Misplaced Pages

User talk:ProcrastinatingReader: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:01, 19 October 2024 editNovem Linguae (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Interface administrators, Administrators51,111 edits RFC close clarification request: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 20:28, 19 October 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,308,054 editsm Archiving 4 discussion(s) to User talk:ProcrastinatingReader/Archive 3) (botNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
Best regards --] (]) Best regards --] (])
<!-- Message sent by User:Superpes15@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Bot_policy/New_global_bot_discussion&oldid=25384075 --> <!-- Message sent by User:Superpes15@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=Bot_policy/New_global_bot_discussion&oldid=25384075 -->

== RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins ==

Hi there! Phase I of the ] has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:

* '''Proposals 2 and 9b''' (''']'''): ] and ]
* '''Proposal 3b''' (in trial): ]
* '''Proposal 13''' (in trial): ]
* '''Proposal 14''' (implemented): ]
* '''Proposals 16 and 16c''' (''']'''): ] and ]
* '''Proposal 17''' (''']'''): ]
* '''Proposal 24''' (''']'''): ]
* '''Proposal 25''' (implemented): ]
See the ] for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. ] (]), via ] (]) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Theleekycauldron@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/2024_review/Mailing_list&oldid=1218650058 -->

== ProcBot: Main Page snapshots failure ==

]'s task "Main Page snapshots" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 edits in the last 1 day, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) 11:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
:I've manually created snapshots for yesterday and today. <span class="nowrap"> — ] (]</span> 15:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

== Telegraph close ? ==

It's been a while since our paths crossed and it seems you've largely been away from Misplaced Pages for a while. Welcome back. Is there a reason you wrote about plural closers for the Telegraph RfC when it was closed by a single person (S Marshall)? Best, ] (]) 03:14, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
:Hey Barkeep. Thanks! Things have been busy recently but I try to pop my head in when I can. No, that particular instance was a poorly placed apostrophe. ] (]) 03:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
::Normally I wouldn't ask but given the previous close for that discussion I was just curious if you were lumping Compassionate in with S Marshall. Glad that wasn't the case. Best, ] (]) 04:01, 15 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello ProcrastinatingReader, thank you for your close of the close review. It must have taken significant effort. Appreciate it! ''']] (])''' 10:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
:same as the rest, thanks for closing such a contentious discussion, which had already eaten two other closers alive, in a way that seems to me completely unobjectionable!--] (]) 11:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
:{{+1}} -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 16:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)


== User:ProcBot purge task == == User:ProcBot purge task ==
Line 67: Line 37:
::::I think it's not immediately going to work, so I've disabled template transclusion purges for now. I'll need to look into it a bit more, but not sure when I'll have time in the immediate future. ] (]) 14:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC) ::::I think it's not immediately going to work, so I've disabled template transclusion purges for now. I'll need to look into it a bit more, but not sure when I'll have time in the immediate future. ] (]) 14:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
:::::OK, thanks for letting me know. ] (]) 14:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC) :::::OK, thanks for letting me know. ] (]) 14:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

== ProcBot: Move editnotices following underlying page move failure ==

]'s task "Move editnotices following underlying page move" failed to run per the configuration specified at ]. Detected only 0 "move" actions in the last 14 days, whereas at least 1 was expected. If/when the issue is fixed, please change the section title (e.g. append " - Fixed") or remove this section completely. When that is done, this notice will be reposted if the bot task is still broken or is re-broken. <small>If your bot is behaving as expected, then you may want to modify the ] instead. Or to unsubscribe from bot failure notifications, remove the {{para|notify}} parameter from the {{tlx|/task|nolink=y}} template.</small> Thanks! – '']'' (]) 22:20, 22 August 2024 (UTC)


== RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review == == RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review ==

Revision as of 20:28, 19 October 2024

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives:

Request for global bot flag for CommonsDelinker

Hello!

This is a notification to let you know that a new request for the global bot flag for CommonsDelinker has been started.

Please note that the request will remain open for 14 days starting today. You can leave a comment or opinion on the relevant page!

Best regards --Superpes15 (talk)

User:ProcBot purge task

Hey, can you reactive the purge task? I've added a category to the one off list at User:ProcBot/PurgeList. Gonnym (talk) 11:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

@Gonnym: Forgot to reply here, but this should be done. (Let me know if you think it didn't work properly?) In future, it should automatically respond to one-time category purge requests on that page. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 13:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, it finished. Gonnym (talk) 06:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Hey @ProcrastinatingReader, can the bot can purge modules and can it purge deleted modules? Gonnym (talk) 14:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted ones I don't think would work.
For non-deleted, let's see... I used to have old code which purged transclusions of templates. It's disabled (and I'd have written the code for it differently today), but I can re-enable it, and it might work mostly as-is for modules. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
I think it's not immediately going to work, so I've disabled template transclusion purges for now. I'll need to look into it a bit more, but not sure when I'll have time in the immediate future. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
OK, thanks for letting me know. Gonnym (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Global bot approval request for Leaderbot

Hello!

I apologize for sending this message in English. Please help translate to other languages..

In accordance to the policy, this message is to notify you that there is a new approval request for a global bot.

The discussion is available at Steward requests/Bot status#Global bot status for Leaderbot on Meta.

Thank you for your time.

Best regards, EPIC (talk) 09:36, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

RFC close clarification request

Hello friend. I hope you're well. In your recent RFC close at WT:AELECT, you wrote any voter guides will not be linked to from this page. I'm wondering if you'd be willing to amend it to be clearer about what this page applies to? Does it apply to subpages? (I assume yes.) Does it apply to AELECT talk pages? (Completely unsure on this one, "this page" is technically the talk page.) Does it apply to any non AELECT pages? (I assume no.) Thanks for your consideration. –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:01, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

User talk:ProcrastinatingReader: Difference between revisions Add topic