Revision as of 19:12, 3 June 2021 editMathglot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors87,135 edits →June 2021: Please do not place User warning templates on the talk pages of other users in retaliation for a validly placed template here.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:39, 3 June 2021 edit undoMathglot (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors87,135 edits →June 2021: Adjust links.Next edit → | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
== June 2021 == | == June 2021 == | ||
Please do not place a ] on the talk page of another user either in retaliation for one placed here, or on any occasion when placement of the template is not warranted by user behavioral policies or guidelines, as you did ] at ]. The template placed ] is well-founded given your reverts and unsourced additions or additions contrary to sources at the article in question; however, if you disagree about that, you can respond by replying in the section above, explaining why you think it was misplaced. You may not retaliate by adding an invalid template to the talk page of the user who placed it. | Please do not place a ] on the talk page of another user either in retaliation for one placed here, or on any occasion when placement of the template is not warranted by user behavioral policies or guidelines, as you did ] at ]. The template placed ] is well-founded given your reverts and unsourced additions or additions contrary to sources at the article in question; however, if you disagree about that, you can respond by replying in the section above, explaining why you think it was misplaced. You may not retaliate by adding an invalid template to the talk page of the user who placed it. | ||
Any disagreement about the content of an article, in this case the size of the protest march in London on May 29, should be carried out at the article Talk page, at ]. I see that you added ] there; so bravo for that. (I've replied to you at that discussion.) User-warning templates are reserved for use on the User talk page of an editor who may have violated a ] or ]. Please do not use them for any other purpose, and especially not to retaliate or to make a point about article content. Thanks, ] (]) 19:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC) | Any disagreement about the content of an article, in this case the size of the protest march in London on May 29, should be carried out at the article Talk page, at ]. I see that you added ] there; so bravo for that. (I've replied to you at that discussion.) User-warning templates are reserved for use on the User talk page of an editor who may have violated a ] or ]. Please do not use them for any other purpose, and especially not to retaliate or to make a point about article content. Thanks, ] (]) 19:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:39, 3 June 2021
Welcome!
|
Proposed deletion of Nate Rothacker
The article Nate Rothacker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication this individual meets ANYBIO or any SNG such as NMUSIC
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 16:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Nate Rothacker
The article Nate Rothacker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Passing mentions of the subject do not lead to WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Fergus Beeley. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 23:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Nate Rothacker for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nate Rothacker is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nate Rothacker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to COVID-19 anti-lockdown protests in the United Kingdom. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. If reliable sources say "hundreds" attended the protest and a less reliable source says "thousands", the Misplaced Pages article should not say "tens of thousands". Lord Belbury (talk) 11:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
Please do not place a User warning template on the talk page of another user either in retaliation for one placed here, or on any occasion when placement of the template is not warranted by user behavioral policies or guidelines, as you did here at User talk:Lord Belbury#May 2021. The template placed above is well-founded given your reverts and unsourced additions or additions contrary to sources at the article in question; however, if you disagree about that, you can respond by replying in the section above, explaining why you think it was misplaced. You may not retaliate by adding an invalid template to the talk page of the user who placed it.
Any disagreement about the content of an article, in this case the size of the protest march in London on May 29, should be carried out at the article Talk page, at Talk:COVID-19 anti-lockdown protests in the United Kingdom. I see that you added this brief section there; so bravo for that. (I've replied to you at that discussion.) User-warning templates are reserved for use on the User talk page of an editor who may have violated a Misplaced Pages behavioral policy or guideline. Please do not use them for any other purpose, and especially not to retaliate or to make a point about article content. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC)