Misplaced Pages

Talk:Celestiial: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:06, 17 June 2007 editGiggy (talk | contribs)Rollbackers30,896 edits 1 more thing← Previous edit Revision as of 17:17, 17 June 2007 edit undoRmky87 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,215 edits replaced "Arts" with "Everydaylife"Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA|oldid=136896557|topic=Arts}} {{GA|oldid=136896557|topic=Everydaylife}}
{{HMM|class=GA|importance=mid}} {{HMM|class=GA|importance=mid}}
{{Notable Wikipedian|North Canoe|Anderson, Tanner}} {{Notable Wikipedian|North Canoe|Anderson, Tanner}}

Revision as of 17:17, 17 June 2007

Good articlesCelestiial has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: No date specified. To provide a date use: {{GA|insert date in any format here}}. (Reviewed version).
WikiProject iconMetal GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Broken link

Broken link - http://celestiial.xathagorra.com/

I have removed it, thanks for the input. J Milburn 22:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Why I just reverted North Canoe's edits

The edits took out information that was sourced, and added new information that was unsourced. The band does use keyboards, harps and piano- please see the cited source. Also, I searched for the keywords Celestiial "Waldländer im Herbst" "Abrons Art Center" "My Dying Bride" Opeth "Swallow the Sun" and got absolutely no results, so I can't see it being a particuarly notable/real event. I couldn't make sense of the changes to the bands that Anderson has been a member of, AND it removed further sourced information. Also, removing the sourced link to black metal, and the sourced fact that there were negative reviews, seemed to be uneeded. If you are going to add new information, please source it. If you are going to remove old information, please bring it up here, or at least talk about it in the edit summary. Thankyou. J Milburn 16:30, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


I am Tanner Anderson. My email is KVELDSETE@aol.com and you can confirm this by contacting Marty Rytkonen/Bindrune Recordings www.crionicmind.org/bindrune (Celestiial's label). Someone put inaccurate information on this page (i.e. I was never a member of Shroud of Despondency or "Despondancy" as it is incorrectly spelled on your page, I've never used "piano/keyboards", the double "ii" has nothing to do with "black metal" or "Mutiilation", www.balletdeviare.org does exist and Celestiial was featured - go to the website, click on events, specifically the event called "Forged"...). This seems to be more trouble than its worth. Contact me if you need to. The citation for Azrael you are looking for can be found here: www.moribundcult.com . I don't have a webpage for Celestiial and that isn't expected to change so I understand "official" information might be difficult to obtain. Regardless, I don't think incorrect information needs to be showcased on this site. Please don't take any of this as ego-driven. I'd just like to clarify the points that I think should be obvious at this point.

I apologise if I seem to have been short with you. I have just e-mailed, I guessed that you wouldn't be coming back here. In any case, I will deal with the information now, and please feel free to bring up any more issues you may have on this talk page, or on my user talk page, or, if you would prefer, you can e-mail me. I will clarify that you are Tanner through an e-mail to Bindrune, but then I must ask you not to edit this article, due to Misplaced Pages's WP:AUTO guideline. However, if there is anything else you would like in the article, please feel free to bring it up at one of those places, but also please provide a source for it. Thanks! J Milburn 22:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

J, thank you. I got your email and replied.

North Canoe is Tanner Anderson

After correspondance with North Canoe, and Marty from Bindrune, I can confirm that Tanner Anderson was editing as North Canoe, but is happy to edit 'through' me, as it were, meaning he does not violate WP:BIO. I have made some changes based on his reccomendations, and he has agreed to keep me updated. J Milburn 09:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

GA Pass

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  5. It is stable.
  6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  7. Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:


I'd like to see the infobox shrunk, if possible (it's a bit wide at the moment). Also, as noted in the review, a bit more mention of crtique etc. would be good. I'm sure that, with such a genre, there would have been a lot of critique and complaints (I don't mean that in a bad way!) Otherwise, this is a very good article. If a few more sources could be found, I don't see why it couldn't be taken to FAC. G1ggy /Contribs 06:58, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Celestiial: Difference between revisions Add topic