Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:52, 26 May 2018 view sourceEdJohnston (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,232 edits →User:108.206.145.38 reported by User:Geraldo Perez (Result: Blocked): Closing← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 17:46, 17 January 2025 view source Bbb23 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators271,255 edits →User:Tamerlanon reported by User:AirshipJungleman29 (Result: ): Blocked 72 hours (using responseHelper)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Short description\|Noticeboard for edit warring}}
	__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}
			{{pp-sock\|small=yes}}
	<noinclude>{{pp-move-indef }}{{/Header}}] ]
			<!--Adds protection template automatically if semi-protected--><noinclude>{{#if:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}\|{{pp\|small=yes}}}}__NEWSECTIONLINK__{{no admin backlog}}{{/Header}}] ]
			{{pp-move\|small=yes}}
	{{User:MiszaBot/config		{{User:MiszaBot/config
	\|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}		\|archiveheader = {{Administrators' noticeboard navbox all}}
	\|maxarchivesize = 250K		\|maxarchivesize = 250K
	\|counter = ~~368~~		\|counter = 491
	\|algo = old(~~36h~~)		\|algo = old(2d)
	\|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f		\|key = 0a3bba89e703569428f2aab1add75bd7d7d1583d2d1f397783aee23fda62b06f
	\|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d		\|archive = Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive%(counter)d
			}}</noinclude>
	}}</noinclude><!--<?xml version="1.0"?><api><query><pages><page pageid=" ns="4" title="Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring"><revisions><rev>=Reports=>
			<!-- NOTE: THE BOTTOM IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->

	NOTE: THE BOTTOM IS THE PLACE FOR NEW REPORTS. -->

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Fadlo R. Khuri}} <br />
	== ] reported by ] (Result: Defer to the SPI) ==
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|94.187.8.87}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Viet Cong attack on Tan Son Nhut Air Base (1966)}} <br />
	'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|TDN92}}

	'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	#		#
	#		#
	#		#
	#		#
	#		#
	#		#
	#
	#
	#
	#

	'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''		'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' ]

			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

	'''Diff of ~~attempt~~ to ~~resolve~~ ~~dispute~~ ~~on article~~ talk page:'''		'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''

	<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />		<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
			This is a straight-forward case of edit warring by an unregistered editor (using multiple accounts). This material was also the subject an edit war in 2022. There may be genuine ] concerns but edit warring without participating in the Talk page section specifically opened to discuss this material is not acceptable. ] (]) 12:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
			:{{AN3\|p\|three days}} by {{u\|Randykitty}} ] (]) 22:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected) ==
	User:TDN:92 and IP:117.6.92.136 (possibly an IP sock) have been edit-warring the results of this and various other First Indochina War and Vietnam War battles. I referred this to discussion of the Talk page which has been fruitless. ] (]) 05:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
	:See also ]. I am almost at the point of indeffing TDN92 as a sock of Dino nam based on behavior, but now that there is an SPI, let's see what happens there. ] (]) 17:15, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	:*'''Result:''' Deferring to the SPI. If this editor continues to revert and the SPI isn't resolved, post on my talk page and maybe something can be done. ] (]) 01:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Bulgaria–North Macedonia relations}}
	== ] reported by ] (Result: No action) ==

	'''~~Page~~:''' {{~~pagelinks~~\|~~Richard Wagner~~}} ~~<br />~~		'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|46.217.186.173}}
	'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Mr KEBAB}}

	'''Previous version reverted to:'''		'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269599524\|13:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	#
			# {{diff2\|1269595946\|12:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	#
			# {{diff2\|1269506198\|01:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	#
			# {{diff2\|1269480789\|22:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (])"
	#
			# {{diff2\|1269469278\|21:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) FASISM TOWARDS MACEDONIA"

	'''~~Diff~~ of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''		'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269596351\|12:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ]."

	'''~~Diff~~ of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''		'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

	<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
	* Just read my edit summaries, which the OP has refused to do. (S)he also required me to provide a citation when the transcription was unsourced to begin with. ] (]) 16:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	**I did no such thing. Provide diffs of your claims. ] (]) 16:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	***, , ] (]) 16:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	****The first diff is not me; the second and third diffs prove your claim is false. ] (]) 16:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	*****Fair enough, but that doesn't change much. It still means you didn't read my edit summaries. ] (]) 16:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	******Provide diffs or other proof to substantiate that ] claim. ] (]) 16:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	*******I think I'll quit this pointless discussion. ] (]) 16:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	*For what it's worth, when the comment <code><nowiki><!-- Do not change this without a source --></nowiki></code> was added to the article, the vowel was already {{IPA-de\|ɪ\|}}. It appears it was changed to {{IPA-de\|i\|}} by an IP, probably inadvertently, as their summary explains other changes in the edit but not the one to the first vowel. So I doubt those who reverted Mr KEBAB had any grounding, but Mr KEBAB also could have certainly handled it in a more respectful manner. ] (]) 16:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	*I must also note that the fourth diff provided by the reporter is not a revert, just a removal of a comment telling people not to edit something already unsourced without providing a source. This strikes me as an ] issue on the part of the two who reverted Mr KEBAB's edit. They reverted it simply because it was a change to something that stood in a featured article for very long, without examining the validity of his edit, which they could have done by simply clicking the notation and reading ]. But Mr KEBAB also could have and should have spared passive-agressive or uncivil comments in summaries on his talk and continued trying to get his point across, such as quoting or pointing to the relevant part of the help page, initiating a conversation on the talk, or citing an external source like ''Duden''. ] (]) 17:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	**Please read ]. "{{xt\|An editor must not perform '''more than three reverts''' on a '''single page'''—<u>whether involving the same or different material</u>—within a '''24-hour period'''. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.}}" (underscoring mine) ] (]) 17:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	***Well, if it weren't him someone should have removed such a silly comment a long time ago, if you ask me. ] (]) 17:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	****He was warned about 3RR but made a fourth revert anyway. That's a 3RR violation. ] (]) 17:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	*****I didn't revert anyone but removed an inappropriate hidden message. ] (]) 17:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	******Please read ]. "{{xt\|An editor must not perform '''more than three reverts''' on a '''single page'''—<u>whether involving the same or different material</u>—within a '''24-hour period'''. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.}}" (underscoring mine) ] (]) 17:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> Persistent edit warring. ] (]) 13:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
	Has ] edit resolved the dispute? --] <sup>]</sup> 18:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
			*{{AN3\|p}} ] ] 20:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
	*'''Result:''' No action. This war may have stopped. Report again if it continues. ] (]) 01:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

	== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==		== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked from article for 72 hours) ==

	'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Al-~~Awamiyah~~}}~~<br />~~		'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Russo-Turkish War (1735–1739)}}
	'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Altamimi579}}

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Asafviki}}
	'''Previous version reverted to:'''

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

	'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''		'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269613200\|14:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "I understood you at the beginning but now I think you are doing this unnecessarily. All the sources are reliable and you can take a look if you want.İf you really have a sound reason tell me the truth please."
	# : first straight revert
			# {{diff2\|1269609369\|14:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Can you please tell me why you reverted my edit?i just want to know where am I doing wrong."
	# : second straight revert
			# {{diff2\|1269569554\|09:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "I am making my edit since there has been no objection to the mentioned sources for 3 days."
	# : third straight revert

	# : fourth straight revert
			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269613702\|14:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>

			Also LOUT socking with ]. --<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">]--]</sup> 15:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
			:{{AN3\|b\|72 hours}} from article; hopefully in that time someone can explain what they are doing wrong. ] (]) 22:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 48 hours) ==

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|SmartLynx Airlines Estonia}}

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|TG-article}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269668652\|20:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Accidents and incidents */"
			# {{diff2\|1269664490\|19:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Accidents and incidents */"

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269638908\|17:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''


			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>

			Also edit warring at ], ], ] and ]. User has been told to discuss edits on talk pages on multiple occasions, and seemingly refuses to do so. ] (]) 20:18, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

			:@] This is not a 3RR violation. I see two reverts. ] ] 20:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
			::No it’s not a 3RR violation - but it’s a user that’s consistently edit warring across multiple pages and refusing to engage in talk pages, which is why I believe it still belongs on the edit warring noticeboard.
			::Edit: I’ll get the rest of the diffs here in a sec… I used Twinkle for the original report. ] (]) 20:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
			:::* ] - {{diff2\|1269663239\|reversion 1}}, {{diff2\|1269667404\|reversion 2}} (which was following a pertial reinstatement of their already reverted content)
			:::* ] - {{diff2\|1269638888\|partial reinstatement}} of reverted content, followed by {{diff2\|1269666092\|reinstating}} his reverted edit
			:::* ] - {{diff2\|1269664088\|reinstating}} their previously reverted content
			:::* ] - {{diff2\|1269664490\|reinstates}} their reverted edit, then {{diff2\|1269668652\|again partially reinstating}} their reverted edit.
			:::* ] - legitimately and in good faith {{diff2\|1269497042\|alters}} a template, but then after being reverted {{diff2\|1269636269\|doubles down}} and reinstates the edit.
			:::The user has previously been blocked for this exact same behaviour by ], and is nt responding to talk page messages. ] (]) 20:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
			::::{{AN3\|b\|48 hours}} ] (]) 22:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24h) ==

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Wolf Man (2025 film)}}

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|190.201.157.28}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269704227\|23:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269703995\|23:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269673354\|20:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Reception */"
			# {{diff2\|1269640157\|17:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269704229\|23:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
			# No, but level 4 warning previously given on editors talk page

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
			{{AN3\|b\|24 hours}} ] (]) 21:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Page protected for a month) ==

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Until Dawn (film)}}

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|2607:FEA8:7221:F600:60E4:6CE4:B415:E562}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269723705\|01:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269722106\|01:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269715862\|00:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) Okay, the vandalism has gone on long enough, you are removing accurate information, and you have engaged in this obsession for days, just accept the information and let it go"
			# {{diff\|oldid=1269684805\|diff=1269714293\|label=Consecutive edits made from 00:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC) to 00:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}}
			## {{diff2\|1269714124\|00:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) Enough with the vandalism already"
			## {{diff2\|1269714293\|00:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Undid revision ] by ] (]) Stop with the vandalism, its accurate information"

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269716711\|00:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on ]."
			# {{diff2\|1269716853\|00:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
			# {{diff2\|1269719613\|01:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* We edit by consensus */ new section"

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
			I was just about to report this IP user here until I noticed you already did it a few mins ago...

			Anyways, the IP user has actually made five reverts not four, here's the fifth (or actually, the first) one: ].

			The report is missing "previous version reverted to:" so here it is: ]

			Regards, — ] ] 03:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
			:{{AN3\|p}} for one month by {{noping\|ToBeFree}} ] (]) 21:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Reporter blocked 2 weeks) ==

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Kajari}} <br />
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Adrikshit}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			#
			#
			#
			#




			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''

	'''Diff of ~~edit~~ ~~warring~~ / ~~3RR~~ ~~warning~~:'''		'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''

	'''Diff of ~~attempt~~ to ~~resolve~~ ~~dispute~~ ~~on article~~ talk page:'''		'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''

	<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />		<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
			{{AN3\|nb\|two weeks}} by {{noping\|ToBeFree}} ] (]) 21:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	Please note that Altamimi579 has made more disruptive edits : , and . This last edit reverted my attempt to bring back the stable version and occured after many attempts to discuss with the reported user : , , , and . The user Altamimi579 firmly declined any attempt to gain consensus : . I would welcome the eye of an admin regarding this user's behavior. Best regards.] (]) 17:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
	:{{AN3\|b}} – 31 hours. ] (]) 15:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

			:I have also added a CTOPS notice to the article talk page. ] (]) 21:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==
			::And Aman has been alerted to contentious topics, too. ] (]) 21:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result:indefinitely partially blocked) ==
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Category:Rayne Red Sox players}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|WilliamJE}}

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Killing_of_Wong_Chik_Yeok}}
	;Previous version reverted to:

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Janessian}}
	;Diffs of the user's reverts:
	# {{diff2\|842833007\|00:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "I've replied to you. You don't know baseball or the wikiproject baseball. Go to WikiProject Baseball's talk page."
	# {{diff2\|842832444\|00:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "See my reply at CFD."
	# {{diff2\|842831454\|23:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Isn't the same team. Not the way minor league baseball players are sorted either. See ] and ]"
	# {{diff2\|842752303\|12:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Not a category for this page."

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff\|oldid=1269356091\|diff=1269786107\|label=Consecutive edits made from 11:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC) to 11:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}}
			## {{diff2\|1269785771\|11:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Posting the photo of a deceased tagged to such an intense tragic story would greatly hurt the family. Imagine this is your daughter mug shot, killed by her husband, with her summarised tragic story plastered for the world to see. All I did was to remove her picture and you youngsters spare no effort in reverting it."
			## {{diff2\|1269786107\|11:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)}} "This man, worked hard his whole life, faithful his entire life, fell ill to a mental illness, does not deserve to have his face tagged to a summarised wrong version of the story for the entire world to see. Imagine this is your brother, who spent his old age in agony. Are you sure this is the right thing to do? What good does it serve to publish pictures of an old case other than to serve what grandiose ideology?"

	;Diffs of ~~attempt~~ to ~~resolve~~ ~~dispute~~ ~~on article talk page~~:		'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''


			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	;<u>Comments:</u>

	4 reverts ~12 hours. User warned in edit summary here and in discussion here. ] <small>] • (])</small> 00:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	I replied to BHG here multiple times. She hasn't even tried to rebutt me or taken it to WikiProject Baseball as I told her. She comes here instead. That says alot.], is the complaint department really on ] 00:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
	:William, I tried to have a discussion with you per ]. You kept on reverting, so naturally I came here to get you to stop. --] <small>] • (])</small> 00:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
	::You haven't responded once to my rebuttal or gone to WikiProject baseball. Again you come here to bully. What does that say about you. Your edit summaries here and here use the word silliness. What does that unnecessary word saw about you? I can point out another instance of you trying to bully or mock me. So when are you going to WikiProject Baseball's talk page?], is the complaint department really on ] 01:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
	:::William, I replied to you twice, but you kept on reverting. That silliness is why you are here. Which part of ] is unclear to you? --] <small>] • (])</small> 02:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
	*{{AN3\|b}} – 31 hours by ]. ] (]) 02:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

			User appears to be slow edit warring at this point. JBW has already banned them once for edit warring. ] (]) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==

			:I would also point out that before their first ban for edit warring @] was making comments with a seeming intent to intimidate users that reverted his edits. ] (]) 19:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Alia Bhatt}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|Aligulla}}

			:: {{u\|Isabelle Belato}} has indefinitely partially blocked Janessian from the ] article. ] (]) 21:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	;Previous version reverted to:

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours from editing articles) ==
	;Diffs of the user's reverts:
	# {{diff2\|842891434\|11:17, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""
	# {{diff2\|842890242\|11:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""
	# {{diff2\|842887461\|10:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "she is not british actress however she got british nationality.if she is proud of to be british not indian then she has to work in british movies."
	# {{diff2\|842824591\|22:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""
	# {{diff2\|842820144\|22:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Capitalism}} <br />
	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Free market}} <br />
	# {{diff2\|842888310\|10:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]. (])"
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Extreme poverty}} <br />
	# {{diff2\|842890614\|11:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "/* May 2018 */ re"
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Distribution of wealth}} <br />
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Poverty reduction}} <br />
			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Trickle-down economics}} <br />

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Timeshifter}}
	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

			POV pushing: added the EXACT same graph of (historical US minimum wage) to 36 articles and edit-warring to keep it there.

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	;<u>Comments:</u>

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	Repeatedly changing the actress' nationality despite (which I ), in which the actress and her father claim otherwise. ] (]) 11:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
			#
	:{{AN3\|b}} – 48 hours. ] (]) 01:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
			#
			#
			#

	== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 24 hours) ==

	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Mary Gill (politician)}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|Nilkpo}}

	;Previous version reverted to:

			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	;Diffs of the user's reverts:
	# {{diff2\|842932890\|17:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "/* Political career */"
	# {{diff2\|842932675\|17:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "/* Political career */"
	# {{diff2\|842932313\|17:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "/* Political career */"
	# {{diff2\|842931306\|17:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "/* Political career */"
	# {{diff2\|842924279\|16:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "/* Political career */"

			'''Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
	# {{diff2\|842931695\|17:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Caution: Not adhering to neutral point of view on ]. (])"

	~~;Diffs~~ of ~~attempt~~ to ~~resolve~~ ~~dispute~~ ~~on article~~ talk page:		'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />

			This is an ad hominem attack: "POV pushing: added the EXACT same graph of (historical US minimum wage) to 36 articles and edit-warring to keep it there." I would appreciate if Avatar317 would please stop with the ad hominem attacks in the edit summaries. They violate ].
	;<u>Comments:</u>

			I stand by most of my insertions of the chart:
	Clearly engaging in edit warring and writing BLPs like a news story. see the user talk page for warnings. ] (]) 17:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
			*]
	:I blocked Nilkpo for 24 hours. -- ] (]) 18:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

			I agree with some of Avatar317's removals. Other removals seemed to be stalking to see where I added the chart. The regular editors of articles are capable of making up their own minds.
	== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==

			I addressed Avatar317's points in my edit summaries. But he sometimes did not address my points in his 2nd reversions.
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Template:Demi Lovato}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|108.206.145.38}}

			I would appreciate not being stalked. And we can always go to the talk page for the articles he regularly edits. --] (]) 23:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
	;Previous version reverted to:

			:Every article I reverted you on was on my Watchlist. I did not (yet) go through the list of your edits other than to count them.
	;Diffs of the user's reverts:
			:You've been around long enough that you should know that per ] "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content."; so you COULD have started discussions rather than continuing to push that content into all those articles.
	# {{diff2\|842965377\|22:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""
			:Which article did you NOT revert my removal? I don't see even one. ---''']]''' 00:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
	# {{diff\|oldid=842851185\|diff=842910068\|label=Consecutive edits made from 14:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC) to 14:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}}
			::]. And in ] you changed the location which I don't mind.
	## {{diff2\|842909688\|14:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""
			::And you '''could''' have addressed my points in your 2nd edit summary instead of doing a kneejerk 2nd reversion in some cases without directly addressing my points. That would save some time before going to the talk page.
	## {{diff2\|842910068\|14:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""
			::And please see ] if you are thinking of following me around to the other articles where the chart is posted. --] (]) 00:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
	# {{diff2\|842850750\|02:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""
			:::All of your "points" are Original Research ] based on your BELIEF that the chart is relevant to the 36 articles you added it to. Again: "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content."
	# {{diff\|oldid=842693616\|diff=842820385\|label=Consecutive edits made from 22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC) to 22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)}}
			:::And if you post the same content into many articles, I will revert those which are inappropriate the same way I would go over a new editor's edits who adds spam to many articles. In case you can't tell, I have an interest in Economics, and keeping extraneous content out of Misplaced Pages. Hounding would be following you to articles OTHER than ones I have an interest in. ---''']]''' 01:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
	## {{diff2\|842820344\|22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""
			*{{AN3\|b\|24 hours}} from editing articles. ] applies. ] (]) 01:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
	## {{diff2\|842820385\|22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)}} ""

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked one week) ==
	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
	# {{diff2\|842822692\|22:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]. (])"
	# {{diff2\|842851727\|03:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "more on reasons"
	# {{diff2\|842944712\|19:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Warning: Three-revert rule on ]. (])"

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Aubrey Plaza}} <br />
	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Ibeaa}}

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''

			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
	;<u>Comments:</u>
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#
			#

	{{AN3\|b}} – 3 days. ] (]) 04:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

	== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocks) ==

			'''Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:''' ;
	;Page: {{pagelinks\|Gail Lese}}
	;User being reported: {{userlinks\|Harvardgrad8897}}

	~~;Previous~~ ~~version~~ ~~reverted~~ to:		'''Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:'''

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u> <br />
	;Diffs of the user's reverts:
			Single purpose account dedicated to removing relevant and properly sourced content. Their only excuse is: "''guys im gonna be honest idk why im doing this''". ] (]) 17:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
			*{{AN3\|b\|one week}}. ] (]) 17:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

			== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked 72 hours) ==
	# {{diff2\|842978062\|00:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 842956611 by ] (]) this is a factual news item with a verified third party noting Gail else’s arrrst."
	# {{diff2\|842956182\|20:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 842955090 by ] (]) no violation. Gail lese is a public figure. Her arrest of assault with a dangerous weapon and possession of a dangerous weapon were reported in the daily item and it has been properly sourced."
	# {{diff2\|842955302\|20:45, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 842955090 by ] (])"
	# {{diff2\|842954086\|20:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 842945205 by ] ( ]) this is from a credible newspaper “the daily item” which is part of the Essex media group publications. Gail leases arrest was published in the police log section of this daily newspaper. Gail lese is a public figure (ran for state senate) so the argument of BLPCRIME is not relevant. Users should be able to add relevant third party sourced data about a public figure."
	# {{diff2\|842643356\|18:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Undid revision 842501290 by ] (]) Gail Lese is a public figure that ran for state senate. this is referenced in the article. she is also a published MD and American CEO. the arrest reference is attributed to a credible third party media outlet."\|warnings=# {{diff2\|842955647\|20:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ].

			'''Page:''' {{pagelinks\|Timur}}
	;Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning: {{diff2\|842955647\|20:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring on ].

			'''User being reported:''' {{userlinks\|Tamerlanon}}
	;Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
	# {{diff2\|842501437\|21:29, May 22, 2018‎ (UTC) on Talk:Gail Lese}} "Removed personal life, violates WP:BLPCRIME
	*full thread has multiple posts

			'''Previous version reverted to:'''
	;<u>Comments:</u>

	Restoring BLP violating criminal material. Subject made one unsuccessful run for public office so is unlikely to be a public figure, thus this violates ]. Even if the subject is considered well-known, the one source does not pass ]. The editor has made no attempt to respond to the article talk page or user talk page posts. ] (]) 00:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
			'''Diffs of the user's reverts:'''
			# {{diff2\|1270047251\|17:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Timur was born in 1336, it is impossible to be in 1320"
			# {{diff2\|1270045995\|17:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Timur's Birth Date is 1336 If You Say 1320 Source?"
			# {{diff2\|1270040416\|16:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Timur was in his 70s in his last years before his death. It is impossible for him to be over 85 years old."
			# {{diff2\|1269989123\|11:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Discussion: He was born in 1320. Give a source?"
			# {{diff2\|1269974575\|09:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269974278\|09:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Timur was in his 70s in his last years before his death. It is impossible for him to be over 85 years old."
			# {{diff\|oldid=1269967855\|diff=1269969911\|label=Consecutive edits made from 08:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC) to 08:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}}
			## {{diff2\|1269968118\|08:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			## {{diff2\|1269969911\|08:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""
			# {{diff2\|1269966433\|08:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} ""

			'''Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:'''
	The source is just a police blotter report of an arrest, with no mention of any trial or conviction. ] (]) 01:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
			# {{diff2\|1269972530\|09:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Caution: Unconstructive editing on ]."
			# {{diff2\|1269987649\|10:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "Warning: Edit warring."

			'''Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:'''
	And now that this user is at AN3 a new account ] is created and three minutes later restores the edit with a similar sounding summary ] (]) 04:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
			# {{diff2\|1269994020\|11:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC)}} "/* Birthdate */ ping"

			<u>'''Comments:'''</u>
	:{{AN3\|b}} – 48 hours to ] for edit warring and one week to ], an apparent sock. ] (]) 04:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
			*{{AN3\|b\|72 hours}}. ] (]) 17:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:46, 17 January 2025

Noticeboard for edit warring

v t e Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles, content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts

Update this page

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Click here to create a new report

Noticeboard archives
Administrators' (archives, search)
349	350	351	352	353	354	355	356	357	358
359	360	361	362	363	364	365	366	367	368
Incidents (archives, search)
1157	1158	1159	1160	1161	1162	1163	1164	1165	1166
1167	1168	1169	1170	1171	1172	1173	1174	1175	1176
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
472	473	474	475	476	477	478	479	480	481
482	483	484	485	486	487	488	489	490	491
Arbitration enforcement (archives)
328	329	330	331	332	333	334	335	336	337
338	339	340	341	342	343	344	345	346	347
Other links
Talk Sockpuppet investigations Backlog

User:94.187.8.87 reported by User:ElKevbo (Result: Page protected)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: User talk:94.187.8.87

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:
This is a straight-forward case of edit warring by an unregistered editor (using multiple accounts). This material was also the subject an edit war in 2022. There may be genuine WP:BLP concerns but edit warring without participating in the Talk page section specifically opened to discuss this material is not acceptable. ElKevbo (talk) 12:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Page protected for a period of three days by Randykitty Daniel Case (talk) 22:47, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User:46.217.186.173 reported by User:StephenMacky1 (Result: Page protected)

User being reported: 46.217.186.173 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

13:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269596382 by StephenMacky1 (talk)"
12:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269506258 by MacaroniPizzaHotDog (talk)"
01:10, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269482182 by StephenMacky1 (talk)"
22:21, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269469326 by JacktheBrown (talk)"
21:11, 14 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269452155 by Fneskljvnl (talk) FASISM TOWARDS MACEDONIA"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

12:41, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Bulgaria–North Macedonia relations."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments: Persistent edit warring. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Page protected EvergreenFir (talk) 20:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Asafviki reported by User:Seawolf35 (Result: Blocked from article for 72 hours)

User being reported: Asafviki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

14:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "I understood you at the beginning but now I think you are doing this unnecessarily. All the sources are reliable and you can take a look if you want.İf you really have a sound reason tell me the truth please."
14:13, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Can you please tell me why you reverted my edit?i just want to know where am I doing wrong."
09:06, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "I am making my edit since there has been no objection to the mentioned sources for 3 days."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

14:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Also LOUT socking with this edit. --Seawolf35 15:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 72 hours from article; hopefully in that time someone can explain what they are doing wrong. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User:TG-article reported by User:Danners430 (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

User being reported: TG-article (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

20:12, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Accidents and incidents */"
19:49, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Accidents and incidents */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

17:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Boeing 737 MAX."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Also edit warring at Batik Air, Boeing 737 MAX, Singapore Airlines Flight 321 and Red Wings Airlines Flight 9268. User has been told to discuss edits on talk pages on multiple occasions, and seemingly refuses to do so. Danners430 (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

@Danners430 This is not a 3RR violation. I see two reverts. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

No it’s not a 3RR violation - but it’s a user that’s consistently edit warring across multiple pages and refusing to engage in talk pages, which is why I believe it still belongs on the edit warring noticeboard.

Edit: I’ll get the rest of the diffs here in a sec… I used Twinkle for the original report. Danners430 (talk) 20:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Singapore Airlines Flight 321 - reversion 1, reversion 2 (which was following a pertial reinstatement of their already reverted content)
Batik Air - partial reinstatement of reverted content, followed by reinstating his reverted edit
Red Wings Airlines Flight 9268 - reinstating their previously reverted content
SmartLynx Airlines Estonia - reinstates their reverted edit, then again partially reinstating their reverted edit.
Boeing 737 MAX - legitimately and in good faith alters a template, but then after being reverted doubles down and reinstates the edit.

The user has previously been blocked for this exact same behaviour by User:Canterbury_Tail, and is nt responding to talk page messages. Danners430 (talk) 20:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 48 hours Daniel Case (talk) 22:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

User:190.201.157.28 reported by User:Flat Out (Result: Blocked 24h)

User being reported: 190.201.157.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

23:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC) ""
23:36, 15 January 2025 (UTC) ""
20:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Reception */"
17:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

23:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Wolf Man (2025 film)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

No, but level 4 warning previously given on editors talk page here

Comments: Blocked – for a period of 24 hours Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User:2607:FEA8:7221:F600:60E4:6CE4:B415:E562 reported by User:Flat Out (Result: Page protected for a month)

User being reported: 2607:FEA8:7221:F600:60E4:6CE4:B415:E562 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

01:44, 16 January 2025 (UTC) ""
01:34, 16 January 2025 (UTC) ""
00:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269714333 by MikeAllen (talk) Okay, the vandalism has gone on long enough, you are removing accurate information, and you have engaged in this obsession for days, just accept the information and let it go"
Consecutive edits made from 00:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC) to 00:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
1. 00:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269684805 by MikeAllen (talk) Enough with the vandalism already"
2. 00:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Undid revision 1269684573 by MikeAllen (talk) Stop with the vandalism, its accurate information"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

00:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on Until Dawn (film)."
00:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Until Dawn (film)."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

01:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "/* We edit by consensus */ new section"

Comments: I was just about to report this IP user here until I noticed you already did it a few mins ago...

Anyways, the IP user has actually made five reverts not four, here's the fifth (or actually, the first) one: diff on 18:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC).

The report is missing "previous version reverted to:" so here it is: diff

Regards, — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Page protected for one month by ToBeFree Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Adrikshit reported by User:Aman8188 (Result: Reporter blocked 2 weeks)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:
Nominating editor blocked – for a period of two weeks by ToBeFree Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

I have also added a CTOPS notice to the article talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 21:38, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

And Aman has been alerted to contentious topics, too. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Janessian reported by User:Insanityclown1 (Result:indefinitely partially blocked)

User being reported: Janessian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Consecutive edits made from 11:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC) to 11:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
1. 11:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "Posting the photo of a deceased tagged to such an intense tragic story would greatly hurt the family. Imagine this is your daughter mug shot, killed by her husband, with her summarised tragic story plastered for the world to see. All I did was to remove her picture and you youngsters spare no effort in reverting it."
2. 11:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC) "This man, worked hard his whole life, faithful his entire life, fell ill to a mental illness, does not deserve to have his face tagged to a summarised wrong version of the story for the entire world to see. Imagine this is your brother, who spent his old age in agony. Are you sure this is the right thing to do? What good does it serve to publish pictures of an old case other than to serve what grandiose ideology?"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

User appears to be slow edit warring at this point. JBW has already banned them once for edit warring. Insanityclown1 (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

I would also point out that before their first ban for edit warring @Janessian was making comments with a seeming intent to intimidate users that reverted his edits. Insanityclown1 (talk) 19:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Isabelle Belato has indefinitely partially blocked Janessian from the Killing of Wong Chik Yeok article. PhilKnight (talk) 21:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Timeshifter reported by User:Avatar317 (Result: Blocked 24 hours from editing articles)

User being reported: Timeshifter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

POV pushing: added the EXACT same graph of (historical US minimum wage) to 36 articles and edit-warring to keep it there.

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:

This is an ad hominem attack: "POV pushing: added the EXACT same graph of (historical US minimum wage) to 36 articles and edit-warring to keep it there." I would appreciate if Avatar317 would please stop with the ad hominem attacks in the edit summaries. They violate WP:NPA.

I stand by most of my insertions of the chart:

Commons:File:US federal minimum wage if it had kept pace with productivity. Also, the real minimum wage.png

I agree with some of Avatar317's removals. Other removals seemed to be stalking to see where I added the chart. The regular editors of articles are capable of making up their own minds.

I addressed Avatar317's points in my edit summaries. But he sometimes did not address my points in his 2nd reversions.

I would appreciate not being stalked. And we can always go to the talk page for the articles he regularly edits. --Timeshifter (talk) 23:52, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Every article I reverted you on was on my Watchlist. I did not (yet) go through the list of your edits other than to count them.

You've been around long enough that you should know that per WP:ONUS "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content."; so you COULD have started discussions rather than continuing to push that content into all those articles.

Which article did you NOT revert my removal? I don't see even one. ---Avatar317 00:05, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Economic liberalization. And in Minimum wage in the United States you changed the location which I don't mind.

And you could have addressed my points in your 2nd edit summary instead of doing a kneejerk 2nd reversion in some cases without directly addressing my points. That would save some time before going to the talk page.

And please see Misplaced Pages:Harassment#Wikihounding if you are thinking of following me around to the other articles where the chart is posted. --Timeshifter (talk) 00:23, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

All of your "points" are Original Research WP:OR based on your BELIEF that the chart is relevant to the 36 articles you added it to. Again: "The responsibility for achieving consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content."

And if you post the same content into many articles, I will revert those which are inappropriate the same way I would go over a new editor's edits who adds spam to many articles. In case you can't tell, I have an interest in Economics, and keeping extraneous content out of Misplaced Pages. Hounding would be following you to articles OTHER than ones I have an interest in. ---Avatar317 01:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 24 hours from editing articles. WP:ONUS applies. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ibeaa reported by User:Sundayclose (Result: Blocked one week)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Soft warning; Second warning

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments:
Single purpose account dedicated to removing relevant and properly sourced content. Their only excuse is: "guys im gonna be honest idk why im doing this". Sundayclose (talk) 17:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of one week. Bbb23 (talk) 17:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Tamerlanon reported by User:AirshipJungleman29 (Result: Blocked 72 hours)

User being reported: Tamerlanon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

17:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Timur was born in 1336, it is impossible to be in 1320"
17:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Timur's Birth Date is 1336 If You Say 1320 Source?"
16:50, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Timur was in his 70s in his last years before his death. It is impossible for him to be over 85 years old."
11:04, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Discussion: He was born in 1320. Give a source?"
09:18, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""
09:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Timur was in his 70s in his last years before his death. It is impossible for him to be over 85 years old."
Consecutive edits made from 08:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC) to 08:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
1. 08:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""
2. 08:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""
08:11, 17 January 2025 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

09:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Timur."
10:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

11:44, 17 January 2025 (UTC) "/* Birthdate */ ping"

Comments:

Blocked – for a period of 72 hours. Bbb23 (talk) 17:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories: