Revision as of 18:34, 8 October 2008 editFusionmix (talk | contribs)Rollbackers5,489 edits →Snoot the dog: meh← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:40, 8 October 2008 edit undoAlexTiefling (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,225 editsm →Snoot the dogNext edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete''' Couldn't find any sources and don't believe any are likely to be found. --] (]) 14:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Couldn't find any sources and don't believe any are likely to be found. --] (]) 14:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''', looks to be somebody's local podunk news article. <small><span style="border:1px solid "#F5FFFA";padding:0px;">]]</span></small> 18:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''', looks to be somebody's local podunk news article. <small><span style="border:1px solid "#F5FFFA";padding:0px;">]]</span></small> 18:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete''' - Unverified promotional piece on behalf of a non-notable pet. ] (]) 21:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:40, 8 October 2008
Snoot the dog
- Snoot the dog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable dog - no sources, no Google hits. Declined speedy because the article explicitly claims notability. Sandstein 20:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete -
Appears to be a woof draftCannot find any sources to indicate why this animal is notable. TN‑X-Man 20:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) - Delete - Understand why article escaped speedy deletion - but am left wondering if this is also a hoax?--VS 03:52, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Couldn't find any sources and don't believe any are likely to be found. --Banime (talk) 14:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, looks to be somebody's local podunk news article. FusionMix 18:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Unverified promotional piece on behalf of a non-notable pet. AlexTiefling (talk) 21:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)