Gergely (2023) . Springer, Cham. ISBN: 978-3-031-46528-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46529-1 ] (]) 20:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
Why doesn't someone mention the hypocritical situation that, in the 2000s, cartoons that could be seen to be negative to black people, Native Americans, Asians, Arabs, smokers, cross-dressers (even though this was common in pantomime), alcholics, women, intellectuals (and those of low intelligence), anyone who looks disabled and who acts without espousing the virtues of their disability, and just about any other concept the politically-correct types despise on any given day, are cut to ribbons or are no longer shown, leaving those containing only (once-censored - irony!) flatulence and gross belching (such as that found at a sleazy hotel on a Saturday night). Oh, don't forget modern teens types 'with attitude' who constantly say 'Duh!' every five minutes, and fat people - why are animators still permitted to make fun of fat people? For this reason I will not let any of my grandchildren watch these low-brow excuses for entertainment. How a child's mind can be expected to think if he is exposed to this tripe is beyond me. How the hell can something that comes out of someone's backside be considered funny? (unless it is a modern 'streetwise' cartoon, of course). If competition with computer games and 'censorship' prevent the creation of quality animated product for fear of offending some group, then DON'T MAKE ANY MORE CHILDREN'S CARTOONS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 06:34, 29 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
Does anyone agree with me? |
|
⚫ |
] (]) 23:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC) |
|