| Revision as of 07:57, 17 August 2005 editKdammers (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users11,066 edits Trump← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:42, 1 April 2006 edit undoDhartung (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers24,482 edits ProposedNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| The list's name says "2004," yet Trump is scheduled to be complted in 2007. IF we're going to include Trump, then why not in parentheses? ] 07:57, 17 August 2005 (UTC) | The list's name says "2004," yet Trump is scheduled to be complted in 2007. IF we're going to include Trump, then why not in parentheses? ] 07:57, 17 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == Proposed == | |||
| I had to move the proposed structures out of the table (]). Not only does it impede the utility of the table for ''current'' rankings, it's potentially wrong. Many things could happen -- construction accidents, financing collapses, terrorism, a steel shortage. That's not even counting new projects that could come to light in the next four years. So proposed/abuilding stuff should be handled separately (I'm not even sure about the table).--] | ] 10:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:42, 1 April 2006
Why isnt the Sears Tower listed? POlsen 17:24, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
Trump
The list's name says "2004," yet Trump is scheduled to be complted in 2007. IF we're going to include Trump, then why not in parentheses? Kdammers 07:57, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Proposed
I had to move the proposed structures out of the table (Misplaced Pages is not a crystal ball). Not only does it impede the utility of the table for current rankings, it's potentially wrong. Many things could happen -- construction accidents, financing collapses, terrorism, a steel shortage. That's not even counting new projects that could come to light in the next four years. So proposed/abuilding stuff should be handled separately (I'm not even sure about the table).--Dhartung | Talk 10:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)