| Revision as of 17:30, 18 June 2008 editRiskAficionado (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,061 edits →Fatimah: m← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:35, 18 June 2008 edit undoRiskAficionado (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,061 edits →Fatimah: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :Al-islam.org is a polemical, sectarian website with no verifiable reputation for fact-checking or accuracy. Citing sources is something any polemical website can do, as evidenced by answering-islam.org or ansar.org - that alone cannot make them reliable. In no way does it meet the specifications listed ]. This isn't about "respecting beliefs" - it is about adhering to the sourcing standards required on Misplaced Pages. ] 17:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | :Al-islam.org is a polemical, sectarian website with no verifiable reputation for fact-checking or accuracy. Citing sources is something any polemical website can do, as evidenced by answering-islam.org or ansar.org - that alone cannot make them reliable. In no way does it meet the specifications listed ]. This isn't about "respecting beliefs" - it is about adhering to the sourcing standards required on Misplaced Pages. ] 17:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Your stance is also inconsistent, as you declare websites like "muslimphilosophy.com" unreliable, yet do not do the same for equally unreliable websites like "al-islam.org." ] 17:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | ::Your stance is also inconsistent, as you declare websites like "muslimphilosophy.com" unreliable, yet do not do the same for equally unreliable websites like "al-islam.org." ] 17:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::I should also notify you about the ]. ] 17:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:35, 18 June 2008
Leave a message.
Fatimah
Hi. All material should meet Misplaced Pages content policies and guidelines, including Misplaced Pages:Verifiability, Misplaced Pages:No original research, and Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view. They all establish that sources must be of a reliable nature. Your insertions on Fatimah do not conform to these requirements, and I would suggest you take the matter to the talk page before reinserting the material further. Please look at the other sources in the article to get an idea of the standard required on Misplaced Pages. Thanks. ITAQALLAH 12:44, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Al-islam.org is a polemical, sectarian website with no verifiable reputation for fact-checking or accuracy. Citing sources is something any polemical website can do, as evidenced by answering-islam.org or ansar.org - that alone cannot make them reliable. In no way does it meet the specifications listed here. This isn't about "respecting beliefs" - it is about adhering to the sourcing standards required on Misplaced Pages. ITAQALLAH 17:21, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Your stance is also inconsistent, as you declare websites like "muslimphilosophy.com" unreliable, yet do not do the same for equally unreliable websites like "al-islam.org." ITAQALLAH 17:29, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- I should also notify you about the three revert rule. ITAQALLAH 17:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)