Misplaced Pages

User talk:Lloyd Shaw: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:36, 8 April 2007 editArglebargleIV (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers36,102 edits Response to comments on User:ArglebargleIV's talk page← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:13, 9 April 2007 edit undoLloyd Shaw (talk | contribs)4 edits Response to comments on []'s talk page 
Line 19: Line 19:
Secondly, I didn't delete the page (although at you can find out who. I did, however, put the 'request speedy deletion' tag on the page. I did so because it read like an advertisement, complete with an address for contact and website at the bottom of the page, IIRC. Apparently, the administrator who deleted the page agreed with me.<br/> Secondly, I didn't delete the page (although at you can find out who. I did, however, put the 'request speedy deletion' tag on the page. I did so because it read like an advertisement, complete with an address for contact and website at the bottom of the page, IIRC. Apparently, the administrator who deleted the page agreed with me.<br/>
I'm sure that if a ] page were created, showing the notability of the method, and without the contact links and the advertising puffery, the page would be welcomed into Misplaced Pages. -- ] 21:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC) I'm sure that if a ] page were created, showing the notability of the method, and without the contact links and the advertising puffery, the page would be welcomed into Misplaced Pages. -- ] 21:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I will not attempt to post again. But I will report in future articles I write for other websites my experiences here. And use it as a good example of why Misplaced Pages should not be trusted as an unbiased resource. As you seem to delete articles at random based only on your own lack of a subject.

It could have been edited.

I have recorded the time it took you to delete the entire subject from posting. Note: I have Uni lecturers that have taken longer to ponder the first section

Regards Lloyd Shaw

Latest revision as of 02:13, 9 April 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Lloyd Shaw, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  -- ArglebargleIV 05:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Vibration training

A tag has been placed on Vibration training, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ArglebargleIV 05:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Response to comments on ArglebargleIV's talk page

First, it's not very nice to not only ignore the request on my talk page and put your comment at the top, but also to delete someone else's comment in the process. Please don't do that again.
Secondly, I didn't delete the page (although at the deletion log page for Vibration Training you can find out who. I did, however, put the 'request speedy deletion' tag on the page. I did so because it read like an advertisement, complete with an address for contact and website at the bottom of the page, IIRC. Apparently, the administrator who deleted the page agreed with me.
I'm sure that if a neutral point of view page were created, showing the notability of the method, and without the contact links and the advertising puffery, the page would be welcomed into Misplaced Pages. -- ArglebargleIV 21:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I will not attempt to post again. But I will report in future articles I write for other websites my experiences here. And use it as a good example of why Misplaced Pages should not be trusted as an unbiased resource. As you seem to delete articles at random based only on your own lack of a subject.

It could have been edited.

I have recorded the time it took you to delete the entire subject from posting. Note: I have Uni lecturers that have taken longer to ponder the first section

    Regards Lloyd Shaw
User talk:Lloyd Shaw: Difference between revisions Add topic