| Revision as of 09:24, 9 January 2025 editWarrenmck (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,035 edits →EV Group← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:14, 9 January 2025 edit undoTheBritinator (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers10,291 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Comment''' from nominator offering a brief analysis of the newly added sources: more ] coverage based on press releases (, , , , ) and one actual press release (). Still no ] in ] and thus no NCORP pass. ] (]) 17:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' from nominator offering a brief analysis of the newly added sources: more ] coverage based on press releases (, , , , ) and one actual press release (). Still no ] in ] and thus no NCORP pass. ] (]) 17:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' While I appreciate the above editor's efforts to improve the article, I think notability is still missing here. ] 09:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' While I appreciate the above editor's efforts to improve the article, I think notability is still missing here. ] 09:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''': Per nom. Though there has been some effort to improve it, this still doesn't appear notable. ] (]) 20:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:14, 9 January 2025
EV Group
AfDs for this article:New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- EV Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company; fails WP:NCORP. All sourcing is WP:ORGTRIV coverage of new facility openings, etc. (); WP:USERGENERATED content (); WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS (, , , ); the company's own website and/or press releases, and other non-independent sources (, , ); WP:PRSOURCE-driven coverage in WP:TRADES publications (, , ); and a WP:PRIMARYSOURCE document (). One source does not mention the company at all (). Nothing else qualifying came up in a WP:BEFORE search. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Austria. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:57, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: To the closing admin, I have restructured the article entirely; check it before you go ahead and keep or delete it. Given the current structure, I believe the subjects meet the notability guidelines. Note: I'm no the initial editor, I just volunteered to improve it. If the resolution was to keep, kindly place an 'Improvement' tag on the article; otherwise, delete it. Cameremote (talk) I came from a remote place 17:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment from nominator offering a brief analysis of the newly added sources: more WP:TRADES coverage based on press releases (, , , , ) and one actual press release (). Still no WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS and thus no NCORP pass. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete While I appreciate the above editor's efforts to improve the article, I think notability is still missing here. Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 09:24, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom. Though there has been some effort to improve it, this still doesn't appear notable. TheBritinator (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2025 (UTC)