| Revision as of 17:30, 2 February 2007 editNae'blis (talk | contribs)10,494 edits →Unsourced images and personal attacks: please come to some amicable solution and read up on our fair use policy← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:56, 2 February 2007 edit undoEd g2s (talk | contribs)Administrators27,325 edits →ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| :I have no sock puppet. Stop right now with this accusation. Yes, I follow the ] from users I interact with and this is not considered a wrongdoing. These logs are public for a reason. And even if you don't agree with my behavior, this is no excuse to push the use of unsourced images in articles. Take good care, --''] <sup>(])</sup>'' 15:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | :I have no sock puppet. Stop right now with this accusation. Yes, I follow the ] from users I interact with and this is not considered a wrongdoing. These logs are public for a reason. And even if you don't agree with my behavior, this is no excuse to push the use of unsourced images in articles. Take good care, --''] <sup>(])</sup>'' 15:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Deathrocker, I would encourage you to take to heart our ] guidelines. It is not appropriate to upload/use general media/promotional images for living persons for whom it is possible to obtain a free image. This restriction has been tightened recently so you may not be aware of it, but Abu badali '''does have policy on his side''' in this instance. In addition, comments like "image terrorism" go beyond the bounds of civility, so please moderate your tone and try to have an honest, reasonable discussion to come to some agreement on this matter. I have every confidence that you will be able to do this well, having seen your good contributions before. -- '']']'' 17:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | :Deathrocker, I would encourage you to take to heart our ] guidelines. It is not appropriate to upload/use general media/promotional images for living persons for whom it is possible to obtain a free image. This restriction has been tightened recently so you may not be aware of it, but Abu badali '''does have policy on his side''' in this instance. In addition, comments like "image terrorism" go beyond the bounds of civility, so please moderate your tone and try to have an honest, reasonable discussion to come to some agreement on this matter. I have every confidence that you will be able to do this well, having seen your good contributions before. -- '']']'' 17:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Per Nae'blis, please do not make personal attacks on Abu. He is upholding our current policy. If you disagree with this, bring it up at ]. Calling him a vandal/troll/terrorist is at the very least ]. When a user comes across a copyright violation it is standard practice to check the contributions of the uploader, this is not trolling. Furthermore the burden of proof is not on the tagger to prove it is replaceable - but the uploader to show why it can be used. Please also ], accusing Abu of deliberately damaging the project does not reflect well on you. <span style="font-family: Verdana;">] • ]</span> 17:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:56, 2 February 2007
You have new messages (last change).
| ||
|
Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.
Note - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be spam and will be deleted. Any other form of spamming will be automatically removed from the page too.
Image tagging for Image:SholaAmeobi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SholaAmeobi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 13:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Unsourced images and personal attacks
Deathrocker, please, stop pushing the use of unsourced images like you did in Shola_Ameobi (,http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Shola_Ameobi&diff=104975958&oldid=104332218]).
Also, avoid personal edit-summaries. And please, consider quitting referring me as a vandal or puppet-master, as I feel it as a form of personal attack.
Best regards, --Abu badali 14:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Reply
Then you and your sock puppet stop stalking users on Misplaced Pages as multiple other users have acused you of doing. Call a spade a spade.... you go following people around screwing with any image you can find, claiming it is replaceable without bothering to prove it by replacing it yourself, is plain as day trolling. You're not adding anything constructive to the project, but then again that is probably your purpose. - Deathrocker 14:54, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- I have no sock puppet. Stop right now with this accusation. Yes, I follow the user contributions from users I interact with and this is not considered a wrongdoing. These logs are public for a reason. And even if you don't agree with my behavior, this is no excuse to push the use of unsourced images in articles. Take good care, --Abu badali 15:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Deathrocker, I would encourage you to take to heart our fair use guidelines. It is not appropriate to upload/use general media/promotional images for living persons for whom it is possible to obtain a free image. This restriction has been tightened recently so you may not be aware of it, but Abu badali does have policy on his side in this instance. In addition, comments like "image terrorism" go beyond the bounds of civility, so please moderate your tone and try to have an honest, reasonable discussion to come to some agreement on this matter. I have every confidence that you will be able to do this well, having seen your good contributions before. -- nae'blis 17:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Per Nae'blis, please do not make personal attacks on Abu. He is upholding our current policy. If you disagree with this, bring it up at WP:FU. Calling him a vandal/troll/terrorist is at the very least uncivil. When a user comes across a copyright violation it is standard practice to check the contributions of the uploader, this is not trolling. Furthermore the burden of proof is not on the tagger to prove it is replaceable - but the uploader to show why it can be used. Please also assume good faith, accusing Abu of deliberately damaging the project does not reflect well on you. ed g2s • talk 17:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)