Revision as of 02:50, 22 July 2019 editLiz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators768,640 edits Notification: speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vajrayana Buddhism portal. (TW)← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:31, 4 January 2025 edit undoGrorp (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,774 editsNo edit summary | ||
(95 intermediate revisions by 43 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]: ], ], ], ], ] • • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]/] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • Article alerts: ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] {{Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfA Report}} | |] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]: ], ], ], ], ] • • ] • ] • ] • ] • ]/] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • Article alerts: ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] • ] {{Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard/RfA Report}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{bots|deny=DPL bot |
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
{{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 16:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)</small> | |||
== Greetings and Salutations == | |||
] collection.|]] | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
: To ]: | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
: Hello! | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
: Congratulations! | |||
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
: You have been included in my first, and possibly only, Very Early Christmas List! | |||
: As an earnest fellow believer in Santa Claus, and possibly in Our Redeemer Liveth as well, you may wonder how you got on this list. | |||
: I have no idea! | |||
: That's my story and I'm sticking to it. | |||
: Unless I tracked down the connection in our user talk archives, in which case you know who you are! | |||
: Or not. | |||
: All the best for you and yours this Christmas 2018 and New Year 2019! | |||
: – ] ] 02:35, 19 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
I am doing a c/e and expansion of this, and I thought you may be interested in this topic area... --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 08:56, 27 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
==] nomination of ]== | |||
] | |||
A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a ], a ], a ], under discussion at ], or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. | |||
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 02:50, 22 July 2019 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:31, 4 January 2025
This is Cirt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Misplaced Pages. | |
|
|
Good article criteria | Statistics | GAN Report | Changes log Nominations list | edit |
Centralized discussion
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. |
|
AFD/T • T-7 • T-8 • T-2 • Relisted • AFDO • WP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, Internet, News, Medicine • AFD tool links • WP:DRV • WP:MFD • AIV • RFUB • UAA/CAT • RFPP • PER • CSD • AB • FAR • FAC urgents • TFAR • RSN • BLPN • FTN • GAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speech • Human rights • Journalism • Sexology and sexuality • LGBT studies • Feminism • Women • Gender Studies • Women artists • Women's History • Women scientists • Women writers • Medicine • Law • Internet • Internet culture • Comedy • U.S. Supreme Court cases
|
Shout out for Social Justice Warrior article
Hi Cirt, A quick note to say that I gave you a shout out for your work on the "Social Justice Warrior" Misplaced Pages article. My review of the article is part of the Wackipedia series on The Outline.
Wackipedia - Social Justice Warrior
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenbharrison (talk • contribs) 16:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Portland Monthly
Portland Monthly has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:47, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Lobster (magazine)
Lobster (magazine) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for WSJ Magazine
WSJ Magazine has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)