| Revision as of 18:47, 2 May 2007 editAltenmann (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers219,613 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:24, 3 May 2007 edit undoUncle uncle uncle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users813 edits Is wikinew an acceptable reference?Next edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| jdkvf';askv[quergamc kerg!fqj'l;cm <!-- Thank you, but please leave it here. Mikka. --> | jdkvf';askv[quergamc kerg!fqj'l;cm <!-- Thank you, but please leave it here. Mikka. --> | ||
| In the Non-apology apology http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Non-apology_apology page - you recently cleaned up a reference pointing to a wikinews article . | |||
| Is wikinews an acceptable reference? | |||
Revision as of 02:24, 3 May 2007
|
Please don't leave me any messages here. Most probably they will not be unanswered. Please use article talk pages to discuss articles (and invite me there if my input is important). I am currently trimming my watchlist severely. Let the next generation watch out and let some old trolls be happy. |
jdkvf';askv[quergamc kerg!fqj'l;cm
In the Non-apology apology http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Non-apology_apology page - you recently cleaned up a reference pointing to a wikinews article .
Is wikinews an acceptable reference?