| Revision as of 08:36, 17 May 2024 editRawn3012 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,073 edits →Siege of Ranthambore (1226): ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:38, 23 May 2024 edit undoExplicit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators327,567 edits →Siege of Ranthambore (1226): Closed as soft delete (XFDcloser) | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|S}} | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''soft delete'''__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on ], this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired ] (a.k.a. ]). Editors can <span class="plainlinks"></span>. ]] 23:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ===]=== | ||
| <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | <noinclude>{{AFD help}}</noinclude> | ||
| :{{la|1=Siege of Ranthambore (1226)}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | :{{la|1=Siege of Ranthambore (1226)}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude> | ]) | ||
| Line 9: | Line 14: | ||
| :'''Delete,''' As it does not passes ]. More of a background story with no mentioning of actual seige. Regards ] (]) 08:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC) | :'''Delete,''' As it does not passes ]. More of a background story with no mentioning of actual seige. Regards ] (]) 08:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC) | ||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 23:38, 23 May 2024
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:38, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Siege of Ranthambore (1226)
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Siege of Ranthambore (1226) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is more about the background of the event than focusing on the topic, because it lacks notability. There's no significant coverage in the sources but passing mentions of few words that "Ranthambore was captured by Iltutmish". Definitely it should not be in mainspace, simply because it fails WP:GNG and WP:SIRS. Based Kashmiri (talk) 18:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and Rajasthan. Spiderone 18:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, As it does not passes WP:GNG. More of a background story with no mentioning of actual seige. Regards Rawn3012 (talk) 08:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.