Revision as of 16:01, 29 October 2008 editDeepfriedokra (talk | contribs)Administrators173,483 edits persistent bugg← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:04, 29 October 2008 edit undoDeepfriedokra (talk | contribs)Administrators173,483 editsm Changed protection level for "User talk:82.31.95.212": make protection time comport to block time ( (expires 16:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)) (expires 16:04, 4 November 2008 (UTC)))Next edit → |
(No difference) |
Revision as of 16:04, 29 October 2008
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).82.31.95.212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Not even a warning?
Decline reason:
For garbage like this, none is necessary or even appropriate. --jpgordon 15:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note to anyone reviewing my block
Editor has removed the prior, up to the point of a block warnings. While the warnings and vandalism were from the 21st, that string is the same as the current set of high speed edits. The content of the vandalism makes it plain that this is not an ordinary anon-- innocent and naive as to our policies. Contrarily, this is someone well enough acquainted with the project to remember USER:Essjay. The cry--"not even a warning!" makes plain this anon's intent to disrupt, vandalize and game the system. Dlohcierekim 15:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)