| Revision as of 06:14, 20 August 2007 editCander0000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,066 edits refined category← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:19, 25 October 2007 edit undoPrestonH (talk | contribs)9,339 editsm correcting spellingNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| The Inquiry found that ] scientists Walter Elliott and Douglas Higgs had lied and suppressed evidence at the trials of both ] and the Maguire Seven<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.aic.gov.au/conferences/medicine/schurr.pdf |title= Expert Witnesses And The Duties Of Disclosure & Impartiality: The Lessons Of The IRA Cases In England. |accessdate=2007-08-05 |author= Beverley Schurr |authorlink= NSW Legal Aid Commission |coauthors= |date= |year= |month= |format= |work= |publisher=|pages= |language= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= }}</ref>. They knew but did not say that a positive result was not unique for nitroglycerine. They did not disclose, even to the prosecution, negative secondary tests. | The Inquiry found that ] scientists Walter Elliott and Douglas Higgs had lied and suppressed evidence at the trials of both ] and the Maguire Seven<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.aic.gov.au/conferences/medicine/schurr.pdf |title= Expert Witnesses And The Duties Of Disclosure & Impartiality: The Lessons Of The IRA Cases In England. |accessdate=2007-08-05 |author= Beverley Schurr |authorlink= NSW Legal Aid Commission |coauthors= |date= |year= |month= |format= |work= |publisher=|pages= |language= |archiveurl= |archivedate= |quote= }}</ref>. They knew but did not say that a positive result was not unique for nitroglycerine. They did not disclose, even to the prosecution, negative secondary tests. | ||
| The terms of reference of the |
The terms of reference of the initial inquiry were expanded, as a result, to include | ||
| *The preparation of court evidence by expert witnesses | *The preparation of court evidence by expert witnesses | ||
| *The advance disclosure of scientific findings | *The advance disclosure of scientific findings | ||
Revision as of 04:19, 25 October 2007
The Right hon. Sir John May was a former Court of Appeal judge appointed by the British Government to investigate the miscarriages of justice related to the Maguire Seven and other miscarriages linked to IRA bombing offences.
On 20 October 1989 following the quashing of the Guildford Four convictions , May was appointed to inquire into both that and the related case of the Maguire Seven. On 12 July 1990, the Home Secretary David Waddington published the interim report
- Interim Report on the Maguire Case : The Inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the convictions arising out of the bomb attacks in Guildford and Woolwich in 1974
The report criticised the trial judge John Donaldson. It unearthed improprieties in the handling of scientific evidence that were also relevant to the other cases and declared the convictions unsound and recommended referral back to the Court of Appeal.
RARDE scientific tests
The Inquiry found that RARDE scientists Walter Elliott and Douglas Higgs had lied and suppressed evidence at the trials of both Judith Ward and the Maguire Seven. They knew but did not say that a positive result was not unique for nitroglycerine. They did not disclose, even to the prosecution, negative secondary tests.
The terms of reference of the initial inquiry were expanded, as a result, to include
- The preparation of court evidence by expert witnesses
- The advance disclosure of scientific findings
- The authorisation of prosecutions based on scientific evidence
- Home Office assessment of scientific evidence after miscarriage claims
Royal Commission on Criminal Justice
On 14 March 1991, the inquiry became the Royal Commission on Criminal Justice covering the systemic problems uncovered earlier.The commission was chaired by Viscount Runciman of Doxford.
References
- Marcel Berlins (2006-10-07). "NatWest Three puzzle". Guardian Unlimited. Retrieved 2007-08-09.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|month=and|coauthors=(help) - Beverley Schurr. "Expert Witnesses And The Duties Of Disclosure & Impartiality: The Lessons Of The IRA Cases In England" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-08-05.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|month=and|coauthors=(help) - Hansard Debates 12 July 1990
- Beverley Schurr. "Expert Witnesses And The Duties Of Disclosure & Impartiality: The Lessons Of The IRA Cases In England" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-08-05.
{{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters:|month=and|coauthors=(help)
.svg){kind=small} | This article related to government in the United Kingdom or its constituent countries is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |