Misplaced Pages

James Tour: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:35, 30 August 2007 editMoulton (talk | contribs)897 edits Controversial petition: Uniform and consistent NPOV clarifying essentiall elements of the controversy and conforming to WP:BLP regarding avoidance of publishing negative opinion as fact.← Previous edit Revision as of 11:37, 30 August 2007 edit undoHrafn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,179 edits Undid revision 154576539 by Moulton (talk)Revert POV nonsenseNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


He also sparked the controversial article "Better Killing Through Chemistry", which appeared in ] a few months after the ], by which he tried to raise awareness of the lack of reasonable controls on the accessibility of ] precursors within the United States. He also sparked the controversial article "Better Killing Through Chemistry", which appeared in ] a few months after the ], by which he tried to raise awareness of the lack of reasonable controls on the accessibility of ] precursors within the United States.
==Controversial petition== ==Controversial anti-evolution petition==
In February 2006, the ] reported<ref> , Kenneth Chang, ], February 21, 2006.</ref> that Dr. Tour was one of a small number of nationally prominent researchers out of several hundred scientists and engineers whose names appeared on the ]'s newly launched website promoting a controversial petition characterized as "]", which states "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."<ref></ref> Tour's field of ] is a branch of scientific research which establishes his credentials as a practitioner and advocate of the protocols of the ] as they apply to all branches of science. The controversy arises from confusion over whether the statement is an expression of the technical protocols of the ] or an expression favoring a political agenda regarding the teaching of scientific subjects related to evolution. In February 2006, the ] reported<ref> , Kenneth Chang, ], February 21, 2006.</ref> that Dr. Tour was one of a small number of nationally prominent researchers out of several hundred scientists and engineers whose names appeared on the ]'s newly launched website promoting a controversial anti-evolution petition, "]", which states "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged."<ref></ref> Tour's field of ] is unrelated to ].


==Exterior links== ==Exterior links==

Revision as of 11:37, 30 August 2007

James Tour is a synthetic organic chemist, specializing in nanotechnology. He is well-known for his work in molecular electronics and molecular switching molecules. He has also been involved in other work, such as the creation of a nanocar and NanoKids, an interactive learning DVD to teach children fundamentals of chemistry and physics. Dr. Tour was also a founder of the Molecular Electronics Corporation. He holds joint appointments in the departments of chemistry, computer science, and mechanical engineering and materials science at Rice University. Dr. Tour received degrees from Syracuse University (BS, 1981), Purdue University (PhD, 1986) and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Wisconsin-Madison (1986-1987) and Stanford University (1987-1988).

He also sparked the controversial article "Better Killing Through Chemistry", which appeared in Scientific American a few months after the September 11 attacks, by which he tried to raise awareness of the lack of reasonable controls on the accessibility of chemical weapon precursors within the United States.

Controversial anti-evolution petition

In February 2006, the New York Times reported that Dr. Tour was one of a small number of nationally prominent researchers out of several hundred scientists and engineers whose names appeared on the Discovery Institute's newly launched website promoting a controversial anti-evolution petition, "A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism", which states "We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged." Tour's field of organic chemistry is unrelated to evolutionary biology.

Exterior links

Stub icon

This biographical article about a chemist is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

  1. Few Biologists but Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition, Kenneth Chang, New York Times, February 21, 2006.
  2. Signatories of 'A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism'
Categories:
James Tour: Difference between revisions Add topic