Misplaced Pages

Principal equation form: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:30, 30 December 2024 editReformbenediktiner (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users718 edits Undid revision 1266191975 by D.Lazard (talk)Tags: Undo Reverted← Previous edit Revision as of 17:30, 30 December 2024 edit undoReformbenediktiner (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users718 edits Undid revision 1266191373 by D.Lazard (talk)Tags: Undo RevertedNext edit →
Line 77: Line 77:


:<math> y^5 - \tfrac{1}{45}(465-61\sqrt{30})y^2 + \tfrac{2}{45}(1616-289\sqrt{30})y - \tfrac{1}{1125}(33758\sqrt{30}-183825) = 0 </math> :<math> y^5 - \tfrac{1}{45}(465-61\sqrt{30})y^2 + \tfrac{2}{45}(1616-289\sqrt{30})y - \tfrac{1}{1125}(33758\sqrt{30}-183825) = 0 </math>

=== Solving the principal quintic via Adamchik transformation ===

The mathematicians Victor Adamchik and David Jeffrey found out how to solve every principal quintic equation. In their essay<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.uwo.ca/apmaths/faculty/jeffrey/pdfs/Adamchik.pdf|title=Polynomial Transformations of Tschirnhaus, Bring and Jerrard|accessdate=28 December 2024|author=Victor S. Adamchik and David J. Jeffrey|publisher=ACM SIGSAM Bulletin, Vol 37, No. 3, September 2003}}</ref> ''Polynomial Transformations of Tschirnhaus, Bring and Jerrard'' they wrote this way down. These two mathematicians solved this principal form by transforming it into the Bring Jerrard<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4988153/a-new-way-to-solve-the-bring-quintic|title=A new way to solve the Bring quintic?|website=Mathematics Stack Exchange}}</ref> form. Their method contains the construction of a quartic Tschirnhaus transformation key. For the construction of that key they executed a disjunction of the linear term coefficient of the key in order to get a system that solves all other terms in a quadratic radical way and to only solve a further cubic equation<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.oocities.org/titus_piezas/Tschirnhausen.html |title="A New Way To Derive The Bring-Jerrard Quintic In Radicals"|accessdate=28 December 2024|author=Titus Piezas III|publisher= oocities.org}}</ref> to get the coefficient of the linear term of the Tschirnhaus key.

In their essay they constructed the quartic Tschirnhaus key in this way:

:<math> y^5 - uy^2 + vy - w = 0 </math>

In order to do the transformation Adamchik and Jeffrey constructed equation system that generates the coefficients of the cubic, quadratic and absolute term of the Tschirnhaus key:

:<math> 4v {\color{crimson}\alpha} - 3u {\color{green}\beta} = 5w </math>

:<math> 3u {\color{crimson}\alpha} + 5 {\color{blue}\delta} = 4v </math>

:<math> 15w {\color{crimson}\alpha} {\color{green}\beta} - 3u {\color{crimson}\alpha} {\color{blue}\delta} - 6v {\color{green}\beta}^2 - v {\color{blue}\delta} = 3uw - 2v^2 </math>

And for receiving the coefficient of the linear term this cubic equation shall be solved successively:

:<math> u{\color{orange}\gamma}^3 + (5w {\color{crimson}\alpha} - 4v {\color{green}\beta} + 3u^2){\color{orange}\gamma}^2 + (uv {\color{crimson}\alpha}^2 - 8v {\color{crimson}\alpha} {\color{blue}\delta} + 5w {\color{green}\beta}^2 + 6u {\color{green}\beta} {\color{blue}\delta} - 8uv {\color{green}\beta} + 3u^3 + 9vw){\color{orange}\gamma} + </math>

:<math> + u^3 {\color{crimson}\alpha}^3 + vw {\color{crimson}\alpha}^3 + u^2 {\color{green}\beta}^3 - 10uw {\color{crimson}\alpha}^2 {\color{green}\beta} + 4v^2 {\color{crimson}\alpha}^2 {\color{green}\beta} + 9u^2 {\color{crimson}\alpha}^2 {\color{blue}\delta} - uv {\color{crimson}\alpha} {\color{green}\beta}^2 + 15u {\color{crimson}\alpha} {\color{blue}\delta}^2 + 10{\color{blue}\delta}^3 - </math>

:<math> - u^2 v {\color{crimson}\alpha}^2 - 3u^3 {\color{crimson}\alpha} {\color{green}\beta} + 6vw {\color{crimson}\alpha} {\color{green}\beta} - 12uv {\color{crimson}\alpha} {\color{blue}\delta} + 5 uw {\color{green}\beta}^2 - 4v^2 {\color{green}\beta}^2 + uv^2 {\color{crimson}\alpha} - u^2 w {\color{crimson}\alpha} + 2u^2 v {\color{green}\beta} + u^4 - 4v^3 + 8uvw = 0</math>

The solution of that system then has to be entered in that mold here:

:<math> z = y^4 + {\color{crimson}\alpha}y^3 + {\color{green}\beta}y^2 + {\color{orange}\gamma}y + {\color{blue}\delta} </math>

:<math> z^5 + \lambda z - \mu = 0 </math>

The coefficients Lambda and My can be found out by doing a polynomial division of z^5 divided by the initial principal polynome and reading the resulting remainder rest. So a Bring Jerrard equation appears that contains only the quintic, the linear and the absolute term. That equation can be solved by an elliptic Jacobi theta quotient that contains the fifth powers and the fifth roots of the corresponding elliptic nome in the theta function terms.


=== Examples of solving the principal form === === Examples of solving the principal form ===

Revision as of 17:30, 30 December 2024

In mathematics and, more specifically, in theory of equations, the principal form of an irreducible polynomial of degree at least three is a polynomial of the same degree n without terms of degrees n−1 and n−2, such that each roots of either polynomial is a rational function of a root of the other polynomial.

The principal form of a polynomial can be found by applying a suitable Tschirnhaus transformation to the given polynomial.

Definition

Let

f ( x ) = x n + a 1 x n 1 + + a n 1 x + a n {\displaystyle f(x)=x^{n}+a_{1}x^{n-1}+\cdots +a_{n-1}x+a_{n}}

be an irreducible polynomial of degree at least three.

Its principal form is a polynomial

g ( y ) = y n + b 3 y n 3 + + b n 1 y + b n , {\displaystyle g(y)=y^{n}+b_{3}y^{n-3}+\cdots +b_{n-1}y+b_{n},}

together with a Tschirnhaus transformation of degree two

φ ( x ) = x 2 + α x + β {\displaystyle \varphi (x)=x^{2}+\alpha x+\beta }

such that, if r is a root of f, ϕ ( r ) {\displaystyle \phi (r)} is a root of ⁠ g {\displaystyle g} ⁠.

Expressing that ⁠ g {\displaystyle g} ⁠ does not has terms in ⁠ y n 1 {\displaystyle y^{n-1}} ⁠ and ⁠ y n 2 {\displaystyle y^{n-2}} ⁠ leads to a system of two equations in ⁠ α {\displaystyle \alpha } ⁠ and ⁠ β {\displaystyle \beta } ⁠, one of degree one and one of degree two. In general, this system has two solutions, giving two principal forms involving a square root. One passes from one principal form to the secong by changing the sign of the square root.

Quintic case

Synthesis advice for the quadratic Tschirnhaus key

This is the given quintic equation:

x 5 a x 4 + b x 3 c x 2 + d x e = 0 {\displaystyle x^{5}-ax^{4}+bx^{3}-cx^{2}+dx-e=0}

That quadratic equation system leads to the coefficients of the quadratic Tschirnhaus key:

F i r s t c l u e {\displaystyle \mathrm {First\,clue} } a s + 5 t + a 2 2 b = 0 {\displaystyle as+5t+a^{2}-2b=0}
S e c o n d c l u e {\displaystyle \mathrm {Second\,clue} } b s 2 10 t 2 + a b s 3 c s 2 a c + b 2 + 2 d = 0 {\displaystyle bs^{2}-10t^{2}+abs-3cs-2ac+b^{2}+2d=0}

By polynomial division that Tschirnhaus transformation can be made:

( x 2 + s x + t ) 5 u ( x 2 + s x + t ) 2 + v ( x 2 + s x + t ) w = 0 {\displaystyle (x^{2}+sx+t)^{5}-u(x^{2}+sx+t)^{2}+v(x^{2}+sx+t)-w=0}

Calculation examples

This is the first example:

x 5 x 4 x 2 1 = 0 {\displaystyle x^{5}-x^{4}-x^{2}-1=0}
y = x 2 1 4 ( 19 265 ) x 1 20 ( 265 15 ) {\displaystyle y=x^{2}-{\tfrac {1}{4}}(19-{\sqrt {265}})x-{\tfrac {1}{20}}({\sqrt {265}}-15)}
y 5 + 1 80 ( 24455 1501 265 ) y 2 1 160 ( 5789 265 93879 ) y 1 4000 ( 5393003 265 87785025 ) = 0 {\displaystyle y^{5}+{\tfrac {1}{80}}(24455-1501{\sqrt {265}})y^{2}-{\tfrac {1}{160}}(5789{\sqrt {265}}-93879)y-{\tfrac {1}{4000}}(5393003{\sqrt {265}}-87785025)=0}

And this is the second example:

x 5 + x 4 + x 3 + x 2 1 = 0 {\displaystyle x^{5}+x^{4}+x^{3}+x^{2}-1=0}
y = x 2 + 1 3 ( 30 3 ) x + 1 15 30 {\displaystyle y=x^{2}+{\tfrac {1}{3}}({\sqrt {30}}-3)x+{\tfrac {1}{15}}{\sqrt {30}}}
y 5 1 45 ( 465 61 30 ) y 2 + 2 45 ( 1616 289 30 ) y 1 1125 ( 33758 30 183825 ) = 0 {\displaystyle y^{5}-{\tfrac {1}{45}}(465-61{\sqrt {30}})y^{2}+{\tfrac {2}{45}}(1616-289{\sqrt {30}})y-{\tfrac {1}{1125}}(33758{\sqrt {30}}-183825)=0}

Solving the principal quintic via Adamchik transformation

The mathematicians Victor Adamchik and David Jeffrey found out how to solve every principal quintic equation. In their essay Polynomial Transformations of Tschirnhaus, Bring and Jerrard they wrote this way down. These two mathematicians solved this principal form by transforming it into the Bring Jerrard form. Their method contains the construction of a quartic Tschirnhaus transformation key. For the construction of that key they executed a disjunction of the linear term coefficient of the key in order to get a system that solves all other terms in a quadratic radical way and to only solve a further cubic equation to get the coefficient of the linear term of the Tschirnhaus key.

In their essay they constructed the quartic Tschirnhaus key in this way:

y 5 u y 2 + v y w = 0 {\displaystyle y^{5}-uy^{2}+vy-w=0}

In order to do the transformation Adamchik and Jeffrey constructed equation system that generates the coefficients of the cubic, quadratic and absolute term of the Tschirnhaus key:

4 v α 3 u β = 5 w {\displaystyle 4v{\color {crimson}\alpha }-3u{\color {green}\beta }=5w}
3 u α + 5 δ = 4 v {\displaystyle 3u{\color {crimson}\alpha }+5{\color {blue}\delta }=4v}
15 w α β 3 u α δ 6 v β 2 v δ = 3 u w 2 v 2 {\displaystyle 15w{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {green}\beta }-3u{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {blue}\delta }-6v{\color {green}\beta }^{2}-v{\color {blue}\delta }=3uw-2v^{2}}

And for receiving the coefficient of the linear term this cubic equation shall be solved successively:

u γ 3 + ( 5 w α 4 v β + 3 u 2 ) γ 2 + ( u v α 2 8 v α δ + 5 w β 2 + 6 u β δ 8 u v β + 3 u 3 + 9 v w ) γ + {\displaystyle u{\color {orange}\gamma }^{3}+(5w{\color {crimson}\alpha }-4v{\color {green}\beta }+3u^{2}){\color {orange}\gamma }^{2}+(uv{\color {crimson}\alpha }^{2}-8v{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {blue}\delta }+5w{\color {green}\beta }^{2}+6u{\color {green}\beta }{\color {blue}\delta }-8uv{\color {green}\beta }+3u^{3}+9vw){\color {orange}\gamma }+}
+ u 3 α 3 + v w α 3 + u 2 β 3 10 u w α 2 β + 4 v 2 α 2 β + 9 u 2 α 2 δ u v α β 2 + 15 u α δ 2 + 10 δ 3 {\displaystyle +u^{3}{\color {crimson}\alpha }^{3}+vw{\color {crimson}\alpha }^{3}+u^{2}{\color {green}\beta }^{3}-10uw{\color {crimson}\alpha }^{2}{\color {green}\beta }+4v^{2}{\color {crimson}\alpha }^{2}{\color {green}\beta }+9u^{2}{\color {crimson}\alpha }^{2}{\color {blue}\delta }-uv{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {green}\beta }^{2}+15u{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {blue}\delta }^{2}+10{\color {blue}\delta }^{3}-}
u 2 v α 2 3 u 3 α β + 6 v w α β 12 u v α δ + 5 u w β 2 4 v 2 β 2 + u v 2 α u 2 w α + 2 u 2 v β + u 4 4 v 3 + 8 u v w = 0 {\displaystyle -u^{2}v{\color {crimson}\alpha }^{2}-3u^{3}{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {green}\beta }+6vw{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {green}\beta }-12uv{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {blue}\delta }+5uw{\color {green}\beta }^{2}-4v^{2}{\color {green}\beta }^{2}+uv^{2}{\color {crimson}\alpha }-u^{2}w{\color {crimson}\alpha }+2u^{2}v{\color {green}\beta }+u^{4}-4v^{3}+8uvw=0}

The solution of that system then has to be entered in that mold here:

z = y 4 + α y 3 + β y 2 + γ y + δ {\displaystyle z=y^{4}+{\color {crimson}\alpha }y^{3}+{\color {green}\beta }y^{2}+{\color {orange}\gamma }y+{\color {blue}\delta }}
z 5 + λ z μ = 0 {\displaystyle z^{5}+\lambda z-\mu =0}

The coefficients Lambda and My can be found out by doing a polynomial division of z^5 divided by the initial principal polynome and reading the resulting remainder rest. So a Bring Jerrard equation appears that contains only the quintic, the linear and the absolute term. That equation can be solved by an elliptic Jacobi theta quotient that contains the fifth powers and the fifth roots of the corresponding elliptic nome in the theta function terms.

Examples of solving the principal form

Along with the Abel Ruffini theorem the following equation is an example that can not be solved in an elementary way, but can be reduced to the Bring Jerrard form by only using cubic radical elements. This shall be demonstrated here:

y 5 5 y 2 + 5 y 5 = 0 {\displaystyle y^{5}-5y^{2}+5y-5=0}

For this given equation the quartic Tschirnhaus key now shall be synthesized. For that example the values u = v = w = 5 are the combination. Therefore, this is the mentioned equation system for that example:

20 α 15 β = 25 {\displaystyle 20{\color {crimson}\alpha }-15{\color {green}\beta }=25}
15 α + 5 δ = 20 {\displaystyle 15{\color {crimson}\alpha }+5{\color {blue}\delta }=20}
75 α β 15 α δ 30 β 2 5 δ = 25 {\displaystyle 75{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {green}\beta }-15{\color {crimson}\alpha }{\color {blue}\delta }-30{\color {green}\beta }^{2}-5{\color {blue}\delta }=25}

So these are the coefficients of the cubic, quadratic and absolute term of the Tschirnhaus transformation key:

α = 1 , β = 3 , δ = 7 {\displaystyle {\color {crimson}\alpha }=-1,\,{\color {green}\beta }=-3,\,{\color {blue}\delta }=7}

That cubic equation leads to the coefficient of the linear term of the key:

5 γ 3 + 110 γ 2 + 1100 γ + 3080 = 0 {\displaystyle 5{\color {orange}\gamma }^{3}+110{\color {orange}\gamma }^{2}+1100{\color {orange}\gamma }+3080=0}
γ = 8 3 11 sinh [ 1 3 arsinh ( 4 11 11 ) ] 22 3 {\displaystyle {\color {orange}\gamma }={\frac {8}{3}}{\sqrt {11}}\sinh {\bigl }-{\frac {22}{3}}}

By doing a polynomial division on the fifth power of the quartic Tschirnhaus transformation key and analyzing the remainder rest the coefficients of the mold can be determined. This is the result:

y 5 5 y 2 + 5 y 5 = 0 {\displaystyle y^{5}-5y^{2}+5y-5=0}
z = y 4 y 3 3 y 2 + { 8 3 11 sinh [ 1 3 arsinh ( 4 11 11 ) ] 22 3 } y + 7 {\displaystyle z=y^{4}-y^{3}-3y^{2}+{\bigl \{}{\frac {8}{3}}{\sqrt {11}}\sinh {\bigl }-{\frac {22}{3}}{\bigr \}}y+7}
z 5 + 14080 3 { 11 2 22 cosh [ 1 3 arcosh ( 7 22 22 ) ] } z + 11264 3 { 11 110 2 sinh [ 1 3 arsinh ( 1 22 2 ) ] } = 0 {\displaystyle z^{5}+{\frac {14080}{3}}{\bigl \{}11-2{\sqrt {22}}\cosh {\bigl }{\bigr \}}z+{\frac {11264}{3}}{\bigl \{}11-110{\sqrt {2}}\sinh {\bigl }{\bigr \}}=0}

These are the approximations of the solution:

z 4.87187987090341241739191116705958390845844658170795795268900739402026742 {\displaystyle z\approx -4.87187987090341241739191116705958390845844658170795795268900739402026742}
y 1.56670895425072582758152133323240667646412076995364965189840377191745 {\displaystyle y\approx 1.56670895425072582758152133323240667646412076995364965189840377191745}

Literature

References

  1. Weisstein, Eric W. "Principal Quintic Form". mathworld.wolfram.com.
  2. "The solution to the principal quintic via the Brioschi and Rogers-Ramanujan cfrac $R(q)$". Mathematics Stack Exchange.
  3. Jerrard, George Birch (1859). An essay on the resolution of equations. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
  4. Adamchik, Victor (2003). "Polynomial Transformations of Tschirnhaus, Bring, and Jerrard" (PDF). ACM SIGSAM Bulletin. 37 (3): 91. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.10.9463. doi:10.1145/990353.990371. S2CID 53229404. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-02-26.
  5. Victor S. Adamchik and David J. Jeffrey. "Polynomial Transformations of Tschirnhaus, Bring and Jerrard" (PDF). ACM SIGSAM Bulletin, Vol 37, No. 3, September 2003. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
  6. "A new way to solve the Bring quintic?". Mathematics Stack Exchange.
  7. Titus Piezas III. ""A New Way To Derive The Bring-Jerrard Quintic In Radicals"". oocities.org. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
  8. Klein, Felix (December 28, 1888). "Lectures on the ikosahedron and the solution of equations of the fifth degree". London : Trübner & Co. – via Internet Archive.
Categories:
Principal equation form: Difference between revisions Add topic