Revision as of 18:10, 23 August 2005 editDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits revert again -- I don't need an archive, that's what the history is for.... editor who took it upon himself to do so defintiely has a problem← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:23, 23 August 2005 edit undoRichardWeiss (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users75,870 edits rv blanking of arbcom noticeNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==New discussion== | ==New discussion== | ||
==arbitration== | |||
since you remain incivil, as per your RFC;'s ending, in which you promiosed to try not to bve incivil, which has failed, a request for arbitration is being processed about you currently. that is all.] 02:14, 21 August 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:23, 23 August 2005
I periodically go through and clean out the old comments... This is because they refer to old situations or that the comments are otherwise no longer relevant. Those looking for archives are invited to refer to the history.
Note: If you are here to leave personal attacks, false accusations of vandalism, a long tirade about why your cat photo or article about yourself should be left alone as you and only you wanted, nonsensical rationalizations of why vampires, ancient astronauts, werewolves, "creation science" and so on should be treated as completely real and so forth, do not bother, as I'll either just remove them right away or simply point you to the appropriate Misplaced Pages policy which you should have read in the first place.
Otherwise please add new comments below.
New discussion
arbitration
since you remain incivil, as per your RFC;'s ending, in which you promiosed to try not to bve incivil, which has failed, a request for arbitration is being processed about you currently. that is all.Gavin the Chosen 02:14, 21 August 2005 (UTC)